Various interesting things in French : documentaries, etc.

Je le suis sur X, il poste +/- tout les jours en général des courtes réflexions pertinentes. Je le conseille (dans le sens : abonnez-vous à lui si vous êtes sur X)
Voici une de ses réflexions intéressante, du moins il a écrit ça vers ses 20 ans :

"Comment un être aussi brillant peut-il être aussi idiot ? Cette interrogation m’obsède depuis très longtemps. Aujourd’hui, en tant que jeune homme, je peux dire qu’elle me hante depuis l’enfance. En effet, en observant de nombreuses personnes exceller dans un domaine précis, dans une dimension particulière de l’intelligence, j’ai rapidement compris qu’être champion dans une matière ne suffisait pas à qualifier quelqu’un d’intelligent. En effet, combien d’hommes ai-je vus capables de résoudre de grandes équations, mais se faire manipuler comme des enfants par le premier vendeur venu, par les médias ou par des politiciens ? Combien en ai-je vus dotés d’une mémoire extraordinaire, mais incapables de faire des liens entre les événements ? Combien en ai-je vus exceller en calcul, mais incapables de remettre en question leurs propres croyances ? Toutes ces interrogations m’ont vite poussé à m’interroger sur la notion d’intelligence. Aujourd’hui, après des années de réflexion sur le sujet, je suis parvenu à cette certitude : l’intelligence ne peut se résumer à une seule dimension, même si l’on y excelle, même s’il s’agit de l’intelligence logico-mathématique, si prisée par le système scolaire et la société. Bref, je suis désormais convaincu d’une chose: on peut être un brillant mathématicien, un universitaire cultivé ou posséder un haut QI, et se comporter, malgré tout, comme un parfait idiot."(Écrit quand j'avais une vingtaine d'années)

Lien du tweet :

--------------
I follow him on X, and he generally posts short, pertinent thoughts every day or so. I recommend him (in the sense: subscribe to him if you're on X)

Here's one of his interesting reflections, at least he wrote it when he was about 20:
"How can someone so brilliant be so stupid? This question has obsessed me for a very long time. Today, as a young man, I can say that it has haunted me since childhood. In fact, by observing many people excel in a particular field, in a particular dimension of intelligence, I quickly realised that being a champion in a subject was not enough to qualify someone as intelligent. Indeed, how many men have I seen who are capable of solving great equations, only to be manipulated like children by the first salesman they come across, by the media or by politicians? How many have I seen who have an extraordinary memory, but are incapable of making connections between events? How many of them have excelled at arithmetic but are incapable of questioning their own beliefs? All these questions quickly led me to ponder the notion of intelligence. Today, after years of reflection on the subject, I've come to the certainty that intelligence can't be summed up in a single dimension, even if you excel at it, even if it's the logical-mathematical intelligence so prized by the school system and society. In short, I'm now convinced of one thing: you can be a brilliant mathematician, a cultivated academic or have a high IQ, and still behave like a complete idiot" (Written when I was in my twenties).
 
Laura's signature :
"He who learns must suffer
And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
And in our own despair, against our will,
Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God."
Agamemnon, Aeschylus
yes, i have experienced this ALL my life.
BUT: why learn, what for ?? to die with alzheimer ??
this is why i am basically bouddhist: life is suffering, and we suffer to feed the devils. bon appetit...
conclusion: why not become devils ourselves?
if you cant beat them, why not join them??
the devil will always win here, and we see it all around us.
shakespeare: "hell is empty as all devils are here".
this is why we need ascension. we surely are not far from it...
 
The independent French journalist Pierre Jovanovic was the victim of an attempt from the PTB to shut up him. Reason given: psychiatric internment. They send the GIPN at his home but he was absent. He think what saved him was he forgot to turn off the light when he left his flat. So they thought he was at home.

Just unbelievable.

Jovanovic GIPN

- And so I was effectively subjected to an attempt at psychiatric internment by, I imagine, the Elysée, but I'll explain to you very simply why, because first of all it avoids any complaint of defamation, because full time defamation means what? There are lawyers, there are judges, there is a file, there is a court, there is a trial, and so on. But turning up at my house at 1am...
So it wasn't at 6am because it allows you to bypass the whole classic legal process.

- But isn't that illegal?

- No, because it's a health issue. Right, OK.
[...]
There was the GIPN, the police commissioner for the 17th arrondissement, a representative of the prefect, a fire engine, and of course a police truck and the BAC. So there were quite a few people there. But the gendarmes and police officers following my press review explained to me that they were the necessary authorities to detain someone. And that's it.

 
Pierre gave another interview on Marcel D. channel. He say "You know I have a lot of listeners praying for me at the moment." So perhaps it played a role.

Marcel explain that there is two ways the PTB can use:
- Hospitalisation at the request of a third party.
- Involuntary hospitalisation. That means that there is no need for a third party, it means that it is the government who...

On this last one Pierre answer: "Yes, but to do that you [normally] have to be armed with a gun, or like this magistrate, or like the crazy people who sometimes stab people in the street."

 
Pierre gave another interview on Marcel D. channel. He say "You know I have a lot of listeners praying for me at the moment." So perhaps it played a role.

Marcel explain that there is two ways the PTB can use:
- Hospitalisation at the request of a third party.
- Involuntary hospitalisation. That means that there is no need for a third party, it means that it is the government who...

On this last one Pierre answer: "Yes, but to do that you [normally] have to be armed with a gun, or like this magistrate, or like the crazy people who sometimes stab people in the street."

In that case, how many people would it take to ask for Mr Macron to be committed?
 
With our IP addresses, it could happen to any one of us if things continue to get out of hand, and V comme Vendetta is becoming more and more realistic. Let's hope the wake-up call in France comes first.
For me there are two solutions:
- a total boycott of digital technology and the Internet
I don't believe in this at all, no one wants to cut themselves off from the Web.
- train to become truly dangerous hackers. I've always found it strange that good, rebellious hackers don't manage to shut down the Web, or do any real damage. Either they get thwarted every time, or they simply don't exist...

So we're back to square one!🤣
 
The independent French journalist Pierre Jovanovic was the victim of an attempt from the PTB to shut up him. Reason given: psychiatric internment. They send the GIPN at his home but he was absent.
Not only that, but also at his enterprise premises (he's journalist, book author and book editor). Both doors broken...

According to him, he's about to (self-)publish a book titled "2008" about the subprime mortgage crisis... and that could disturb Macron (former investment banker at Rotschild's bank) or his puppet masters. So Macron's minions decides to attack him...

The pretext to this nocturnal police raid is that he would be suicidal (reality check : he's not at all !).
That reminds the political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, of dismal memory.

In the last "Nexus magazine reviews the news" video, Morad El Hattab (a political writer, and "geopolitologist") told that he asked preventively to make some psychological exam with 3 different psychiatrists, and gave the results (that he's mentally sane) to his lawyers. To avoid such a bad adventure...
Just unbelievable.
Well, welcome in "Macrony" as some say. Corruption and tyranny... Like
After Benalla affair(s), and so many worse actions since, I'm no more surprised.

If you find it unbelievable, it's due to your belief system, that we (here in France) are in "democracy", and so.
But we're no more, if we ever were. (I doubt it.)
 
A humbling documentary that begins with an embalmer and his extraordinary daily life.


The medium shares her anecdotes with the deceased. And what she learned about the afterlife. The difficulties some deceased people face as a result of their mistakes while alive. Others don't find the strength and courage to accept what they did and continually run away from it. They will ultimately succeed, in principle, but it remains depressing. I thought that by leaving the body, we would simultaneously get rid of our blockages and blindness that hinder our progress, but ultimately, it's the challenge to overcome before being able to analyze and learn lessons from our past life.



For English speakers, in this video, something unexpected happens. A child who knows we're talking about her comes up to make a joke. We hear a "hello" and also a laugh. We see that the interviewer wasn't expecting this situation, and the medium bursts out laughing because she understands what's going on. There's also a short dialogue with the child, it's cute.

 
I found another video of a medium telling her story. Being a medium isn't easy; it takes years of adaptation and reflection before you can truly embrace your potential. I can't find anything interesting anymore; I come across mediums who seem fake and who talk nonsense.

 
They criticize other mediums and become mediums suddenly or during an accident. Listening to them, it's as if they were chosen. And they have something extra that sets them apart from other mediums. But it doesn't say much about the dialogues they may have had with the deceased. I don't bother sharing the links with you; I just feel like I wasted my time.
 
Back
Top Bottom