Because Bibi is sure leading the world to hell. And Trump seems completely ignorant of this.
It does appear that way, there can simply be no worse alignment than with Bibi (Peterson and co. have done just that, and now it seems like Trump is all in). That said, it also seems astounding given some of the depth and breadth of those in and around him - possibly within his own family, Kushner aside - to not see one would have to be completely blind. The problem is, is that there are massive implications, so if one was a new president and wanted to fix it, what would you do, how would one do it?
If some leaders are talking to him and his people through backchannels, no doubt it would be one topic on the top of the list. If they are all just that blackmailed and penetrated, not much hope - blackmail can also take on other dimensions from our everyday understanding of its use. So, if one takes the premise that Trump is totally besotted with the Zionist regime, aligning with the abject mass slaughter and rubble it produced, and then tries to prove he is not that way, that is not easy based on the surface evidence and headlines around it. Not easy when a good part of your country is looking for the second coming when conditions look rapturizing.
If a new president had as a goal to fix it, by turning one way there would be repercussions, then turn that other way and it is the same. Seems near hopeless in this day and age. If you tried to play the fool, promise the moon, agree to weapons gifts and a new Riviera on the sea, and then let greed carry the tune while employing another strategy, who knows, and I don't or can't know either. So yeah, that seems unlikely when the Mossad puppet masters are central to the area and story.
Crazy business, and highly emotional as can be expected and justified, yet one never knows exactly how it will go. It seems it is very much a wait and see game that is being played (and perhaps speeding up). On higher levels, it is more then we can even imagine, especially following what has been deemed a program change - readjustments.
April 2024 (July was the change):
(Altair) Which events initiated the upcoming program change? Is it because of Ukraine losing on the battlefield?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is it because of Trump?
A: Closer.
Q: (Niall) Something to do with American politics?
(L) So, does this program change have to do with American politics?
A: Warm.
Q: (L) Is it something that we're seeing at the present moment with these massive protests that are going on at the US universities, which is basically making Israel look really, really bad?
(Joe) Because of what they're doing in Palestine.
(L) So they've got some kind of something that's got to be done about this?
A: Very warm.
Q: (L) So, it has to do with Israel, possibly with Trump and the American political scene and the mass protest against the genocide and Palestine?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So, they're going to try to do something because...
(Joe) To distract from all that.
(L) To distract from all that, or to damp that down?
A: Yes
Q: (L) All right. Okay. Altair asks:
(Altair) How many nukes does Israel actually have?
A: 157
Q: (Joe) That's less than people suspect.
(L) Huh?
(Joe) People say 400. The number of 400 has been touted over the years as the number of nukes that they have.
(L) Well, they said 157.
(Joe) It's still enough, right?
(L) Yeah, that's a lot.
(Joe) How many does Iran have?
A: More
July 2024:
(Joe) Oh, one last question. Gaza, how many Palestinians have been actually killed by Israel in Gaza compared to the official number of 40,000?
A: Over 100k.
Q: (Joe) Is Israel going to get smashed for doing that?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Tomorrow?
A: Not yet.
Laura’s note:
The Lancet estimates that when you count indirect deaths (illness, starvation, etc.) already close to 8% of the Gaza population has died. And that's a "conservative estimate". That is, 186K people…
By October 2024 the message is pretty somber:
Q: (L) Can you look down on the world itself, the world affairs, and make any commentary on that
A: Great suffering is coming for many
Q: (L) Well, is that going to change anything?
A: Ultimately
(economic likely, war possibly, and catastrophic events happening from in and outside the planet, also a good chance)
Slipping over to UAP's et cetera, and back to the 3d picture (Dec 2024):
Q: (L) But we know from case histories that UFOs make cars stop, make things blink, etc. I mean, we've seen that repeatedly in the case histories. We also know that overflying comet or meteorite fragments can cause all the car alarms in a neighborhood to go off, as well as all of the garage doors to open and close and so forth because there's electromagnetic anomalies. And we also know it can happen from weather. So, you'd have to take a particular case in order to get an answer, a particular case and say, was this one due to whatever. Because if it's happening and the drones are there at the time, we may assume that it's associated.
(Niall) Okay. Well, then let's assume, okay.
(Joe) They said that it was part of an ongoing plan falling into place. Is that a long-term plan, or does this happening now in recent weeks have anything to do with... Is it related in any way to Trump becoming president and something that's planned for that? Or is it a longer term acclimatization only?
A: As previously noted, there was a change in plans, thus some recalibration is needed.
Q: (L) So... Okay, let me ask this: Is this activity beneficial to human beings?
A: Decidedly not.
Q: (Joe) Why not?
A: Review plans to amalgamate and rule humans after the changes.
Q: (Joe) But that was going to happen... Okay, so it's just part of that longer term plan then.
A: Yes
In the Middle East region (Jan 2025):
(Joe) There's a new so-called new Embassy that the US has been building for the past few years in Beirut. It covers 43 acres and will house 5,000 people. It's clearly not a standard embassy, based on America's other embassies around the world. It's massive. So what else is it going to be used for, or what's the intention?
A: Military, what else?
Q: (Joe) So it's a military base masquerading as an embassy.
(L) Yeah, without being a publicly advertised military base.
(Niall) Oh yeah, it's the second biggest one to the one in Baghdad. So the US is not leaving the Middle East any time soon.
Same session above:
(Joe) Only a little bit. Trump stated this week, in his inauguration speech, that the next four years would be the greatest years in American history. How likely is this to be the case?
A: Not very.
It is hard to see some sudden miraculous 3d fixing of much, the problems are just so very deep, although it may still take some time and the exposure or some of the rotten core is taking place in the open. Then there is the wave and 4d transition going all the way back to the beginning of the sessions.
So buckle up, the SS USAID flotilla et alia, sees its depth being further exposed, so that is something and a long time in coming.
