I don't get it.... why not destroy evil?

[bozadi]

I wrote the following when I was about twelve or fourteen years old:

"I think, therefore I am."

But... am I existence or am I thought?

If I die...

Does my existence die?

Does my thought die?

Isn't thought the true existence?

What is told about thoughts in the Ra-Cassiopaea cosmology is the source of "the greatest inspiration", I think.

When we will solve all our deep problems, we will do it by our "thoughts" alone, essentially. All problems are caused by "thoughts" and solved by "thoughts", eventually.

 

[bozadi]

Yet were not 4D STS said to be (sometime) pets of higher density STS?

Yeah, the C's say bigfoots are the slaves and pets of Lizzies, who, in turn, are the slaves and, sometimes, pets of Orion STS. I'm not sure what Orion STS refers to specifically, but here I take it to be higher 4D STS, like Nordic 4D STS.

Or are the masters of reptilians also 4D or 5D?

If I remember right, Ra says 5D STS teaches 4D STS and command their armies. I think, technically, both Lizzies and Nordic 4D STS are voluntary slaves/students of 5D STS.

Do not 6D STS sometimes abduct people?

I don't think so, I don't remember reading anything like that in the Ra and Cassiopaea materials. I don't think that 5D STS will abduct humans either. I think there may be exceptions but the rule is that they won't, probably. They wouldn't concern themselves with that. They don't need to abduct people, I suppose.

Are we to understand that as disunified thought experiments by 5D or 6D?

Can you clarify or rephrase it, please?

Perhaps our higher selves (assuming their existence of course) are playing around with scenarios, and some of it happens to become real for us?

Like what?

Can I even think about these things without my head exploding?

Don't torture yourself. Growing positivity should be our first concern, I believe.

 

[Wandering Star]

Possible. I also suppose that the "content" of yin-yang can be seen as 1D thru 6D, and the "full circle" that contains that content can be seen as 7D. Not sure, just a point of view.

My idea too.

 

[bozadi]

I'm not sure if could distinguish a 4D attack from a 5D attack.

After I said that, I remembered the attack that almost caused me to commit suicide:

Third density repetition

there is manipulation and influence after death to persuade entities to reincarnate down to an overtly STS realm You almost make it sound like STO guides in the contemplation zone do not serve our highest good. I think you are making the assumption that “The light” and 5D are synonymous...

cassiopaea.org

Yeah, I think that could have been a 5D STS attack.

 

[Nienna]

Do not 6D STS sometimes abduct people?

Since 6D is STO with STS thought forms only, for balance, I would say that 6D does not abduct people as 6D STO would not do that and thought forms, I would think, cannot do that.

 

[hobnob]

Can you clarify or rephrase it, please?

Like what?

Both of my questions refer to the 6D abductions, which I think are convincingly debunked by you and @Nienna . I was searching for what I may have been remembering, but only found something about even Nordics rarely abducting people (and when they do so, it is permanent).

From what I might recall, though, there was something about someone being taken aboard a UFO and having a forced encounter with a woman, but I must have read this too many years ago for the memory to be accurate. I believe it may have something to do with a case John Keel came across, but no matter.

That said, I do wonder if 5D and 6D play a lot with imagination, constantly coming up with creative scenarios, if that helps to clarify anything.

 

[Ricardo]

Both of my questions refer to the 6D abductions, which I think are convincingly debunked by you and @Nienna . I was searching for what I may have been remembering, but only found something about even Nordics rarely abducting people (and when they do so, it is permanent).

From what I might recall, though, there was something about someone being taken aboard a UFO and having a forced encounter with a woman, but I must have read this too many years ago for the memory to be accurate. I believe it may have something to do with a case John Keel came across, but no matter.

That said, I do wonder if 5D and 6D play a lot with imagination, constantly coming up with creative scenarios, if that helps to clarify anything.

That was in Brazil , the Antonio Villas Boas case , i think is what you are referring to , but that has no, "direct " bearing , on 5 or 6th . linky

 

[Wandering Star]

cannot do that.

STS have slaves for the work (in all levels), so others do it.

 

[Wandering Star]

Abductions and density levels, right?

According to the C's, it is something exclusive to STS and the STS system is pyramidal.

Do any of you know a company president who goes down to the basement to sort the mail?

Is that understandable?

 

[Fluffy]

I also consider 7D (the big bang, at least) to be 100% positivity. In that sense, yeah, it's on the extreme positive end of the spectrum. For life/universe to be, various mixtures of positivity and negativity are needed, obviously. Life as we know it would not possible with 100% positivity alone, because absolute positiveness means absolute oneness; no division whatsoever, no individuals, and thus, I suppose, no experience, which is somewhat similar to 100% negativity (non-existence). I wonder if this is metaphorically one of the explanations of the black dot within yang.



Possible. I also suppose that the "content" of yin-yang can be seen as 1D thru 6D, and the "full circle" that contains that content can be seen as 7D. Not sure, just a point of view.


But also remember that we have more 5D experience than

Can you please clarify that? You mean STO doesn't know about STS?

Sure, I’m just proposing that in 5D, which is said to be a dream state of whatever the consciousness chooses as it’s reality, there could most surely be souls who don’t know that there is any negative elements to their experience or the experience of others as they have not developed that sense because of blind spots or desire to ignore or exclude the possibility.

I can imagine 5D is just where some souls live that are not actively learning anything intentionally (super duper slow wave cycle)
They just are, in the comfort and bliss of their dreamy lala land, being inherently good in company with others doing the same.

 

[Fluffy]

H

"So I think the yin yang symbol only applies for 6D down." something was bothering me with this , hate to be that guy , (not really :D ) , but if ying/yang are considered , as , fractal, then it must apply as well, even C's give us individual names when talking to us lowly 3rd graders eh ;) . ( imo / my 2 cents / blah )

How is yin yang a fractal? it’s merely a third density representation of balance.

 

[Fluffy]

My idea too.

I like that idea too

 

[Ricardo]

As a representation of reality that, must be consistent with itself , albeit , with differentiation enough , to be reliable, as a tool for reflection /analysis . ( ie like there are rules that consciousness must learn at any level , even while allowing INFINITE variety )

 

[Fluffy]

As a representation of reality that, must be consistent with itself , albeit , with differentiation enough , to be reliable, as a tool for reflection /analysis . ( ie like there are rules that consciousness must learn at any level , even while allowing INFINITE variety )

Huh?
May be I’m a bit dumb.. I have no idea what you just said.

Okay, honesty time.. the truth is sometimes I have no idea what’s being said but just pretend I do, wing it, and hope the info filters into my consciousness at some point later…. It’s an okay approach, ive seen some positive results, and there’s still stuff that I don’t know that I pretended I did, I’m just waiting on those downloads

 

[Ricardo]

aight , fractal :

" In mathematics, a fractal is a geometric shape containing detailed structure at arbitrarily small scales, usually having a fractal dimension strictly exceeding the topological dimension. Many fractals appear similar at various scales, as illustrated in successive magnifications of the Mandelbrot set.[1][2][3][4] This exhibition of similar patterns at increasingly smaller scales is called self-similarity, also known as expanding symmetry or unfolding symmetry (...) " ( edit : i wish i waz a lumber jack , no shite , i went from proclaiming being agnostic , to , wherever "we" are XD )