Keit said:
I realize that my current vet education is maybe going to provide me with a proper foundation of the basis medical knowledge, but clearly there will be also many things that I'll need to unlearn if I were to take a natural and much more beneficial approach to treating animals. Especially when the impression a student often gets here, that surgery skills are more highly regarded than being a good therapist or good at preventive medicine. So, even if I understand that one should be well versed at accepted fundamentals first before trying to learn something different, I would greatly appreciate if you, HE, would help me avoid having some basic but crucial misconceptions regarding certain issues. Specifically the issue of vaccination.
I think you are at the great advantage for being exposed to great deal of knowledge and off stream sources at such early stage of your professional education. Its not easy to shake your foundations after they have been cemented by mainstream science for great number of years. I think employing " thinking with a hammer" from the beginning of your education will definitely make you a better vet,
I do believe that surgery is only straight forward thing in the medicine while the therapy in veterinary medicine is most of the time "nothing but shooting in the dark", I am saying this because the usual therapeutic protocol in 90% of the cases for every mainstream is antibiotics and antinflamatories. You probably noticed this already. So it is indeed up to you to make the difference and try to get the best both from mainstream and alternative approach.
Keit said:
Now, in the above you write that the only vaccination a pet may ever need is for Rabies. I had an opportunity to help in one of the academy clinics, and of course there were all kind of patients with all kind of problems, but I've noticed that when it came to cats, many of them were diagnosed with Feline Panleukopenia. They were never vaccinated for anything (the law here says that it isn't necessary to vaccinate even for rabies if the pet lives only indoors) and when cat owners bring them to the clinic they are often already in a poor state, and even giving them a serum doesn't help. The same is with Feline Calicivirus, while in this case treatment with serum usually does help.
Well I certainly wouldn't want to throw out baby with the bath water. I do think that certain vaccines work, for example we haven't had outbreak of Canine Distemper in this sea locked country for at least 15 years which coincides with introduction of import vaccination rules and increased vaccination of dogs by their owners.
Its the annual re vaccination that is the problem.
When it comes to cats I am almost determined to never again re-vaccinate, after the initial immunization has been administered ( at least 2 vaccines in first year) unless the owner insists as I had few cases of cats succumbing to "mysterious illness" only few days after vaccine, where blood tests offered no clue whatsoever , with unspecific neurological symptoms ( leg weakness, inbalance, staring) , listlessness lack of appetite and the only thing these cats had in common was the annual vaccination.
Keit said:
For dogs it's Canine Parvovirus, but most of the serious cases were of Piroplasmosis. So the owners are advised to vaccinate their pets when they reach 3 months with a complex vaccine, and then advised to revaccinate every year. Now, from reading the first article in this thread, I understand that there is no need to revaccinate every year but once in 7 years. But what I want to clarify is if those vaccinations are indeed needed, considering the fact that there are probably animals that wouldn't contract the virus if they were vaccinated, and also because administering a serum afterwards helped to deal with it.
I would be very careful with using only Parvo vaccine. In last couple of years it has become practice of many vets to vaccinate puppies with Parvo only vaccine as early as 3 weeks of age. While this doesn't make any sense as the puppies at that age are protected by maternal antibodies it can be damaging as I heard of many reports of Parvo being induced by the vaccine. So I consider this very bad practice.
When it comes to Piroplasmosis or Babesiosis - this disease doesn't exist where I live at the moment, it use to be big problem in country I lived in before. Not really sure. It is a protozoa and I wonder how efficient the vaccine is. We have the similar situation with Leishmaniasis here and recently they launched new vaccine - which is only 70 % efficient. The producer of the vaccine admitted this initially although now they are trying to stretch it to 90%. While this creates false sense of security in the owner who then neglects repelling the vectors there are also many cases of severe reactions to this vaccine, in only one year from its launch I have seen 3 very bad cases of local reactions, 1 severe atopic dermatitits that occurred immediately after the vaccine and 2 cases of "mysterious" illness. Therefore I strongly advise against it.
This is very difficult because this vaccine is very expensive and significant money generator for the industry, fortunately I found out that there a some of my colleagues locally who share the same view - so there is hope.
Keit said:
What else, some time ago I heard a Natural Veterinary Medicine podcast where a lady vet talked against any kind of vaccination, saying that vaccination interferes with a natural immunization and selection process. Meaning, that most of the pets if left for the own devices would be able to develop a natural immunity against most of the viruses, and those who don't and get infected are simply weaker, and that's the unfortunate result of the natural selection. Well, I understand the concept, but on the other hand, an owner may have a hard time swallowing the idea that his or her pet just lost the evolution Russian roulette. But perhaps I misunderstood it.
Well it certainly makes sense. I think keeping the immune system up to scratch by proper nutrition and perhaps using homeopathic nosodes might be the way to go.
Keit said:
So what would you advice in such cases? Would you still advice to avoid any vaccinations (except maybe for Rabies)? And maybe there are some other treatments, preventive measures and such? Thanks a lot in advance!
Well each case has its own merits, epidemiological situation , individual animal etc. This is where you will have to utilize all the knowledge you have both main stream and off stream and devise your own protocols and policy. Its not easy but its still better then vaccinating indiscriminately and following the main stream protocols like a bible.
I hope this helps at least a little bit :)