Trump era: Fascist dawn, or road to liberation?

First there was the "break in" of a Secret Service agent's car and theft of badges and a laptop with plans of Trump Tower and other critical documents. Now we have this break in of an FBI vehicle. Does it seem credible that security and criminal investigative agents leave laptops, badges and guns in their vehicles to begin with?

WASHINGTON – A burglar broke into an FBI vehicle and stole weapons – including a .40 caliber Glock-22 handgun and a Rock River Arms Rifle – hours before DNC staffer Seth Rich was shot multiple times just two miles north of the weapons theft.

Now a private investigator is suing the Metropolitan Police Department for ballistics reports that would reveal whether the two crimes, both of which took place in the early hours of July 10, 2016, are in any way connected.

“Our investigators have learned that one hour on the morning of July 12, one hour before the murder of Seth Rich, there was an FBI SUV in the vicinity … of the shooting of Seth Rich. Two guns were stolen from that SUV one hour before the killing of Seth – a 22 Glock and an M4 rifle,” said Jack Burkman, the head of the Profiling Project investigative team, which is seeking video footage of the shooting, the medical examiner’s report, autopsy documents and ballistics reports.

Burkman, who made the statements at a news conference Wednesday, said video footage, the medical examiner’s report and ballistics reports are crucial to finding out how Rich was killed.

“One hour after, approximately one hour and 10 minutes after the killing of Seth, this was reported stolen by the person in charge of that SUV,” he said. “This is why ballistics are so critically important. We need to know if that ammunition was somehow a part of the shooting of Seth.”
WND asked if Burkman currently has any specific information connecting the two crimes.

“We don’t know that there’s any link, and that’s the problem,” Burkman said. “They won’t release the ballistics report to verify whether those were the weapons used.”

WND is one news agency determined to get to the truth about the Seth Rich murder. It has launched a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for three purposes – to put more resources into investigative reporting, to hire an independent private investigator and to provide rewards for new evidence that leads to the arrest and conviction of the perpetrator.

Burkman, who has been working with his Profiling Project team to investigate the Rich murder for more than 10 months and is offering a $105,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killer, said he has refrained from criticizing police. But, he claimed, the police’s insistence on withholding the most basic information pertaining to Rich’s murder – information that is typically made public in other homicide cases – is highly suspect.

_http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/burglar-stole-guns-off-nearby-fbi-vehicle-hours-before-seth-rich-shooting/

WorldNet Daily also lists these related stories in the sidebar:

Want to solve Seth Rich murder mystery? Help now

2 D.C. hospitals shut down questions about Seth Rich murder

Investigator sues for clues in Seth Rich murder mystery

TV news network boosts Seth Rich reward

'Credible evidence' points to 'hanky panky' in Seth Rich case

Seth Rich timeline reveals questions that haven't been answered

CNN pounces on congressman calling for fed probe of Seth Rich murder

Investigator: Cops hid evidence, halted Seth Rich probe

Twitter suspends news agency for Seth Rich report

'That's patently false!' Seth Rich family spokesman denies DNC is paying him
 
German magazine Der Spiegel published on the cover of its latest June 2017 issue the image of Donald Trump and the Earth in flames.

German Magazine Rolls Out a Cover Mocking Trump (PHOTO)
https://sputniknews.com/art_living/201706031054283522-german-magazine-mocking-trump/

In this way, Der Spiegel reacted to the news about the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement.

The cover depicts the US president dressed in golf attire, hitting a burning planet with a stick. The drawing has the inscription "You're fired."

This phrase became popular when Trump hosted the reality show "Apprentice," in which episodes ended with the host selecting the poorest candidate and eliminating him from the competition, with the words "You're fired!"

On Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced his decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, a move that has been severely criticized by many other countries. At the same time, the president expressed readiness to renegotiate the deal under terms that would be "fair to the United States."

The Paris Agreement on climate change was adopted in December 2015 at the 21st UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) and was signed by 194 countries and ratified by 143. The deal aims to limit average global temperatures to less than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, with parties to the deal agreeing to cut their emissions in accordance with the proposed plan.


Former adviser to Senate Republican leaders Jim Jatras claims that Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Accords on climate change put the real interests of the United States and the American people first.

Trump Pullout From Paris Accords Puts US Interests First - Ex-Senate Adviser
https://sputniknews.com/us/201706031054268681-trump-paris-pullout-usa-interests/

President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Accords on climate change put the real interests of the United States and the American people first, former adviser to Senate Republican leaders Jim Jatras told Sputnik.

Trump’s pulling out of the Paris climate agreement was perhaps the most eloquent way he could have shown the world he’s serious about America First," Jatras stated.

Trump’s many critics like German Chancellor Angela Merkel viewed reducing carbon emissions and trying to prevent climate change not as a rational choice of policies but as a quasi-religious crusade or act of faith, Jatras observed.

"Let’s keep in mind that for [Trump’s] detractors abroad like Angela Merkel… to the carbon cultists in America, man-made climate change is not just a political opinion or even a scientific conclusion. It’s a deep, sincerely held item of faith," he said.

Trump’s pulling out of the Paris commitments pursued by his predecessor Barack Obama would shock and offend European leaders in the 28-naiton European Union and in NATO and would strengthen the forces leading to the dissolution of both institutions, Jatras predicted.

"To the extent it convinces the Europeans that they don’t share the same ‘values’ as America and it hastens the demise of NATO — good. I’m sure the Poles will be thrilled to sign up for Merkel’s German-led European army," he said.

Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Accords set a precedent that could be followed by other major nations too, Jatras remarked.

Trump‘s action also served notice on other nations that he was serious about being prepared to face international anger and criticism for insisting that previous agreements and deals damaging to US interests be scrapped or renegotiated, Jatras pointed out.

"Trump’s action also signals possible willingness to start playing hardball on renegotiating bad trade agreements. Ottawa, Mexico City and Seoul should take note," he said.

Within the United States, anger at Trump’s move might even serve to distract his political enemies from their baseless accusations about his alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election campaign, Jatras suggested.


Democrats should direct their frustration over President Donald Trump’s exit from the Paris climate accord at former President Barack Obama, who never submitted the agreement to the US Senate for ratification, Senator Bob Corker said in a statement on Friday.

Obama to Be Blamed for Not Sending Paris Deal for Senate Ratification - Corker
https://sputniknews.com/us/201706021054258500-obama-trump-obama-paris-deal/

Obama never used the word "treaty" in describing the 195-nation Paris agreement, because the US Constitution requires all treaties to be confirmed by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

"The left's anger about the Paris climate agreement should be directed at President Obama," Corker wrote in the statement via Twitter. "Unlike France and Germany, President Obama purposely chose not to have the Paris agreement ratified by the Senate."

If the Paris climate deal was so crucial to the future of the world, then Obama should have been willing to ratify it as a treaty, Corker noted.


Billionaire, and former New York City Mayor, Michael Bloomberg would like for you to know that, despite Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate agreement, he’s absolutely intent upon imposing the environmental ‘tax’ contemplated in the agreement on you anyway. As such, he’s developing a coalition of U.S. states, cities and business leaders to defy the President’s decision and comply with the terms of the original deal.

Dis-United States – Billionaire Bloomberg Builds Coalition Of States To Combat Climate Change
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-02/dis-united-states-billionaire-bloomberg-builds-coalition-states-combat-climate-chang

Billionaire philanthropist and businessman Michael Bloomberg is defying President Trump’s decision to exit the Paris climate change agreement, saying he is rallying a bipartisan coalition of states, cities and business leaders to meet the climate pact’s targets even as the president rescinds the nation’s commitment to it.

“Americans are not walking away from the Paris Climate Agreement,” Bloomberg said on Thursday. “Just the opposite — we are forging ahead. Mayors, governors, and business leaders from both political parties are signing on to to a statement of support that we will submit to the U.N. — and together, we will reach the emission reduction goals the United States made in Paris in 2015.”

Bloomberg’s philanthropic groups, in partnership with others, is also making a $15 million contribution to fund the U.N.’s climate secretariat, which will lose money under Trump. “Americans will honor and fulfill the Paris Agreement by leading from the bottom up — and there isn’t anything Washington can do to stop us,” Bloomberg said.

Not surprisingly, Bloomberg’s ‘coalition’ is comprised of the snowflake states of California, New York and Washington…which should result in people moving out of those states even faster than they already are.

Bloomberg made the announcement as California, New York and Washington are forming a pact to enact policies to help meet the emission reduction targets called for under the Paris Agreement.

The Democratic governors’ new agreement would seek to meet the same goal of reducing emissions 26 to 28 percent from 2005 levels as the U.S. committed to under the Paris deal. Details on individual state contributions are still to be worked out.

Finally, because Bloomberg seems to live in an alternative universe where Americans consider global climate trends among their key voting priorities, we would remind him that those same Americans just elected a President who vowed repeatedly in 2016 to withdraw from the Paris climate deal and once had this to say about global warming:

“The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.”

So, while this may be a priority for you Mr. Bloomberg, a man who undoubtedly flies all over the world on a fleet of private jets, it’s probably safe to say that the majority of Americans, especially those living outside the safe spaces of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle, either don’t agree with you on climate change or simply don’t care.


President Donald Trump has been excoriated for his decision to have the United States exit the Paris Climate Accord.

However, one very influential man — John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel — has his back.

JUST IN: Weather Channel Founder Backs Trump, Tells The TRUTH About Global Warming…
http://thetruthdivision.com/2017/06/just-weather-channel-founder-backs-trump-tells-truth-global-warming/

TAA reports:

In a series of tweets and emails Coleman sent to Al Gore and various Democratic supporters and organizations, he called out climate alarmists with a barrage of facts based on actual science and not wishful thinking. As it turns out, if you chart global temperatures back into the ’70s, there are absolutely no signs of global warming.

There’s been less than one degree temperature change since 1978 and no warming to speak of since 1998. So where is the government getting their information from?

It turns out that the government has been manipulating climate computer models. This means that the American tax payers are being charged $4.7 billion a year in taxes that are being used to fund organizations that carry out meaningless studies based on bad science. Basically, the American people are paying fake scientists to lie to them.

Find out more in the video below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k (36:08 min.)

Government actions to counter “carbon pollution” have raised the cost of fuel, electricity and food by an average of $1000 per year for an average American family of four. If that family of four would only open their Internet browsers and see that the Antarctic Sea is at an all time high and sea levels are rising at an “alarming” rate of around 6 inches per century, they would feel outraged that they’re being taken advantage of, at least one would hope.

President Trump was right to leave the Paris Climate Accord — they lie to American taxpayers and waste trillions of dollars.
 
NormaRegula said:
Palinurus said:
Did anybody else notice the odd year number: 1660 ?

I wonder what that's all about ?? :huh:

I have no idea. It's all covfefe to me. Can't wait to see how the MSM reacts to this one. :rolleyes:

1660 is the number of the report of that youtube channel (Still Report). It doesn't like like any official channel from the US government. If you click play the intro reads "Still Report #1660 - June 3, 2017", so the guy probably just made a mistake (or was trying to be funny).
 
US State Department officials appointed during the administration of President Barack Obama have been revealed to have actively sought to block the normalization of diplomatic relations between Moscow and Washington under Obama’s successor Donald Trump.

How Obama’s State Department Sabotaged Trump Efforts to Calm US-Russia Relations
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201706041054306099-obama-officials-sabotage-trump-efforts/

In an effort to prevent the improvement of Russia-US ties following the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, State Department officials appointed during the administration of President Barack Obama engaged in a focused backroom campaign to block bilateral diplomatic normalization between the two superpowers.

Officials, including Obama's assistant secretary of state for human rights Tom Malinowski, claim that they provided the momentum to push US lawmakers into drafting and placing into law a bill that would make the normalization of diplomatic relations between Washington and Moscow illegal, unless Congressional approval was received first.

Malinowski and others, seeking to prevent the lifting of economic sanctions against Russia by the Trump administration, approached lawmakers including Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who were able to ram through the bill with little or no debate.

"It would have been a win-win for Moscow," Malinowski told Yahoo News of the Trump team's efforts, kept secret from the US public.

Almost immediately after Trump's inauguration, State Department staffers were tasked with crafting plans for the lifting of economic sanctions, returning diplomatic compounds and other measures.

Other channels within the previous administration also worked frantically to prevent any Trump-backed normalization of ties between Moscow and Washington.

Following Trump's inauguration as the 45th US president, State Department official Dan Fried claimed that he was the recipient of many panicked telephone calls from multiple government officials, seeking a way to stop a US-Russia reconciliation, according to Antiwar.com.

"We've been reviewing all the sanctions — and this is not exclusive to Russia," a senior White House official confirmed, stating that the move was part of a broader policy review that continues to this day.

During the period immediately following the inauguration, Trump — now said to have been stymied in his pro-Russia efforts — quickly reversed a much-ballyhooed 2016 campaign pledge to normalize relations with Moscow, much to many of his supporters' dismay, justifying the about face by claiming that he was seeking additional concessions from the Kremlin.


US Senator John McCain said on Friday the United States should push for tougher sanctions against Russia amid reports that the Trump administration is moving toward returning two diplomatic compounds frozen by the previous Obama administration.

McCain Urges Anti-Russia Sanctions Amid Claim on Return of Diplomatic Property
https://sputniknews.com/us/201706021054258919-mccain-russia-sanctions-diplomatic-property/

On Wednesday, the Washington Post reported that the two properties in the US state of Maryland and outside New York City could be handed back to Russian officials for diplomatic purposes.

According to the report, the Trump administration originally linked the return of the sites to Moscow allowing the construction of a new US consulate in St. Petersburg, but is now considering handing them back over with some conditions, including the removal of diplomatic immunity.

"Russia's done nothing to deserve relief of punishment for election interference- we should pursue stronger sanctions," McCain, who is known as one of the most anti-Russian politicians in the US, stated via Twitter.

Former President Barack Obama announced on December 29 that 35 Russian diplomats were being expelled and the compounds seized, accusing Moscow of using the sites for "intelligence-related purposes."

Obama said the measures were taken in response to Moscow's alleged interference in the 2016 US presidential election. Russian officials have called the allegations absurd.


US billionaire Michael Bloomberg pledged to $15 million pay US share of contributions to Paris Climate Agreement after US President Donald Trump announced he was pulling the US from the accord.

Bloomberg Pledges to Pay US Share of Paris Climate Contributions
https://sputniknews.com/environment/201706041054288632-bloomberg-paris-climate-contributions/

Bloomberg, the billionaire and the former mayor of the New York City, has pledged to pay the $15 million US share of Paris Climate contributions,
despite Trump's announcement that the US is going to pull away from the Paris Climate Accord.

The money is going to be raised by Bloomberg Philanthropies, with help from an undisclosed number of other actors.

Bloomberg, whose net worth is estimated as $50 billion, is said to be the USA's eighth richest man. However, he seems to associate himself with the American people, to the degree that apparently he can speak in their name.

"Americans will honor and fulfill the Paris Agreement by leading from the bottom up — and there isn't anything Washington can do to stop us," he said.

The announcement comes in the wake of Trump's decision to pull out of the Paris Climate Accord, which he says will put the US at a "permanent disadvantage" with China, India and other developing countries. Ironically, the withdrawal from the accord puts the US in the same camp with the only two other countries who refused to take part in the deal: Nicaragua and Syria.


US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley stated that the moving the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is the matter of time.

Moving US Embassy to Jerusalem Matter of Time - US Envoy to UN
https://sputniknews.com/world/201706041054304529-us-embassy-israel-jerusalem-trump/

US President Donald Trump has not changed his position regarding the issue of moving the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and this issue is a matter of time, US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley told CNN broadcaster in an interview on Sunday.

On June 1, Trump signed a waiver to keep the US diplomatic mission in Israel in Tel Aviv for at least six months instead of moving it to Jerusalem, despite his election campaign promises to make the move when elected into office.

"I think that he [Trump] knows that it could be very much a part of the peace process. And so I think that what he did want to do is make sure that he wasn't interrupting the negotiations that are happening with the peace process. I think that they feel like it's moving forward in a constructive way, and he didn't want this to get in the way. He hasn't changed his position on moving the embassy. It is all about time," Haley said.


Before tweeting support and sympathy to the UK following Saturday’s deadly terror attacks at the London Bridge and Borough Market, US President Donald Trump took advantage of the tragedy to promote his immigration policy. That didn’t sit well with some.

CNN Host Slams ‘Piece of Sh*t’ Trump for White House Response to London Attacks
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201706041054306553-cnn-host-calls-trump-poop/

Seeking to fulfill a campaign pledge by pushing through an unpopular immigration policy already blocked twice in US courts, US President Donald Trump tweeted in the wake of on Saturday's attacks in London, "We need to be smart, vigilant and tough. We need the courts to give us back our rights. We need the Travel Ban as an extra level of safety!"

Many in the US saw Trump's tweet to be a form of opportunism by his close advisors to promote the president's agenda in the wake of tragedy.

Iranian-born CNN host Reza Aslan, a US citizen, echoed those sentiments.

"This piece of sh*t is not just an embarrassment to American and a stain on the presidency," tweeted an outraged Aslan on Saturday, "He's an embarrassment to humankind."


Aslan, who hosts a CNN show about religion, also referred to the 45th US president as a "man baby," according to Reuters.

The administration of Donald Trump, however, has doubled down in its attempts to close US borders and issue edicts banning lawful immigration into the country.

In a Sunday tweet, Trump ratcheted up the fear, asserting that Washington "must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people. If we don't get smart it will only get worse.


Longtime CNN New Year's Eve host Kathy Griffin released an ISIS-style propaganda video featuring herself holding up the severed head of President Donald Trump.

Kathy Griffin Channels ISIS, Beheads Trump In New Photoshoot
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=56809

What exactly did she seek to gain by this?

President Trump's 11-year-old son, Barron, screamed when he saw the Kathy Griffin picture on TV, according to @TMZ
http://12160.info/forum/topics/president-trump-s-11-year-old-son-barron-screamed-when-he-saw-the
 
Windmill knight said:
NormaRegula said:
Palinurus said:
Did anybody else notice the odd year number: 1660 ?

I wonder what that's all about ?? :huh:

I have no idea. It's all covfefe to me. Can't wait to see how the MSM reacts to this one. :rolleyes:

1660 is the number of the report of that youtube channel (Still Report). It doesn't like like any official channel from the US government. If you click play the intro reads "Still Report #1660 - June 3, 2017", so the guy probably just made a mistake (or was trying to be funny).

Ah, that makes more sense. I guess it would have really freaked a lot of folks out if it were report #1666. :evil:
 
I don't know if it has any symbolic significance whatsoever, but the only major event related to 1660 I could find is the English Restoration: _https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_(England)
1666 is the year of the Great fire of London.
 
In case you missed it, both Putin and Assad talked about the US Deep State in recent interviews:

Putin on US Deep State: Men in dark suits rule the US - Presidents can't change policies

https://www.sott.net/article/352557-Putin-on-US-Deep-State-Men-in-dark-suits-rule-the-US-Presidents-cant-change-policies

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an interview with French publication Le Figaro, has revealed that a US president is more often than not just a figurehead of government. A certain person may be elected by the public on the basis of his merit and ideals - but rarely is this person able to formulate policy. Putin explained that the 'bureaucracy' in the US, which is more commonly known as the Deep State, is very powerful and as such does not allow any real change in direction.

"Presidents come and go, but the politics remains the same." As such, an individual, who may have his own genuine ideas, is elected into the White House only to satisfy the illusion of a democratic process taking place. In reality, "men in dark suits", who remain anonymous to the voting public, continue to pursue the well-established interests of the US elite with each incoming administration.

Terrorism has been used for political reasons in both India and Syria: Bashar al-Assad

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/interview-terrorism-has-been-used-for-political-reasons-in-both-india-and-syria-bashar-al-assad-2460795

Assad: The problem in the United States is about the whole political system, it's not about one person. Trump's election has proven again, for us, again and again, that the president is only a performer, he's not a decision-maker. He's part of different lobbies and the deep state who implement and dictate on the president. The proof of what I'm saying is that Trump, after he became president, swallowed most of the promises he was boasting during his campaign. He made a 180-degree turn on nearly every promise. Why? Because the deep state wouldn't allow him to go in a certain direction. That's why for me, dealing with him as a person, it could be, but can that person deliver? No. In the United States, the president cannot deliver, the deep state only is the one who can deliver, and this is the problem. This deep state doesn't accept partners around the world; they only accept puppets, and they only accept followers, they only accept proxies, that’s what they accept, and we're not any of these.

So the idea that the US is ruled by a group of people in the shadows and not the president is now on the lips of world leaders. Remember, you read about it first on Sott! ;)
 
Windmill knight said:
In case you missed it, both Putin and Assad talked about the US Deep State in recent interviews:

And then there's this one!

https://www.sott.net/article/352951-Putin-notes-parallels-between-Kennedy-assassination-and-Russias-alleged-meddling

"There is a theory that Kennedy's assassination was arranged by the United States special services," he noted

Russian President Vladimir Putin believes that attempts to pin the blame on Russia for alleged interference in the 2016 US presidential election could be an attempt to distract the public's attention, just like the way it happened with the investigation of US President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

"Hackers (that allegedly influenced the US presidential campaign - TASS) may be anywhere. They may be in Russia, in Asia, in America, in Latin America. There may be hackers, by the way, in the United States who very cunningly and professionally passed the buck to Russia," Putin said in an interview with NBC News anchor Megyn Kelly.

"In the middle of an internal political fight, it was convenient for them, for whatever reason, to put out that information. And put it out they did. And, in doing it, they invoked Russia," he asserted. "Can't you imagine it happening? I can."

Putin suggested recalling the assassination of US President John Kennedy in 1963.

"There is a theory that Kennedy's assassination was set up by the United States special services," he noted. "If this theory is correct, and one cannot rule it out, thus what can be easier in today's situation, given the entire technical capabilities available to special services than to organize some kind of attacks in an appropriate manner while alluding to Russia in the process."

Accusations against Russia are likely to come from supporters of the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton who lost the election.

"Now, the candidate from the Democratic Party, is this candidate universally beloved in the United States? Was she such a popular person? That candidate, too, had political opponents and rivals," Putin noted.

You have to wonder how far Putin is willing to go in basically telling the Western world what they - and Russia - are up against...
 
Not sure how far he and Russia will go, but by mentioning what he did about the JFK assassination he is pointing directly at what seems to be the coming out of the deep state/national security state. From the little I’ve seen in MSM they are very dismissive of the interview, which isn’t a surprise, but for those with eyes and ears to see Putin and other spokes people he surrounds himself with seem to be slowly laying out the truth of things.
 
NormaRegula said:
Windmill knight said:
NormaRegula said:
Palinurus said:
Did anybody else notice the odd year number: 1660 ?

I wonder what that's all about ?? :huh:

I have no idea. It's all covfefe to me. Can't wait to see how the MSM reacts to this one. :rolleyes:

1660 is the number of the report of that youtube channel (Still Report). It doesn't like like any official channel from the US government. If you click play the intro reads "Still Report #1660 - June 3, 2017", so the guy probably just made a mistake (or was trying to be funny).

Ah, that makes more sense. I guess it would have really freaked a lot of folks out if it were report #1666. :evil:

Thank you both for your reactions. :cool2:

Report #1666 probably will be reached in a few weeks -- or maybe days even, as #1661 is already up. ;)

Odd mannerism, to number each one consecutively regardless of its content. :ohboy:
 
Bear said:
Not sure how far he and Russia will go, but by mentioning what he did about the JFK assassination he is pointing directly at what seems to be the coming out of the deep state/national security state. From the little I’ve seen in MSM they are very dismissive of the interview, which isn’t a surprise, but for those with eyes and ears to see Putin and other spokes people he surrounds himself with seem to be slowly laying out the truth of things.

I would say that he is willing to go as far as the global population are ready to accept, so the fact that he talks about the deep state and JFK - and lets not forget that in the context of the supposed chemical attack in Syria he talked about false flags - is a very good sign, cause it means he has reasons to believe the public is way more open now to these things than they used to be. Obviously, he can measure the global sentiment way more accurately than we can.
 
Back
Top Bottom