UFO In Jerusalem Over Mt Temple: Look For Flash ( Excellent Footage! )

Question I have about this now is that flash. If you stop the video right at the flash(es) (you prolly need to download it to slow it down to the right point)l, you see that the entire old city area is bathed, for a split second, in an intense light. So my question is, wouldn't a lot of people in the vicinity of the old city have seen this? Wouldn't they have reported it? Wouldn't it be in the local papers? Was it in the local papers? Thinking about it, if I lived in the middle of a city, with lights on all night, and I saw a very fast and momentary flash of light, I might not think much of it, at least, I might not call immediately call the police or the papers.

The guy in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5s78wr0UF0&feature=related

claims to debunk the second closer video. He claims it's a picture and that it was filmed from a LCD screen. I'm inclined to disagree with him.
 
Perceval said:
Question I have about this now is that flash.
That's my question as well.

P said:
Thinking about it, if I lived in the middle of a city, with lights on all night, and I saw a very fast and momentary flash of light, I might not think much of it, at least, I might not call immediately call the police or the papers.

I think that's the case - if anyone did notice it, lightening would likely come to mind first, even if there were no clouds - and then - even if they thought, 'wow, that was weird', they'll likely just sweep it under the rug as 'one of those things'. Most people in a lighted city might not even notice it at all, especially if they're inside watching TV or whatever - and those outside could write it off to lightening or 'weirdness' and keep on moving along, assuming they registered it at all.
 
i've never seen such a controversy about a youtube video, there are a lot who wish to "dubunk" it, as if this particular event triggered some emotional reaction about it. I mean, there are hundreds of ufos in facebook, whether hoaxes or real. this one is special.
 
P said:
Thinking about it, if I lived in the middle of a city, with lights on all night, and I saw a very fast and momentary flash of light, I might not think much of it, at least, I might not call immediately call the police or the papers.

I think that with all the lights around the dome it would not be that visible in this area anyway.
I doubt that enough people look up to the sky that much these days.

The guy in the debunking video makes a very nice advertising for ATS...I am inclined to distrust it just on that.

Israeli news (?) covered the event on TV :

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itp6HycvtXI
 
The flash could be rationalized as lightning, someone nearby taking a picture, a light bulb failing (on a street light), a flashing TV in your own house, a police siren or car headlights, etc. You'd pretty much have to be outside and see the UFO to care, or maybe if the flash was more intense and lasted longer or something.
 
Just can't shake that feeling of being manipulated.

The timing of the various events in these videos do not seem to all sync up. The tourist video missing the flash. The orb in the 'Fourth' video not hanging about over the temple mount for long enough.

I think it might be a good time to review what we already know about confusion tactics.

Some clips from the transcripts where "Confusion" is mentioned. . .

From session 950513

Q: (T) Is he trying to influence things?
A: Forces trying to influence things are working through him.
Q: (T) He is not working for the CIA, or the NSA, or the FBI, or
military intelligence, or anything like that?
A: No.
Q: (L) You told us before that he worked for the NSA... (T) The
CIA...
A: CIA stands for Confusion Is Apparent!
Q: (T) He is Confusion Is Apparent agent?
A: Might as well be.

From session 950111

Q: (B) Are the E.T.s putting thoughts in Benjamin Creme's head?
A: Yes.
Q: (B) What is their purpose in this?
A: To cause confusion, diversion, and deception so that reality
channels may be cloaked. Self explanatory.

Q: (B) Does this mean so that what we think is real really isn't?
A: Close.
Q: (B) This must mean that the Aliens want to give us one person to
focus on which is so spectacular, so that we cannot see the truth.
A: Remember warnings about false prophets in the "desert."
Q: (B) Does this mean that Benjamin Creme is an STS person?
A: Yes, indirectly.
Q: (B) Is he the antichrist?
A: No. The "antichrist" is not an individual, but consortium.


From session 941116

Q: (L) The healings that take place...
A: Because of the concentration of positive energy.
Q: (L) What or who has been causing the apparitions of the Virgin
Mary
at Conyers, Georgia?
A: Deceptive field.
Q: (L) What energy is behind this?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) Why?
A: Confusion campaign part of bigger picture and plan.
Q: (L) What is the bigger picture and plan?
A: Conquest.
Q: (L) How will that aid their conquest?
A: By dispersing knowledge.
Q: (L) Dispersing as in breaking apart or scattering?
A: Spreading thin. Confusion does this. You are being bombarded
with confusion in this era.
I high-lighted bit about the "Virgin Mary", because this whole Temple Mount thing might be meant to tweak people's previous programming wrt religion.


From session 030202 http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=21617.msg226778#msg226778

Q: (L) Piece of cake to produce a bodyguard, I guess. (A) He is saying exactly what the Israelis want him to say. He is not revealing any particular data that counts. It is just general things. Anybody could say such things and be called a "bodyguard." (L) Exactly. Okay, you say that an EM pulse brought down the shuttle. (A) Where did the EM pulse come from?

A: From space based satellite.

Q: (A) Does NASA know about the cause?

A: There are some who suspect.

Q: (L) Which explains why they are so anxious to convince everyone that it was NOT sabotage. Like Wellstone's death, there was "no question" about it being a terrorist attack. The likelihood is that the Bush Junta was behind Wellstone's death. In both cases they "know" the cause and want to divert the attention away from it. But, in the case of the shuttle, they aren't "dirty," but they most definitely do NOT want anyone to realize that they also are not "in charge." It makes me think of the remark the C's made a few years ago about the reason for the Military Industrial Complex build-up and manipulations. C's said that the REAL enemy is "out there" and that war was just a "cover" to prevent the masses from realizing what they were really doing. Maybe Bush and the gang are really convinced, in their own minds, that they are acting to "protect" humanity from this threat. Meanwhile, they are simply being driven to fulfill the agenda of the Consortium. And it is so interesting that the shuttle broke up over Palestine, Texas... as though it was saying to Bush: this is what is going to happen to you: Palestine is going to be your destruction. But, of course, Bush would be incapable of perceiving it in that context. Is it so that a message was intended in this event?

A: As always, confusion is the mask.


Q: (L) In other words, everyone's reaction to the event will depend on their own context. There is the view that it was a "message to Bush." Bush and gang will, of course, see it only as a stimulus to faster and more "decisive" military action. So, it will really work on them the way it is wanted. (A) And of course, we wonder how they will make use of this event.

A: The primary effect among the masses will be shock, thus making them less resistant to Bush's policies. Still other groups will see the clear threat to Bush and Co. from their activities. Bush and Co. will, of course, seek to capitalize on the event even while remaining in the dark as to its meaning. But there most certainly is awareness among them that there is a "Maverick" element at loose. Bush has even "felt" a bit of primal fear in respect of this event.

Whether these are student pranks, psy-ops, the Real Thing or a combination of all three, there is clearly a fair amount of energy being channeled into this performance, which suggests by that fact alone that something is up. This has been suggested before by others commenting here. I guess the trick is to keep perspective and not allow this whole show to drain too much awareness and energy so that we miss big pictures and other items trying to slip past.
 
Woodsman said:
Just can't shake that feeling of being manipulated.

The timing of the various events in these videos do not seem to all sync up. The tourist one missing the flash. The 'Fourth' video not hanging about over the temple mount for long enough.

I think it might be a good time to review what we already know about confusion tactics.

Some clips from the transcripts where "Confusion" is mentioned. . .

From session 950513

Q: (T) Is he trying to influence things?
A: Forces trying to influence things are working through him.
Q: (T) He is not working for the CIA, or the NSA, or the FBI, or
military intelligence, or anything like that?
A: No.
Q: (L) You told us before that he worked for the NSA... (T) The
CIA...
A: CIA stands for Confusion Is Apparent!
Q: (T) He is Confusion Is Apparent agent?
A: Might as well be.

From session 950111

Q: (B) Are the E.T.s putting thoughts in Benjamin Creme's head?
A: Yes.
Q: (B) What is their purpose in this?
A: To cause confusion, diversion, and deception so that reality
channels may be cloaked. Self explanatory.

Q: (B) Does this mean so that what we think is real really isn't?
A: Close.
Q: (B) This must mean that the Aliens want to give us one person to
focus on which is so spectacular, so that we cannot see the truth.
A: Remember warnings about false prophets in the "desert."
Q: (B) Does this mean that Benjamin Creme is an STS person?
A: Yes, indirectly.
Q: (B) Is he the antichrist?
A: No. The "antichrist" is not an individual, but consortium.


From session 941116

Q: (L) The healings that take place...
A: Because of the concentration of positive energy.
Q: (L) What or who has been causing the apparitions of the Virgin
Mary
at Conyers, Georgia?
A: Deceptive field.
Q: (L) What energy is behind this?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) Why?
A: Confusion campaign part of bigger picture and plan.
Q: (L) What is the bigger picture and plan?
A: Conquest.
Q: (L) How will that aid their conquest?
A: By dispersing knowledge.
Q: (L) Dispersing as in breaking apart or scattering?
A: Spreading thin. Confusion does this. You are being bombarded
with confusion in this era.
I high-lighted bit about the "Virgin Mary", because this whole Temple Mount thing might be meant to tweak people's previous programming wrt religion.


From session 030202 http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=21617.msg226778#msg226778

Q: (L) Piece of cake to produce a bodyguard, I guess. (A) He is saying exactly what the Israelis want him to say. He is not revealing any particular data that counts. It is just general things. Anybody could say such things and be called a "bodyguard." (L) Exactly. Okay, you say that an EM pulse brought down the shuttle. (A) Where did the EM pulse come from?

A: From space based satellite.

Q: (A) Does NASA know about the cause?

A: There are some who suspect.

Q: (L) Which explains why they are so anxious to convince everyone that it was NOT sabotage. Like Wellstone's death, there was "no question" about it being a terrorist attack. The likelihood is that the Bush Junta was behind Wellstone's death. In both cases they "know" the cause and want to divert the attention away from it. But, in the case of the shuttle, they aren't "dirty," but they most definitely do NOT want anyone to realize that they also are not "in charge." It makes me think of the remark the C's made a few years ago about the reason for the Military Industrial Complex build-up and manipulations. C's said that the REAL enemy is "out there" and that war was just a "cover" to prevent the masses from realizing what they were really doing. Maybe Bush and the gang are really convinced, in their own minds, that they are acting to "protect" humanity from this threat. Meanwhile, they are simply being driven to fulfill the agenda of the Consortium. And it is so interesting that the shuttle broke up over Palestine, Texas... as though it was saying to Bush: this is what is going to happen to you: Palestine is going to be your destruction. But, of course, Bush would be incapable of perceiving it in that context. Is it so that a message was intended in this event?

A: As always, confusion is the mask.


Q: (L) In other words, everyone's reaction to the event will depend on their own context. There is the view that it was a "message to Bush." Bush and gang will, of course, see it only as a stimulus to faster and more "decisive" military action. So, it will really work on them the way it is wanted. (A) And of course, we wonder how they will make use of this event.

A: The primary effect among the masses will be shock, thus making them less resistant to Bush's policies. Still other groups will see the clear threat to Bush and Co. from their activities. Bush and Co. will, of course, seek to capitalize on the event even while remaining in the dark as to its meaning. But there most certainly is awareness among them that there is a "Maverick" element at loose. Bush has even "felt" a bit of primal fear in respect of this event.

Whether these are student pranks, psy-ops, the Real Thing or a combination of all three, there is clearly a fair amount of energy being channeled into this performance, which suggests by that fact alone that something is up. This has been suggested before by others commenting here. I guess the trick is to keep perspective and not allow this whole show to drain too much awareness and energy so that we miss big pictures and other items trying to slip past.

It smells fishi for me, too.
 
anart said:
Perceval said:
Question I have about this now is that flash.
That's my question as well.

Why the flash? What is the purpose of such a powerful strobe light. Last time I saw such a light was on June 24th 2010. http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=18447.msg173726#msg173726. The strobe light was of the same strength, impossible to miss if someone was looking in that direction but surprisingly even if the craft flew directly over a park where hundreds were celebrating, I didn't hear anyone in town saying that they saw something that night. The C's, if I remember correctly, said that strobe light are sometime use for mind programming and I remember reading that it effect travel to a certain distance, a few km. Strobe light are use to make you not see, to hide things. Maybe, just maybe the video man/woman were outside of the perimeter or, were not affected by it as most were.

I know, this sound like the men in Black using their small device to erase memory from undesired witnesses in the Hollywood movie of the same name but, when you think that they are ten of thousands of years in advance on us, this is maybe just a petty gadget indeed for them.
 
Tigersoap said:
Israeli news (?) covered the event on TV :

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itp6HycvtXI

The video, as you can see, starts immediately with the third (taken by tourists) video. Don't know if they ever showed the first or the second one, but the guy who talks in the background mentions how every first video that is uploaded on Youtube is always a suspect to be a hoax. The whole tone is dismissive and sarcastic. Then they are waiting for the light to do something, and meanwhile are talking about other cases of similar light in the 70s and another picture of UFO taken near military aircraft, and some others in 90s.

Then they are asking for the opinion of an expert who says that to everything there is a logical explanation. Sometimes we are talking about a very rare meteorological phenomena, but it is definitely not a UFO. Then the expert says that there are two possibilities, or these tourists completely fabricated and staged the event, or it is a natural phenomena like lightning or some other light, and these people made an honest mistake.

I find it very interesting that they didn't bring up the first or second videos, and that makes the third video as highly suspect. Or they took the one that was the hardest to refute.

Edit: oops, meant to say, the easiest to refute.
 
Perceval said:
Question I have about this now is that flash. If you stop the video right at the flash(es) (you prolly need to download it to slow it down to the right point)l, you see that the entire old city area is bathed, for a split second, in an intense light. So my question is, wouldn't a lot of people in the vicinity of the old city have seen this? Wouldn't they have reported it? Wouldn't it be in the local papers? Was it in the local papers? Thinking about it, if I lived in the middle of a city, with lights on all night, and I saw a very fast and momentary flash of light, I might not think much of it, at least, I might not call immediately call the police or the papers.

If this is a hyperdimensional phenomenon, maybe they can make the flash disappear from below? Or make it shorter in time? Anyway, I have my doubts.


Perceval said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5s78wr0UF0&feature=related

claims to debunk the second closer video. He claims it's a picture and that it was filmed from a LCD screen. I'm inclined to disagree with him.

It was my first thought that it was filmed off an LCD screen and that the image was static.

I've attached images of the flash to this post. It's strange that also the street lights are increasing in brightness, which suggests to me that it is image manipulation.
 

Attachments

  • Selection_032.jpg
    Selection_032.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 8
  • Selection_023.png
    Selection_023.png
    84.7 KB · Views: 6
  • Selection_033.jpg
    Selection_033.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 7
The pulsating flash seen is very very like the flashes I have seen on a number of occasions .This is when i see a flash in the night sky and a few seconds after i see a lit object moving high up in the sky.

At present i have no idea if what we are seeing is fake or not.Its difficult to tell for me as im not after proof of the existence of these types of things. Ive seen enough strangeness to know something is happening .

Woodsman your thoughts regarding the not zooming in with the camera to get a closer look , which often happens with most videos of this kind , has got me on the side of the see saw lfalling into the fake zone.

I just dont know.
 
TV News about this "UFO sighting" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYSZgLJDZvM
 
They showed the footage on UK evening news today. _http://www.channel4.com/news/is-jerusalem-light-a-ufo-a-hoax-or-god
 
i was very skeptical of the authenticity of these videos until i saw the 4th one shot by the young people driving in the car.

i hope that this is a true ET visitation and not a government orchestrated event.

it is going to take an ET standing in front of me to be convinced that we are not alone in this biosphere.

i want to believe.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom