Trump era: Fascist dawn, or road to liberation?

A youtuber named Roy Potter who has been following Q quite closely blew up in anger when Q wrote
DEFCON [1]
in one of his recent posts. Potter panicked due to it being a known signal for threat of imminent major attack. This led him to begin to take Q less seriously as he stated someone at a high level of intel would not have used Defcon1 so recklessly. The whole Q phenomenon is extremely fascinating and difficult to work out. The apparent coordination with Trump and others is difficult to deny. His posts are definitely worth reading though. They have "redpilled" a lot of people and sent researchers in new directions, and the fact that Media Matters is now going on the offensive says lot, they are calling "the storm" the "new pizzagate".
 
As I briefly mentioned in the Collingwood thread, then the phenomena Trump whether consciously or unconsciously has made explicit what previously was implicit. Previously people around the world might have had an intuitive understanding despite the selling of the American dream that the US was a racist bully who was hypocritical, corrupt, thieving, aggressive, destabilising of other countries, megalomaniac and much more. Since Trump came to power this understanding has been made explicit not least because of the Deep State and its agents in the MSM and elsewhere keep exposing no-body but themselves. This has caught the eyes of the world and even criticism has been voiced of the US by its otherwise always silent allies. Not least because under Trump criticism has been ok, just like everything anti-Trump.

In a way as far as I see it then Trump has in his counter intuitive way done much in just one year to curb the US as the world's policeman. Trump was over the top aggressive in the rhetoric against issues where the Deep State would normally just be underhandedly aggressive, with the results that the Deep State's actors and the EU had to appeal to moderation, which resulted in the cancelling of many Deep State projects. The Philippines is gone as an ally, so is Turkey, so is now Pakistan, and so is the wish of the Iranian people to be close to the US. Likewise, the Deep State wished to be close to Israel, so Trump said, "Ok, let us be real close to Israel and recognise Jerusalem". The result is that the Arab world has been much more united than for decades and Israel looks bad in the eyes of many including the EU. The Middle East has completely been lost to Russia in the last year, though that was well on the way beforehand.

North Korea is another example, where due to the tough talk, a solution might be found but without the US directly involved. There are also signs that Japan and South Korea are seeing where the voice of reason comes from. Any war on the Korean peninsula would be devastating for both Japan and South Korea, so while the US might find it fun to drop a few bombs, then others are seeing that they will be the ones to bear the consequences and the casualites.

The result whether consciously or not by the phenomena Trump has been that the US is being forced out and pulling back as a hegemon from many centers of the world and can concentrate more on the US as Trump actually said he wanted before he got elected. Likewise, the swamp is in the process of being drained. It would have been utopia to think that it would happen overnight or even in the first presidential period, but again, as far as I see it, which could be wrong, then this is what is happening.

Trump is like the child who says the emperor is naked, as the way he says things unfiltered exposes what the emperor is. Trump is perhaps not aware that the emperor is what the US is or has become and also what he himself represents. Due to the approach and behaviour of Trump and the US body politics in general, then a multipolar world is appearing. Russia does not have to go out and talk up Russia, they only have to act like normal rational conscientious people to shine like the sun. The lies and wishful thinking of the Deep State elite and their minions is their unravelling and they don't have anything in their powers to stop this unravelling since simply being what they are is their undoing. Just like the Zebra can not remove it's stripes.

That it is a relatively slow unravelling is not a bad thing, as a fast unravelling could/can result in much violence. Violent revolutions never end well.

I called the phenomena Trump as the focus is not on him as a person, neither am I attributing what has happened in the last year as due to some genius stable strategy of his. What he does might to a certain extent be conscious but a lot likely unconscious. And he epitomises many things truly American. A soft spoken, honest, humble, resolute, unwavering,rational, courteous, diplomatic, reflective person with a nuanced look at situations with consideration to all the actors involved and the possible future consequences, would never be elected by the American people who have been made to believe themselves as exceptional. It simply would never cut it with American culture. In Russia such a person could be elected, which is why Putin is the president of Russia. America was more likely to elect a cowboy, who then would in gung-ho style take on the establishment.

As Collingwood says in Speculum Mentis, an error is not a bad thing.
 
This video (well, audio only) today from American Intelligence Media seems to have a pretty good take on the Q phenomenon. The guy in the video apparently has some sort of Intelligence background and they speculate that Q is some sort of "white hat(s)" in NSA or some type of SIGINT who have picked up on all the nefariousness of what has been going on and are working to get the word out on the dirty deeds of the Deep State/Swamp and essentially counter the coup against Trump. Whether there is any direct affiliation with Trump himself is ultimately irrelevant, but the notion seems to inspire many in the "patriot" community so that's why Q presents it that way. It seems like a decent working theory. I think I've listened to maybe one other video from this couple and I can't speak broadly to how disinfo-y they are (there's something about John Brennan being radicalized by Islam? OK, fine, whatever, the entire Deep State is composed of radical Muslims) but by and large they seem to be on point with this analysis.


Is it possible that Q has been corrupted or replaced as Roy Potter seems to have concluded in the videos referenced in Rhythmik's post above? Sure, but the genie is out of the bottle now.
 
If all the months of the bickering between Trump and Kim Jong Un was to get North and South Korea at the Peace table, seems there's some progress?

North Korea will send a 140-member musical group called the Samjiyon orchestra to South Korea, Lee Woo-sung, the head of South Korea’s delegation, told reporters today.

North Korean orchestra to perform in Seoul Jan 15, 2018
http://abcnews.go.com/International/north-korean-orchestra-perform-seoul/story?id=52358553

The North’s “art troupe” will perform in Seoul and Gangneung, near the main site for next month's Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea,
according to Lee, who also oversees the culture and arts policy office at South Korea’s Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.

Meanwhile, if the two Koreas march together at the opening ceremony of the Olympics, they’d parade under a joint "unification flag,” according to The Associated Press.

Seoul said the two Koreas agreed in principle to field a joint women's ice hockey team and have relayed the news to the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the AP said. The two countries will meet with the IOC on Saturday in Switzerland.

The developments came during a second-round of rare, high-level talks between the Koreas. Last week, the two countries said North Korea agreed to send an Olympic delegation consisting of athletes, cheerleaders, artists, spectators and members of the North Korean media.

Both countries planned to continue to discuss performance venue and stage details for North Korea's orchestra, and the South will do its best to ensure the performers’ safety and convenience, Lee said.

According to Korean broadcaster KBS, Lee said the South needs additional information about the orchestra.

The North Korean musicians will perform widely known folk songs that citizens of both countries are comfortable with – songs that go well with the theme of unification, according to KBS. There was no discussion about a joint performance, KBS reported.

According to South Korean news agency Yonhap, the North asked if the performers could enter the South through the Panmunjom "Truce Village" in the joint security area of the Demilitarized Zone, the highly fortified border between the two Koreas. The South suggested they take the train, Yonhap reported.


Speaking to Radio Sputnik about his explosive, detailed and documented but broadly overlooked investigation into how US intelligence agencies, not Russia, were the ones trying to meddle in the 2016 US presidential race, retired CIA officer-turned political activist Ray McGovern outlined why changing Americans' minds on the matter is so difficult.

FBI 'Should Feel Embarrassed' by Its Russian Meddling Claims –Ex-CIA Analyst
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201801151060773365-ray-mcgovern-interview-fbi-election-meddling/

McGovern's report, which came out last week, provided new, documented proof on some of the ways US intelligence officers attempted to interfere in the 2016 election, and on how pro-Clinton FBI staffers now involved in the alleged Trump-Russia collusion investigation worked to try to immunize former Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton from crimes including lying to the FBI and endangering state secrets.

Sputnik: Tell us a little about this report, and how you came about creating it.

Ray McGovern: Well, it was not very difficult. The fact that our report is unique is a symptom of the blanket coverage saying that Russia interfered in our election. Even most of my progressive colleagues believe that and so this is a counter-narrative, and it's really hard to change your mind around into believing something very different, even if, as in this case, it's based on documentary evidence.

So, just let me note at the outset that this is the first request, after several days of this article being up on the web in various places, for an interview, on this shocking news that it might not be Russia that intervened into our election, but rather the FBI in cooperation with the CIA and others who we call the deep state.

The story is simply this: the exchange of emails that was released by the Department of Justice inspector general shows that very top level FBI officials, including the head of counterintelligence, were plotting to make sure #1: that Trump did not win and #2: that if he did win, they would be able to push a narrative saying 'Aha, he didn't win fairly, and it was the Russians that helped him win.'

That is the narrative that prevails in our media right now; it's a really, really shameful thing because even my progressive friends believe it. Even the progressive website that used to automatically print my materials, like CommonDreams for example, or Amy Goodman on Democracy Now. I am shunned, like those dissidents in Russia way back when the Soviet Union existed.

Sputnik: Why would the FBI and the CIA try to promote this Russian-hacking narrative, when implying that they could allow such a thing to happen makes them look incompetent?

Ray McGovern: If it were true, it would make them incompetent. You're quite right; they're pushing a narrative that should be embarrassing, but the American people are not aware of what's really going on, because the media presents a one-sided view here.

The intelligence agencies were first and foremost determined [to ensure] that Trump could not win. You have not only this business coming out of the FBI – mainly documentary evidence in the form of text messages, but the…[forensically disproven] notion that Russia hacked into the DNC emails and gave them to WikiLeaks. When I say that's disproven, it all hinges on the forensic studies we have supervised, made and reported on, which show that this Guciffer 2.0 is a fraud…He's an entity that was invented, we think, by Bill Binney from the NSA, earlier. And I think that it was probably our own security services who invented Guciffer 2.0 and used this entity as a way of showing 'Oh, here are Russian templates on these messages!' and 'Oh, here's a little bit of Cyrillic!' They superimposed this 'evidence' on these messages to show that the Russians hacked. That is disproven by forensics now.

It's very important that people know this, but just as other things that show the faults of the narrative that prevails, it does not appear in the media, not even in the so-called progressive media.

Sputnik: Donald Trump is known for his difficult relationship with the security agencies. What do you make of that?

Ray McGovern: Well let me just give you one example. Right before he became president, that is on the 6th of January [2017]…the FBI, the CIA and the NSA gave him a scurrilous document that indicated that he had been guilty of all manner of profane and other activities captured by the [Russian FSB] when he visited Moscow many years ago. Why did they do that? They did it as an annex to another report that had no proof in real evidence, that is, that the Russians, under the direction of President Putin, interfered in our elections.

What happened was, three of them presented it, and one stayed behind, and that was James Comey of the FBI…[who] gave [Trump] what was called the dossier, the dossier about all of these terrible things. Now none of them are true. It's disproven and really conjured up. Why did they do it? It's an old tactic that the FBI uses. They say to an incoming president, 'we have this information on you, so just be aware.'…If I were Mr. Trump, I would react very, very negatively to that, because this is the old implicit trick of blackmail; that the security services have this information on a new president, and they can use it at any time if he does not do the bidding of the security services.
 
angelburst29 said:
Sputnik: Donald Trump is known for his difficult relationship with the security agencies. What do you make of that?

So, apparently if that aberration called Hillary won, they were going to call Air force One "Broomstick One".

It's nice to know that that when talking about 'relationships'... only the ones with 'management' matter.

These people are truly pathetic. They've truly got no idea.
 
TEL AVIV: US Vice President Mike Pence began a visit to Israel on Sunday after being praised as a “great friend” by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and shunned by the Palestinians over US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

US Vice President Mike Pence arrives in Israel Sunday 21 January 2018
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1230516/middle-east

Pence was welcomed at Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion Airport by Israel’s tourism minister and made no statement to reporters before traveling to Jerusalem.

It is the highest-level US visit to the region since President Donald Trump made his Jerusalem declaration on Dec. 6 and promised to begin the process of moving the American embassy to the city, whose status is at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

With the Palestinians boycotting Pence, the visit provides little obvious opportunity to build bridges toward peace.


JERUSALEM: US Vice President Mike Pence pointedly referred to Jerusalem as Israel’s capital on Monday and said the US embassy would open there by next year, as he met the country’s leader, further vexing Palestinians who have already snubbed his visit over a US policy shift toward the holy city. And Pence urged Palestine to rejoin the peace talks.

US Vice President Pence meets Israeli PM Netanyahu during Jerusalem visit Monday 22 January 2018
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1230876/middle-east

Pence, who is part-way through an official visit to the Middle East, said in Egypt on Saturday and again in Jordan on Sunday that Washington would support a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians if they both agreed to it.

On Monday he said he was honored to be “in Israel’s capital, Jerusalem” at the start of talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Echoing that sentiment, Netanyahu told the vice president. “This is the first time that I stand here where both leaders can say those three words: ‘Israel’s capital Jerusalem.’“

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who has called the declaration a “slap in the face,” left for an overseas visit before the vice president’s arrival.


The US embassy extended its invitation to a speech today by Vice President Mike Pence at the Israeli Knesset to leaders of Israeli settlers belonging to messianic and religious extremist groups.

US invited leaders of Jewish only settlement group to Vice President’s speech January 22, 2018
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180122-us-invited-leaders-of-jewish-only-settlement-group-to-vice-presidents-speech/

Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that a spokesman for the organization that lobbies on behalf of settlements, which are illegal under international law, confirmed that the leaders of the settler’s movement received personal invitations from the US embassy in Tel Aviv.

The spokesperson for the Yesh Council -successor to Gush Emunim (“Bloc of the Faithful”)-confirmed that the chair of the umbrella organization for Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the director of its foreign desk received invitations to the Knesset event from the US embassy.

Founded in the 1970s, the Yesh Council was formed to promote exclusively-Jewish settlements in the West Bank. They espouse a similar ideology to the Gush Emunim, whose leaders are widely portrayed as messianic, fundamentalist, theocratic, and right-wing.

Gush Emunim believed that the coming of the messiah can be hastened through Jewish settlement on land they believe God has allotted to the Jewish people as set forth in the Hebrew Bible.

The Yesha Council also serves as the political arm of the settler movement. They have been given a green light by David Friedman, who was appointed as US ambassador to Israel by President Trump last year. Friedman is a staunch supporter of the settler movement. The former bankruptcy lawyer is well-known for making incendiary remarks and holding contentious views that are at odds with longstanding US policy on Israeli and Palestine. He has previously served as president of an organization that fundraises in the US for the settlement of Beit El. Trump himself is said to have donated to Beit El.

Describing the sympathetic attitude of the current US administration to the activities of the illegal settlers, leaders of the Jewish-only settlements said that “in general, there is a much better atmosphere these days.”


Palestinian MKs accused Knesset ushers of using excessive force while being removed from debating chamber as US vice president spoke.

VIDEO: Palestinian MPs kicked out of Knesset during Pence speech Monday 22 January 2018
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/video-arab-israeli-mks-kicked-out-knesset-during-pence-speech-999382977

Palestinian-Israeli members of parliament (MK) were removed from the Knesset after they protested against US Vice President Mike Pence during his speech.

The leading Arab party in the Israeli parliament had warned that they intended to boycott Pence's speech on Monday.

Ayman Odeh, the leader of the Joint Arab list, said it was a democratic right to boycott Pence's speech.

In a tweet posted in English and Hebrew, after being kicked out, Odeh wrote: "Our protest today in the plenum is in honour of all who oppose the occupation and dream of peace."

Before being ejected from the plenum - the chamber where MKs sit - 13 Palestinian MKs put up signs that said: "Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine."

Israeli MKs, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, gave Pence a standing ovation and were filmed smiling while ushers dragged the Palestinian MKs out of the chamber.

Joint list MK Jamal Zahalka accused the ushers of using unnecessary force.

In a statement posted after the Palestinian MKs were ejected, Zahalka said: "The ushers attacked them (Palestinian MKs) brutally, pushed them and dragged them even though they were on their way out without resistance.

"Our expulsion was done in a collective manner without reading the name of lawmakers that should be removed, contrary to Knesset regulations. "

During his speech, Pence confirmed that the US would move its embassy by the end of 2019.

"In the weeks ahead, our administration will advance its plan to open the United States embassy in Jerusalem," Pence said.

"And that United States embassy will open before the end of next year."

In addition to being condemned by the Palestinian MKs, the Palestinian Authority also declared a boycott of Pence's visit.

On Sunday, the PA leader Mahmoud Abbas called a peace plan being formulated by Trump the "slap of the century" and claimed Israel was a European "colonial project".


US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis on Sunday began a one-week trip to Asia, hoping to strengthen defense cooperation with Indonesia and Vietnam as regional Chinese military power looms ever larger.

Mattis heads to Asia to draw a contrast with assertive China Sunday 21 January 2018
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1230716/world

In Jakarta, where he is to arrive Monday evening, Mattis is to meet on Tuesday with President Joko Widodo and Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu for talks on maritime cooperation.

The vast Indonesian archipelago reaches from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific.

In Vietnam, Mattis and his counterparts are set to discuss freedom of movement in the South China Sea, a region over which Beijing has extended its dominance in recent years, militarizing several small, disputed islands.

Washington hopes to draw a contrast between its own approach and those of China — seen as aggressively modernizing its military capacities — and Russia, which has annexed parts of Georgia and Ukraine.

“The point I want to make is, we respect Asia’s sovereign nations with a sovereign voice and sovereign decisions, and we don’t think anyone else should have a veto authority over their economic, their diplomatic or their security decisions,” Mattis said. “We respect these countries.”


LONDON: US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson paid a discreet visit to the new US Embassy in London on Monday, after President Donald Trump canceled plans to open it himself following a series of rows.

Tillerson visits US Embassy in London after Trump snub Tuesday 23 January 2018 (Video)
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1231321/world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl1LFjPFJTE (1:24 min.)

Tillerson bucked tradition by not holding a formal meet-and-greet at the new embassy, which the State Department claimed was due to the current shutdown of the US government over a budget impasse in Congress.

But even before the shutdown, the State Department had already played down Tillerson’s visit to the embassy, which opened last week, due to controversy over Trump’s refusal to inaugurate the new building.

The president claimed it was because he was unhappy at the cost and location of the new embassy.

But the decision came after a series of rows that have damaged the so-called “special relationship” between the two nations and after it became clear the visit would be met with mass protests.

“The purpose of the trip is to underscore our commitment to the transatlantic alliance,” said a State Department spokesman. “First stop is the United Kingdom, where the secretary will reaffirm the US-UK special relationship.”

Tillerson posed for photographs before being shown around the new building.

Trump had been due to inaugurate the building in February, but canceled the visit, tweeting: “having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for ‘peanuts,’ only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars. Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO!.”

The new building is slightly outside central London in a neighborhood south of the River Thames, unlike its predecessor, which was in the heart of the British capital.


Tillerson’s mini-tour of Europe will continue with a visit to Paris on Tuesday.
 
Government Shutdown Ends After 3 Days of Recriminations JAN. 22, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/us/politics/congress-votes-to-end-government-shutdown.html?action=click&contentCollection=DealBook&module=Trending&version=Full&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article

Congress brought an end to a three-day government shutdown on Monday as Senate Democrats buckled under pressure to adopt a short-term spending bill to fund government operations without first addressing the fate of young undocumented immigrants.

The House quickly approved the measure — which will fund the government through Feb. 8 and extend funding for the popular Children’s Health Insurance Program for six years — and President Trump signed it on Monday night.

The agreement also revealed fissures among Democrats, with about one-third of the party’s members in the Senate and a majority in the House voting against it.

The passage of the measure ended an ugly, if short-lived, impasse that threatened to give a black eye to both major political parties. The deal, reached after a bipartisan group of senators pushed their leaders to come to terms, enables hundreds of thousands of federal employees who had been facing furloughs to go back to work.

But a key part of the deal, a pledge by Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, to allow an immigration vote in the coming weeks, sets the stage for a battle over the so-called Dreamers, young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children.

Lawmakers in the House and Senate are offering drastically different visions of how to resolve their fate. But those on both sides of the debate, as well as advocates for immigrants’ rights, said that ultimately Mr. Trump would need to get involved for the immigration dispute to be settled.

Mr. Trump’s intentions were hard to discern, even as he took time to jab at the Democrats.

“Big win for Republicans as Democrats cave on Shutdown,” the president said on Twitter at 11:30 p.m.

The message continued: “Now I want a big win for everyone, including Republicans, Democrats and DACA,” referring to the Dreamers, “but especially for our Great Military and Border Security. Should be able to get there. See you at the negotiating table!”

The vote in the Senate was lopsided: 81 senators voted to end the shutdown while 18 — two Republicans and the rest of the Democrats and an independent who caucuses with them — sided against the measure. In the House, the vote was 266 to 150, with about three-quarters of Democrats opposed.

The measure also shored up the Children’s Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP, which insures nearly nine million children. States had warned that they were on the verge of having to end coverage after Congress allowed funding for the program, which had been created and sustained for two decades with bipartisan support, to expire in September.

The votes came after a weekend of fevered negotiations by a bipartisan group that eventually grew to include about 25 senators, who helped put together a framework in which Democrats would vote to reopen the government in exchange for the promise from Mr. McConnell.

An apparent turning point came when Mr. McConnell took the Senate floor on Monday morning to announce that he would ensure a “level playing field” on immigration — language that some Democrats interpreted as going further than he had before. Mr. McConnell said he would have the Senate take up immigration legislation by mid-February if the issue had not been resolved by then.

“I sat on the floor and listened to him very intently, somewhat holding my breath,” said Senator Angus King, independent of Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats. “I think the majority leader has made a public commitment that it would be very hard for him not to meet.”

But Senator Kamala Harris, Democrat of California, was unconvinced, and voted against the bill. She suggested that she did not trust Mr. McConnell.

“I refuse to put the lives of nearly 700,000 young people in the hands of someone who has repeatedly gone back on his word,” she said. Immigrants’ rights activists were crushed.

“Last week, I was moved to tears of joy when Democrats stood up and fought for progressive values and for Dreamers,” said Frank Sharry, the executive director of America’s Voice, an immigrants’ rights group. “Today, I am moved to tears of disappointment and anger that Democrats blinked.”

Hundreds of thousands of young immigrants have been protected from deportation under an Obama-era initiative, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. Mr. Trump rescinded the program in September and gave Congress six months, until March 5, to come up with a replacement.

But the president has demanded that border security — including money for the “big, beautiful wall” he has promised at the southern border with Mexico — be included in any package. Mr. Trump also wants limits on what critics call “chain migration,” in which immigrants can sponsor their relatives, and an end to the diversity visa lottery, which fosters immigration from countries that are underrepresented.

A bipartisan group of six senators, led by Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, and Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, has proposed the backbone of an immigration deal that backers hope could garner 60 votes, enough to break a filibuster.

But Mr. Trump has rejected that plan. And the measure is almost certainly a nonstarter in the House, where Speaker Paul D. Ryan has promised a vote on a conservative immigration measure championed by the chairmen of the Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees, if it has the support to pass.

“If we are hoping that Paul Ryan is going to have courage and that the House Republicans are going to be fair and decent and that a bill could emerge, we’re smoking something,” Mr. Sharry said.

Monday’s Senate vote exposed a rift between moderate Democrats who are up for re-election this year in states won by Mr. Trump and their more liberal counterparts.

One of those Trump-state Democrats, Senator Bill Nelson of Florida, characterized the vote as a “big win for the Dreamers,” adding that if the Senate passes a measure with more than 60 votes, it would “put a lot of pressure” on the House to act.

“The lesson to me is that a promise here is far less meaningful when there is no involvement by the House, not to mention the White House,” he said, adding that he has “no confidence, zero, that Paul Ryan will bring a measure to the floor, in fact on the contrary.”

Mr. Graham said it was critical that the Senate’s eventual immigration bill have the support of a broad bipartisan majority of perhaps 70 senators.

“A partisan product doesn’t get you to where you want to go,” he said. “If you’re going to make the play of trying to pick off a handful of the other side, it’s going to crash and burn.”

The shutdown crisis began Friday, after talks between Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, and Mr. Trump to keep the government open broke down when the president and his chief of staff demanded more concessions on immigration.

According to one person familiar with that day’s discussion, Mr. Schumer agreed to more military spending and discussed fully funding the president’s request for a border wall in exchange for an agreement from the president to support legalizing the Dreamers.

Late that night, an overwhelming majority of Democrats, joined by a handful of Republicans, voted to block consideration of a spending bill very much like the measure that passed Monday. The only difference is that the initial bill would have funded the government for four weeks, not three.

A round of partisan finger-pointing ensued, with Democrats calling the impasse the “Trump Shutdown” and Republicans branding it the “Schumer Shutdown.”

At the White House on Monday, Mr. Trump’s press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, insisted that Monday’s deal was not “drastically different” than what was discussed on Friday between the president and Mr. Schumer.

Despite what was characterized by both parties as Mr. Trump’s invisibility this weekend, Ms. Sanders insisted that he was responsible for making a deal happen.

“What the president did clearly worked,” she said, adding, “The president stayed firm, Republicans stayed firm, and Democrats, I think, realized that they had to move past that piece of legislation” to discuss immigration going forward.

But Ms. Sanders declined to clarify precisely what the parameters of an immigration deal would look like. That worried Democrats like Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey.

“The problem with all of this is the problem it’s been from the beginning,” Mr. Menendez said. “You got no guarantees from the House. You got no guarantees from the president. So you have two-thirds of the equation that are just not there.”


DAVOS, Switzerland — As the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum gets underway here this week, the conversation among business and policy leaders in the Alps is already dominated by one topic: What will the first-time invitee President Trump say?

Fox in the Globalist Henhouse? Davos Awaits Trump’s Arrival JAN. 22, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/business/dealbook/davos-president-trump.html?ribbon-ad-idx=12&rref=business&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Business%20Day&pgtype=article

Mr. Trump, who is to arrive later this week, is drawing a mix of breathless anticipation, anxiousness and downright agitation among a crowd that has long considered him an outsider.

Davos has always been a playground for elites who believe in globalism, climate change and free trade. The cast of multinational leaders this year ranges from chief executives like Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase to philanthropists like Bill Gates and policymakers like Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor. Over the years, it has attracted artists like Bono and Matt Damon.

It is both speed-dating at high altitude for the cognoscenti and a cerebral affair filled with panel conversations about issues such as gender diversity, harassment, artificial intelligence and the environment. The official theme this year is “Creating a shared future in a fractured world.”

All of which makes Mr. Trump the anti-Davos Man.

“Trump is as loathed by the elites of Western Europe as he is by the elites of Manhattan,”
said Niall Ferguson, a senior fellow of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University and a longtime Davos attendee, although he will not go this year. “This isn’t just personal: His policy positions on trade and immigration are blasphemy in Davos, as are his recent derogatory remarks about Africa.”
Continue reading the main story

Indeed, Mr. Trump ran his populist campaign against the very plutocrats who populate this forum every year. His former chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, acknowledged as much during the election when he said that the American working class was “tired of being dictated to by what we call the party of Davos.” Mr. Dimon, a longtime Davos attendee, once described the event as a place “where billionaires tell millionaires what the middle class feels.”

The big question is, how will Mr. Trump’s “America First” campaign play here? Will he use the stage as an opportunity to deliver a live version of his Twitter feed and publicly eviscerate — and possibly humiliate — the crowd? He has already shown he can be hostile toward traditional alliances by scolding European nations for not paying their fair share toward NATO.

Or will Mr. Trump use the gathering as a chance to bring leaders together?

Will he talk about protectionism or free trade?

Mr. Trump’s presence has been described as a mixed blessing by many of the participants.

“Trump’s attendance is exciting for attendees inasmuch as it shows them Davos is still the place to be,” said Ian Bremmer, president and founder of Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. “The opposite of love is irrelevance, and Trump gets that as much as everyone else attending.”

And while Mr. Trump may alienate much of the intellectual set, many of the chief executives in attendance have become huge beneficiaries of the president’s tax overhaul, which has instantly created bigger profits, higher compensation and a soaring stock market.

“Most attendees like his tax policy, sure,” Mr. Bremmer said.

But Mr. Bremmer said he did not think the president’s tax policy would convert the audience into supporters. “At Davos, they’ll see him primarily through an international lens,” he said. “If he has 5 percent approval among the attendees, I think that’s generous.”

Mr. Trump was never invited to Davos during his career in real estate and entertainment. While he is a businessman and entrepreneur, he never formed part of the circle of the Fortune 500 chief executives who frequent Davos, many of whom considered him something of a carnival barker.

And while the World Economic Forum always invites the president of the United States, it is rare for one to attend. Many of the organizers were shocked that Mr. Trump had accepted the invitation (as were some members of the president’s own staff.) Mr. Trump will be the first American president to travel to Davos since Bill Clinton did in 2000.

“I think it was a very good, perhaps contrarian move,” Martin Sorrell, chief executive of the advertising giant WPP, told me in an email. “Last year, President Xi filled the vacuum left by non-U.S. government attendance, so President Trump has the opportunity to dominate the agenda and the news flow,” he added, referring to the Chinese leader.

Perhaps Mr. Trump will follow in the footsteps of one of his heroes, Ronald Reagan. “When President Reagan addressed the forum in 1982, by satellite video, his presidency was emerging from a bruising period,” Adrian Monck, a member of the World Economic Forum’s managing board, told me. “He had run as an outspoken cold warrior. But his administration was able to reshape America’s standing in the world.”

Mr. Ferguson said that one thing working in Mr. Trump’s favor was the authority of his office. “The W.E.F. reveres power and the president of the United States has that in abundance,” he said.

Mr. Trump has an opportunity to use that power to demonstrate his understanding of how interconnected the global economy is. However, don’t hold your breath.

Late last week, his Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, who will also attend Davos for the first time, sought to play down the idea that somehow they would be rubbing shoulders among the billionaire class.

“If you look at the list, there’s an awful lot of world leaders, there’s an awful lot of finance chairs, there’s an awful lot of business people,” he said. “This is an important economic agenda.”

With a bit of smile, he said, “I didn’t realize that it was the global elite.”
 
Trump's rock star reception at Davos Jan 25, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOOs_YEAblM (2:00 min.)


This is an interesting development ... Are the elites losing their grip on their centuries old push for a One World Order?

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger addresses members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, Jan. 25, 2018, as former Secretary of State George Shultz, center and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage listen. Kissinger warned that a collapse of world order has been gaining momentum for two decades.

Kissinger warns senators of 'systemic failure of world order' January 25, 2018 (Photos)
https://www.stripes.com/news/kissinger-warns-senators-of-systemic-failure-of-world-order-1.508497

Three former high-ranking State Department officials warned a Senate panel on Thursday that the United States is facing potential, catastrophic confrontations as global order erodes.

The United States is now in a national security race against time to prepare for the growing global destabilization, said the former secretaries, who have served under generations of presidents.

“The international situation facing the United States is unprecedented,” Henry Kissinger, the iconic former secretary of state, said in testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee. This is “more than a coincidence of individual crisis across various geographies. Rather, it is a systemic failure of world order.”

Kissinger warned the United States is facing an urgent concern with North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, a more intermediate threat through entrenched and expanding conflicts in the Middle East and a rising challenge to the current state of world powers.

The testimony’s sobering look into the potential for future, violent U.S. conflicts could influence the development of the next National Defense Authorization Act. The most recent $700 billion NDAA policy plan to help grow the military was signed into law last month, but has yet to get the funding necessary to surpass budget caps.

“Now more than ever, the challenges of today’s world require strategic vision,” said Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., who sat in as the committee chairman in lieu of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who is battling brain cancer. “We need to cast aside partisan politics and pass an appropriations bill finding a way to fix the defense spending caps that have (hurt) our military in terms of readiness and modernization.”

Kissinger, 94, who testified alongside former Secretary of State George Shultz, 97, and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, 72, all warned the United States is already behind in developing future weapons, such as artificial intelligence, among other concerns.

For example, Shultz said the new National Defense Strategy, which was unveiled by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis last week, doesn’t go far enough.

“I am pretty impressed with what they laid out,” Shultz said. “But it doesn’t adequately address the fact of the huge change taking place in de-globalization and a new kind of weaponry that’s coming about. Those things need to be factored in.”

Armitage also warned the depleted ranks at the State Department is another liability facing the United States today, hurting diplomacy efforts around the world. This, as the military is being pushed past its capacity.

“No question we are losing our training edge, our qualitative edge, the equipment is being run into the ground,” Armitage said. “The military leadership, the secretary of defense and you all ought to think through this problem and make sure we are deploying people that we really need to deploy.”

The threatening collapse of world order has been gaining momentum for two decades, Kissinger warned. This, a result of a drive towards sovereignty, rejection of territorial acquisition by force, the expansion of trade and the push for human rights, he said.

“Traditional patterns of great power rivalry are returning,” Kissinger said. “Complicating this dynamic is the pace of technological development, whose extraordinary progress threatens to outstrip our strategic and moral imaginations… This creates new potential for truly catastrophic confrontations between nations.”

A calm tone marked Thursday’s hearing. But when Kissinger and Shultz last testified before the committee, it was a raucous hearing in 2015 that drew a dramatic scene of protestors. The two men, at the time, provided a look into the future, Inhofe said.

“The insights and wisdom you offered then were prescient and have borne out in the years since,” he said.
 
An Amtrak train carrying Republican members of Congress and their spouses to a party retreat in West Virginia was involved in a collision, Wednesday, according to members who were on the train.

Train carrying congressional Republicans to GOP retreat hits garbage truck in Virginia (Photos - Video)
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/GOP-Members-of-Congress-Retreat-Train-Collision-471966623.html

Most people are unhurt, according to House members and senators who are communicating from the train. NBC News reported that a person who was standing at the time of the incident, which took place near Charlottesville, Virginia, was taken off the train to be treated.

House Speaker Paul Ryan was not hurt, sources told NBC News. President Donald Trump, who is meeting with his national security team, was made aware of the incident, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said.

Images from the scene showed damage to the Amtrak train and a warped, overturned truck. NBC News reported that the train hit a garbage truck.

An Amtrak representative said the train collided with a truck on the tracks in Crozet, Virginia, at 11:20 a.m. ET, and that there were no injuries to the train’s passengers or crew. The incident is under investigation by local law enforcement, according to the Amtrak statement.

Rep. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, a doctor, said that he and his wife Laina were OK and he was “helping those that are injured.”

Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla., was on the train with his wife when “there was a sudden impact, a loud noise and everyone was jolted,” he said on MSNBC.

“My wife who was in front of me, her cellphone went flying,” he continued. “It was just uncomfortable for a few minutes and as we started realizing that everyone was okay I think people started feeling a little better.”

Curbelo said there were some minor injuries but “most people are OK here.”

Rep. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala., tweeted that he had his wife are OK as well after the collision. “Security and doctors on board are helping secure the scene and treat injuries,” he added.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., was on board the train. He said he was thrown around, but is OK.


Secretary of Defense James Mattis is actively considering banning US military and civilian personnel from bringing their personal cell phones into the Pentagon, the world's largest office building, according to three US defense officials familiar with an ongoing review of the issue.

Exclusive: Mattis seeking to ban cell phones from Pentagon Wed January 31, 2018 (Video)
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/31/politics/mattis-pentagon-cellphone-ban/index.html

The officials told CNN that while the issue is under review and a final decision has not been made, the recent revelations that a fitness tracking app that maps people's exercise habits could pose security risks for US troops has only underscored the need for the review.

The officials added that the review was ordered after Mattis expressed his intent to ban personal cell phones in the Pentagon.

A defense official told CNN that the intelligence about the risk of cell phone vulnerabilities that drove the Pentagon's review is the same intelligence that helped lead to a similar ban of personal cell phones among White House staffers in the West Wing, a ban that went into effect this month.

Pentagon spokesman Col. Rob Manning told reporters Monday that Mattis had been recently briefed on the issue of wearable devices and that the Department of Defense was reviewing policy regarding the use of smartphones and wearable devices by military personnel.

There are approximately 23,000 military and civilian staff that work in the Pentagon. (Article continues.)


Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown is now a federal inmate.

Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown turns herself in to prison
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/local/corrine-brown-to-report-to-prison-by-noon/690892983

She turned herself in at Federal Corrections Institution Coleman’s minimum security prison camp about 15 minutes before Monday’s noon deadline.

Brown was sentenced last month to five years in prison for fraud, filing false tax returns and more. Brown lost her fight to remain out of prison while she appeals.

The former Congresswoman arrived at prison on Monday in a rented black limo bus. The bus paused at the prison complex’s entrance and waited for Bishop Kelvin Cobaris to cross the highway and get on board.

Cobaris had parked across the street from the prison, awaiting Brown’s arrival.

Cobaris, who is the president of the African American Council of Christian Clergy, described himself as Brown’s spiritual advisor.

“She had a humble demeanor. Very emotional, but yet graceful,” said Cobaris. “And as soon as I got on the bus, she greeted me with a smile and a hug, and said, ‘Pray.’”

Cobaris said Brown brought a bag into the prison with her, but did not know what was inside. “The guards, as far as I saw at the door, they were very kind to her. They just asked her what the things were that she had with her, and escorted her in, and said, ‘We’ll discuss more when you come in,’” said Cobaris.

According to Coleman’s minimum security prison camp Admission and Orientation Handbook, Brown would have been issued a green jumpsuit and basic hygiene supplies when she was admitted.

Each inmate at the prison camp is assigned to a job after being medically cleared by Health Services.

“I think the biggest worry and fear is obviously being separated from family members. As you know, she has an elderly mother who’s in her 90s. Obviously, she’s concerned for the welfare of her daughter. But I think, most of all, she’s concerned about the impact that this will have on her reputation and legacy,” said Brown’s trial attorney James Smith.

Brown will continue to collect her Congressional pension while she’s in prison until the appeals process has been exhausted.


WASHINGTON —FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe has told FBI staff he is stepping down effective Monday, sources tell CNN.

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stepping down, sources say
http://wgntv.com/2018/01/29/fbi-deputy-director-andrew-mccabe-stepping-down-sources-say/

McCabe had become a central target of President Donald Trump’s ire toward the FBI over its involvement in the investigation into potential collusion between his campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

McCabe was eligible to retire in March, but with his accumulated leave, he is able to step down earlier. His departure came as a surprise even to some expecting his March retirement.

Various sources described McCabe’s departure as a mutual decision, while others said it was the result of pressure to step down. One source briefed on the matter said McCabe announced his decision to senior executives and portrayed it as his choice. The source disputed the characterization that McCabe was removed.

But a source familiar with the matter said FBI Director Christopher Wray told McCabe he is bringing in his own team, which he would not be a part of, and that it was McCabe’s decision whether to stay at the FBI or leave.

Trump learned about the departure Monday morning, a White House official told CNN. The President did not answer a reporter’s question at the White House about McCabe’s departure.


The Justice Department's internal watchdog has been investigating former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for apparently sitting on emails obtained from Anthony Weiner's laptop, the Washington Post's Devlin Barrett and Karoun Demirjian reported Tuesday (of note, Barrett was recently outed as a potential source of FBI leaks, according to text messages between FBI employees accused of political bias)

Andrew McCabe Under Active DOJ Investigation For Sitting On Weiner Laptop Emails
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-31/andrew-mccabe-under-active-doj-investigation-sitting-weiner-laptop-emails

The DOJ Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, wants to know why McCabe allegedly took little to no action for approximately three weeks on the trove of emails sent by Hillary's top aide, Huma Abedin - Weiner's wife, which were discovered during an unrelated investigation into Weiner "sexting" with an underage girl.

The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October about three weeks after first being alerted to the issue, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

A key question of the internal investigation is whether McCabe or anyone else at the FBI wanted to avoid taking action on the laptop findings until after the Nov. 8 election, these people said. It is unclear whether the inspector general has reached any conclusions on that point. -WaPo

In late September 2016, approximately five weeks before the US election, thousands of Huma Abedin's work-related emails were found on Weiner's laptop. According to WaPo, the New York FBI office alerted FBI headquarters within days - though accounts as to the exact date vary.

Either way, McCabe was made aware of the matter by late September or early October, as the NY field office agents wanted to discuss the issue with DC Clinton email investigators to compare notes. According to people familiar with the matter, officials at FBI headquarters requested the emails' metadata - which include the sender, recipient and timestamp.

While McCabe is said to have been involved in those discussions, accounts vary as to how much then-FBI Director James Comey knew of the situation.

Some people involved at the time said Comey learned of the issue around the same time as McCabe. Others contend Comey did not know about it until weeks later. Senior Justice Department officials, according to several people familiar with the issue, were not notified until mid-October.

But for a period of at least three weeks, according to people involved at the time, nothing much happened a lag that has sparked the inspector generals questions. -WaPo

McCabe announced his departure from the FBI on Monday following a meeting with FBI Director Christopher Wray, in which they reportedly discussed the Inspector General's investigation.

McCabe had previously announced a March retirement. Several media outlets reported that McCabe is using his remaining vacation days to go on "terminal leave" and that his official retirement from the agency won't happen until March, allowing him to collect the full pension.

Also notable is that Wray was reportedly "shocked to his core" Sunday night after viewing a four-page confidential FISA memo said to detail egregious surveillance abuses by McCabe's team. The next day, McCabe was forced to step down.

Hannity sat down once again with journalist Sara Carter this week, whose sources say McCabe may have also instructed FBI agents to alter their "302" forms - the paperwork an agent files after interviewing someone:

Shocked him to his core, and not only that, the Inspector General's report - I have been told tonight by a number of sources, there's indicators right now that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302's - those are their interviews with witnesses. So basically every time an FBI agent interviews a witness, they have to go back and file a report.

If the reports from Sara Carter and the Washington Post's ever-connected Devlin Barrett are true, McCabe not only sat on the Weiner laptop emails related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation - but also asked FBI agents to commit crimes by altering paperwork.

Or, as Sarah Westwood summarizes, this report suggests:
1.McCabe tried to stall probe of Weiner laptop emails til after the election
2.McCabe's colleagues got suspicious about the delay
3.Comey sent 11th-hour letter that reopened the probe in order to correct for McCabe's perceived bias

Further pointing towards evidence of political bias is an October, 2016 Wall St. Journal article which reported that McCabe's wife received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from close Clinton ally, then-Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe for her failed run at VA state legislature.

President Trump allegedly chided McCabe over his wife's loss during a phone call following the May 9th dismissal of ex-FBI Director Comey. According to three people who recounted the alleged incident to NBC News, Trump was so enraged by footage of Comey boarding a government airplane following his dismissal that he brought up McCabe's wife during the conversation:

The president was silent for a moment and then turned on McCabe, suggesting he ask his wife how it feels to be a loser...

McCabe replied, "OK, Sir." Trump then hung up the phone.

An anonymous White House official disputed the account off the record, telling NBC, "this simply never happened. Any suggestion otherwise is pure fiction."

Whether or not Trump said mean things to McCabe (a conveniently timed story from the MSM), the fact remains that he is now out of a job - and purportedly the focus of Inspector General Horowitz for a variety of politically motivated crimes.


Donald Trump 1 – Deep State 0

House Intel Votes To Make “Shocking” FISA Memo Public
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/house-intel-committee-votes-make-shocking-fisa-memo-public

In a highly anticipated decision, on Monday evening the House Intelligence Committee voted to make public the memo alleging what some Republicans say are “shocking” surveillance abuses at the Department of Justice regarding the Trump presidential campaign.

In immediate response to the vote, the Committee’s top democrat Adam Schiff said that “we’ve crossed a deeply regrettable line”, adding that the “committee voted to put the president’s interest above the interest of the country.”

Adam Schiff’s full post-memo release press conference is below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGhQ3RIKqxk (15:34 min.)

The decision weeks of speculation over whether the memo, which was drafted by staff for committee chairman Devin Nunes (R- Calif) would be made public. At the same time, it intensifies the dispute over what Democrats say is an all-out assault by Republicans to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Now the fate of the 4-page FISA memo is in the hands of Donald Trump: as we discussed earlier, the document will not be immediately released as under the House rule Republicans used to override the classification of the four-page memo, President Trump now has five days to review and reject its publication.

But, as per Bloomberg’s reporting earlier, the White House has signaled support for the document’s release and is widely expected to defy the DOJ in allowing the publication to go forward. The DOJ has opposed the release of the document, reportedly infuriating President Trump.

While Nunes has described the memo as “facts,” Democrats have slammed it as a collection of misleading talking points they are unable to correct without exposing the highly classified information underpinning the document.

As Bloomberg disclosed earlier on Monday, releasing the memo without allowing them to review it on those grounds, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote to Nunes, would be “extraordinarily reckless.”

Of course, the reason for the DOJ – and the Democrats’ fury – is well-known: Republicans who have read the memo have hinted heavily that it contains information that could unravel the entire Mueller investigation, long described by the president as a “witch hunt.”

In an amusing twist, now that transparency appears to be the watchword, the Republican controlled House Intel Committee also plans to release the transcript of the business meeting dealing with releasing the FISA memo.

While the precise contents of the memo remain unknown, it’s believed to contain allegations that the FBI did not adequately explain to a clandestine court that some of the information it used in a surveillance warrant application for Trump adviser Carter Page came from opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign, now known as the “Steele dossier.”

As Bloomberg reported earlier, citing three House lawmakers who have read the memo, the memo claims FBI officials didn’t provide a complete set of facts in requests made to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to obtain a warrant or warrants on Carter Page, Trump campaign associate.

Furthermore, the memo claims important details were left out that might have kept a judge from issuing a surveillance warrant, or possibly two, targeting Page. Those include its claims that investigators were relying partly on an unverified dossier put together by an opposition research firm that hired a former British spy, Christopher Steele — work that was funded by Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and Democrats.

The memo also spotlights Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein’s role in approving the warrant application, according to the New York Times. Rosenstein appointed Mueller and has become a recent target on the right — as well as reportedly garnering the frustration of the president.

* * *
According to The Hill, it’s unclear how much input the DOJ will have prior to the publication of the memo. Typically, when sensitive documents are declassified, the agencies with equities in the intelligence weigh in to assess whether its release would damage national security. But the committee initially stonewalled the DOJ from viewing the document because, as one committee member put it last week, “They’re the ones that have the problem.”

On Monday morning, deputy press secretary Raj Shah hinted on CNN that the DOJ would also not have an opportunity to review the document during the White House pre-release review. “The Department of Justice doesn’t have a role in this process,” he told CNN.

FBI Director Christopher Wray was reportedly allowed to view the document in the committee’s secure spaces over the weekend. A committee spokesperson declined to comment on Monday, as did the FBI.

Another unanswered question revolves around the highly-classified intelligence that underpins the memo, which came from documents provided to the committee by the DOJ as part of an agreement brokered by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). The DOJ has said that the release of the memo would be an abrogation of the terms of that agreement, an assertion that spokesmen for both Ryan and Nunes reject.

Lawmakers say the underlying intelligence justifying the memo’s allegations is so sensitive that only eight members of Congress are able to view it. Nunes and ranking member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) are two of the eight figures, but the other members of the Intelligence Committee are not. The top two lawmakers on the Senate Intelligence Committee are also part of the so-called Gang of Eight, but while they have access to the underlying intelligence, Nunes has denied committee requests to see the memo.

“Seeking Committee approval of public release would require [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] committee members to vote on a staff-drafted memorandum that purports to be based on classified source materials that neither you nor most of them have seen,” Boyd told Nunes.

Nunes has brushed aside the notion that the memo wouldn’t be persuasive without the underlying intelligence to substantiate its claims, calling the argument Democratic obstruction of his investigation into DOJ misconduct. The memo is a committee work product and the responsibility for releasing it, or not releasing it, rests with Congress.

The underlying intelligence, however, belongs to the executive branch, and Trump could unilaterally make it public if he wished.

For now, however, the decision whether the FISA memo will be made public – an event which is supposed to help Trump greatly in his ongoing battle against Special Counsel Mueller – is entirely in Trump’s hands, which will be a welcome change for the president.

And incidentally, Trump will be delighted to learn that, in addition to blocking the Democrat memo, House Intel Committee member Adam Schiff admitted that the committee was also probing the DOJ and FBI, i.e., the “deep state” itself.


The numbers are in, and Democrats aren’t going to be happy about this.

Polls Show a Majority of Americans Approved of Trump’s SOTU Speech, Most Tweets Ever
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/trump-sotu-poll-cbs/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_campaign=TPI_Morning_Newsletter_1_31_2018&utm_content=1d09840caddec138a6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI

A majority of Americans approved of President Trump’s very first State of the Union speech. In fact, the numbers are unequivocal: it was a smashing success! Take a look at this CBS poll conducted last night:

From the report: “Three in four Americans who tuned in to President Trump’s State of the Union address tonight approved of the speech he gave. Just a quarter disapproved.”

That’s an incredible disparity. A president who can bring together 75% of Americans on something is truly a president who can lead.

And who wouldn’t have loved Trump’s speech? From highlighting Congressman Steve Scalise, the lawmaker who survived multiple gunshot wounds over the summer, to paying special recognition to a little boy who started an initiative to decorate the graves of veterans, there were many highlights during the big speech.

But one of the biggest high points during the address didn’t happen during Trump’s remarks. It happened online, where the President just shattered another record.

Trump’s SOTU speech was the most tweeted about SOTU speech in American history. Twitter even verified that fact:

How very fitting! A president who used the social media platform to bypass the mainstream media just made history on the very same platform.
 
Today is a sad day for conservatives. Trey Gowdy, the irascible congressman from South Carolina, is retiring. The lawmaker just announced the news via Twitter:

https://twitter.com/TGowdySC/status/958750202206318592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthepoliticalinsider.com%2Ftrey-gowdy-retire-congress%2F

The influential chairman of the House Oversight Committee is sick of politics and won't seek reelection.

Gowdy finally had it with Washington 01/31/2018
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/31/gowdy-wont-seek-reelection-380231

Trey Gowdy is done with politics.

The House Oversight Committee Chairman for years has joked privately about quitting Congress and returning home to South Carolina. On Wednesday, he finally pulled the plug — likely for good.

A rising star that many Republicans once considered a dark-horse for speaker of the House, Gowdy announced Wednesday he would not seek reelection or any political office and would instead return to the justice system. Sources close to him say he wants to return home, practice law and maybe teach and write a book with his friend Sen. Tim Scott.

"Whatever skills I may have are better utilized in a courtroom than in Congress, and I enjoy our justice system more than our political system," the South Carolina Republican said.

And in a sign of Gowdy’s desire to step back from public life, he recently turned down a golden opportunity to become a federal judge.

White House counsel Don McGahn in recent weeks broached Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, about filling a slot on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals — a newly vacated judgeship that Gowdy has eyed before, according to sources close to Gowdy. His fellow Palmetto State Republicans, Scott and Sen. Lindsey Graham, also urged him to accept the post.

But Gowdy, who's long complained about the increasingly toxic nature of politics, turned down the position, the sources said.

“There is more civility in a death penalty case than there is in some congressional hearings,” Gowdy, who has won seven death penalty cases, recently told POLITICO.

Gowdy will become the eighth current chairman to depart Congress, but his decision is an extra blow to Speaker Paul Ryan, who often seeks Gowdy’s counsel on legal matters. Most recently, Gowdy has advised the Wisconsin Republican on how to navigate the increasingly partisan Russia investigation into President Donald Trump — and how to balance the GOP conference’s demand for scalps at the FBI.

But to anyone who knew the 53-year-old former House Benghazi Committee Chairman, the retirement is hardly a surprise. Gowdy rarely participated in House GOP events, rarely attending the weekly GOP conference, for example. He often talked privately about resenting the increasingly partisan atmosphere. And he loved to say that he wished he was home watching cheesy Hallmark movies with his wife.

Gowdy rose to prominence in 2013 for his fierce interrogation of IRS officials accused of targeting tea party groups for extra scrutiny — scoring headlines when he argued that Lois Lerner, the official at the center of the controversy, had “waived her right” when she boldly proclaimed her innocence before the House Oversight panel but then asserted her Fifth Amendment right.

The House ultimately held Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about how conservative nonprofits applying for tax-exempt status were treated under the Obama administration.

Former Speaker John Boehner later appointed Gowdy to lead the House Benghazi Committee, a select panel charged with investigating the deaths of four Americans, including former U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, in Libya.

Gowdy was pummeled from the left and the right for his investigation: Democrats blasted him for overseeing a partisan “witch-hunt” against then-presidential candidate Hilary Clinton and conservatives — including his once-good friend Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) — snarled that he’d let Clinton off the hook.

Trump also knocked Gowdy for refusing to hold Clinton’s feet to the fire, calling him the “Benghazi loser." Gowdy, however, said his investigation wasn’t going to make assumptions he couldn’t prove.

When Trump won the presidential election in 2016, Gowdy expected a call from the White House about the attorney general post. He was disappointed when he never even got an interview, sources close to him said. While the two never had a close relationship — and to this day, Gowdy says he’s never had a conversation with the president — he figured his legal acumen would make him a worthy candidate.

Earlier this year, Republicans voted for Gowdy to lead the House Oversight Committee. Since then, his panel has overseen part of the Russia controversy, though most of his work on the matter has been focused in the House Intelligence Committee, a panel on which he is also a member.

Gowdy has found himself butting heads in recent months with Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and other pro-Trump Republicans who have hinted at corruption at the FBI. He’s expressed concerns about anti-Trump texts by some FBI officials, and he has said on TV that Congress has a duty to oversee the agency. But behind the scenes he’s had to rein in some of his conservative colleagues who want to undercut the entirety of the Justice Department, which he views as essential to American life.

Gowdy's exit is likely to open up a contentious race for the Oversight gavel. Jordan has long eyed the post, but the Freedom Caucus founder has been at odds with leadership for years and would have an uphill battle in winning the post from a committee of Ryan loyalists.

National Republicans said they expect a crowded primary to replace Gowdy in his Republican-leaning seat based in Greenville. Several names have already been floated as potential replacements, including state Rep. Dan Hamilton, state Rep. Garry Smith and Karen Floyd, a businesswoman and former South Carolina GOP party chairwoman.

Minutes after Gowdy’s announcement, Spartanburg County Republican Chairman and talk radio host Josh Kimbrell posted on Facebook that he was “exploring a run” to “keep the 4th District on the national stage in the conservative fight.”
 
Republican memo: What you need to know about alleged FBI & DOJ abuses 2 Feb, 2018 (Copy 4 page text)
https://www.rt.com/usa/417742-memo-main-points-text/

The four-page memo compiled by the GOP Chair of the House Intelligence Committee accuses the FBI and DOJ under the Obama administration of securing a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign based on the notorious ‘Steele dossier.’

Declassified by President Donald Trump and published by the committee Friday over strong objections by Democrats, the DOJ and the FBI, the memo lays out the origins of the warrant to spy on Trump adviser, Carter Page, in the dossier funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign.

The so-called Steele dossier “formed an essential part” of the FISA probable cause order obtained by the FBI from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) on October 21, 2016. The warrant was extended three times, also on the basis of the Steele dossier.

370598711 House Intelligence Committee Report on FISA Abuses by RT America on Scribd

“Then-director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one,” the document says. Then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then-Deputy AG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein all signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of the Department of Justice.

Comey testified in June 2017 that the Steele dossier was “salacious and unverified.” Yet McCabe himself testified in December 2017 that no FISA warrant would have been sought without the dossier, according to the document.

Rosenstein is currently the deputy attorney general, who is in charge of all aspects of the Russia investigation after AG Jeff Sessions recused himself due to potential conflicts of interest. Yates was famously fired by Trump in January 2017, after she defied his executive order of a temporary travel ban. McCabe abruptly stepped down Monday, taking all his leave prior to his official retirement in March.

“Neither the initial application in October 2016 nor any of the renewals disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials,” the memo notes.

Steele’s work was paid for by Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm retained by the Clinton campaign in April 2016 via the Democratic National Committee and the law firm Perkins Coie.

Notably, the FISA applications does not mention at any point that Steele was working for Fusion GPS or that the company and its principal, Glenn Simpson, were on the payroll of the Democrats, the memo says.

Furthermore, the original FISA application “cited extensively” a September 23, 2016 Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff - which was based on information provided by Steele himself. While Steele has admitted in UK court filings that he met with Yahoo and other news outlets, the FISA application “incorrectly assesses” that Steele did not provide Yahoo News with the information, according to the memo.

Before the FBI severed ties with Steele on October 30, due to his public revelations of his relationship with Mother Jones magazine, Steele had maintained contact with Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr. In a September 2016 meeting, the memo notes, Steele told Ohr he was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” Ohr’s wife Nellie worked for Fusion GPS at the time. Though Ohr provided the FBI with all of his wife’s research, the memo says, the Ohrs’ relationship with Fusion GPS and Steele was “inexplicably concealed” from FISC.

While the FISA application relied on Steele’s “past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations,” the memo argues.

The very last point of the memo notes that the FBI counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign was initiated by FBI agent Peter Strzok in July 2016, based on “information regarding… Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos.” Yet “there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos,” the memo notes.

Strzok was eventually assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, but demoted and reassigned to the human resources department after the discovery of his texts with FBI attorney Lisa Page (no relation to Carter), with whom he was having an extramarital relationship. In the texts, “they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated,” the memo says, adding that the Strzok/Page texts also reflect “extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an ‘insurance policy’ against President Trump’s election.”

The memorandum is dated January 18, and its classified version was available to members of the House of Representatives. On January 29, the committee voted along party lines to make the memorandum public. President Trump approved its declassification on Friday.

“I think it's terrible, if you want to know the truth," Trump said about the contents of the memo, after approving its publication. “I think it’s a disgrace."

“A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves, and much worse than that,” Trump added. “Let’s see what happens.”



The long-awaited memo compiled by the US House Intelligence Committee (HIC) that alleges surveillance abuses undertaken by the FBI and Justice Department (DOJ) against campaign officials of US president Donald Trump was finally released to the public Friday afternoon.

Congress Releases Republican Memo Alleging FBI Abuse of Power
https://sputniknews.com/us/201802021061310092-congress-declassied-memo-release/

The full text of the memo can be viewed at the House's website here.

The four-page memo focuses on the FBI's investigation of Carter Page, a banker and strategic consultant who served as an adviser to Trump during his presidential campaign. In October 2016, the FBI received a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to investigate alleged ties between Page and Russian actors from the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (US FISC).

The memo alleges that the FBI misled the FISC to retrieve the warrant in five ways. Firstly, the warrant was based on a memo compiled by Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 agent who conducted opposition research against Trump in 2016. However, the request failed to mention that Steele had conducted this research while on the payroll of Trump's political opponents Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Secondly, the warrant request also relied on an article published on Yahoo News that was used to corroborate Steele's claims — but that very Yahoo article was based on information leaked by Steele himself by his own admission. This was not mentioned in the filing.

Thirdly, Steele allegedly told DOJ Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr in September 2016 that he "was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president." Steele's animus towards Trump was also omitted from the filing.

Fourthly, the contents of the Steele dossier were (and still are) mostly uncorroborated when it was used as the basis for the filing of the FISA warrant. While the FBI admitted this in the filing, banking instead on Steele's proven record as an intelligence agent, they hid Steele's personal and financial baggage that made him a less-than-credible source.

Fifthly, the filing mentions a connection between Page and another Trump adviser, George Papadopolous. However, the FBI has no evidence of that connection, other than both men serving as foreign policy advisers to candidate Trump. Papadopolous pleaded guilty in October 2017 to making false statements to the FBI related to meetings he had with Russian Foreign Ministry officials on the campaign trail.

HIC Chair Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who compiled the memo, said that it demonstrates "serious violations of the public trust" undertaken by the FBI and DOJ. He added that he hoped the document would trigger reforms to the US' judicial system.

The FBI defended themselves from allegations of misconduct. FBI Agents Association President Thomas O'Connor issued a statement of his own where he claimed that FBI agents were dedicated to upholding the law and the American constitution. "The American people should know that they continue to be well-served by the world's preeminent law enforcement agency," O'Connor wrote.

The existence of the memo became public knowledge in mid-January when Nunes and other Republicans called for the memo to be declassified. Conservative media soon joined them, as did many private individuals who called for Congress to #ReleasetheMemo.


Read the controversial Nunes Intel memo released by Republicans (Video of Trump on memo)
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/372022-read-the-controversial-memo-just-released-by-republicans
 
angelburst29 said:
Train carrying congressional Republicans to GOP retreat hits garbage truck in Virginia (Photos - Video)
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/GOP-Members-of-Congress-Retreat-Train-Collision-471966623.html

Images from the scene showed damage to the Amtrak train and a warped, overturned truck. NBC News reported that the train hit a garbage truck.

An Amtrak representative said the train collided with a truck on the tracks in Crozet, Virginia, at 11:20 a.m. ET, and that there were no injuries to the train’s passengers or crew. The incident is under investigation by local law enforcement, according to the Amtrak statement.

There's some speculation on the net as to "how" this accident occurred? Apparently, there is a railroad crossing several hundred feet from where the Amtrak train hit the garbage truck?

I pulled up some photos of the accident and in the first frame, there's a map that shows the location of the accident. In another photo, a white "X" sign is visible, denoting a crossing but none of the news reports that I came across mentions that the truck was at the intersection?

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=train+carrying+congressional+republicans+to+gop+retreat+hits+garbage+truck+in+virginia&id=4655035581E306E4F26E1C467B132782ACBF2DE8&FORM=IQFRBA

A train carrying members of Congress to a Republican retreat in West Virginia slammed into a garbage truck Wednesday, throwing lawmakers from their seats and leaving at least one person dead, officials said.

Train carrying GOP lawmakers to retreat hits truck on tracks, 1 killed
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/31/train-carrying-lawmakers-to-gop-retreat-involved-in-accident.html

Authorities identified the person killed as Christopher Foley, 28, of Louisa County, Va., one of two passengers inside the truck. The other passenger, still unidentified, was airlifted to the University of Virginia Medical Center with critical injuries.

The truck's driver, also still unidentified, was transported to a hospital with serious injuries, according to Madeline Curott, public information officer of the Albemarle County, Va., police department.

Several train passengers and crew members, including at least one lawmaker, were rushed to a local hospital for what were largely described as minor injuries.

"It was a very high-speed collision," U.S. Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., who was on board, told Fox News. "There was no braking that was felt. We hit an immediate impact and went from 70 to zero very quickly."

According to numerous accounts, lawmakers on the scene sprung into action to help the injured, including by carrying one individual across the tracks to an ambulance.

There were mixed reports on whether the train actually derailed, but sources said the front engine ended up with wheels off the tracks. Lawmakers on the train quickly flooded social media with images of the wrecked truck, as well as damage to the crumpled front of the train.

"There is one confirmed fatality and one serious injury. There are no serious injuries among members of Congress or their staff," White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement. "Senior Administration officials are in regular contact with Amtrak and state and local authorities. Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone that has been affected by this incident."

After initially claiming there were no reported injuries to passengers or crew members, Amtrak later said two crew members and two passengers "were transported to a local hospital with minor injuries."

"Local law enforcement is investigating the incident," Amtrak said in a statement.

One of those passengers was apparently U.S. Rep. Jason Lewis, R-Minn., who told Fox News he had a “little bit of a whiplash” and “maybe a tiny bit of a concussion.” An aide to House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., also was taken to the hospital after suffering a head injury, his office said.

Ryan was on the train but is fine, Fox News was told. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was not on the train.

The crash unfolded in Crozet, Va., near Charlottesville. Members were on a special chartered Amtrak train to the Greenbrier resort, where Vice President Pence was set to speak Wednesday night, with a planned appearance from President Donald Trump on Thursday. Trump confirmed that he still will be traveling to the retreat, adding that the crash was “a pretty rough hit, that’s what they all tell me.”

The retreat is where the party traditionally gathers to discuss its agenda and goals for the coming year -- and was starting a day after Trump's State of the Union address.

The retreat is expected to go on as planned. The train -- which had a functional engine on the other end -- was able to run in reverse back to Charlottesville, where members were taking buses to West Virginia.

While injuries on the train were largely described as minor, U.S. Rep. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., a medical doctor, tweeted that he was helping the injured immediately after the crash.

"We are on our way to our annual GOP retreat, the train carrying members and spouses hit something. Laina and I are ok, I am helping those that are injured, I will have Laina keep you updated as I know more," he tweeted.

A Politico reporter, U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., and others posted photos of the wreckage of the truck, where the most serious injuries were reported.

In a phone interview from the train, U.S. Rep. Mark Walker of North Carolina described several helicopters in the air, saying there was also “lots of armed security” working to determine it was an accident and “there was no nefarious behavior.”

“We don't think that's the case,” he told Fox News.

The crash is the latest tragedy to affect congressional Republicans, who were targeted in a shooting last summer at a baseball practice in northern Virginia. The lawmaker most seriously injured in that attack, U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., was not on the train Wednesday.

Comment section:

Callhow
Is it me, or does it seem strange that a train with limited visibility would impact a parked "garbage truck" that was literally on the tracks some distance "before" the street & RR crossing ? I say that because the garbage truck was severed & spewed debris "before" reaching the actual RR crossing! In a Democratically controlled state that recently had "political unrest/riots" at the very town/city that was passed... I find it very curious, that the majority of passengers would be Republican members of Congress (and their families) on an annual retreat ritual (every Jan), which is something the FBI would be well aware of, plus most Washington Democrats......

Bengals27Leader
Supposedly all the roads that crossed the train tracks were closed for security reasons and there was a helicopter escorting the train. There are many other sites out there suggesting that this was an assassination attempt on the GOP for signing documents to release the memo!!


Devin Nunes (R-CA) said that the investigation leading up to the four-page FISA memo released on Friday was only "phase one," and that the House Intelligence Committee is currently in the middle of investigating the State Department over their involvement in surveillance abuses.

Nunes: FISA Memo Just "Phase One," Now Targeting State Department In "Phase Two" Sat, 02/03/2018 (Video)
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-03/nunes-fisa-memo-just-phase-one-now-targeting-state-department-phase-two

"We are in the middle of what I call phase two of our investigation, which involves other departments, specifically the State Department and some of the involvement that they had in this," said Nunes.

"That investigation is ongoing and we continue work towards finding answers and asking the right questions to try to get to the bottom of what exactly the State Department was up to in terms of this Russia investigation."

While it is unclear what role the State Department may have in surveillance abuses, the Washington Examiner's Byron York noted last month that former MI6 spy, Christopher Steele, was "well-connected with the Obama State Department," according to the book Collusion: Secret meetings, dirty money, and how Russia helped Donald Trump win" written by The Guardian correspondent Luke Harding and published last November.

Harding notes that Steele's work during the World Cup soccer corruption investigation earned the trust of both the FBI and the State Department:

The [soccer] episode burnished Steele's reputation inside the U.S. intelligence community and the FBI. Here was a pro, a well-connected Brit, who understood Russian espionage and its subterranean tricks. Steele was regarded as credible. Between 2014 and 2016, Steele authored more than a hundred reports on Russia and Ukraine. These were written for a private client but shared widely within the State Department and sent up to Secretary of State John Kerry and to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who was in charge of the U.S. response to the Ukraine crisis. Many of Steele's secret sources were the same sources who would supply information on Trump. One former State Department envoy during the Obama administration said he read dozens of Steele's reports on Russia. The envoy said that on Russia, Steele was "as good as the CIA or anyone." Steele's professional reputation inside U.S. agencies would prove important the next time he discovered alarming material, and lit the fuse again.

Aside from the infamous 35-page "Trump-Russia" dossier Steele assembled for opposition research firm Fusion GPS (a report which was funded in part by Hillary Clinton and the DNC), Congressional investigators have been looking into whether Steele compiled other reports about Trump - and in particular, whether those other reports made their way to the State Department, according to The Examiner.

...they are looking into whether those reports made their way to the State Department. They're also seeking to learn what individual State Department officials did in relation to Steele, and whether there were any contacts between the State Department and the FBI or Justice Department concerning the anti-Trump material.

It will be interesting to see how the State Department - and in particular Secretary of State Rex Tillerson - responds to "phase two."

Comment section:

Dilluminati

Of that amount how many involved the FISA judge recusing themselves from a case?

No matter what the corporate press, the globalists, no matter what the lies being told to Americans on CNN, MSNBC, and other treason networks, what has happened here is similar to 3rd world nations. When a party ousted in a legitimate election uses the nations intelligence services to try and overturn a legitimate election, the Russians are the least of my worries.

Flynn Judge Who Recused Himself Sat on FISA Court During Illicit Wiretaps of Trump & Team
https://truepundit.com/flynn-judge-who-recused-himself-sat-on-fisa-cour…

There is something deeply worrisome going on where we now have effectively TREASON and acts undermining elections in the United States.

Here are the FACTS!

REP. MATT GAETZ: Here's what we know now as a consequence of this memo: The Democratic National Committee gave money to the Perkins Law Firm, the Perkins Law Firm then paid the company Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS then hired Nellie Ohr, the wife of Bruce Ohr, who is a senior official at the Justice Dept, and they hired Christopher Steele, who went and wrote this fake dossier. Then Bruce Ohr, the spouse of Nellie Ohr, who has a background in anti-narcotics and the anti-drug agenda at the Dept. of Justice, he all of a sudden starts meeting with Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele, and he valets this fake dossier, paid for by the DNC, into the Dept. of Justice.

The Dept. of Justice and the FBI then use the fake dossier as a basis for a FISA warrant to spy on American citizens. And the reason you know that is because of Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, the same Andrew McCabe whose wife got $700,000 from the closest allies of the Clinton family. Andrew McCabe testifies that there never would have been a FISA warrant, but for the dossier.

The dossier is the cause of the FISA warrant, that is from Andrew McCabe, no friend of Donald Trump.

Then the FISA warrant is in process, it is being sought. To validate the fake dossier, the Dept. of Justice and FBI use an article written by Mr. Isikoff of Yahoo News to be the validating information for the dossier. What's the problem with that? Christopher Steele is the very person who planted the article at Yahoo News. So you've got a fake dossier, paid for by the Democratic Party, served into the process by the spouse of someone hired, functionally, by the Democratic Party, and then validated by a news article planted by the very author of the dossier. It is outrageous, but it gets worse from there.

The FBI the learns that Mr. Steele has been leaking information to the media. so despite the fact that the FBI has authorized payments to Mr. Steele, they then don't render payment to Christopher Steele. now, do they go on and alert the court that that has happened? Absolutely not. The FISA warrant has to be reauthorized every 90 days, and it is reauthorized multiple times with the signatures on it of the senior officials of the Dept. of Justice all based on a lie. All based on completely false information that has to be validated by the authors of the originally false information.

That's what is so outrageous about this. Not only the original lies and the original application for the FISA warrant, but the reauthorizations and the proof that this entire narrative is built on a rotten foundation.

So in the coming days and weeks, we're going to be seeking to excersize our oversight authority, and Democrats will continue to do what they've always done, attack Chairman Devin Nunes, attack me, attack those of us who are trying to get information in front of the American people about the basis of these claims.

We're going to keep telling the truth, because this is rotten, and this can never happen again in the U.S.A.
 
angelburst29 said:
Flynn Judge Who Recused Himself Sat on FISA Court During Illicit Wiretaps of Trump & Team
https://truepundit.com/flynn-judge-who-recused-himself-sat-on-fisa-cour…

Whoa! They just exposed the FISA judge
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=116039

Jacob Wohl
✔ @JacobAWohl

Rudolph Contreras was the FISA Judge who issued a warrant to spy on Carter Page because of a Yahoo News article and a Phony Dossier. Guess who appointed Contreras to the FISA Court? Barack Hussein Obama.

https://twitter.com/JacobAWohl/status/959936195672199168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fredstatewatcher.com%2Farticle.asp%3Fid%3D116039

THE BIG UGLY – Why U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras Recusal From Mike Flynn Case is a Big Deal… December 8, 2017
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/08/the-big-ugly-why-u-s-district-court-judge-rudolph-contreras-recusal-from-mike-flynn-case-is-a-big-deal/comment-page-1/

Last night news broke that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras “has been recused” from the case overseeing the prosecution of General Mike Flynn. Details are vague. According to Reuters, both the judge and the Flynn legal team have yet to comment.

Additionally, there is no concrete answer as to whether the recusal was done by the judge himself or was forced upon him. While the reasoning is the key, the difference between the two options adds another layer of consequence within the rest of this outline. Reuters News Service puts it this way:

(Reuters) – The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge presiding over the criminal case for President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has been recused from handling the case, a court spokeswoman said on Thursday.

According to a court filing, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over a Dec. 1 hearing where Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his contacts with Russia, will no longer handle the case.

Court spokeswoman Lisa Klem did not say why Contreras was recused, and added that the case was randomly reassigned. Reuters could not immediately learn the reason for the recusal, or reach Contreras. An attorney for Flynn declined to comment. (Link)

Obviously, the customary reason for recusal is when there is a conflict of interest between the case as assigned and the judge overseeing it. However, as you can clearly see, in this case it’s rather odd that if a conflict existed the judge would have even begun to oversee the case at the prior hearing. Why wait until six days after the first hearing?

As to the reasoning for the recusal, and stressed against the backdrop of the new information surrounding the investigative practices of the DOJ and FBI, this recusal is potentially both a game-changer and a massive dose of sunlight.

U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras is one of a very few FISA Court Judges.


Republicans and Democrats alike should be scared about one overriding fact in the Flynn case. The FBI said Ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn never lied, yet he had to plead guilty to lying in order to avoid a protracted fight he could no longer afford.

This Should Scare Everyone, Flynn Never Lied February 3, 2018
http://www.independentsentinel.com/scare-everyone-flynn-never-lied/

Ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s son, also Michael, wants justice for his father. He reacted to the release of the FISA abuse memo with hope but he might be underestimating the level and extent of corruption in both the media and the administration of our intelligence agencies. He went on fire on Twitter with several tweets. Here are two.

THE FBI SAID FLYNN NEVER LIED

He has every reason to believe his father was wronged.

Recently, Robert Mueller asked for a delay in Lt. Gen. Flynn’s sentencing because both defense and prosecution were not ready. Mueller allegedly also wants to talk with Flynn again.

Flynn pled guilty to one charge of lying to the FBI and is “cooperating” with the agency investigators in their Russia probe.

In the spring of 2017, FBI agents who interviewed the retired general said he didn’t lie. They said he was confused and couldn’t remember the details. Then Mueller came in with his team of witch hunters and they decided Flynn did lie after all.

Ret. Lt. Gen. Flynn did plead guilty because the case caused tremendous strain on him and his family. It also bankrupted him and he had to sell his home, his last asset.

Listen to Catherine Herridge summarize the Flynn plea deal last December. Mueller turned a case of Flynn not lying into a crime of lying to the FBI.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBXk-Ybe09U (4:15 min.)
 
Back
Top Bottom