Gloria Steinem is the last person I would consult on any of these issues since there is evidence to show that she was a CIA mouthpiece at best, a 4D STS tool at worst.
Mr. Russo retells in his documentary the story, as told to him directly by Nick Rockefeller, that the Feminist movement in the 1960′s was manufactured so that women would have to enter the workforce and so that more taxes could be collected with women working, thus having to pay taxes. Additionally, children would then have to be put into day care and pre-schools where indoctrination could begin at a much earlier age. The State could then be seen to the children as part of the family. Interestingly, it was also reported in an article in the Village Voice on May 21, 1979 that Ms. Steinem's M.S. Magazine was funded by the Ford Foundation and the CIA, to which the article claims she also a CIA asset.
A well-educated and knowledgeable young woman actually find it more difficult to marry than a less educated one back those days. Partially because while they were studying, the other girls grabbed the available specimens to marry, partly because men were reluctant to marry smarty pants, as their own education was also low level.
This post really touched me. To think of this woman who feels/sounds to me as though she is very alone and pretty distressed... it sounds like she has nobody to advocate on her behalf (except you @AzarHyun!). From the sounds of things she has been ignored and most certainly not supported appropriately by the system (why am I not surprised ) I am unsure how much of this situation she finds herself in has been perpetuated by her inability to read, as I notice this also happens to people a lot who are fully literate and extremely articulate and vocal about their situation!An 80-year-old woman came to my work today. She is an illiterate old woman, she literally can't read or write anything. He lives relatively close to the city (20 km or less). Her husband and son died in the war 27 years ago. He is trying to get an additional pension from his late husband. She is entitled to that pension but she did not know about it (she could have gotten it many years ago). She repeated several times that she was illiterate and did not go to school because she had to look after cattle and sheep. She is now alone and quite helpless to cope. Now she's sorry she didn't force her to write and read. She is aware of how much easier it would be for her. I tried my best to listen to her, help her and do everything in my power.
The ruth, all be it incomplete, because it does not take into account the concurrent transformation of the male variable (JP) is in the desintegration of the family; the close family and the extended family.It's funny for some reason Steinem reminds me of that old feminist who recently disavowed her past stances, fully acknowledging it disinfo, not women's wants.
I looked up her name, not the same one, but it's still an interesting insight into the manipulation of the 'feminine perspectives' that came out of the last half-century.
We are all teachers and students. You were not the only one who was puzzled by my post. I think my academic background got the best of me. From my studies, I learned how important to create a scene, a background for your topic. I created a historical background, a scene, but created the wrong ambiance.To @Sybill and @Joe.
Sorry that I haven’t come back to this until today and to be clear I have come with my head hanging pretty low. My “external consideration” was so absent it might as well have been non existent. There was a good way for me to bring up my concerns and a bad way. I chose the bad.
Sybill I ran my ego around and I’m sure I sounded like a Jerk. Instead of politely enquiring more info and thinking up an appropriate way to ease into my concern, I jumped the gun and acted like an authoritative egotistical jerk and I am sorry.
Joe and others (I tagged Joe because he was early to the party to give me the reprimand I deserved) I did not have the intention of trying to speak for the “group” but that’s actually what I did. I saw a small issue and came at it like Rambo. Oh boy did I think I was winning the day.
I didn’t respond earlier because I had not yet gone through the five steps of being called out for being a jerk. I stayed on step one for a bit too long (“I’m not the jerk, Joe is”). I knew my logic was faulty when I asked myself why I listen to your show every week if you are such a jerk. I wasn’t satisfied with the answer of “I just really like listening to jerks.” So I moved on and accepted the undeniable fact that you were right. I still didn’t have the courage to acknowledge so I waited a bit longer. In order to grow I have to take responsibility for my actions.
As for any innocent bystanders let my example be a lesson that hopefully you can learn without going through. Remember to chill, stop and think and remember that Its not a good idea to flip out.
Of course, the system and bureaucracy are not sensitive and careful according to their internal laws. So while working on another bureaucratic job I tried to have a little more human approach to people. A little personal, without distance, to be understandable in expression and to joke whenever possible. Simple humor helps a lot in such situations. People accustomed to the arrogance of the administration react very positively to the first signs of "humanity" in the approach. It was my strategy, to make my job easier (there was less quarreling and tension in the office) and to help the client. I was looking for a win win situation.Sudeći po zvukovima stvari, ona je ignorisana i sasvim sigurno nije adekvatno podržana od strane sistema (zašto nisam iznenađena ) nisam sigurna koliko je ova situacija u kojoj se našla ovjekovječena njenom nesposobnošću da čita, dok to primjećujem također se često dešava ljudima koji su potpuno pismeni i izuzetno artikulirani i glasni o svojoj situaciji!
I didn’t respond earlier because I had not yet gone through the five steps of being called out for being a jerk. I stayed on step one for a bit too long (“I’m not the jerk, Joe is”). I knew my logic was faulty when I asked myself why I listen to your show every week if you are such a jerk. I wasn’t satisfied with the answer of “I just really like listening to jerks.”
Another item worth throwing into the pot. Just comparing and contrasting the different realities that men / women existed in for a long duration of time. I wouldn't say that historically speaking it was expected for a woman to provide for herself, however, I'd say that it was for a man. I think it's undeniable that this put different pressures on the 2 genders and drove different kind of behaviours. For sure nowadays all genders are expected to provide for themselves but even in this, women have an easier exit route through choosing a male partner with higher means. So for a guy it's rarely "I'm going to work my way out of a bad economic situation by meeting and marrying a well to do woman", rather it's "I really have to figure this out otherwise I'm condemned to a life of struggle". I think that kind of pressure drives a certain kind of behaviour which may not necessarily be fully recognised and appreciated by women generally speaking. I think there is a certain kind of underlying level of aggression and drive that is qualitatively different in men compared to women and you can't deny that this result in somewhat different realities for the 2. I can't deny to not being able to fully understand certain aspects of women's realities as I don't expect women's world's to be the same and hold precisely the same expectations, be they unspoken. I'd say as a man you are way closer to death than a woman, at least like as a general rule. The world is a bit more visceral and raw to the male, a bit more unforgiving too. It really does call you to harness masculine qualities if you intend to navigate it okay, otherwise you'll run into some serious problems - rarely will anyone come to rescue you, rather you must endure. But again this is not to say women don't face real dangers too. It's just that things aren't the same between the 2 even though the 2 occupy the same space.
Added: No wonder we have a rise of she-males in today's world. It flipping isn't easy to be a man and be a man well - to do it well. It requires being able to handle fear and the unknown, it requires bravery and courage in the presence of scary odds. It requires a lot! It's much easier to take an exit route if one is presented to you and if that exit route is to deny reality and say that gender doesn't exist and that you can be a woman too, then many will take it especially if it becomes fashionable. But I dare say there will be costs - weak men allow for the rise of tyrants & tyrannical systems and both genders will pay the price for this.
In general men across the board (all over the world) do not marry women who are more intelligent than them. Dr. Jordan Peterson goes into detail about this in his lectures (you can find a lot of his work on YouTube). If you haven’t read or listened to him I would highly recommend it.
So true! I saw soo many wives belittle themselves in order to fan their husband's ego. They just cannot look smarter than their husbands. It's a real thing in many societies.This is a useful angle on the problems that have faced most men in our culture for a very long time. Yes, women were suppressed and repressed in many ways, but the ones carrying the major burden of care were men. It was so in my family too.
Yup. And through it all, there are the fundamental genetic differences of the genders. You just can't escape that.
Another excellent point. I guess that's why I had to marry a physicist to find happiness... he's way smarter than me and always building me up. My ex was definitely not so smart and constantly felt like he had to break me down. It was debilitating and exhausting.