Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Joe]

This is going to be pretty big:

It's been known about for a while now, but was just announced officially. This is Dan Farah's UFO documentary (Farah produced Ready Player One). He interviews "34 senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community", including Rubio, Gillibrand, Carson, Burchett, Elizondo, Stratton, Clapper, and more. The rumor has been that they will be saying a lot more here than they have publicly until now. The trailer seems to confirm this, with Jay Stratton (who ran AAWSAP, AATIP, and UAPTF, at the latter of which he directed Grusch to find the stuff he found) saying for the first time that he has personally seen non-human craft and intelligences.

It premiers at SXSW in March.

I'll just say this now for future ref. All "disclosure" is gonna be lies and manipulation. This "documentary" seems to fit right in there. I mean, Clapper?? Seriously?? And note toward the end the guy talking about "so many beneficial aspects including clean energy". Right there we have the set up for what the Cs mentioned.

 

[Joe]

1) He encountered a negative entity that made him feel these emotions.
2) He encountered a positive entity that made him feel these emotions.
3) His proximity to the craft simply opened up his higher emotional center, and the emotions were a secondary effect not directly tied to the craft or its "pilots."

On 2) There are no "positive entities" in this general picture.

On 3) I seriously doubt it.

Option 4) The CIA used a microwave device to create those feelings in him.

 

[Joe]

Also, he thinks that the military get such a bad rep that they don't deserve, that generally military types love their country and that's why they do what they do.

As a general rule, military types are people who follow orders and are therefore very malleable, aka useful dupes in many cases.

 

[Joe]

Now, is it possible that the being in question (if the story is even true!) was indeed well-intended? I suppose. After all, there is probably a small percentage of individuals or "experiencers" who have come in contact with STO ET's. But given the thrust of Greer's agenda, it just seems to me that this "kindly" being discussed in the talk could have just as easily been a shill and arranged to meet with the contacter - to further bolster the perception in the UFO community that all or most aliens were ok and harmless.

I'd say it's very likely that this was a ploy to support the "friendly aliens" lie.

Having said that, I'm now wondering what overall percentage of ET-human close encounters have been/are (from an STO value system and perspective) of a positive orientation? There have to have been at least a few I think.

I'd say it's vanishingly rare, and as the Cs have said, not something that is ambiguous, which I think would include some "alien" asking you not to hurt it. Basically, given the current climate, I think there is zero chance of ANY positive dudes putting in an appearance, because that would only give credibility to the "friendly aliens" lie, which is obviously not something positive.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

If they did deliberately exclude him, and it wasn't an innocent oversight, as being the one who submitted the documents, he doesn't give his opinion as to why. Anyone here able to guess why?

A bit of clarity here, but not much. The main issue seems to have been that Corbell made promises to the Immaculate Constellation author about how things would go down, and Mace lying about the document threw her reliability in question, and the whole congressional approach. Go to around the 1-hour mark.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I'll just say this now for future ref. All "disclosure" is gonna be lies and manipulation.

I'll throw this out for future reference: all "disclosure" is going to be a mixture of truth, lies, omissions, and manipulation (some intentional, some "sincere").

 

[Joe]

I'll throw this out for future reference: all "disclosure" is going to be a mixture of truth, lies, omissions, and manipulation (some intentional, some "sincere").

As far as the Cs have gone in mentioning it, and in terms of the *actual* truth as given by them, disclosure looks like it's shaping up to be 100% a lie. The likely, at this stage, full disclosure, will be "they" are some kind of underground ancient human race that is fully material with some advanced tech that can help humans solve problems and "evolve". There is unlikely to be any mention of the expanded/hyperdimensional nature of reality and no mention of their true intentions. That would make it 100% a lie.

 

[Keit]

I'll throw this out for future reference: all "disclosure" is going to be a mixture of truth, lies, omissions, and manipulation (some intentional, some "sincere").

There is unlikely to be any mention of the expanded/hyperdimensional nature of reality and no mention of their true intentions. That would make it 100% a lie.

In my opinion, both statements are true

It appears that the hyperdimentional nature of reality (along with the cyclical nature of catastrophes) is the most important and core secret. Sure, we have all kind of mentions of "ultraterrestrials" and that maybe ufos come from a different dimension, but it's not near the level that has been explained by the C's and in Laura's books.

Hyperdimentional nature of reality is the million-dollar question. The key component of the "level playing field". Therefore "they" will do anything to prevent this kind of understanding on the global level in order to further their plans.

And as far as I understand, Approaching Infinity talks about the general ongoing process of gradual disclosure of information, i.e., whistleblowers coming forward, documents released, etc. In this sense there is a very high chance that a "true and genuine" data will be released and shared.

It probably will be true and genuine in a sense of people coming forward with a genuine desire to share information they witnessed or received. There are all kind of factions, and some of them have a serious interest in getting some info out. And some of this info will be genuinly "true".

What will be problematic, that without the "hyperdimentional" context, even true information can be used to shape a different narrative. This will be the manipulation part (some intentional, some "sincere").

It will be a learning opportunity for many to develop or hone their "seeing the unseen" skills. And at least right now we don't know how things will go, and if "they" will be succesful in their plans. In fact, at least the C's say that they won't. So at least right now it's not possible to predict with absolute certainty how this whole process will go, even if it does look that there is already an undeniable pull toward the "underground" and "angelic" direction.

 

[Joe]

And as far as I understand, Approaching Infinity talks about the general ongoing process of gradual disclosure of information, i.e., whistleblowers coming forward, documents released, etc. In this sense there is a very high chance that a "true and genuine" data will be released and shared.

The entire history of the phenomenon has been carefully presented in a manufactured and duplicitous way by the beings themselves for a period of time that extends back thousands of years, including all 1st 2nd 3rd 4th (etc.) "encounters".

The most you could say is that "disclosure" will be a VERY limited hangout, so limited perhaps that it may as well be a complete fabrication.

 

[Joe]

Maybe someone can, based on the current information being put out there and the likely trajectory of it, tell me what the official story a few years down the line is likely to be, when the reality of "aliens" or "NHI" (or whatever they call it) is common knowledge. What understanding will, for example, your 'normie' mother or brother have?

 

[Keit]

The most you could say is that "disclosure" will be a VERY limited hangout, so limited perhaps that it may as well be a complete fabrication.

Yeah, for sure. It can't be anything, but very limited, because "the truth" encorporates many other aspects and fields than simply testimonies from the whistleblowers, no matter how many "revealing" videos they may produce.

What you said below is an appropriate description of "disclosure", imo:

At this point it's pretty clear that disclosure is a process of drip feeding information into the public sphere in order to slowly, very slowly, acclimatize the population to the 'reality' of some kind of NHI. So no one event or statement can ever be called "disclosure".

We should also remember that most of this information is NOT reaching the average person, except indirectly, perhaps even by something akin to the "collective unconscious".

Maybe someone can, based on the current information being put out there and the likely trajectory of it, tell me what the official story a few years down the line is likely to be, when the reality of "aliens" or "NHI" (or whatever they call it) is common knowledge. What understanding will, for example, your 'normie' mother or brother have?

It's hard to say at this point. It's a tad premature, imo, because like you said above, most of this information is still unknown to the public. To most of the human population. Even the "NJ drones" event is a highly localized thing. You guys talked about this too during one of the shows. If we would ask people who live in many other countries, they wouldn't have any idea what drones, and why they should care. Same is for whistleblowers or anything that is called "disclosure" nowadays. It does appear that the "overton window" had shifted, but as you said, right now for the most part it affects in an indirect "collective unconscious" way.

And so at this point we are missing all kind of external variables (earth changes? virus? war in Middle East and the global economic crisis? other strange and "thrilling" events?) that would change that. And that's why it's kind of hard to say specifically now, because we could also have something like covid happening. Meaning, something happening that we didn't really expect. We got hints from the C's, but really, no one expected covid and everything that happened.

What's for sure, that whatever happens, PTB will make their outmost effort to control us. And so based on the circumstances and whatever their "thinktanks" will calculate, they will either present "aliens" or "NHI" as bad, or as saviors. Or maybe even both, and we will be sold a story of "factions in conflict". But at this point it's also hard to predict if their efforts will be succesful. Again, look at covid as an example.

 

[Joe]

What's for sure, that whatever happens, PTB will make their outmost effort to control us. And so based on the circumstances and whatever their "thinktanks" will calculate, they will either present "aliens" or "NHI" as bad, or as saviors. Or maybe even both, and we will be sold a story of "factions in conflict". But at this point it's also hard to predict if their efforts will be succesful. Again, look at covid as an example.

I suppose my question is, IF NHI become common knowledge and there are, as the Cs suggested, going to be presented an ancient humans of some type with high tech here to save us from our problems, and therefore largely benevolent, how much of that picture is true? For me, none of it is. Therefore, if "disclosure" happens on that basis or something similar, then it will fundamentally be a lie.

 

[Keit]

I suppose my question is, IF NHI become common knowledge and there are, as the Cs suggested, going to be presented an ancient humans of some type with high tech here to save us from our problems, and therefore largely benevolent, how much of that picture is true? For me, none of it is. Therefore, if "disclosure" happens on that basis or something similar, then it will fundamentally be a lie.

Yeah, I agree with you. If all this process of gradually releasing information presented by the whistleblowers would have a distinct signature and eventually lead to NHI being presented in the way you described, it would be safe to assume that it was orchestrated. Doesn't matter if the participants were true and genuine.

The question is, do we already know at this point that this is the direction where it is going?

Personally I saw some signs already with the NJ drones. See this discussion as an example. But not everyone in the UFO "community" is an "alien hugger" Also previous whistleblowers (Grusch, Graves, Fravor, Elizondo, etc) in no way or shape talked about aspects that were described by Barber. Here is also a reminder that Grusch's testimony advocates for the "the interdimensional hypothesis".

At this point I am still not sure if whatever is happening now with all the information that comes up is necesseraly ALL part of this manipulative process that eventually will lead to what you wrote above. It's too early to say, imo. But there is also no doubt that the process of acclimatization to the idea of benevolent aliens has begun much earlier. Laura described it in the Amazing Grace and in the Wave, everything that went with New Age COINTELPRO, etc. Similar things were happening in the Soviet Union, and now in Russia. There are "alien huggers" everywhere

 

[Ryan]

Maybe someone can, based on the current information being put out there and the likely trajectory of it, tell me what the official story a few years down the line is likely to be, when the reality of "aliens" or "NHI" (or whatever they call it) is common knowledge. What understanding will, for example, your 'normie' mother or brother have?

It could go something like this:

"'NHIs' are mostly good, but there are a few bad apples of course, although most hostile encounters were probably 'self-defense' due to ignorant and primitive humans reacting badly to those who are far 'superior' to them in so many ways. Humans have constantly warred and destroyed the environment and climate change is threatening humanity's survival, so we should at least listen closely to what our 'universal brothers' have to say. Yes, governments have been covering up interactions with such beings, but given how primitive and aggressive humans are, can you blame them? It's likely been 'for our own good'.

What's more, it may be that our 'universal brothers' were responsible for a lot of humanity's progress as a civilisation and have been helping us out all along; did you watch that new Netflix documentary, "Humanity's Saviours"? There's a whole bunch of people who've known this for ages; we should have been listening to them more. In fact, we should be thinking about electing those sorts of people to political office. 'Traditional' politicians are corrupt - they all tell lies and are just after money. We need people who know about this 'NHI stuff' and can tell us how things should be done.

Hey, if you don't believe me, just Google it. The new AI search is super helpful."

 

[Joe]

It seems that most people that have been into this topic for a long time are waiting for "disclosure". They've been waiting so long that they have "ontological angst" and are seeking "ontological relief" (as Ennio quoted someone as saying). There are two problems with that IMO

1) "disclosure" is being used as synonym for "truth" when it shouldn't be, because it isn't.

2) That ontological relief many are so desperately seeking is leaving them open to believe whatever they're told (especially the positive version), because it's "disclosure" and therefore the "truth" and they feel so much better after all these years of waiting and wondering (especially because it's "positive" and they can let go of the fear they felt at the idea that it was negative).

Basically, it's likely to be one giant manipulation and con, like most major global man-made (or NHI-made) events are on this planet.