Trump era: Fascist dawn, or road to liberation?

Ant22 said:
The petition to 'Declare Soros a Terrorist' has reached the required threshold too:

https://sputniknews.com/us/201709021057027149-petition-soros-terrorist/
A petition on a White House website asking to declare billionaire financier and investor George Soros a domestic terrorist for acts of "sedition" has reached the threshold needed for an official response by the White House. Political scientist Alexander Gusev explained to Sputnik why it spells serious trouble for the 87-year-old heavyweight.

Over 100,000 people have signed the petition posted on the White House website accusing George Soros of regular attempts to "destabilize and otherwise commit acts of sedition against the United States and its citizens" and demanding immediate declaration of the billionaire and all of his organizations and staff members "to be domestic terrorists, and have all of his personal an organizational wealth and assets seized under Civil Asset Forfeiture law."

I hope Trump will respond to the petition but it might take "more than one petition" for him to act on getting Soros out of the U.S. and nullifying his organizations?

I would imagine, with Soros funding many of the main players in Washington and Capital Hill, that there's a lot of pressure on Trump "to ignore" the petition but if there was a second one with the same amount of signatures, it might be the excuse Trump needs to push the envelope, so to speak? If Putin managed to do it - Trump might be able to achieve the same outcome?

Ironically, Soros has destabilized so many Countries, with it's inhabitants crossing borders as refugees, that to do the opposite and limit Soros movement, by narrowing down his playing field, isolating him and putting him in a corner - might be his worse nightmare?

Soros is also deeply entrenched in the current Rohingya conflict in Myanmar. He thrives on suffering and pushing buttons to make it happen. In the article below, you'll notice Soros used the U.S. to get his foot in the door in Myanmar. I suspect, Soros was using his Poster Child - Hillary - to gain full control over the U.S., Congress and the Senate. When Trump "won" - Soros went into overdrive to fulfill his ambitions. Now, Hillary comes out with - she's no longer a Political Candidate. Is that a signal - that Soros is on a crash course - to completely destroy the U.S. and bring us down on our knees? Might this be - what's behind the protests to "get rid of the White's or White Europeans"? For eight years, Soros flooded the U.S. with immigrants, courtesy of Obama, another Soros funded project, so that "the stage would be set" to remove the naturalized citizens, if Hillary - lost? Could another signed petition - stop it in it's tracks?

The Rohingya conflict in Myanmar, which had caught its second wind in August 2017, appears to be a multidimensional crisis with major geopolitical players involved, experts say, referring to both internal and external reasons behind the recent upsurge in violence in the country.

Soros and Hydrocarbons: What's Really Behind the Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201709051057098493-myanmar-rohingya-energy-china-soros/

The Rohingya conflict, which erupted between Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar's western Rakhine state in late August, was apparently fanned by external global players, Dmitry Mosyakov, director of the Centre for Southeast Asia, Australia and Oceania at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told RT.

According to the academic, the conflict has at least three dimensions.

First, this is a game against China, as China has very large investments in Arakan [Rakhine]," Mosyakov told RT. "Second, it is aimed at fuelling Muslim extremism in Southeast Asia…. Third, it's the attempt to sow discord within ASEAN [between Myanmar and Muslim-dominated Indonesia and Malaysia]."

According to Mosyakov, the century-long conflict is used by external players to undermine Southeast Asian stability, especially given the fact that what is at stake are vast reserves of hydrocarbons located offshore of the Rakhine state.

There's a huge gas field named Than Shwe after the general who had long ruled Burma," Mosyakov said. "Additionally, the coastal zone of Arakan [Rakhine] almost certainly contains oil hydrocarbons."

After the massive Rakhine energy reserves were discovered in 2004 they attracted China's attention. By 2013 China completed oil and natural gas pipelines, which connect Myanmar's port of Kyaukphyu with the Chinese city of Kunming in Yunnan province.

The oil pipeline allows Beijing to deliver Middle Eastern and African crude bypassing the Malacca Straits, while the gas pipeline is transporting hydrocarbons from Myanmar's offshore fields to China.

The development of the Sino-Myanmar energy project coincided with the intensification of the Rohingya conflict in 2011-2012 when 120,000 asylum seekers left the country escaping the bloodshed.

According to Dmitry Egorchenkov, deputy director of the Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognosis at the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, it is hardly a coincidence. Although there are certain internal causes behind the Rohingya crisis, it could also be fueled by external players, most notably, the United States.

Myanmar's destabilization may affect China's energy projects and create a pocket of instability at Beijing's doorstep. Given the ongoing crisis between the US and North Korea, another Chinese neighbor, Beijing may soon find itself caught in the crossfires.

Meanwhile, the Burma Task Force, which comprises a number of organizations funded by George Soros, has been actively operating in Myanmar since 2013 calling upon the international community to stop what they call "the genocide of the Rohingya Muslim minority group." However, Soros's interference in Myanmar's domestic affairs goes deeper into the country's history.

In 2003, George Soros joined a US Task Force group aimed at increasing "US cooperation with other countries to bring about a long overdue political, economic and social transformation in Burma [Myanmar]."


The Council of Foreign Relation's (CFR) 2003 document entitled "Burma: Time For Change," which announced the establishment of the group insisted that "democracy… cannot survive in Burma without the help of the United States and the international community."

"When George Soros comes to this or that country… he looks for religious, ethnic or social contradictions, chooses the model of action for one of these options or their combination and tries to 'warm them up,'" Egorchenkov explained, speaking with RT.

On the other hand, according to Mosyakov, it appears that some established global economies are seeking to contain the rapid economic development of ASEA nations, by instigating inner strife within the bloc.

The academic opined that the globalist management policy envisages sowing discord in stable regional formations. By fuelling regional conflicts external players jump at the opportunity to gain control over sovereign states and exert considerable pressure on them.

The recent Rohingya crisis started on August 25 when Muslim insurgents of Rohingya origin attacked security posts in Myanmar's Rakhine state. The tough response of the country's authorities triggered violent clashes, which claimed the lives of at least 402 people. However, according to some estimates, up to 3,000 Muslims were killed during the recent conflict.

The conflict that started about a century ago has gradually escalated since 2011, hitting its peak in 2012 when thousands of Muslim families sought asylum in the special refugee camps on the country's territory or fled to Bangladesh. Yet another escalation started in 2016.

This List Of 200 American Organizations Funded By Liberal Extremist George Soros Is Staggering…
_https://uspoliticsinfo.com/2017/04/15/this-list-of-200-american-organizations-funded-by-liberal-extremist-george-soros-is-staggering/
 
angelburst29 said:
In her narration of the report, Pauley said Clinton still seemed "gobsmacked" over the defeat at the hands of Donald Trump, saying she "dishes out blame and she accepts responsibility."

<snip>

In released excerpts, Clinton has laid blame for her defeat on herself but also on Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), the media's coverage of her private email scandal, former FBI Director James Comey, Russian meddling in the election and other factors.

Obviously she's not really accepting responsibility for her defeat, because she's still blaming everyone else for stuff she and her co-conspirators did. Ugh. :rolleyes:
 
Steve Bannon, Trump's ex-chief strategist, tells 60 Minutes why he's out at the White House and criticizes the GOP for not supporting the president. "They're gonna be held accountable," he says. Charlie Rose reports.

Steve Bannon - 60 Minutes interview
https://www.cbsnews.com/videos/steve-bannon/ (27:18 min.)

Following Steve Bannon’s highly anticipated interview with Charlie Rose on 60 Minutes Sunday night, professional photographer Peter Duke published a video explainer on how CBS may have used color adjustments to make the Breitbart News boss “look bad” on television.

WATCH: Photographer Explains How CBS Uses Color Adjustments To Make Steve Bannon ‘Look Bad’ On 60 Minutes
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/09/watch-photographer-explains-cbs-used-color-adjustments-make-steve-bannon-look-bad-60-minutes/

“It seems like 60 minutes would like you to listen less and look more at Steve Bannon. By subtly tweaking the color of the video, they make him look like a bleary-eyed drunk. I show you how they did it,” writes Duke on the video’s YouTube page.

Peter Duke has photographed Milo Yiannopoulos, Scott Adams and James O’Keefe.

In the video, Duke explains how CBS color adjusted Bannon’s shots to make his eyes and lips red by increasing the level of saturation. This results in curtains that are a brighter orange behind Bannon than they are in Charlie Rose’s shot. Rose’s shot was made “cooler,” to make the host’s make-up more subtle.

Duke then adjusted the interview’s lighting, removing Bannon’s redness and Rose’s “coolness.” The result is a natural looking Bannon.


As author Ann Coulter pointed out, these types of mainstream media tricks aren’t done on Fox News — hence why conservatives look better on the channel.

60 Minutes & CBS want you to think Steve Bannon is a red eyed monster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkF9Ab8wblM (2:42 min.)

Below is a transcript of Peter Duke’s video:

DUKE: I wanted to talk a little bit today about color correction and grading, and how it can be used to make people look better or worse on television. This is a still frame of Steve Bannon from the 60 Minutes interview that’s going to run tonight. And the first things that I noticed was that there were red circles around his eyes and his lips looked cherry red. And I also noticed the curtains in the background looked really orange.

Now I’ve met Steve Bannon and I know what he looks like. He’s Irish and he does kinda have paper skin. But, he doesn’t have pronounced red circles around his eyes. That’s not who he is in real life. So I started comparing the two shots of Charlie Rose and Steve Bannon to see what kind of differences I could find, and it was very interesting. The first thing that you need to take a look at is the coloring saturation. Those drapes in the Breitbart Embassy are actually the same color. Now the light lighting them might be slightly closer or farther away, which accounts for the brightness, but they are the same color. And you can see from these two shots that they are defiantly not the same color.

If you take a look at Charlie Rose’s shirt, it’s about 13 unit of blue from neutral, which means that they’ve graded it into a cooler shot. That does a couple of things. It makes his make-up look less clownish and it also knocks down the contrast a little bit. So, I’m going to do the same thing to Steve. I’m going to make it a little bit bluer and I’m also going to lighten up the shadows a little bit. And Voila, the blood shot eyes are gone.

Now I’m going to do to Charlie what they did to Steve. I’m going to kick up the situation, the red, the orange, and i’m going to increase the contrast. So here are the two shots before and after, before and after. And here’s what the pictures would look like if they were graded similarly. Steve doesn’t have red circles under his eyes, Charlie’s make-up is subtle, can’t really tell he’s got it on, unless you’re looking. And Steve doesn’t look like the monster they want you to think that he is.

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon appeared on 60 Minutes with Charlie Rose and discussed a myriad of topics, from the GOP establishment trying to nullify Trump’s presidency to Hillary Clinton not being as smart as liberals always say she is . . .

“Her very first speech when she came off the beach was nonsense,” Bannon begins to Rose, “and this goes with something I want to address with you: Hillary Clinton’s not very bright.”

Bannon continues to describe the ways in which she failed during the election, and beyond.


“Everybody says she’s so smart, so much smarter than Donald Trump . . . She doesn’t really have a grasp, she doesn’t have a grasp on what’s important and what’s not – and that’s what’s essential in a leader. Donald Trump has a grasp on what’s important and what’s marginalia.”

Rose then pressed Bannon the ethno-nationalist descriptor she pinned to Breitbart and others on the New Right, but Bannon was quick to shut down the impending smear.

Rose asks, “Cause you want no part of ethno-nationalism?”

Bannon replies quickly, “That’s ridiculous on the face of it, it’s absurd . . .”

Rose: “You don’t want any part of any of those people?”

Bannon: “Not only is it morally wrong, it’s also totally irrelevant. Economic nationalism is what this country was built on, it’s the American system . . .”
 
What we suspected:


Steve Bannon: Trump administration's 'original sin' was embracing the establishment
by Todd Shepherd | Sep 10, 2017, 7:00 PM
_http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/steve-bannon-trump-administrations-original-sin-was-embracing-the-establishment/article/2633966

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon said the Trump administration's biggest mistake came early on when they dropped their "drain the swamp" attitude for the sake of simply forming a government.

"In the 48 hours after we won, there's a fundamental decision that was made," Bannon said to Charlie Rose in a "60 Minutes" interview. "You might call it the original sin of the administration. We embraced the establishment. I mean, we totally embraced the establishment."

Bannon said many of the people that had staffed the backbone of the campaign — including himself — comprised an "island of misfit toys."

"So he looks around and I'm wearin' my combat jacket, I haven't shaved, I got — you know, my hair's down to here, and he says — he's — he's thinkin,' "Hey, I've gotta put together a government. I've gotta really staff up somethin'. I need to embrace the establishment."

Bannon told Rose that the task of "draining the swamp" was a bigger accomplishment than any one administration could pull off, predicting it would 15-20 years of "relentlessly going after it."

Bannon, once again the chief editor of Breitbart News, also related a story about how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell complained about the "swamp" language, arguing that he was having a difficult time convincing the right people to take government jobs in D.C. and on Capitol Hill because of the pay, reporting requirements, and scrutiny.

Bannon's wide-ranging discussion with Rose is his first "extended" mainstream media interview since leaving the White House on Aug. 18.

On the same day as the news of his departure broke, Bannon had a harsh prediction for the rest of the Trump presidency.

"The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over," Bannon told The Weekly Standard. "We still have a huge movement, and we will make something of this Trump presidency. But that presidency is over. It'll be something else. And there'll be all kinds of fights, and there'll be good days and bad days, but that presidency is over."

Other excerpts of the Bannon interview were released in recent days by CBS, which included Bannon saying National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn should have resigned over his feelings about the Charlottesville, Va., riots and Trump's response, and also Bannon saying that the Catholic church has an "economic interest" in fostering illegal immigration into the United States.

The interview does not touch on the recent deal President Trump struck with congressional Democrats to extend the deadline on the debt ceiling by three months.
 
In another interview, Published on Sep 10, 2017

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sits down with "CBS Sunday Morning" anchor Jane Pauley for her first TV interview about her new book, a memoir entitled "What Happened."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tteLMfFDCb4 (13:24 min.)

As of this Posting - 3282 likes - 22,582 dislikes!

At the 4:02 mark in the video, Hillary's weight gain is very obvious. Taking a clue from her new book .... “What Happened?”
 
angelburst29 said:
In another interview, Published on Sep 10, 2017

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sits down with "CBS Sunday Morning" anchor Jane Pauley for her first TV interview about her new book, a memoir entitled "What Happened."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tteLMfFDCb4 (13:24 min.)

As of this Posting - 3282 likes - 22,582 dislikes!

At the 4:02 mark in the video, Hillary's weight gain is very obvious. Taking a clue from her new book .... “What Happened?”

Hillary really doesn't get how totally she is detested.
 
Hillary Clinton's latest memoir, "What Happened," hit the shelves Tuesday, and despite the former secretary of state announcing in her November concession speech that the election was never just about her, not everyone was convinced.

Clinton Memoir Shows Candidate Was Unable to Learn From Mistakes
https://sputniknews.com/us/201709121057332182-memoir-clinton-unable-to-learn-from-mistakes/

Speaking to Sputnik Radio's Loud and Clear with Brian Becker, Ted Rall, an editorial cartoonist and columnist, says Clinton's "campaign was [always] about her, that's why her campaign slogan was ‘Stronger Together': in other words — shut up, Bernie people, and support me."

And yet what's even sadder, according to the cartoonist, is that the former presidential nominee's book "is merely going to feed into this narrative" that "it's still about her [which] is a big part of the reason why she lost."

"[Clinton] thought she was inevitable, but what really is just gobsmacking is that she made the same exact mistake eight years earlier during the Democratic primaries and lost to Obama," Rall pointed out. "No one thought that John Edwards or this guy who had a name that sounded like the guy who attacked [the US] on 9/11 had a chance."

"No one is owed the presidency, no one is owed political office…you'd think that after being burned so badly on 2008 that she and her advisors would've learned that lesson," Rall added.

According to the columnist, instead of Clinton learning from her mistakes, she opted to play the blame game — even taking a shots at Barack and Michelle Obama.

"She was endorsed hard by Obama who worked hard, and by the way apparently gets blamed in her book [for her loss]," Rall said. "If I were Obama I'd really be feeling a bit annoyed because he and Michelle really did campaign for her very hard and pulled out the stops for [Clinton]."

For Rall, Clinton's inability is learn from both the private email server and hacked DNC emails shows a side of the politician's unwillingness to acknowledge her own mistakes and instead try to brush it under the rug.

"A lot of her gripes come down to people reporting things that she caused," Rall told Becker and co-host John Kiriakou. "It seems to me like what she complains about half the time or more than half the time is stuff that she did to herself and then she just doesn't want anyone to pay attention to them…that's just really unrealistic."

Published by Simon & Schuster, Clinton's more-than-500-page memoir is said to offer an in-depth account of her experience as the Democratic Party's presidential nominee against Republican rival now-US President Donald Trump.
 
The Senate just worked against Trump (again) by blocking legislation - aimed at repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF).

The vote on revoking the Bush-era "Authorized Use of the US Military Forces" bill is scheduled in the US Senate on Wednesday. US Senator Rand Paul believes that this legislation has bound the United States to long-running proxy wars around the globe.

Rand Paul Announces US Senate's Vote on Repeal of Bush-Era War Resolutions
https://sputniknews.com/us/201709131057364576-us-senate-bush-war-aumf/

The US Senate is scheduled to vote on legislation aimed at repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), a resolution which was adopted shortly after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, Senator Rand Paul said in an interview on Wednesday.

"I don't think the resolution in 2001 has anything to do with the seven different wars that we're involved in now," Paul, who introduced the repeal bill, told MSNBC. "Today will be the first major vote we have, not necessarily on ending the wars… but on whether we should even vote on whether to continue war or end war."

Paul said that in the long run the legislation binds the United States to multi-generational proxy wars without the capacity to vote on a preferred course of action.

There is no "winnable solution" for the United States to be found in Afghanistan, Paul added, calling on the White House to review its military strategy in the region.


The US Senate voted against a legislation aimed at repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), a resolution which was adopted shortly after September 11, 2001, terror attacks proposed by Republican Senator Rand Paul.

US Senate Blocks Repeal of Authorizations for Bush-Era Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq
https://sputniknews.com/us/201709131057365483-us-senate-repeal-war-bush-iraq-afghanistan/

The US Senate on Wednesday blocked a measure to repeal authorization for the Bush-era wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Senate voted 61-36 in favor of killing Senator Ron Paul's Amendment #871 to HR 280, which would have repealed the authorization for use of US military force in Iraq and Afghanistan. The measure would have ended the authorizations for use of military force after six months.


Senator John McCain's foundations and political endeavors deserve to be thoroughly scrutinized, Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel told Sputnik, sharing his views on what is behind a more than decade-long cooperation between the Arizona senator and US billionaire George Soros.

Power Games: What McCain, Soros and the Clintons Have in Common
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201709131057355221-mccain-clinton-soros-power/

There is one thing Republican Arizona Senator John McCain and the Clintons definitely have in common — their passion for power games.

Ortel, who has been looking into the Clintons Foundation's alleged fraud for the past few years, told Sputnik that the McCain-hosted annual Sedona Forum, the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) and other private gatherings which bring together senior foreign officials and American serving politicians "seem highly suspect" and "deserve tough scrutiny" concerning "related party transactions" that likely are created behind closed doors at such events.

The McCain Institute for International Leadership - The McCain Institute for International Leadership at Arizona State University (ASU) was founded in 2012 with $8.7 million in funds leftover from McCain's 2008 futile presidential campaign.

In the introduction video, Michael M. Crow, the ASU president explains that "in the spirit of John McCain himself and the spirit of multiple generations of the McCain family, The McCain Institute for International Leadership… is an opportunity to step out and depart from the standard think tank model," which means that they are "not sitting and talking about things" but "facilitate the making of decisions."

The departure from "the standard think tank model" could be seen in the Institute's unwillingness to disclose the amount of donations made by its most generous foreign donors as The Daily Caller's investigative journalist Richard Pollock found in his July report.

Pollock pointed out that the Institute's web site "only lists donors who have given '$100,000 and above,' which can be misleading," especially given Bloomberg's 2016 disclosure that the non-profit "with ties to Senator John McCain" received "a $1 million donation from the government of Saudi Arabia in 2014, according to documents filed with the US Internal Revenue Service."

The embarrassing revelation coincided with McCain seeking his sixth term in the US Senate prompting the politician to vehemently deny that he had anything to do with The McCain Institute "except that they use [his] name."

To add to the confusion, the senator rushed to cut off questions about the Saudi donation to the non-profit asked by Arizona broadcaster, KPNX Channel 12.

According to Ortel, McCain's words didn't sound convincing. It is no secret that foreign actors seeking to get along with current US politicians sometimes donate money to non-profits somehow linked to these policymakers.

"John McCain does love his foreign adventures and does cultivate foreign government (and wealthy individual) contributions," Ortel says, "Now, if the McCain Institute were in Arkansas or Bosnia, rather than Arizona, I might find his denials potentially plausible, but two words leap to mind: 'Come on!'"

The analyst stressed that he finds this Saudi sponsorship "deeply disturbing" especially given McCain's role in the Senate on a key committee [Committee on Armed Services]," since it amounts to a probable conflict of interest.

He also poses the question whether individuals and firms working for the McCain Institute "have appropriately registered under FARA [The Foreign Agents Registration Act], or under US state laws/regulations that require such persons to register before soliciting 'contributions.'"

FARA requires agents representing the interests of foreign powers to disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances. "There is also talk that McCain/his staff remain close with the Qataris," he remarked.

John McCain's 'Foreign Adventures' - The rumor isn't surprising in light of John McCain's involvement in the Syrian crisis and his support to Saudi and Qatari-backed militants.

​In 2015 the delegation of US senators led by John McCain met with Saudi and Qatari leaders during their regional tour aimed at dealing with issues related to training Syrian rebels.

On the other hand, McCain was spotted equally enthusiastically supporting the so-called Euromaidan Revolution in Ukraine which resulted in a coup d'etat in February 2014.

"John McCain has never recently seen an intervention he did not care to support," Ortel said, expressing doubts that these activities truly correspond to America's national interests: "The US record intervening abroad, particularly since 2000 (so bi-partisan) has done a lot more harm than good to geo-political balances, has cost trillions of dollars, and resulted in great bloodshed."

However, there is yet another reason why McCain and like-minded American politicians and financiers could be interested in instigating instability abroad: these are possible vested interests, according to the Wall Street analyst.

A glaring example of such a "trouble-maker" is George Soros, a Hungarian-American investor and business magnate who has a long record of profiting from currency crises and economic instability.

'McCain Lives in George Soros' Back Pocket' - "Most individuals are not investors and most investors are not familiar with how one can profit from instability and from declines in the values of securities," Ortel explained, adding that George Soros has a long career of profiting from adversity while covering himself "in the cloak of his 'charities.'"

Soros and many others can 'short' government bonds of nations that descend into chaos and/or enter into financial contracts where, by paying a modest set of premiums, they stand to gain as values of underlying securities decline in value," the Wall Street analyst elaborated.

According to Ortel, the practice "actually should be encouraged to regulate governments using market forces but only if such transactions are regulated and free from insider knowledge."

It is no coincidence that Soros and McCain have been repeatedly spotted endorsing US regime change operations here and there: their cooperation goes back over a decade, according to Jerome Robert Corsi, an American author and political commentator, who highlights that McCain has been "funded" by Soros since 2001.

In his 2008 article Corsi opined that in 2001, McCain founded the Reform Institute, not-for-profit think tank based in Alexandria, VA, "as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations."

However, in 2006 the senator was forced to "sever his formal ties with the Reform Institute" due to a controversial $200,000 contribution from Cablevision, which was viewed as a potential conflict of interest.

Corsi believes that McCain is still being financed by Soros: "McCain lives in Soros' back pocket," the political commentator told Sputnik.

For its part, The Daily Caller in June 2017 drew attention to the fact that George Soros is among the McCain Institute's donors.

"I am not accusing McCain of trading on advance knowledge of looming instability in a particular nation or region," Ortel told Sputnik, "But I imagine there is enormous temptation for speculators to cultivate politicians to try to learn about future government actions or policies that might adversely affect exiting conditions in a particular foreign nation."


After the US national debt reached the $20 trillion mark for the first time ever, a clock showing the debt in New York City has been removed.

US National Debt Clock Removed in NY After Hitting Historic $20 Trillion Mark 12.09.2017
https://sputniknews.com/business/201709121057322561-us-national-debt-clock/

The billboard-sized running clock that in real time displays the US national debt has been removed from its location in New York City after the federal debt surpassed a historic $20 trillion mark last Friday, a Sputnik correspondent reported from the site.

As of Tuesday morning, the clock was detached from its location on the southeast corner of 44th street and 6th Avenue in Manhattan, supposedly for physical updates to the display.

On Friday, the US national debt reached the $20 trillion mark for the first time ever after President Donald Trump signed a bill temporarily raising the nation's debt limit for three months. The legislation allowed the US Treasury Department to begin borrowing again under "extraordinary measures" to avoid a financial default.

Emergency funding to aid Hurricane Harvey relief was attached to the borrowing measure, amounting to $15 billion.


JOHN McCAIN WHO IS HE? I am sick to death of hearing " MY FRIENDS I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR THIS COUNTRY FOR 17 YEARS AND I HAVETHE SCARS TO PROVE IT". SCARS ALL RIGHT AFTER 20 HOURS NOT 17 YEARS, FRIGHTENED TO DEATH,HE WOULD BE SHOT DOWN OVER HANOI, HE BAILED OUT OF HIS PLANE! THAT'S WHERE THE SCARS CAME FROM.

McCain lost five U.S. Navy aircraft.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-125584

Navy pilot John Sidney McCain III should have never been allowed to graduate from the U.S. Navy flight school. He was a below average student and a lousy pilot. Had his father and grandfather not been famous four star U.S. Navy admirals, McCain III would have never been allowed in the cockpit of a military aircraft.

During his relative short stint on flight status, McCain III lost five U.S. Navy aircraft, four in accidents and one in combat. #1 McCain III lost jet number one in 1958 when he plunged into Corpus Christi Bay while practicing landings. He was knocked unconscious by the impact coming to as the plane settled to the bottom.

#2 McCain's second crash occurred while he was deployed in the Mediterranean. "Flying too low over the Iberian Peninsula," Timberg wrote, "he took out some power lines reminiscent of the 1998 incident in which a Marine Corps jet sliced through the cables of a gondola at an Italian ski resort, killing 20 which led to a spate of newspaper stories in which he was predictably identified as the son of an admiral."

#3 McCain's third crash three occurred when he was returning from flying a Navy trainer solo to Philadelphia for an Army-Navy football game. Timberg reported that McCain radioed, "I've got a flameout" and went through standard relight procedures three times before ejecting at one thousand feet. McCain landed on a deserted beach moments before the plane slammed into a clump of trees.

#4 McCain's fourth aircraft loss occurred July 29, 1967, soon after he was assigned to the USS Forrestal as an A-4 Skyhawk pilot. While seated in the cockpit of his aircraft waiting his turn for takeoff, an accidently fired rocket slammed into McCain's plane. He escaped from the burning aircraft, but the explosions that followed killed 134 sailors, destroyed at least 20 aircraft, and threatened to sink the ship.

#5 Can be found http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_mccain_lost_five_u.htm "McCain had roughly 20 hours in combat," explains Bill Bell, a veteran of Vietnam and former chief of the U.S. Office for POW/MIA Affairs -- the first official U.S. representative in Vietnam since the 1973 fall of Saigon. "Since McCain got 28 medals," Bell continues, "that equals out to about a medal-and-a-half for each hour he spent in combat. There were infantry guys -- grunts on the ground -- who had more than 7,000 hours in combat and I can tell you that there were times and situations where I'm sure a prison cell would have looked pretty good to them by comparison. The question really is how many guys got that number of medals for not being shot down."
 
Cross Talk Trump and his generals (25:51)
Published time: 13 Sep, 2017 07:26
CrossTalking with Michael O'Hanlon, Thomas Palley, and Patrick Henningsen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuOcmiHXDXc
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/403140-trump-administration-on-religon/
Candidate Donald Trump ran on a campaign that not only questioned many foreign policy orthodoxies, but also lashed out against the neoconservative view of the world. Today the president is surrounded by men in uniform. Some are calling this a soft coup.

CIA Agent Whistleblower Risks All To Expose The Shadow Government (1:07:37)
Aug 23, 2017
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

Trump’s New Pledge: Build the Wall Later Video
_https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-15/trump-deal-with-democrats-brings-new-wall-pledge-build-it-later
Snip:
President Donald Trump got elected on the strength of three words: Build the wall.

He was more equivocal on Thursday, after cutting a loose deal with Democratic leaders to protect some undocumented immigrants: “We will build the wall later.”

Trump’s deal-making has left Republicans unnerved, and some of his strongest backers worried that he’s backtracking on his most central campaign promise. Eight months into his presidency, Trump still hasn’t explained when the wall will be built or when it will be paid for, let alone how he will satisfy his election assurance that Mexico will foot the bill.

Conservatives’ worries deepened Thursday after Trump left the border wall out of a deal he decided to cut with the top Democrats in Congress, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, to safeguard roughly 800,000 young people brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

Steve King, an Iowa Republican who is perhaps the most outspoken congressional opponent of immigration, said cracking down on border control is the most pressing concern of Trump’s core supporters. Backtracking would be considered a betrayal, he warned.

“If they see amnesty coming out of the White House then that’s the one thing that will crack his base,” King told reporters. “They’re loyal Trump supporters, but the most important plank in that platform is the rule of law."
Signs of Unease

The White House showed signs of unease over the political consequences.

After Democratic leaders announced in a triumphant late-night statement on Wednesday that Trump had agreed wall funding would be left out of a deal, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders quickly issued a statement declaring he "certainly" had made no such concession.

Trump, for his part, insisted there was "no amnesty" in the deal and stressed any legislation would include "heavy" new security measures at the border - while vowing that the wall itself "will happen."

"If the Democrats aren’t going to approve it then we’re not going to do what they want," Trump said. "So, I think it will work out."

The justifications appeared intended to appease cascading criticism from some of the president’s staunchest supporters. Breitbart News -- headed by former Trump chief strategist Stephen Bannon -- labeled him "Amnesty Don.”

Trump defended the talks, saying he was working out the deal "in conjunction with the Republicans."

"We have a very, very good relationship with a lot of people, a lot of people want this to happen," he said.

On Friday, Trump warned on Twitter that “CHAIN MIGRATION cannot be allowed to be part of any legislation on Immigration!” an apparent reference to extended family of legal immigrants being allowed to settle in the U.S.

The president’s legislative affairs director, Marc Short, told reporters in Washington Friday that in seven to 10 days the administration plans to outline what it wants in legislation on immigration and border security.

CBP South Texas‏Verified account @CBPSouthTexas South Texas Sep 12
_https://twitter.com/CBPSouthTexas/status/907733613298503681
DJjq5o9VwAAUFjx.jpg

Packages containing 127 pounds of methamphetamine seized by CBP officers at Laredo Port of Entry.
Triple play: #CBP officers at Laredo Port of Entry seize more than $9.7M in hard narcotics. Read more here: _http://bit.ly/2eUfPGA

CBP Officers Continue to Maintain Vigilance and Seize Narcotics Worth More Than $9.7 Million at the Laredo Port of Entry
Release Date:September 12, 2017
_https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/cbp-officers-continue-maintain-vigilance-and-seize-narcotics-worth-more
Snip:
LAREDO, Texas – U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers seized a significant amount of alleged cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine with a combined value of more than $9.7 million recently in three separate enforcement actions.

“These three interceptions of hard narcotics are significant and I am extremely proud of our CBP officers for keeping these dangerous drugs away from our youth,” said Port Director Gregory Alvarez, Laredo Port of Entry.

The last seizure occurred on Thursday, Sept. 7 at Juarez-Lincoln Bridge when a CBP officer referred a 2000 Ford Explorer, driven by a 27-year-old female United States citizen from Pearland, Texas for a secondary examination. Upon a canine and non-intrusive inspection of the vehicle by CBP officers, a total of 124 pounds of alleged liquid methamphetamine were discovered. The methamphetamine has an estimated street value of $2,487,670.

The seizures combined have a total estimated street value of $9,742,952.

Arizona Border Ranchers Torn in Support for Trump's Wall (5:53)
Mar 16, 2017
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=508RmYu2hNI
 
Is Trump being poisoned?

Re: Dream about Putin's death - probably assassinated

This is rather interesting, Just the other night I had a dream of Trump being assasinated. Someone had poisoned him on Inauguration Day. I assumed it was connected to some of the reading I had done on the days prior to it.

OK. Alex Jones might not be the best source:

_http://amp.dailydot.com/layer8/alex-jones-trump-poisoned/ Alex Jones swears he has ‘sources’ who say Trump is being poisoned:
Jones says he has “direct intel” that globalists are slowly poisoning President Donald Trump, causing him to slur his words and become sluggish by the end of every day.

“I’ve talked to people, multiple ones, and they believe that they are putting a slow sedative that they’re building up that’s also addictive in his Diet Cokes and in his iced tea and that the president by six or seven at night is basically slurring his words and is drugged,” Jones said during his show on Monday. “I’ve talked to people that talk to the president now at nine at night, he is slurring his words. And I’m going to leave it at that. I’ve talked to folks that have talked to him directly.” Jones said Trump has been drugged for about two months. He also claims he was “risking” his life by telling his audience about the nefarious, unsubstantiated plot. Media Matters for America first reported on Jones’ conspiracy theory.

“First it’s almost zero, just a tiny bit and then a little more and then your brain subconsciously becomes addicted to it and wants it and so as the dose gets bigger and bigger you get more comfortable in it,” Jones said of the alleged drugging. The host continued, saying that since Trump’s much-criticized response to violent unrest in Charlottesville, Virginia, he’s become more sluggish. But don’t be fooled, it’s not “the stress of the job,” Jones said, it’s because he’s been drugged.

Now I came across this psychic medium called Utsava. She has predicted, that the poisoning of Donald Trump was one of the very early plans of the Clintons et al. in the beginning of the year. In: Is President Trump being poisoned? Who is on drugs? she basically confirms the Alex Jones article. She sees, that they decided instead of killing him with poison they put some drug on his food to make him look like he has dementia and is not sane. She sees a man ("Navy Seal and CIA member") sprinkling white powder ("a sedative") sporadically over the food when it's served on an open plate. They want to poison the food in his refrigerator but are afraid of being exposed in case the food is tested. They also bugged his office, behind a painting - so she says.
 
Now, while the video at this link on Twitter is truly hilarious, https://twitter.com/TheRickyDavila/status/906176561480687617
it concerns me.

This guy Vincente is no bozo; he knows why Trump hasn't been able to pass legislation or get much else done: the Deep State is against him. Ipso facto, Vincente is actually supporting the Deep State.

But, more than that there is the obvious inference to be drawn here that the Deep State and its agents are actively degrading the USA to the laughing-stock level. Instead of getting behind the president, making sure he has good advisers and competent press representation, etc, they prefer to attack him even in this way. That just shows how desperate the Deep State has become.
 
Laura said:
Now, while the video at this link on Twitter is truly hilarious, https://twitter.com/TheRickyDavila/status/906176561480687617
it concerns me.

This guy Vincente is no bozo; he knows why Trump hasn't been able to pass legislation or get much else done: the Deep State is against him. Ipso facto, Vincente is actually supporting the Deep State.

I've been wondering about this kind of thing.

Assuming he does have enough insight to see what's really going on, he might be consciously helping it along.

I imagine there are many countries that would love to see the US crash and burn because they're tired of saying, "Yes massuh! Right away, massuh!"

Of course, if Trump is eventually replaced by some real Hitler-type, that could be especially bad for countries like Mexico who are right next door. But people like Fox may not have thought of that possibility.

And who knows if it will even get that far, because if the fires and hurricanes and floods are any indication, "other events" may intervene...
 
Scottie said:
Laura said:
Now, while the video at this link on Twitter is truly hilarious, https://twitter.com/TheRickyDavila/status/906176561480687617
it concerns me.

This guy Vincente is no bozo; he knows why Trump hasn't been able to pass legislation or get much else done: the Deep State is against him. Ipso facto, Vincente is actually supporting the Deep State.

And who knows if it will even get that far, because if the fires and hurricanes and floods are any indication, "other events" may intervene...

Exactly. And the likelihood of that happening seems to be increasing with each passing season. As for the video - I did not find it funny at all, more disturbing than anything. Or even desperate - perhaps, he is feeling threatened by something.
 
Laura said:
angelburst29 said:
In another interview, Published on Sep 10, 2017

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sits down with "CBS Sunday Morning" anchor Jane Pauley for her first TV interview about her new book, a memoir entitled "What Happened."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tteLMfFDCb4 (13:24 min.)

As of this Posting - 3282 likes - 22,582 dislikes!

At the 4:02 mark in the video, Hillary's weight gain is very obvious. Taking a clue from her new book .... “What Happened?”

Hillary really doesn't get how totally she is detested.

This caption from a book store - has the right idea?

https://i1.wp.com/fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/image.png
 
angelburst29 said:
Laura said:
angelburst29 said:
In another interview, Published on Sep 10, 2017

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton sits down with "CBS Sunday Morning" anchor Jane Pauley for her first TV interview about her new book, a memoir entitled "What Happened."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tteLMfFDCb4 (13:24 min.)

As of this Posting - 3282 likes - 22,582 dislikes!

At the 4:02 mark in the video, Hillary's weight gain is very obvious. Taking a clue from her new book .... “What Happened?”

Hillary really doesn't get how totally she is detested.

This caption from a book store - has the right idea?

https://i1.wp.com/fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/image.png

Or like this one that is a pop quiz that is a head scratcher...

"One of these contains relevant truths; the other self-serving lies--you decide!"

DJ2J5wOVwAAqk10.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom