Vaccines

Laurs

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
Just reading the above excerpts is enough to make me want to throw up. The entire article lays out the intrinsic evil of this vaccine and the psychopaths behind it.

Well, at least RFK Jr takes on Merck now as co-counsel:

The national law firm of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman filed a Gardasil lawsuit against Merck today on behalf of a 19-year-old woman, alleging the company misled the FDA, legislators, doctors and moms about the safety and efficacy of its Gardasil vaccine. The lawsuit asserts Merck purposely downplayed the risk of Gardasil’s ingredients, including a proprietary aluminum compound (a potent neurotoxin) and secret and potentially hazardous DNA particles. Plaintiff Julia Balasco alleges she suffered and continues to suffer severe and permanent physical injuries such as an autoimmune disease known as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) after receiving multiple injections of the human papillomavirus (HPV) Gardasil vaccine.

The lawsuit also seeks punitive damages against Merck.

According to the complaint, Merck failed to properly test Gardasil before the HPV vaccine was fast-tracked and administered to millions of young girls and boys throughout the United States and the world. Furthermore, Merck knew or had reason to know that its vaccine was defective and ineffective, but instead of warning the medical community and the public, the company wrongfully concealed information and further made false statements concerning the safety and efficacy of Gardasil.


Remember the Vioxx scandal? (Vioxx Lawsuit | Settlements, Injury Claims & Notable Cases) I remember one podcast i saw years ago with an ex Merck employee saying that the losses incurred by Vioxx had to be made good by Gardasil, whatever it would take. But anyway, as you know, in countries like The Netherlands, HPV vaccination Gardasil is in the state vaccination program for girls since 2009 and in 2019 the Health Advisory Board advised to also vaccinate boys. And Portugal was one of the first countries to offer HPV vaccination after it came on the market in 2006. And the people say thank you.
 

Ruth

The Living Force
I got this legal update from ICAN in my email. I can't find a direct link anywhere on their website: Home | ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network
So, I'll post it as a quote:
It's worrying to know that vaccines trials are such an unmitigated mess.
The NIH and Moderna have rigged the clinical trial of their COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1273, to avoid capturing adverse reactions that occur more than 28 days after injecting this experimental vaccine. ICAN’s legal team has filed an emergency petition to stop this unethical conduct.

ICAN previously filed a petition to the FDA demanding that this clinical trial include a placebo. The clinical trial for this vaccine was then delayed and when its design was finally issued, it included a placebo. But it appears that NIH and Moderna have decided to play a different game to avoid capturing safety issues that could prevent licensure of their mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Their trick is to only capture adverse reactions that occur more than 28 days after injection if the participant withdraws from the clinical trial. This is nonsensical, since there is little for a participant to withdraw from after getting two doses during the first 28 days of the clinical trial. Once a participant has received both doses, if anything, a participant would have an incentive to remain part of the follow-up check-ups to address any adverse effects.

There could be many autoimmune, neurological and chronic health disorders which have a major impact on the quality of life that this experimental vaccine could cause. All of which may only arise more than 28 days after the injection. But yet, as long as the participant does not withdraw from the clinical trial, these will nonsensically be ignored as if they did not occur. This is unethical and renders vacuous any claim of safety for this product based on this trial.

Given that efficiency in this trial will be tracked for two years, the only reason to not track safety for this same duration is to avoid detecting safety issues that would prevent licensure.

ICAN’s legal team, headed by Aaron Siri, has therefore filed a citizen petition and an emergency stay petition demanding that the clinical trial design for this vaccine be updated to require that all adverse reactions for the entire period of the clinical trial be tracked. These petitions also demand that the number of participants in this trial be increased and that they be tested before and after injection for any T-cells to SARS-CoV-2. ICAN intends to take further legal action if its rational and sensible requests are not met.​
mail

Pfizer and BioNTech have also rigged the clinical trial of their COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b, to avoid capturing many potential life-altering adverse reactions that may occur from this experimental vaccine. ICAN’s legal team again filed an emergency petition to stop this unethical conduct.

While Pfizer and BioNTech have now included a placebo control group in their clinical trial, these companies have decided to play a different game to avoid capturing safety issues that could prevent licensure of their COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b.

The study design for the clinical trial for BNT162b provides that -- despite reviewing efficacy for at least 2 years -- it will only capture “adverse events” for 1 month and “serious adverse events” for only 6 months after each dose.

The adverse events captured beyond a month after injection should not be limited to “serious adverse events,” since there are many autoimmune, neurological, and chronic health disorders which have a major impact on the quality of life, yet are categorized by the FDA as “adverse reactions” and not categorized as “serious adverse reactions.” To wit, there are a myriad of post-licensure adverse reactions reported by consumers and physicians and are also listed in the package inserts for one or more vaccines that any individual living with would categorize as “serious”; yet the FDA, under its current guidelines, may not. These include, but are not limited to: alopecia, autoimmune disease, lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, Bell’s Palsy, hypotonia, migraine, myelitis, neuropathy, seizures, mental disorders, rhinitis, and vertigo.

The study design for BNT162b nonetheless provides that these adverse events should be captured for only 1 month after vaccination while “serious adverse events” are captured for 6 months. These artificial limitations are unethical and make any claim of safety for this product based on this trial specious at best.

Incredibly, the efficiency of Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine in this trial will be tracked for two years. As such, the only reason to not track safety for this same duration is to avoid detecting any safety issues that would prevent licensure. If BNT162b causes a systemic autoimmune issue to arise two months after vaccination, it would be irresponsible and unethical not to capture that reaction just because an autoimmune issue falls into the artificially defined zone of being an “adverse event” or “non-serious adverse event,” rather than what the FDA has decided to label a “serious adverse event.”

ICAN’s legal team filed a citizen petition and an emergency stay petition demanding that the clinical trial design for this vaccine be updated to require that all adverse reactions for the entire period of the clinical trial be tracked. These petitions also demand that the number of participants in this trial be increased and that they be tested before and after injection for any T-cells to SARS-CoV-2. ICAN intends to take further legal action if its rational and sensible requests are not met.​
mail

AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford have also rigged the clinical trial of their COVID-19 vaccine, ChAdox1 nCoV-19, to avoid capturing many potential life-altering adverse reactions that may occur from this experimental vaccine. ICAN’s legal team once again filed an emergency petition to stop this unethical conduct.

Unlike the clinical trials for Moderna and Pfizer’s vaccines for COVID-19, which are occurring in the United States, the current clinical trial for AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine is not under the direct authority of the FDA, since this clinical trial is not occurring in the United States.

News reports have indicated that AstraZeneca will be starting a new clinical trial in the United States for its COVID-19 vaccine that presumably will include a placebo control group. In the meantime, its current clinical trial occurring outside the United States persists in using a MenACWY vaccine as a control. As if that were not enough to rig this trial’s safety results, the study design for their vaccine, ChAdox1 nCoV-19, like the design of Pfizer’s vaccine, provides that, despite reviewing efficacy for at least 2 years, it will only capture “adverse events” for 1 month and “serious adverse events” for only 6 months after each dose.

Therefore, ICAN’s legal team has also filed a citizen petition and an emergency stay petition demanding that the clinical trial design for this vaccine be updated to require that all adverse reactions for the entire period of the clinical trial be tracked against a placebo control group. These petitions also demand that the number of participants in this trial be increased and that they be tested before and after injection for any T-cells to SARS-CoV-2. ICAN intends to take further legal action if its rational and sensible requests are not met.

Just as the pharmaceutical companies will never rest when it comes to promoting and selling their vaccine products, we will never rest in exposing the truth regarding these products.​
 

Chimpazilla

The Force is Strong With This One
I suspect that "vaccines" are (or have become) a multi-factorial thing. It seems that initially, the theory behind vaccination was sound, but as time went on, the ingredients used became more and more toxic (mercury, formaldehyde, various tissues, chemicals) and people began having reactions. Now it seems that vaccines have some positive benefits and some negative, not the least of which is that of getting us to fight about the issue and also sink many, many hours of our time into research and debate, all of which is STS. My big concern, and feeling, is that the vaccine agenda has been near-completely co-opted by STS such that it is leading up to a very powerful STS takeover maneuver. Whatever is proffered as a vaccine against Covid could very well be a weapon in the STS arsenal to get people to comply with their agenda. The vaccine itself could contain elements that alter our DNA in such a way that we are more compliant, and/or which makes us literally sick. Doing this to us however might violate our freewill and therefore somewhat nullify their "victory." At a minimum, our acceptance of such a vaccine in the name of "keeping us safe" without thinking it through fully could constitute agreement to further STS enslavement, even if the vaccine doesn't contain toxic materials. This could be true especially in the event that we are forced to get this vaccine and prove that we received it in order to function in life (grocery stores, banks, public places of all kinds, i.e. "no one could buy or sell lest he had the mark"). I don't plan to get the covid vaccine but I suspect that this choice is going to make daily life much more difficult. I'm not willing to take the chance with my soul though! What are your thoughts?
 

Ruth

The Living Force
I suspect that "vaccines" are (or have become) a multi-factorial thing. It seems that initially, the theory behind vaccination was sound, but as time went on, the ingredients used became more and more toxic (mercury, formaldehyde, various tissues, chemicals) and people began having reactions. Now it seems that vaccines have some positive benefits and some negative, not the least of which is that of getting us to fight about the issue and also sink many, many hours of our time into research and debate, all of which is STS. My big concern, and feeling, is that the vaccine agenda has been near-completely co-opted by STS such that it is leading up to a very powerful STS takeover maneuver. Whatever is proffered as a vaccine against Covid could very well be a weapon in the STS arsenal to get people to comply with their agenda. The vaccine itself could contain elements that alter our DNA in such a way that we are more compliant, and/or which makes us literally sick. Doing this to us however might violate our freewill and therefore somewhat nullify their "victory." At a minimum, our acceptance of such a vaccine in the name of "keeping us safe" without thinking it through fully could constitute agreement to further STS enslavement, even if the vaccine doesn't contain toxic materials. This could be true especially in the event that we are forced to get this vaccine and prove that we received it in order to function in life (grocery stores, banks, public places of all kinds, i.e. "no one could buy or sell lest he had the mark"). I don't plan to get the covid vaccine but I suspect that this choice is going to make daily life much more difficult. I'm not willing to take the chance with my soul though! What are your thoughts?
You gotta remember that there has been literally decades of brainwashing going on and that the situation is more fraught with issues than anyone realizes. Some of the biggest challengers of vaccine safety get feedback along the lines of: What do you mean there is no legal liability for manufacturers? What is VERS? How come I didn't know that vaccines have been contaminated through the manufacture process? A lot of people aren't even aware that vaccines have adjuvants and that they are not very effective - especially for long term immunity. And they certainly aren't aware of how powerful the pharmaceutical industry is and how it's tentacles reach into much of this planet's business.

I've just had another conversation with infection control at my work. I raised the issue that the flu shot was more likely to increase a risk of Coronavirus infection (US Military study 2017). This was something that wasn't dismissed out of hand, but it was dismissed because 'the study couldn't be replicated' and 'lack of references' in that study. But it still can't be explained. I'm sure 'they' don't want it explained.

I have been told via multiple sources that some people getting COVID-19 have become VERY sick. That was when I raised the issue of the flu shot. It occured to me later, that some people may have had a more severe reaction because of the flu shot, or any vaccine for that matter, as per the Chinese experience. This is the same problem the COVID-19 vaccine will face, but most likely it will be more severe. The problem is re-exposure to a coronavirus post vaccination, especially if the vaccination contained coronavirus either deliberately or unintentionally. In the case of the flu shot, it would be unintentional contamination via the manufacturing process.

Sure, the wrong type of antibodies produced in large amounts will kill a person very quickly. I don't think people really understand how complicated the immune system is.
 

Voyageur

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
And they certainly aren't aware of how powerful the pharmaceutical industry is and how it's tentacles reach into much of this planet's business.

Speaking of which, caught RFK jr.'s talk from Berlin today - a massive turnout of Berliners to hear his words, and sure hope his words continue to resonating around the world, cause enough is enough, and he certainly, in capitals, squared off against big pharma.

Thank you, Bobby Jr!

 

Laurs

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
Even though by the WHO's own admissions they have caused paralysis, pain, misery and sorrow for so many children in Africa by giving them the polio toxin vaccine, they won't stop as now the "scientists" at the Hell Gates foundation are working real hard to push more genetically engineered toxins in those poor arms.

... in Africa, where type 2 vaccine-derived outbreaks have been more frequent and much harder to stop than the models projected; they are now smoldering in seven countries. By using mOPV2, "We have now created more new emergences of the virus than we have stopped," Pallansch says.
....
And as a result of the 2016 vaccine switch, an increasing number of children lack immunity to the type 2 virus, setting the stage for an explosive outbreak. That puts the program in a bind. "We have no choice but to keep using" the monovalent vaccine, Zaffran says. "It is all we've got. We have to live with the risk until we have a technical solution."
I keep being astounded by the sheer arrogance and 'rücksichtslosigkeit ' of these people who pretend to work towards a better world for humanity....
 

Ruth

The Living Force
ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network is looking to take legal action against the FDA and US HHS regarding the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine given to infants on day one of life (and 1 month and 6 months of age). Presumably even if the infant is not at risk (from a Hep B infected mother). Their reasoning is for safety tests that only last a few days. It's good to see organizations such as these required to explain themselves.


ICAN, through its attorneys, has provided the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) numerous opportunities over the past three years to provide proof it licensed the vaccines for Hepatitis B based on clinical trials that reviewed safety for more than five days after injection.

All that HHS and FDA have provided in response are a litany of excuses -- not science. ICAN's attorneys have therefore filed a petition to revoke or suspend the license for these vaccines until a proper clinical trial is conducted.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) childhood vaccine schedule recommends universal vaccination of all infants with a Hepatitis B vaccine at birth, 1-month of age, and 6-months of age. There are only two Hepatitis B vaccines licensed for administration to newborns: Engerix-B and Recombivax HB.

In 2017, a supporter of ICAN told us that the clinical trials the FDA relied upon to license these vaccines only reviewed safety for a few days after injection. ICAN found this claim incredible. It assumed the claim was likely false.

It seemed improbable because Congress mandated that the FDA only license drugs that have been proven to be "safe and effective" in a clinical trial, and five days of post-injection safety data would be patently insufficient to demonstrate safety. This is why drugs, such as Enbrel, Lipitor, Belviq, and Botox, typically given to adults, had safety review periods of 6.6 years, 4.8 years, 2 years, and 51 weeks respectively, and each was tested against a placebo control group. The FDA even states that the clinical trial relied upon for licensure is typically "1 to 4 years" in duration.

If anything, the safety review period in a clinical trial for a vaccine given to babies and toddlers should be longer since autoimmune, neurological, and developmental disorders will often not be diagnosed until after babies are at least a few years old. Indeed, a 2019 review of 306 pediatric studies, authored by researchers at the FDA and Duke University, explained that, compared to licensing a drug for adults, "data on drug efficacy and safety in children may require an additional 6 years."

Putting this all together, it seemed like science fiction to claim the Hepatitis B vaccines were licensed by the FDA based on only a few days of post-injection safety data. That was, until ICAN reviewed the package inserts for Engerix-B and Recombivax HB issued by their manufacturers and approved by the FDA. To ICAN's amazement, the package inserts stated that safety in these clinical trials was only reviewed for a few days post-injection into babies.

Therefore, on October 12, 2017, ICAN sent a letter to HHS demanding that it "list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life." On January 18, 2018, HHS (in a response reviewed and approved by the FDA) responded by letter in which it failed to provide any clinical trial supporting the safety of either Hepatitis B vaccine that reviewed safety for more than a week post-injection.

After careful review of every single study HHS cited, ICAN responded on December 31, 2018, in a letter which pummeled HHS for failing to provide a single clinical trial reviewing the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccines for more than a week post-injection to babies. ICAN even provided HHS and the FDA another opportunity to provide any such data, including sending a follow-up letter repeating this demand on March 12, 2020. HHS and FDA still have not provided any such data.

ICAN's legal team also formally submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the FDA demanding a copy of the clinical trials relied upon to license Recombivax HB and received a 1,264 page production of clinical trial reports for this vaccine which confirmed it only reviewed safety for a few days post-injection into babies. ICAN's legal team made a similar request to the FDA for Engerix-B, but this time only requested clinical trials that reviewed safety for more than a week post-injection. The FDA has refused to respond to this request and ICAN's legal team has filed a federal lawsuit against the FDA demanding it respond to this request – more on that lawsuit in a future legal update.

Given the foregoing, it has come time to take formal action. ICAN's legal team, therefore, on September 4, 2020, formally filed a petition to the FDA demanding that the licensure of the Hepatitis B vaccines be revoked or suspended until their safety, as required by law, is determined in a properly designed clinical trial of sufficient duration.

Please submit a comment to the FDA today in support of the petition!

There may be some uncertainty as to what is required under federal law to determine that a product is "safe" prior to licensure, but what is clear is that five days cannot possibly be sufficient to meet that requirement. Hence, if the FDA refuses to grant or timely respond to ICAN's petition, we intend to sue the FDA in federal court to demand that the license for these vaccines be revoked or suspended until a proper clinical trial is conducted.​


Stand for vaccine truth and help us keep winning with your tax-deductible gift of $20, $30, $50, or $100 or more today!
 

Brewer

Jedi Master
Several months ago it was flu shot time down under. I refused, they didn't like that but the rest of my platoon readily took the shot. About half got sick because 'their immune systems are functioning properly' :grad:

However, one got quite ill, at 21 he was in his prime, athletic and healthy. Several hours after the shot he was running a temp of 39.4C but he recovered soon enough. It was his first ever flu shot.

A few weeks later he got sick again, this time he didn't possess full control over his body, he was hospitalized, recovered then relapsed a few weeks after that.

A saw him a few days ago, he looked well enough but he says that he now has Osteonecrosis, a disease normally reserved for alcoholics or deep sea divers, he's neither. He says they don't know what caused it and added that his white blood cell count is chronically low.

I googled osteonecrosis and flu vaccines and there appears to be a connection.

Looks like he could have a lifetime of pain and disability ahead, poor bastard, just 9 months ago we were shoulder to shoulder, smashing the fires surrounding our town. I'm pissed off.

Any suggestions on repairing the damage would be appreciated. Thanks
 

Meg

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Physicians for Informed Consent sent a letter to the University of California's Board of Regents opposing the flu vaccine mandate. It's refreshing to see doctor's take a stand about vaccines.

Physicians for Informed Consent Letter Opposing UC Regents’ Flu Vaccine Mandate
September 22, 2020

Michael V. Drake, M.D.
President, University of California Board of Regents, president@ucop.edu
Cc: Vice President for Human Resources, Executive Vice President for UC Health, University of California Regents Office, regentsoffice@ucop.edu
Anne Shaw, Secretary and Chief of Staff to the Regents, anne.shaw@ucop.edu

RE: University of California Executive Order July 31, 2020 (flu vaccine mandate)

Dear Professor Drake,

On behalf of hundreds of physician and scientist members of Physicians for Informed Consent, I am writing out of our concern that the bodily integrity of UC students, faculty, and staff is being potentially sacrificed by the recent UC Regents’ flu vaccine mandate,1 with no robust scientific justification. The data currently available shows the following:

1. People who receive the flu vaccine are 65% more likely to contract non-flu viruses and bacteria than people who do not receive the flu vaccine.

Patients have reported becoming ill following flu vaccination. To address the concern among patients that the flu vaccine causes illness (i.e., acute respiratory illness), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a three-year study, published in Vaccine in 2017, to analyze the risk of illness during a time period after flu vaccination compared to the risk of illness in unvaccinated individuals during the same time period.2 The study found there is a 65% increased risk of suffering from a non-flu acute respiratory illness within 14 days of receiving the flu vaccine. The authors state, “Patients’ experiences of illness after vaccination may be validated by these results.”

This is important because although flu vaccines typically target at most four strains of flu virus,3 over 200 different viruses cause illnesses that produce the same symptoms—fever, headache, aches, pains, cough, and runny nose—as influenza,4 and more than 85% of acute respiratory illnesses do not involve the flu.

2. There is evidence that the flu vaccine doesn’t reduce demand on hospitals.

The studies referenced in the UC Regents’ flu vaccine mandate suggest positive effects of the flu vaccine on the incidence of illness caused by flu viruses; however, that benefit may be outweighed by the negative effects of the flu vaccine on the incidence of non-flu respiratory illness. A 2018 Cochrane review of 52 clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of influenza vaccines did not find a significant difference in hospitalizations between vaccinated and unvaccinated adults. Instead, the reviewers found “low-certainty evidence that hospitalization rates and time off work may be comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated adults.”6
Furthermore, a Mayo Clinic study published in 2012 found “a threefold increased risk of hospitalization in subjects who did get the TIV [trivalent inactivated influenza] vaccine.”7

3. There is no evidence that the flu vaccine prevents the spread of influenza viruses.

Households are thought to play a major role in community spread of influenza, and there has been a long history of analyzing family households to study the incidence and transmission of respiratory illnesses of all severities. As such, the CDC funded a study of 1,441 participants, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, in 328 households. The study, published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, evaluated the flu vaccine’s ability to prevent community-acquired influenza (household index cases) and influenza acquired in people with confirmed household exposure to the flu (secondary cases). Transmission risks were determined and characterized. In conclusion, the authors state: “There was no evidence that vaccination prevented household transmission once influenza was introduced.”8,9

Furthermore, a systematic review of 50 influenza vaccine studies conducted for the Cochrane Library states: “Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.”5

4. The flu vaccine has not reduced pneumonia and influenza mortality.

The National Vaccine Program Office, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), funded a study to examine flu mortality over the period of 33 years (1968–2001). The study found that there has been no decrease in flu mortality since the widespread use of the influenza vaccine. The authors state: “We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group… [W]e conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit.”10

5. The flu vaccine fails to prevent the flu about 65% of the time.

The CDC conducts studies to assess the effects of flu vaccination each flu season to help determine if flu vaccines are working as intended.11,12 As the flu viruses that are circulating are constantly changing (primarily due to antigenic drift mutations),13 flu vaccines are reformulated regularly based on a “best guess” of which viruses might circulate during the coming flu season.14 The CDC states: “CDC monitors vaccine effectiveness annually through the Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) Network, a collaboration with participating institutions in five geographic locations… [A]nnual estimates of vaccine effectiveness give a real-world look at how well the vaccine protects against influenza caused by circulating viruses each season.”12

Data from the CDC’s Influenza VE Network indicate a 65% vaccine failure rate between 2014 and 2018 (Fig. 1).11
PIC-Flu-Vaccine-Failure-1024x641.png

6. Repeat flu vaccination has been shown to increase the likelihood of flu vaccine failure.

Studies have observed that influenza vaccines have a high failure rate in individuals who are vaccinated in two consecutive years.8 A review of 17 influenza vaccine studies published in Expert Review of Vaccines states, “The effects of repeated annual vaccination on individual long-term protection, population immunity, and virus evolution remain largely unknown.”15

7. The overall benefits of flu vaccination and flu vaccine policies are not clear.

A Cochrane Vaccines Field analysis evaluated studies measuring the benefits of flu vaccination. The analysis, published in the BMJ, concludes: “The large gap between policy and what the data tell us (when rigorously assembled and evaluated) is surprising… Evidence from systematic reviews shows that inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on the effects measured… Reasons for the current gap between policy and evidence are unclear, but given the huge resources involved, a re-evaluation should be urgently undertaken.”

Finally, it’s important to remember that since the enactment of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,17 which has shielded both vaccine manufacturers and physicians from vaccine injury lawsuits, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has awarded over $4 billion to people who incurred vaccine injuries and deaths.18 These individuals and their families have a heightened awareness of their risk of vaccine injury, whether or not their injuries fall under the CDC list of contraindications or precautions; and flu vaccine injury claims are the most common.

We urge you to rescind the UC Regents’ flu vaccine mandate as it thwarts the ability of your students, faculty, and staff to exercise their ability to refuse a medical procedure. There is no medical justification for requiring people to potentially sacrifice their bodily integrity and health in order to work or obtain an education.

Respectfully,

Shira Miller, M.D.
Founder and President
Physicians for Informed Consent

Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization that delivers data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and unites doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccination. Its Coalition for Informed Consent (CIC) includes over 200 member organizations.

Download/Print PDF

References
  1. University of California. Regents of the University of California. University of California executive order July 31, 2020; [cited 2020 Aug 17]. https://ucnet.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/2020/08/2020-21-flu-vaccination-executive-order.pdf.
  2. Rikin S, Jia H, Vargas CY, Castellanos de Belliard Y, Reed C, LaRussa P, Larson EL, Saiman L, Stockwell MS. Assessment of temporally related acute respiratory illness following influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2018 Apr 5;36(15):1958-64.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Table 1: influenza vaccines—United States, 2020–21 influenza season; [cited 2020 Sep 3]. TABLE 1. Influenza vaccines — United States, 2020–21 influenza season* | CDC.
  4. Demicheli V, Jefferson T, Al-Ansary LA, Ferroni E, Rivetti A, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 13;(3):CD001269.
  5. Jefferson T, Di Pietrantonj C, Rivetti A, Bawazeer GA, Al-Ansary LA, Ferroni E. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2010 Jul 7;(7):CD001269.
  6. Demicheli V, Jefferson T, Ferroni E, Rivetti A, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD001269.
  7. Joshi AY, Iyer VN, Hartz MF, Patel AM, Li JT. Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):e23-7.
  8. Ohmit SE, Petrie JG, Malosh RE, Cowling BJ, Thompson MG, Shay DK, Monto AS. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the community and the household. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1363.
  9. Physicians for Informed Consent. Newport Beach (CA): Physicians for Informed Consent. Vaccines: what about immunocompromised schoolchildren? Dec 2019. Immunocompromised Schoolchildren - Risk Group Information Statement (RGIS) — Physicians for Informed Consent.
  10. Simonsen L, Reichert TA, Viboud C, Blackwelder WC, Taylor RJ, Miller MA. Impact of influenza vaccination on seasonal mortality in the US elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 14;165(3):265-72.
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC seasonal flu vaccine effectiveness studies; [cited 2020 Apr 17]. CDC Seasonal Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Studies | CDC.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How flu vaccine effectiveness and efficacy are measured; [cited 2020 May 14]. How Flu Vaccine Effectiveness and Efficacy are Measured | CDC.
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Influenza (flu): how flu viruses can change; [cited 2020 Aug 17]. How Flu Viruses Can Change.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Influenza (flu): selecting viruses for the seasonal influenza vaccine; [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Selecting Viruses for the Seasonal Flu Vaccine.
  15. Belongia EA, Skowronski DM, McLean HQ, Chambers C, Sundaram ME, De Serres G. Repeated annual influenza vaccination and vaccine effectiveness: review of evidence. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Jul;16(7):723,733.
  16. Jefferson T. Influenza vaccination: policy versus evidence. BMJ. 2006 Oct 28;333(7574):912-5.
  17. Congress.gov. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress (LOC). H.R.5546 – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986; [cited 2020 Aug 17]. H.R.5546 - 99th Congress (1985-1986): National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
  18. National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Rockville (MD): Health Resources and Services Administration. National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: monthly statistics report; [updated 2019 Jun 1; cited 2020 Aug 17]. https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/data/monthly-stats-june-2019.pdf.
*Estimates presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on June 27, 2019
 

Laurs

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
He says they don't know what caused it and added that his white blood cell count is chronically low.

I googled osteonecrosis and flu vaccines and there appears to be a connection.

Looks like he could have a lifetime of pain and disability ahead, poor bastard, just 9 months ago we were shoulder to shoulder, smashing the fires surrounding our town. I'm pissed off.

How absolutely terrible what happened to your friend Brewer, i hope they will get to the bottom of it and that his health will be fully restored before too long. Good thing you refused the flu shot!
And imo it is also good that Astra Zeneca had to pause their trials twice because of transverse myelitis manifesting in two trial participants because this public scrutiny leads many more people to find out a few things about how this vaccine business operates and how treacherous and insane it all just is. Of course, i am not a doctor and i do not know if osteonecrosis is or can be part of or a symptom of a wider diagnosed illness like Guillain-Barre syndrome for example (a quick search led me to these two sites Search Results from the VAERS Database, and Guillain-Barré syndrome – CheckOrphan), but i saw this interesting article by RFK Jr and thought it might be useful information anyway. A snip:

Based on analysis of information posted at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims website, conditions involving demyelination and paralysis—TM, ADEM, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)—are among the top vaccine injuries for which Americans (primarily adults) have filed claims with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). GBS is currently the NVICP’s second most compensated vaccine injury. Of the 330 TM-related petitions adjudicated to date, the program has awarded approximately $150 million in damages to 266 claimants (including estimated annuities), while dismissing 55 claims and leaving 9 still pending.
In prior years, most NVICP claimants linked their TM to hepatitis B vaccines, but in more recent years, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccines have become the principal suspects.

It's just unbelievable how these companies get away with wrecking so many people's lives with these toxxines. In that respect the book 'Dissolving Illusions' by Dr Suzanne Humphries, (Amazon.com: Dissolving Illusions eBook: Humphries, Suzanne, Bystrianyk, Roman: Kindle Store), earlier recommended by aragorn, is a real and true eye-opener.
 

Ruth

The Living Force
Looks like he could have a lifetime of pain and disability ahead, poor bastard, just 9 months ago we were shoulder to shoulder, smashing the fires surrounding our town. I'm pissed off.

Any suggestions on repairing the damage would be appreciated. Thanks
If I were your colleague, I would try to get in touch with people who can expose these issues to the public as much as possible, as well as point them in the right direction to get some sort of legal recompense.

Maybe you could try these people:

I'm not sure how to repair the damage cause by injecting something like that. But I know it's not a fair, or just, that somebody has to suffer a lifetime of pain and disability just because they believed the same lie that everybody else believed in.
 
Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan put out a press release of an image of him getting the flu vaccine. He was encouraging others to get the shot.

Closer inspection reveals the syringe didn't have the needle i.e. this is just a PR stunt.


View attachment 39199
I believe the Flu vaccine is one that can be delivered without needles. A high-pressure jet of vaccine is squirted directly through the skin - like in the old Star Trek episodes.

The same technology is now publicly available for women who want to inject hyaluronic acid into their faces...

1601554516716.jpeg
 
Top Bottom