shijing
The Living Force
James Henry said:I mourn the temporary loss of "The Work" section and look forward to one day walking through the "50 Post" pearly gates.
We're looking forward to that day too, James Henry :)
James Henry said:I mourn the temporary loss of "The Work" section and look forward to one day walking through the "50 Post" pearly gates.
Hi jelyfish. About ATS, this is most likely a disinfo website. You may wish to spend some time reading this thread.
As a Newbie I've come to appreciate the fact that many long-time members may not be aware that when they're linking to certain sites in a post, they may be off-limits to Newbies. It makes me realize that there's a high probability that a significant number of people may post one-liners just to get their post quota up. I'm certainly not gonna' resort to that method of qualifying just to have access, and a part of me doesn't even want to know the reason. I did see that there was an exclusion based on some some suspicious forum member who may be a stalker, and I guess I can sympathize with that unfortunate circumstance. But yesterday I was locked-out of a Dolores Cannon thread that I'd wanted to see just because I'm pretty familiar with her work (and have lots of reservations about it).
So qualified posters may want to take notice of when they're posting links that the receiver may not be qualified to view it.
And perhaps the administration may want to consider some other measure of qualifying, and I'm not gonna touch anything where it comes to how one may qualify, because I've never concerned myself with anyone else's qualifications. Kinda makes me wonder how much others may be missing in places where potentially meaningful contributors are denied access.
cicero said:I'm sure I'm not alone in this, and if Admins would like some sincere input on other qualifying measurements, I'd certainly be happy to post some suggestions.
cicero said:As a Newbie (only 16 posts now), I don't want to appear as one who is deliberately 'making waves' (pun seriously intended), but there is something very wrong in a system where the Cs (our Mentors?) have suggested that we begin acting like we're already in 4th density, but the forum administration seems to be carrying on 'business as usual' as though we should continue to be practicing 3rd density STS where the 'access denied' policy relies on a wholly contrived premise that somehow one qualifies simply because he/she has reached a certain number of posts.....
cicero said:And please, if you're finding yourself offended by my honesty,
cicero said:If someone is going to determine the 'strength of my force' based on the number of posts I've made, perhaps we should set up a committee with a Ouija Board to invoke an equally 'strong force' that could sort through the energies associated with each poster.
-Guardian said:I'm curious...have you given even a moments thought to the person or persons the policy was changed to protect? How about the hosts who've given you free access to thousands of interesting threads where you can ramble on and on about how much you've studied to your heart's content?
cicero said:Guardian, for someone who isn't offended you seem to be generating a lot of hostility. If that makes you feel better, please, have at it.
As far as the 'one semi-private forum' to which I want to have access, I'm not sure how you could know where I've wanted to navigate, but the number is in the tens, at least.
While you're doing your Guardian work, please, avoid my door, and impose your judgments on yourself. Perhaps you could take the time to notice that I never imposed any upon anyone on this forum.
cicero said:Guardian, for someone who isn't offended you seem to be generating a lot of hostility. If that makes you feel better, please, have at it.
As far as the 'one semi-private forum' to which I want to have access, I'm not sure how you could know where I've wanted to navigate, but the number is in the tens, at least.
While you're doing your Guardian work, please, avoid my door, and impose your judgments on yourself. Perhaps you could take the time to notice that I never imposed any upon anyone on this forum.
cicero said:Guardian, for someone who isn't offended you seem to be generating a lot of hostility.
As far as the 'one semi-private forum' to which I want to have access, I'm not sure how you could know where I've wanted to navigate,
but the number is in the tens, at least.
While you're doing your Guardian work, please, avoid my door,
Perhaps you could take the time to notice that I never imposed any upon anyone on this forum.