Where is Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales?

I don't see evidence of any wig, but maybe. Seriously doubt body-double.

Apparently not all chemo causing hair loss. Depends on:

  • The type of chemo drug: Some are more likely to cause hair loss than others.
  • Amount (dose) of drug: Higher doses generally have a greater risk of hair loss.
  • The combination of drugs (chemotherapy regimen): Receiving a combination of drugs increases the risk.
  • How the drugs are given: Intravenous (IV) drugs are more likely to cause hair loss than oral drugs.
  • Your individual susceptibility: Some people are more likely to lose hair than others, even with the same doses of the same drugs.
So keeping her "type of cancer" private will allow for the assumption that her chemo doesn't cause hair loss.
I had to find the transcript to make sure I wasn't remembering wrong. This is from Session 13 April 2024:


Q: (L) What's happening with Kate Middleton?

A: Vaccine injury.

Q: (L) Is it something that is really horrible and visible?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) Like a stroke where she's partially paralyzed?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is it something on her skin or, or something like Bell's palsy or...?

A: Close. She may not recover.

Q: (L) Does the rest of the Royal Family know that it's a vaccine injury?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So was the last video of her when she actually came out and made a video saying that she had cancer and she was going through chemotherapy, was that really her?

A: No
 
I had to find the transcript to make sure I wasn't remembering wrong. This is from Session 13 April 2024:


Q: (L) What's happening with Kate Middleton?

A: Vaccine injury.

Q: (L) Is it something that is really horrible and visible?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) Like a stroke where she's partially paralyzed?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is it something on her skin or, or something like Bell's palsy or...?

A: Close. She may not recover.

Q: (L) Does the rest of the Royal Family know that it's a vaccine injury?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So was the last video of her when she actually came out and made a video saying that she had cancer and she was going through chemotherapy, was that really her?

A: No

Yeah, I'm aware of that. I was just asking about the Chemo because it seems her cover story is cancer, and most people assume with Chemo you lose hair. But apparently not always, so the cover story holds.
 
Yeah, I'm aware of that. I was just asking about the Chemo because it seems her cover story is cancer, and most people assume with Chemo you lose hair. But apparently not always, so the cover story holds.
I'm sorry, I wasn't looking at it from that angle. Perhaps she is recovered somewhat from whatever she has been dealing with. Agreed, Chemo makes a good cover story. Whatever she does have I feel bad for her.
 
Very contrived video.
Absolutely contrive. Absolutely, and Kate doesn't look like she has cancer or received chemo. It seems to me that those who have cancer and undergo this harsh treatment have a particular skin colour and also a particular look, but above all the colour of the face is not pink, but rather yellow. I see this video, and it's my personal vision, as an insult to the people who are undergoing chemotherapy and suffering. I see this video, with its melt-in-your-mouth music and the beauty of the forest, as very, very cynical, absolutely painful for those who are in the clutches of the hard medicine of our system. It's also an advertising video about chemotherapy, and to show that British royalty is beautiful, everyone loves each other, everything's fine.

And now that's me being cynical.
 
Very contrived video. Anyway, is there a type of chemo that doesn't cause any hair to fall out?
That was kind of my thinking as well, a bit much. And they tried to make it all touching and stuff.. but it would've been more effective if she had just stood in front of a camera and said the same thing, instead of reading the script.. but, it's a matter of taste I suppose.
 
While it was quite nice to see the royal family out and about (even a view of the inlaws kitchen) the video did seem well over the top. The script that was prepared for Kate made it seem that she had been saved from the jaws of cancer death by chemo. I thought originally it was supposed to be a "just in case" round of chemo lasting a short time. I believe the majority of people who are treated for breast cancer will lose their hair to some extent but I don't think it was ever publicised which type of cancer she had. She was "supposed" to be having some abdominal surgery so perhaps they have left the public to assume that the cancer is connected to her abdomen in some way. I don't suppose we will ever know. Regarding the physical signs of vaccine damage, she seems to have recovered well. I wonder how she really feels about the drivel and lies she is having to recite as a cover story.
 
That was kind of my thinking as well, a bit much. And they tried to make it all touching and stuff.. but it would've been more effective if she had just stood in front of a camera and said the same thing, instead of reading the script.. but, it's a matter of taste I suppose.

Point being, all of their happy family footage was pre-planned and filmed by at least one and probably several other people. None of that (except perhaps the kids playing) was natural, it was all explicitly done for the camera. Yet people watch it and think it's a 'fly on the wall' view of what they're *really* like. Bizarre.
 
Yes, very silly, yet "credible" for most people. I still think that it was more likely something like this, and that the whole chemo story was just created because it's something most people wouldn't question or think much about. It's not even just the hair issue, but the fact that she was completely GONE from the public sphere, that they posted a fake picture & fake videos, etc. If she had undergone chemo, it would have been easy to take a few legit pictures and be done with the speculations. Nope, it was something that they didn't want people to see.
 
I noticed on the video that Kate mentioned "her path to healing and full recovery is long" and she will be "undertaking a few more public engagements in the coming months when she can." After 6 months of chemo and 9 months out of the public eye you would think she would be well enough to gradually return to her previous workload. It sounds like the palace PTB are hedging their bets. Perhaps she is not quite physically "right" enough to be close up to strangers. Some people I know are undergoing chemo and working between courses because they have to financially. No long road to recovery for them.
 
Anyway, is there a type of chemo that doesn't cause any hair to fall out?
Definitely but she supposedly had very serious type of cancer - it was not exactly stated which - but given the story they gave sounded like ovarian - that treatment is not a joke and she’d be bald for months.
As far as the video goes it i agree it looks contrived and too “artistic” and vintagy for usual royal family PR BS.
Recently there was an advert circulating FB stating that Novak Djokovic is suffering from heart problems, showing him recommending this miraculous natural treatment for blood pressure. This obviously piqued my curiosity so I looked into it. Needless to say Novak is in excellent health as I would expect and the whole video was AI generated.
It is really scary what AI can do these days.
In other words I don’t believe this “recent” footage of Kate for a second.
 
Recently there was an advert circulating FB stating that Novak Djokovic is suffering from heart problems, showing him recommending this miraculous natural treatment for blood pressure. This obviously piqued my curiosity so I looked into it. Needless to say Novak is in excellent health as I would expect and the whole video was AI generated.
It is really scary what AI can do these days.
In other words I don’t believe this “recent” footage of Kate for a second.

But keep in mind that one of the reasons these deep fakes are so successful and often undetected is that they are combined with true footage. Kate was seen a couple or a few times in public this year (MUCH harder to fake).

For example:

So, it's possible that this last one (with husband and children) is real. It doesn't mean the cancer announcement one was, or that the narrative sold to the public is. Right now she probably looks and acts just like you see in the recent footage and pictures. But that doesn't mean at all that she had cancer, chemo and all the rest.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom