In 2006 two physicists, Elisabeth Rausher and Russel Targ , published a paper in Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics conference under the title "Investigation of a complex space-time metric to describe precognition of the future" [1]. In the original 2001 version of the paper [1a] (still available here ), the title was expanded by adding "The speed of thoughts:" at the beginning, although the abstract of the paper was exactly the same.
Let me quote from the Introduction of this article:
"(...) Now, in the 21st century, the evidence has become overwhelming that our thoughts and bodies can be directly affected and influenced by another person's thoughts or by events and activities in a distant place blocked from ordinary perception. (...)"
It is somewhat surprising that the American Institute of Physics, a serious institution, would allow the publication of such a statement. And "Precognition of the Future?" Isn't it considered pseudoscience? Or, at best, as "fringe science"? Strange. I leave it to the reader to speculate on the possible causes of such a "faux pas".
Yes, it is possible that there are translation errors. I use Google translator for reading. I also use Deepl. Maybe in the copies the meaning is lost. I will keep more in mind the dates of the sessions to copy them directly from English. The issue is that, to quote, I have to pay attention where I want to quote. I am gradually picking up more English words to be more accurate. Can you mark me where the mistakes are so I can fix them? If I know where I have to correct, I will do a search for the sessions and copy them directly from the forum in their original language. Sorry if I caused any misunderstanding. Thanks for the heads up. I'll do my best to keep the purity of the messages. Regards!
