Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies


Oh man, this one will really drive some lefties up the wall...
That whole interview is dynamite. I know we can't fully rely on subjective testimony from 1999, but unlike Trump's accusers, Sinclair is cogent and his 20+ years old insights into Obama's character are consistent with what subsequently transpired. Sinclair knew when Obama ran for president in 2007, for example, that he would be a highly divisive president, in complete contradiction to the disinformation blizzard Axelrod and the Podestas love-bombed the whole world with.

 
Yes, it is quite problematic. Here in Argentina, in spite of her sympathizers (who do not resist the slightest psychological analysis and prove to have a sanity as thin as a spider's thread, and I say this with some knowledge of cause because I got to know in person one of her candidates* in their party, and I know what kind of person she is -a textbook narcissist-) we know that the guy has a salad in his head. What I see with concern is the reading that will be made by those who watch Carlson's show, which is the American public proud of their Gadsden flag, but who unfortunately are ignorant of how politics has developed in South America in the last 150 years. If it says Liberty this, or Liberty that, they will go and consume it without reading the label, that - and it is ironic - they are buying snake oil.
Yeah that's my concern as well, essentially that this interview will blast Milei into an inevitable victory, and that spells awful trouble for Argentina, IMO.

Which for all of Tucker's greatness, this one is an ideological interview, I don't think he realizes how far from his point of view Milei really is. How far away from say Orban Milei really is.

But we shall wait and see, maybe Milei makes a fool out of himself.
 
And here is the interview with the 'libertarian'.

He's so well behaved... a far cry from the guy that screams insults at people. But he says a lot of reasonable things, a lot. But he also has some really nuts ideas about how to run the country that truly concerns me for Argentina.

Despite his reasonable answers, there's something about his speech pattern that lacks depth and it almost sounds like he doesn't really comprehend what he's saying, more like he's rehearsing. I will allow nervousness, but not sure about this guy.
 
He's so well behaved... a far cry from the guy that screams insults at people. But he says a lot of reasonable things, a lot. But he also has some really nuts ideas about how to run the country that truly concerns me for Argentina.

Despite his reasonable answers, there's something about his speech pattern that lacks depth and it almost sounds like he doesn't really comprehend what he's saying, more like he's rehearsing. I will allow nervousness, but not sure about this guy.

It is not and will not be the first time that someone says reasonable things to capture an audience. It is textbook for a politician in these contexts to use a real discontent to capitalize on it.

And much of what he says, lies by omission of data.

For example, here we know that indeed climate change is not an exclusive product of man but to generalize that the climate change lobby is something of socialist origin as he puts it, is to completely ignore that behind it there is not only ideology, there are the interests of technocrats and multinationals that will adopt one ideology or another for the sake of their coveted profit. And here is what is not perceived: ideology or ideologies are not the cause, they are the tool.

In another section when he talks about buildings, the aesthetics of the square and the ugly that he attributes to socialism, is to ignore the history of art. In this case he ignores that much of that aesthetic comes from the Bauhaus school of Weimar Germany. That school, although it was not alien to the ideologies of the time, tried to remain neutral. The question here is that this aesthetic is the one that would define after World War II, what we know as industrial design. Milei in his ignorance does not realize that:


At the time of its founding, the objectives of the school, characterized by Gropius in a manifesto, were: "The recovery of craft methods in construction activity, to raise the power of craftsmanship to the same level as the Fine Arts and try to market the products that, integrated into industrial production, would become consumer objects affordable to the general public" since one of its goals was to become independent and start selling the products made at the School, to stop depending on the State that until then was the one who subsidized them.

It seems to me that a design school that wants to be independent from the state is a rather libertarian concept...

Finally, to say that socialism has been gradually embraced for 100 years is again to ignore Argentina's own history and economy. It is well known that before Perón's first government (Revolution of 1943), he was characterized by being profoundly anti-communist:


I could add more, but I think it is clear what I mean. Milei may say two or three truths but his ignorance of history and geopolitics (to say that Putin is a communist just because he associates him with China, is an ignorance not of past history of decades, but of recent history) puts him at the level of what he criticizes. If we add to that his extravagance with his pets, tantric sex etc etc... more woke in that sense I don't know what there is...
 
And here is the interview with the 'libertarian'.

Milei_Putin.png

:thdown:

His name-dropping of Friedman, Hayek, and Bentham are intended to impress his intellectual credentials upon anglophones, but actually his most insightful contribution to 'the culture wars' is his moral condemnation of 'leftist values'. But even there one has to tread carefully because what he's really describing are ponerological features common to 'snakes in suits' found in all political movements, and which so happen to be largely concentrated in 'the left' today.
 
La Derecha Diario's Media Director BasilNatalia, exclusively interviews the most famous journalist in the United States, Tucker Carlson, days after his interview with Javier Milei.


I ask after watching this video, how many times does one have to hear how educated and intelligent we Argentines are, and how rich we are in natural resources? I would think that one mention is enough, right?

I am just saying, Europe is exhausted, Africa no longer wants colonialism and Russia is no longer so generous with its resources. But if you want to label me paranoid I won't be offended. It's just that as an Argentinean I'm tired of cheap flattery and being asked what's in my pocket...

>Watch this video<
 
His name-dropping of Friedman, Hayek, and Bentham are intended to impress his intellectual credentials upon anglophones, but actually his most insightful contribution to 'the culture wars' is his moral condemnation of 'leftist values'. But even there one has to tread carefully because what he's really describing are ponerological features common to 'snakes in suits' found in all political movements, and which so happen to be largely concentrated in 'the left' today.
Yep,

A lot of his stance is Washington's dogma justified with hate to the left. so, I hate Putin because Washington hates Putin, and I will justify it with saying that he's a socialist. That's kind of it really.
 
View attachment 81681

:thdown:

His name-dropping of Friedman, Hayek, and Bentham are intended to impress his intellectual credentials upon anglophones, but actually his most insightful contribution to 'the culture wars' is his moral condemnation of 'leftist values'. But even there one has to tread carefully because what he's really describing are ponerological features common to 'snakes in suits' found in all political movements, and which so happen to be largely concentrated in 'the left' today.

La Derecha Diario's Media Director BasilNatalia, exclusively interviews the most famous journalist in the United States, Tucker Carlson, days after his interview with Javier Milei.


I ask after watching this video, how many times does one have to hear how educated and intelligent we Argentines are, and how rich we are in natural resources? I would think that one mention is enough, right?

I am just saying, Europe is exhausted, Africa no longer wants colonialism and Russia is no longer so generous with its resources. But if you want to label me paranoid I won't be offended. It's just that as an Argentinean I'm tired of cheap flattery and being asked what's in my pocket...

>Watch this video<

Yep,

A lot of his stance is Washington's dogma justified with hate to the left. so, I hate Putin because Washington hates Putin, and I will justify it with saying that he's a socialist. That's kind of it really.

If the translation was correct, I noted a possible freudian slip:

He said something like „politicians are lowlives even more so than ordinary people.“

So does he consider ordinary people lowlives?
 
So does he consider ordinary people lowlives?
I believe it too and what exists are individuals who are exceptions to that.

Secrets are jealously kept in people, but going with prostitutes, taking drugs, getting drunk very often, cheating on your partner with other women or men, giving in to materialism with terrible consequences for those who depend on you..., and I could go on and on.

What we generally see from people is a facade, a representation, an performance that hides what is really happening.

And I'm glad that in your living environment you can't see this.
 
So does he consider ordinary people lowlives?
I would say so, at least those who disagree with him. There's a whole set of videos where he simply goes live on TV screaming and shouting at people who question him. So, yes.. he has not made a secret about it, the thing is that some people think that he hates some of society... but in fact, he seems to hate all of society.
 
Back
Top Bottom