Vaccine information

FOTCM Vaccine information 2020-08-14

No permission to download
Gandalf submitted a new resource:

Vaccine information - Vaccine information.



Read more about this resource...

Page 153:

"3. Omega 3 & Omega 6 Oils:

-Especially if you or your child suffered from adverse reactions from MMR, dtap, tDap, DPT, or varicella.

Buy a GREAT Omega Oil here:
Flora Udo's Choice Oil, 3-6-9 Blend, 32 Ounce
Amazon.com : Udo's Choice Organic Omega 3-6-9 Oil Blend 32 Oz - Great Vegan Alternative To Fish Oil - Natural & Plant Based Unrefined Oil With Flax, Evening Primrose, Coconut, Sunflower & More - Made In the USA : Cooking Oils : Health & Personal Care

Plant Sources of Omega 3:
Spinach
Romaine
Flax Oil
Kale
Chia
Papaya
Brussel Sprouts
Collard Greens
Red Cabbage
Arugula"

As we all know, the best source of omega 3&6 is lard. Such plants (spinach, kale, brussel sprouts) may also deepen Iodine defficiency.
Defficiency of Iodine (as well as animal fats) is probably primary cause of vaccination damages.
 

Blacklisting and Censorship Violates Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience​

Story at a glance:
  • This is a commentary about a special report that was researched and written on the systematic abuse of parents with vaccine injured children and the silencing of information published by NVIC
  • Entitled “The Silencing of Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information Center in the Digital Public Square: A Violation of Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience,” the report is anchored with more than 300 live linked references
  • In my report, I take the reader on a chronological step-by-step journey from 1982 through 2023, giving an overview of the history of the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America against the backdrop of the creation of a global mass vaccination infrastructure facilitated by public-private business partnerships encouraged and funded by Congress
  • I have connected the dots so the reader can appreciate the scope and influence of the great wealth and political power held by those who have built the spider web of a global infrastructure institutionalizing censorship of freedom of thought, speech and conscience about vaccination and health, especially in the new digital public square
  • Please read my report and share it with everyone you know. Join NVIC’s mission and take action to educate your friends, family and community about vaccination, health and autonomy
 

Attachments

iDNA Vaccines to Generate Internal Virus Production​

Story at a glance:
  • “Immunization DNA” or iDNA is a novel class of gene therapy “vaccines” that encodes for the whole virus
  • iDNA “vaccines” transcribe the full-length genomic RNA of the live-attenuated vaccine virus. The full-length viral RNA then initiates replication of live attenuated virus in the tissues of the vaccine recipient, resulting in an immune response
  • The iDNA platform can be used to create vaccines in two different ways. You can either grow the iDNA in a culture to produce the vaccine in the conventional way, or you can inject the iDNA directly into the recipient and allow the body to produce the live attenuated virus internally
  • The first human trials for an iDNA shot that codes for a live virus could begin as early as 2024
  • In early April 2023, microbiologist Kevin McKernan reported he’d discovered DNA fragments in the mRNA shots made by Pfizer and Moderna, raising concerns about the possibility of genomic integration, autoimmune diseases and cancer. McKernan now reports having found a dose relationship between the load of DNA contamination and serious adverse events
 

Attachments

Dissolving Illusions About Vaccine Safety​

Story at a glance:
  • The vaccine industry intentionally deceives us about the risks and benefits of vaccines in order to make a profit, with complete disregard for human suffering and the destruction of public health over time
  • One of the reasons the polio vaccine doesn’t work is because polio isn’t caused by an infectious virus. It’s caused by toxins. Poliovirus is a commensal virus that is completely harmless in the absence of toxic onslaught
  • The changing of definitions is part of the vaccine industry’s playbook. The definition of a “vaccine” was radically altered to allow for the use of experimental modified RNA gene therapy
  • Another part of the fraud is using another vaccine as the control in lieu of a true placebo. You simply cannot prove a vaccine is safe by comparing it to another, most likely unsafe, vaccine
  • According to Dr. Suzanne Humphries, there are no worthwhile vaccines, not even smallpox or tetanus. Tetanus can be successfully treated using high-dose intravenous vitamin C and other essential nutrients
  • Vitamin C works because tetanus is a bacterial disease caused by an obligate anaerobe that cannot survive in the presence of oxygen. Other oxidative therapies that could be used if the infection is related to a wound include hydrogen peroxide and ozone therapy
 

Attachments

I have been subscribed to Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea for a few years now...she has been doing Darkfield Microscopy research and analysis into the blood of the jabbed and more recently, the unjabbed. It would seem that we all have the same nano tech inside our blood. I wonder if we could ask the C's firstly if what Dr Anna is finding is correct. Also, how this will impact the population in general over the next few years. I would also like to ask them that if Dr Anna's findings are real, then what do we have available to us all, that will allow us to be able to counteract the negative affects of this in our blood. There are some protocols that available now but they need to be an ongoing therapy as we are breathing in and ingesting the nano tech continuously. It would seem that all of nature is now affected and has the nano tech....and especially these Amyloid clots that are being found to run the length of the veins. Can the C's speak on how this will affect all life, generally, over the next decade and perhaps beyond. We may have tresecended this dimension by then....hopefully:)
 
I have been subscribed to Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea for a few years now...she has been doing Darkfield Microscopy research and analysis into the blood of the jabbed and more recently, the unjabbed. It would seem that we all have the same nano tech inside our blood. I wonder if we could ask the C's firstly if what Dr Anna is finding is correct. Also, how this will impact the population in general over the next few years. I would also like to ask them that if Dr Anna's findings are real, then what do we have available to us all, that will allow us to be able to counteract the negative affects of this in our blood. There are some protocols that available now but they need to be an ongoing therapy as we are breathing in and ingesting the nano tech continuously. It would seem that all of nature is now affected and has the nano tech....and especially these Amyloid clots that are being found to run the length of the veins. Can the C's speak on how this will affect all life, generally, over the next decade and perhaps beyond. We may have tresecended this dimension by then....hopefully:)

I admit that the stories of nanotech suspected of being used in the vaccines sound outlandish, bizarre and fantastical. Hadn't read too much about it either - except for some of the anecdotal stories, questions to the C's, and some articles here and there that had something in it which suggested that it was true. This changed for me in a rather big way though when I read the following series on Transhumanism, which has, as one of its main areas of focus, the Covid "vaccines".

Though the series linked to below is a somewhat academic and dry read, the sourcing and footnotes for all the research it includes is very extensive. Among other things, the articles show how the US military has been researching, financing and discussing with the private sector just how to include nanotech in vaccines. And they've been doing it for many years.

The articles are long but well worth the read in my opinion. As for your questions about counteracting the effects of the shot (other than the spike protein part of it), do first a look at the Health Protocol for Mandatory Corona Virus Vaccination thread for any clues, if you haven't already. And do some more outside research too if you can, and maybe post to the thread above with your findings. Then, when you're ready, you can post your question to the Questions for the C's subforum for further refining by others here who may have some thoughts about it.

Bringing transhumanism down to Earth, Part 1: Military intelligence operations cloaked in the false promise of transcendence

Transhumanist Futures, Part 2: Humanity in the Crosshairs

Military Operations in Civilian Disguise, Part 3: Bio-Nano Governance and Terms of Use for Humans 2.0

WHO's Pulling the Strings? Covid Injections and the Internet of Bio-Nano Things, Part 4: Testing New Human Nodes of Connectivity
 
I admit that the stories of nanotech suspected of being used in the vaccines sound outlandish, bizarre and fantastical. Hadn't read too much about it either - except for some of the anecdotal stories, questions to the C's, and some articles here and there that had something in it which suggested that it was true. This changed for me in a rather big way though when I read the following series on Transhumanism, which has, as one of its main areas of focus, the Covid "vaccines".

Though the series linked to below is a somewhat academic and dry read, the sourcing and footnotes for all the research it includes is very extensive. Among other things, the articles show how the US military has been researching, financing and discussing with the private sector just how to include nanotech in vaccines. And they've been doing it for many years.

The articles are long but well worth the read in my opinion. As for your questions about counteracting the effects of the shot (other than the spike protein part of it), do first a look at the Health Protocol for Mandatory Corona Virus Vaccination thread for any clues, if you haven't already. And do some more outside research too if you can, and maybe post to the thread above with your findings. Then, when you're ready, you can post your question to the Questions for the C's subforum for further refining by others here who may have some thoughts about it.

Bringing transhumanism down to Earth, Part 1: Military intelligence operations cloaked in the false promise of transcendence

Transhumanist Futures, Part 2: Humanity in the Crosshairs

Military Operations in Civilian Disguise, Part 3: Bio-Nano Governance and Terms of Use for Humans 2.0

WHO's Pulling the Strings? Covid Injections and the Internet of Bio-Nano Things, Part 4: Testing New Human Nodes of Connectivity
Thanks Ennio! That sure is plenty of reading! Dr Anna has many photos/videos of live microscopy research of the stuff inside us.....and it glows!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The polio vaccine’s dark side: Massive shedding and outbreak-driven mutations
04/28/2025

In a groundbreaking study published in NPJ Vaccines, Chinese researchers have unearthed a shocking truth about the oral polio vaccine (OPV). The vaccine, administered globally to eradicate polio, is now becoming a driving force behind polio outbreaks and transmitting vaccine-derived viruses at an alarming rate. This revelation throws a wrench into the global efforts to eliminate polio and raises serious questions about the safety and efficacy of OPV.

Key points:

Over 80% of infants shed live polio virus after OPV vaccination, enrolling in the viral shedding race.
  • Shedding continued for weeks in over 10% of infants, maintaining a steady supply of vaccination-derived viruses.

  • Type 3 shedding was the most dangerous, with the longest duration (up to 28 days), highest rate (up to 91.7%), and fastest mutation accumulation.

  • OPV-derived viruses are transmissible, with 2.3% of unvaccinated infants grateful recipients.

  • WPV2 and WPV3 were eradicated, but VDPVs have replaced WPV cases worldwide.

  • Vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 accounted for the highest number of cases, despite the removal of type 2 from OPV.

  • Re-vaccination with OPV can't stop VDPV circulation, presenting a bleak outlook for eradication.

More than 80% of infants shed live polio virus after vaccination​

The study, conducted by the Institute of Medical Biology in China, followed 1,200 infants who received either a bivalent (types 1 and 3) or trivalent (types 1, 2, and 3) OPV. The results are staggering: more than 80% of infants tested positive for poliovirus in their stool just seven days after vaccination. Moreover, over 10% of these infants continued to shed virus for up to 28 days.

Worse still, these vaccine-derived viruses don't simply disappear; they evolve, regaining their strength and pathogenicity. The study confirms what polio researchers have long known: OPV-derived viruses can cause polio, with no meaningful difference between wild and vaccine-derived polio viruses

Vaccine-derived polioviruses now cause 828% more paralysis than wild polio​

The implications are alarming. Despite the eradication of wild poliovirus types 2 (WPV2) and 3 (WPV3), vaccine-derived polio viruses (VDPVs) are now the primary cause of polio outbreaks worldwide. Between 2018 and 2023, there were only 397 wild poliovirus cases globally, but 3,684 cases caused by circulating vaccine-derived strains (cVDPV). That means vaccine-derived polio caused approximately 828% more cases than wild polio.

"The majority of global paralytic poliomyelitis cases are now attributed to poliovirus shedding from OPV rather than WPV," the study states

Type 3 shedding poses the greatest threat​

Among the three polio types, type 3 had the longest shedding duration, the highest shedding rate, and the fastest mutation accumulation. Multiple mutation hotspots were identified, with some shifting the virus back to neurovirulent forms, capable of paralyzing vaccine recipients and their close contacts.

OPV replicates in the gut and can be excreted via stool and other bodily fluids. The study confirms that vaccinated children can transmit the virus to their close contacts, including unvaccinated children, allowing it to circulate and mutate rapidly in the community.

WHO's failed pivot: From tOPV to bOPV​

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) attempted to mitigate risk by removing type 2 from the trivalent OPV (tOPV), replacing it with bivalent OPV (bOPV, types 1 and 3). However, this move backfired, with the study noting a slight increase in the shedding rate of type 3 following the removal of type 2. Without type 2 to balance replication competition in the gut, type 3 replicated and mutated more aggressively, leading to rising cVDPV3 detection rates in recent years.

IPV alone doesn't stop transmission. Although inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is safer and doesn't replicate in the gut, it also doesn't halt fecal-oral spread. This leaves a dangerous gap, allowing silent transmission even as the world moves toward polio eradication.

This new evidence confirms what global health authorities have tried to obscure: OPV is not just risky; it is driving outbreaks. To eradication efforts, OPV recipients shed virus that mutates rapidly, spreads to others, and causes polio in areas of low vaccination coverage. In 2025, the dominant strains of polio circulating in the world will no longer come from nature; they will come from the vaccine itself.

Sources include:

Nature.com

JonFleetwood.substack.com

Pubmed.gov
 
Back
Top Bottom