It's a very interesting and sad situation both for the Bolivarian Revolution and the Venezuelan people, most people out there find difficult to make sense about this situation and unfortunately they just go with the propaganda without considering all the years of economic war, sponsorship of the opposition and political interference. Chavez fought to maintain the economic stability, and sovereignty of Venezuela and its resources with great results. But now, the circumstances changed since the US came up with a new strategy on steroids to get rid of the "progressive" governments in LatAm, starting with Brazil and Argentina. Of course they cannot leave Venezuela standing, it's a reminder to other LatAm counties that extreme globalism is not the way to go.
Things got very difficult to Maduro's administration, and they indeed tried their best to get out of the claws of the US, but almost every strategy has been used against them with less than optimal results, for the government and the people. Now, because of the pressure, they are resourcing to less effective strategies, and deceitful maneuvers (some now are saying that the elections were ridged because of the amount of positive votes, that not even Chavez got) that are becoming more obvious to external eyes; that again, can be used against them. Of course it's not the same, but see the Rouseff impeachment and the prosecution Lula and charges of corruption against Kirchner. The pathocrats always smell this kind of stuff from miles away, it's their way of life and they know how to amplify and use that against others that are not even pathological as them.
Now comes the dilemma, because it's true that the US has been interfering with the Bolivarian Revolution since the beginning, now, under Maduro's administration, things are getting pretty bad for a lot fo people. 'One cannot be neutral in situations of injustice', but there are things to report from both sides and needs to be done in a way that do not diminish the US interference and foul play, or that's what i think. The issue is that most people do not take the time to really study the situation and JUST get the headers of the mass media or easy to read propaganda against Maduro's administration.
On another related topic, we have a couple of interesting examples of seeking different strategies to maintain protectionist policies without selling you soul to the "devil"; The latest economic strategies of Bolivia and Ecuador that most viewed as opening the doors to the empire and it's corporate minions, were not that bad IMO, maybe it was not an open door, but a small window that they opened, that helped them to maintain their sovereignty and structure without risking falling into the pit as other countries in the area.
Part of the problem IMO, is when ideologies -or political/economical systems- become "dogmas", if that happens, with time, you start to worry about defending that abstract idea instead of the people wellbeing and real sovereignty of the country. Ideologies, as paradigms and political/economical systems, are tools, and that's it, if you have a pragmatical approach to them with the best interest of people in mind, you can see that maybe just embracing one is no the Answer, but selecting different aspects of each that work and get well together. Countries can become "possessed" by ideologies and things start to go south. At some point, people on the government and their followers stop standing for the actual wellbeing and proper function of the system, they start defending a human abstract idea elevated at the the level of "god".
Paradoxically, in some cases, people care little about abstract concepts as sovereignty when things start to get rough (The US has and still use this in its favour), so maybe, when food and basic needs start to become a problem, the actual government could start using other tools, change the course a little bit, to maintain the state and social structure.
We have the example of Russia, once Putin said that they were using 'Capitalism for Russia, not Russia for the Capitalism" Which is something quite innovative and refreshing given the global tendency to take ideologies, or X political/economical system as inmutable banners of X administration, instead of taking what really works for any given moment and context.
Russia also started to diversify its economy in the face of the increasing external pressure as the sanctions; Venezuelan economic stability is almost entirely dependant in the oil, that's also why things started to get ugly with the manipulation of the oil prices.
I know that Maduro's administration is not Putin's administration, the contexts are indeed different, i'm just sharing some thoughts about the situation.
Things got very difficult to Maduro's administration, and they indeed tried their best to get out of the claws of the US, but almost every strategy has been used against them with less than optimal results, for the government and the people. Now, because of the pressure, they are resourcing to less effective strategies, and deceitful maneuvers (some now are saying that the elections were ridged because of the amount of positive votes, that not even Chavez got) that are becoming more obvious to external eyes; that again, can be used against them. Of course it's not the same, but see the Rouseff impeachment and the prosecution Lula and charges of corruption against Kirchner. The pathocrats always smell this kind of stuff from miles away, it's their way of life and they know how to amplify and use that against others that are not even pathological as them.
Now comes the dilemma, because it's true that the US has been interfering with the Bolivarian Revolution since the beginning, now, under Maduro's administration, things are getting pretty bad for a lot fo people. 'One cannot be neutral in situations of injustice', but there are things to report from both sides and needs to be done in a way that do not diminish the US interference and foul play, or that's what i think. The issue is that most people do not take the time to really study the situation and JUST get the headers of the mass media or easy to read propaganda against Maduro's administration.
If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality. Desmond Tutu
On another related topic, we have a couple of interesting examples of seeking different strategies to maintain protectionist policies without selling you soul to the "devil"; The latest economic strategies of Bolivia and Ecuador that most viewed as opening the doors to the empire and it's corporate minions, were not that bad IMO, maybe it was not an open door, but a small window that they opened, that helped them to maintain their sovereignty and structure without risking falling into the pit as other countries in the area.
Part of the problem IMO, is when ideologies -or political/economical systems- become "dogmas", if that happens, with time, you start to worry about defending that abstract idea instead of the people wellbeing and real sovereignty of the country. Ideologies, as paradigms and political/economical systems, are tools, and that's it, if you have a pragmatical approach to them with the best interest of people in mind, you can see that maybe just embracing one is no the Answer, but selecting different aspects of each that work and get well together. Countries can become "possessed" by ideologies and things start to go south. At some point, people on the government and their followers stop standing for the actual wellbeing and proper function of the system, they start defending a human abstract idea elevated at the the level of "god".
Paradoxically, in some cases, people care little about abstract concepts as sovereignty when things start to get rough (The US has and still use this in its favour), so maybe, when food and basic needs start to become a problem, the actual government could start using other tools, change the course a little bit, to maintain the state and social structure.
We have the example of Russia, once Putin said that they were using 'Capitalism for Russia, not Russia for the Capitalism" Which is something quite innovative and refreshing given the global tendency to take ideologies, or X political/economical system as inmutable banners of X administration, instead of taking what really works for any given moment and context.
Russia also started to diversify its economy in the face of the increasing external pressure as the sanctions; Venezuelan economic stability is almost entirely dependant in the oil, that's also why things started to get ugly with the manipulation of the oil prices.
I know that Maduro's administration is not Putin's administration, the contexts are indeed different, i'm just sharing some thoughts about the situation.