Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

the picture of melania standing behind trump signing something could be fake, as i have not seen such a picture on yandex
As it turns out this is a true image. I saw a video recently with Melania standing behind Trump signing EO's. I can't share because I don't have a link. Just now looking at that image once again, it makes an impression on me as a strong message, V for Vendetta and Zorro is there, I think so.

1739557662500.png
 
Isn't interesting that you came to the previous conclusion so quickly...

And perhaps this was a reflective observation of your own inner child ;)
I've been reading the comments on X about it and there are divided opinions of what appears in the video. Another possibility mentioned is that child X is not addressing Trump but "a reporter" interrupting his father.


I don't see the relevance of what a child of this age does as being significant at all. If he's showing disapproval in some way it could be for many reasons, maybe a potty break is needed. Give him another 10 minutes and he'll be smiling. Is this sort of thing an attempt to get views, click bait? Not relevant in any way.
 
Last edited:
Worth watching in full to see the audience seethe as he lambasts their undermining of the concept of democracy. So much truth telling in a setting usually associated with lies, it's almost surreal. His jokes fall flat and he doesn't care, he came to deliver a message.
Beautiful! Vance defending the European people from their corrupt European leaders in their faces!

You can almost feel bad for the EU toadies. They were merely following the orders of their American masters. It's just they didn't expect a new leader would arrive and call them out on it. They've never actually had to be competent before.
Yeah, they're so pathetic. They miss their servitude. Or perhaps they were so compromised at a personal level (blackmailed or profiting) that they just can't let go.
 
You shouldn't be surprised that he's unaware of "other-dimensional evil manipulations", almost no one is. Also, it's not those particular people who are doing the color revolutions, it's the people that are instrumentalized by them, and those people mostly do it to "further the US Deep State's influence, power and wealth all over the world".
Yes, absolutely. I agree that someone acknowledging the possibility of other-dimensional manipulations is very, very rare. I'm not holding his unawareness of it against him, I just threw it in the mix with the other stuff. :-) I'm not sure how to articulate what I sensed about Benz. Maybe you could say that I was disappointed that his wisdom and awareness didn't go any deeper than some sort of shallow patriotism. I also felt that Tucker, being a more spiritual person these days, was a bit disappointed that Benz didn't go any deeper.
 
Actually, I think Trump personally views things in a way (and acts accordingly) that are very close to how Russia and others in the emerging multipolar world think, act and behave: But he is probably unaware how close his views actually are to that multipolar world. There are many things that coincide there.
 
A new addition to the Oval Office.


If you are listening to the new White House briefings you'll notice a change in the questions which are intelligent, better informed and relevant to current events. The press room has been opened to independent media such as Real Americas Voice (doing great!), Rumble, War Room, Breitbart and Axios among others. An excellent development.


:shock:;-D:shock: Another Trump shocker on a smallish scale.

 
Last edited:
Vance's entire speech at the Munich Security Conference


Worth watching in full to see the audience seethe as he lambasts their undermining of the concept of democracy. So much truth telling in a setting usually associated with lies, it's almost surreal. His jokes fall flat and he doesn't care, he came to deliver a message.

I‘m very impressed! Great and I would say historic speech by Vance. And clearly, part of what he was saying/illustrating is what has happened in Germany in respect to the AFD party, which IMO is likely now the party most voters in Germany support, while being EXTREMELY defamed and shut out from the political process at the same time. While in one week the big election in germany for a new government and chancellor will take place. I sure hope the power of the AFD will be “too big to rigg“. It might be the last chance for Germany/Europe to jump off the train that already has started to drive over the cliff.

Edit: Spelling
 
Last edited:
Actually, I think Trump personally views things in a way (and acts accordingly) that are very close to how Russia and others in the emerging multipolar world think, act and behave: But he is probably unaware how close his views actually are to that multipolar world. There are many things that coincide there.
Indeed. In many ways and after the events in recent years, it is not hard to imagine Trump and Putin having reached some deeper understanding and recognition of each other. They have dealt with the same enemy, fought against every dirty trick in the book to remove them, and both survived victorious and powerful.
 
While a lot of things seem to be very hopeful now, I can’t help to take Putins prediction for the future very seriously, because it might be the most likely/realistic one:

Yes. And if we talk about likely scenarios, Putin has, for a number of years now, “predicted“ prolonged periods of large regional and even somewhat global instability and chaos. Most recently again by saying that, objectively speaking, paraphrasing, “in the coming 20 years“ profound conflicts, revolutions and shifts are likely to take place, primarily because the global hegemon (the west in general including in big parts America) will not let a transition to a multipolar world happen peacefully and instead will fight tooth and nails for the old system to continue, and if that doesn’t work, will try to bring everyone else down with them. I think that is a realistic and likely scenario.
 

Vance accuses WSJ of inventing ‘threats to Russia’

The US Vice President has claimed that newspaper misrepresented his remarks, denying he threatened “military action” against Russia

“As we’ve always said, American troops should never be put into harm’s way where it doesn’t advance American interests and security,” Vance wrote on X. “The fact that the WSJ twisted my words in the way they did for this story is absurd, but not surprising,” he added."

"Vance’s communications director, William Martin, criticized the article, calling it “pure fake news,” posting a transcript of Vance’s interview with the newspaper and argued that the vice president had not made any threats."

 
Catherine Austin-Fitts points out that Musk and the DOGE team are violating several laws, even though it could all have been done legally.

1) Musk has glaring conflicts of interest between the companies he owns and his position at DOGE. He could personally go to jail for it, if the laws are enforced by the judges.

2) There are also unnecessary violations of privacy and secrecy laws at DOGE. According to CAF, doing it all legally could have been done quickly too, but wasn't.

She wonders if this lawlessness is on purpose or if Trump/Musk are just ignorant or have an incompetent legal team (similar to the post-2020 election legal incompetence by Trump).

Doing all this illegally means they will face increasing legal challenges. Congress could also challenge the illegality, but is completely silent. CAF suspects that the Zionists may be responsible for that (blackmail, bribes, etc.)
 
RFK Jr's swearing in at the Oval Office, and the very poignant speech he gave just following it seemed, at least symbolically, like an important event to me. Yes, he's up against a juggernaut of powerful interests, and yes his efforts are likely to be resisted at every turn - but, at the very least, it says something about the Trump Presidency and the will of US citizens that a Kennedy now, once again - and for the last time in all likelihood, has such close ties to the Executive Branch, and at the twilight of the existence of the US. And given all the good work he's done in his political career, and now his new position, I think he does great honor to his father's and uncles' efforts and legacy in fighting the good fight.

His swearing in begins at about 6:30:

I watched the entire White House video of RFK Jr's swearing in, with an introduction by Trump and a speech by RFK. RFK wants vaccines to be tested and to be safe.
 
For me, the framing of the hot issues of our day between "left" and "right" I think stops the real debate which is "psychopathy" Vs "normal humans". I think it's misdirection.
Absolutely. 100% And people still play out these misdirections. It's insane.

And this latest 'move' on the chessboard.... Trump want's to cut military spending by 1/2! He includes Russia and China in this and wants to negotiate.

You know what he's like, he goes in to a negotiation asking for something impossible, and comes out with exactly what he wants.... But.... what if China and Russia want exactly what he's offering (initially)? Talk about pulling the rug under his feet. They call his bluff. It would be an historicly shocking circumstance for him. 😁

 
...what if China..
Excerpt from the answer by Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun to a question from RIA Novosti, at the Regular Press Conference, February 14, 2025.


RIA Novosti: U.S. President Donald Trump said yesterday that he plans to meet with the leadership of China and Russia to discuss military deescalation, especially regarding nuclear weapons. He also said that at the meeting with the leaders of China and Russia, he wants to propose that all three countries cut their defense budget in half. I have two questions. First, is China ready to engage in nuclear talks with Russia and the U.S. and second, in your point of view, is there any possibility that the three countries can agree to cut their defense budget?

Guo Jiakun: We noted the reports. It is widely known in the world that the U.S. and Russia combined own over 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons. Nuclear disarmament must follow the basic principle of “maintaining global strategic stability” and “undiminished security for all.” Sitting on the world’s biggest nuclear arsenals, the U.S. and Russia should earnestly fulfill their special and primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament, further make drastic and substantive cuts to their nuclear arsenals, and create necessary conditions for other nuclear-weapon states to join in the nuclear disarmament process. There has been extensive agreement on this among the international community.

Chinese modernization will be achieved through peaceful development. China follows a policy of “no first use” of nuclear weapons and a nuclear strategy that focuses on self-defense. China always keeps its nuclear strength at the minimum level required by national security, and never engages in arms race with anyone. China stands ready to work with all parties to firmly support the multilateral arms control regime with the U.N. at its core and contribute to world peace and security.

On defense budget, let me stress that the U.S. military spending accounted for 40 percent of the world’s total in 2024, which is the highest in the world, and higher than that of the following eight countries combined. The U.S. “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025” further increased the military budget to about USD 895 billion. The U.S. side has been advocating “America First,” then it should be the first to cut military spending.

China’s national defense spending is open, transparent, reasonable and appropriate. Compared with major military countries such as the U.S., the shares of China’s national defense spending in both GDP and fiscal expenditure are relatively low, and China’s defense spending per citizen and per service member is also relatively low. China is committed to peaceful development and follows a defensive national defense policy. It is a stabilizer in the turbulent world, a positive force for international security and a doer in safeguarding peace. Facts have proven and will continue to prove that China makes finite national defense spending to safeguard our nation’s sovereignty, security and development interests, and to uphold world peace.
 
Back
Top Bottom