Where is Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales?

[Stella Jones]

That was kind of my thinking as well, a bit much. And they tried to make it all touching and stuff.. but it would've been more effective if she had just stood in front of a camera and said the same thing, instead of reading the script.. but, it's a matter of taste I suppose.

Well there are wigs, body doubles, (clones?). Then there is the C's affirming that her illness is COVID shot related. Laura suggested Bell's Palsy or something visible and that was confirmed.
So who/what will be paraded around as Kate if her 'cancer' treatment is finished now?
Sounds like a distraction (or bait to get the public interested in the story again?). Clown world, eh?

I am no expert, but the small amount of research I have done tells me that -
radiation treatment makes your hair fall out and they don't use radiation therapy much anymore on cancer, and

chemotherapy is mostly very strong antibiotics, nothing fancy but like all antibiotics, it kills both the good and the bad tissue.

My mother's 'ovarian cancer treatment' was 9 monthly needle shots of antibiotics where she sat in a recliner for an hour then went home. At first, she was fine but after the 3rd shot, she started to feel sick after the injections. After her 9th treatment, they told her they couldn't control her numbers but they would be happy to euthanize her - we live in Canada.

She agreed because she was tired of being so sick from the treatments. She died in 1995 aged 70.

They didn't offer her radiation probably would have been ineffective for her cancer.

Needs more research but that's what i have learned incidentally over the years. I hope that helps.

Stella

 

[Z...]

I am no expert, but the small amount of research I have done tells me that -
radiation treatment makes your hair fall out and they don't use radiation therapy much anymore on cancer, and

chemotherapy is mostly very strong antibiotics, nothing fancy but like all antibiotics, it kills both the good and the bad tissue.

My mother's 'ovarian cancer treatment' was 9 monthly needle shots of antibiotics where she sat in a recliner for an hour then went home. At first, she was fine but after the 3rd shot, she started to feel sick after the injections. After her 9th treatment, they told her they couldn't control her numbers but they would be happy to euthanize her - we live in Canada.

She agreed because she was tired of being so sick from the treatments. She died in 1995 aged 70.

They didn't offer her radiation probably would have been ineffective for her cancer.

Needs more research but that's what i have learned incidentally over the years. I hope that helps.

Stella

Just for the sake of accuracy although antibiotics are technically also chemo therapy they mostly target bacteria while cancer chemo treatment targets rapidly growing body cells, this includes hair follicles or oral mucosa cells and that’s why common side effect is hair loss or ulcers in the mouth.
The same is with radiation but only radiation of the head and neck will cause hair loss.

 

[Liliea]

I have watched the video -again- and the final sensation that the video gives me is that of having seen an advertisement for a vegan product, very Bio.
This emotional aesthetic of wanting to make us see an intimate “romantic” and external experience of the future queen is quite ominous in all its forms, because it uses traditional concepts that have been conditioned by the effect of the objects, the environmental settings, the costumes, the wig (or extensions I think she has always had) , the video, the filters, the AI, the editing, making us feel the construction of a fiction, sublime if you will, a script made of romantic sensibility but modern or better fashionable... nothing that happens there is spontaneous or real is fiction, everything in sum acquires a haunting and quite disturbing feeling. The superficial becomes deep and the other way around.
I think in this way they imply that they can continue showing continuity chapters with similar montages.

 

[Beau]

She made a public appearance today, her first "public engagement" since undergoing chemo. She looks healthy if a bit thin and a bit of aging in the face, both probably from chemo. Good to see her out and able to chat with the public.

Prince William and Kate meet families of Southport knife attack

In her most significant public engagement to date this year, Catherine, 42, joined Prince William to meet with the families of Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Mrs. Peel]

both probably from chemo.

I thought the Cs said she did not have cancer?

 

[Beau]

I thought the Cs said she did not have cancer?

Right, my bad. Her appearance likely due to issues surrounding the vaccine injury, although she looks pretty good to me now.

 

[Z...]

Right, my bad. Her appearance likely due to issues surrounding the vaccine injury, although she looks pretty good to me now.

Or maybe C’s were off about this one, if i remember correctly- the impression after their answer was that she is seriously disfigured and unlikely to recover. But I might be remembering wrongly.

 

[T.C.]

They never said that she didn't have cancer.

Q: (L) What's happening with Kate Middleton?

A: Vaccine injury.

Q: (L) Is it something that is really horrible and visible?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) Like a stroke where she's partially paralyzed?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is it something on her skin or, or something like Bell's palsy or...?

A: Close. She may not recover.

Doesn't mean that she actually did have it, or does have it, either. The strange part is the apparent weight loss that we saw when she first reappeared in public. That might suggest (vaccine induced) cancer. But then there's the whole "horrible and visible" thing.

I don't know. Maybe some inaccuracy from the C's on this one.

 

[loreta]

She made a public appearance today, her first "public engagement" since undergoing chemo. She looks healthy if a bit thin and a bit of aging in the face, both probably from chemo. Good to see her out and able to chat with the public.

Prince William and Kate meet families of Southport knife attack

In her most significant public engagement to date this year, Catherine, 42, joined Prince William to meet with the families of Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine.

www.dailymail.co.uk

She is filmed too far away and we do not hear what she is saying.

 

[Soluna]

All they said was that she "may" not recover. Perhaps she did, or perhaps she hasn't and things may get worse down the line. Even if she had some disfiguring symptoms or effects - keeping her out of sight seems to go along with that - but perhaps she recovered from these symptoms (regardless of overall recovery); or even she may have had some corrective plastic surgery to disguise anything like that, which would also require out of sight healing time.

We do know that collective consciousness can have an effect on the outcome of events - perhaps the public awareness of her absence, or concern, or well wishes assisted in her recovery despite the odds. Maybe this outcome will even encourage her to out the truth one day - if she's even aware of it.

 

[Evan]

They never said that she didn't have cancer.



Doesn't mean that she actually did have it, or does have it, either. The strange part is the apparent weight loss that we saw when she first reappeared in public. That might suggest (vaccine induced) cancer. But then there's the whole "horrible and visible" thing.

I don't know. Maybe some inaccuracy from the C's on this one.

My sense was that they did say “close” to the mention of a Palsy (or something on her skin; they didn’t specify which). My wife once had Bell’s Palsy due to a shingles outbreak, and half of her face was paralyzed, and her eye was completely droopy. But after a week or so it cleared up and you’d never know it had happened. Still, her appearance certainly qualified as “horrible and visible”, at least to me. It was scary AF. Knowing how the British public feel about “their Kate”, it would have stopped Big Ben. I’m just saying that it’s relative. The Cs weren’t asked nor did they specify to whom it would be “horrible”.

 

[nicklebleu]

Apparently not all chemo causing hair loss. Depends on:

And even with chemo where you lose your hair there is a method to prevent that - if you wear a hood with ice while the chemotherapy has the highest concentration in the blood, the hair is protected by vasoconstriction, so the chemo agent doesn’t touch the hair follicles. Apparently it is quite efficient - the only problem is that most people cannot tolerate this treatment and finally accept hair loss rather than the discomfort of the cold treatment.

But if you are really, really determined ….?