The Earth Just Started Spinning Faster than Ever Before and Scientists Don’t Know Why

I would ignore the part that it is "human-driven climate change" in the next article. It is worst than Castaneda's quote of "how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior"...

Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years

[...] However, in recent years, the climate seems to be playing an increasing role in altering Earth's rotation, said study co-author Mostafa Kiani Shahvandi, a geoscientist at ETH Zurich. "I wanted to know if this was unusual or something like this happened in the past," Shahvandi told Live Science. "As it turned out, it is quite anomalous. The effect is therefore anthropogenic [caused by humans]." [:rolleyes:]
Not necessarily caused by humans. Taking a look to the research methods they've used, one has the impression that the entire study is questionable. However, the significant slowing down of Earth's rotation at this moment in time stands out as the significant signal-to-noise ratio here. It also means a Cs hit.

Even when all measurements are 100% correct, how would a twin sun cycle affect the whole? It was last here a few centuries ago, and before that, circa 27 million years ago. Perhaps the Cs cosmology is making better sense now. A review:

February 22nd, 1997

A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.

Q: (L) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and also the fourth!.

A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chlorofluorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density STS forces in a number of different ways.

Q: (L) All right, were those given in the order in which they are occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later?

A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation. Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought. [Discussion of new scientific theory recently presented that the earth is expanding.]

A: Continental "drift" is caused by the continual though variable, propelling of gases from the interior to the surface, mainly at points of magnetic significance.

Q: (J) What causes the change in the axis?

A: By slow down of rotation.
Earth alternately heats up and cools down in interior.

Q: (L) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?

A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.

April 15th, 2000

Q: (L) When you described it this way, you were talking about everything "opening up." You mentioned that if the earth's rotation were to slow, even a minute bit, that everything "opens up" gravitationally speaking. But, this seems to be connected to solar activity, and no so much the speed of the earth.

A: The solar and earth activities are interconnected.

March 4th, 2012

Why is the electromagnetic field weakening?

A: Spinning is slowing!

Q:
(L) So the electromagnetic field of the earth is a property of its spinning? And it's spinning is a property of... can be affected by electric stuff. (Belibaste) Yeah, like a motor, if it slows down, it generates less electromagnetic field. (Perceval) Getting ready for a flip.

Continuing with the LiveScience article:

[Shahvandi and study co-author Benedikt Soja, a professor of space geodesy at ETH Zurich, turned to the fossils of shelled single-cell organisms called foraminifera to peer back millions of years into Earth's day length. Changes in the oxygen content of these fossils could reveal sea levels when the organisms were alive, from which the researchers could extrapolate day lengths.

They found that today's 1.33-millisecond-per-century increase in day length was among the fastest changes seen in the past 3.6 [million] years. "This is expected to get even larger and even bigger than the effect of the moon," Shahvandi said.

One episode around 2 million years ago saw a similar increase in day length of 2.1 milliseconds per century , the researchers found. That was in the Early Pleistocene, during a period when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperatures rose. There is some uncertainty in the historical estimate, meaning that this period may have seen a similar increase in day length as today, or that today might be faster.

Under a future warming scenario where greenhouse gases increase, the day could lengthen by 2.62 milliseconds per century by 2080, Shahvandi and Soja reported in their study, which was published March 10 in the journal JGR Solid Earth.

Although the impact would likely not be perceptible to humans, the findings have other real-world implications. For example, Mann said, instruments that require precise knowledge of Earth's rotation rate, such as those on spacecraft, may need to be recalibrated. Other precise timekeeping applications, such as in computing, could be affected, Shahvandi said.

The findings also underscore the rapidity of modern warming. "It tells us about the rapid climate change," Shahvandi said, "[the] melting of snow and ice in polar ice sheets and mountains glaciers, and increase in the sea levels."

And if the trend continues, it's sudden glacial rebound...
 
I would ignore the part that it is "human-driven climate change" in the next article. It is worst than Castaneda's quote of "how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior"...

Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years
Intrigued that this slowing down doesn't show in the data; the trend past 50 and more years as seen from the plots in previous pages of the thread has been the opposite, that the rotation has been speeding up.

Do you think the data is tampered with? If so, for what reason, to hide the truth and give the opposite impression, i.e. to make people believe in a lie that's completely opposite from what's really been going on? And in such a way to have them in their power/control like described in that Precis on Stalking text? Or something else completely? What are your thoughts on this seemingly contradictory thing?
 
Or something else completely? What are your thoughts on this seemingly contradictory thing?

I think the measurements are accurate and that is what they're seeing. However, speeding relatively to when? When did current measurements started? The field of astronomy was born in the 17th century, the century when Nemesis made perihelion with the Sun, grounding the current and slowing down the planets in the solar system. Ever since, one would expect rotations to speed up relatively to that big grounding event. Now Nemesis is zooming out and is making its journey back through the Oort cloud which will take millions of years.

So the difference could be decades/centuries vs millennia trends. It has sped up since Nemesis perihelion, however, now the overall trend is "global warming". Enter an entirely different cycle: inner Earth core dynamics. Science doesn't factor in all the possible elements at play in the core mantle dynamics. Cs said there was a crystalline ammonia at Earth's inner core, and scientists are starting to tease with the idea of different elements at play.

Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?

A: Picture biorhythm graph.

Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?

A: 100,000 years, roughly.

It's all related, but the scale here is hundreds, if not a thousand years or so. It's all really amazing.
 
However, speeding relatively to when?
What do you mean by "relatively to when"?

Speeding, as in increase of angular velocity or rotational speed is usually referred to 'now", i.e. there IS positive angular acceleration, in contrast to slowing down which implies that there IS negative acceleration.

When did current measurements started?
The IERS data I was referring to and shown in the plot on previous page, reproduced below for the sake of convenience, started in 1962 on daily basis. Before that there were only yearly averages from cca 1900, shown on black/white plot on previous page which is also copy-pasted below.

117095


lod_year-average_1900-2021-jpg.90925


As shown in the first plot, when the C's made the remark around mid 2010 about Earth's rotation slowing down which could only be seen by instrumentation, there really was decrease of rotational speed which is evident on the data plot; there is an upward trend in the period 2004-2016. So it was a hit for the C's when they said that.

But now there is no such trend or any notable trend at all. Since 2016 until 2022 there was a clearly visible downward trend meaning that rotation was speeding up. That trend stopped in 2022 when this thread was started after those sensational news headlines about Earth spinning faster than ever, which also was not correct as can be seen in the second plot and also later in 2024 when that 1.6 millisecond so called 'record' was broken.

So, I'm a bit confused by your reply.
There was no mention of a "faster" or "slower" rotation compared to the time of Maunder minimum when hypothetically solar companion made its perihelion. The C's reference to Earth's rotation slowing down was evidently correct at the time when it was given, i.e. a hit then and there. Why mix that with some questionable propaganda study in favor of man-made global warming scam?

That's also the reason why I asked if you think that the data are tampered with, because when it's said that Earth's rotation is slowing down it means that it is slowing down now which is evidently not what the data show.

BTW, thanks for the October 31, 2001 session's link. :flowers:
I remembered reading about crystalline ammonia at the Earth's core, but not the rest of the discussion. No wonder modern science is in the dark about the real thing producing so called Earth's dynamo as understood in magneto-hydrodynamics; super-conductivity at -55 degrees Kelvin is not something that's even allowed in physics. Well, at least not in our standard materialistic 3-dim physics taught at universities and written about in textbooks.
Evidently, we are really in need for real hyperdimensional stuff, which most probably includes also consciousness, being developed if we actually want to understand our reality on more fundamental basis.
 
What do you mean by "relatively to when"?

Speeding, as in increase of angular velocity or rotational speed is usually referred to 'now", i.e. there IS positive angular acceleration, in contrast to slowing down which implies that there IS negative acceleration.

I don't mean to question these terms. They're what they are and we assume they're correct. For this moment in time.

My point is to raise the awareness of this subject to a wider perspective - one where seemingly contradictory data may be explained by factors that science leaves out of the equation.

That Nemesis made perihelion with the Sun in the 17th century. In this context, all measurements, as we know them, are after this time.

That the magnetic field is weaker at this moment in time, which is related to the Earth's spinning slowing down compared to the past according to indirect historical traces or records (fossil studies), and this is related to Earth's core dynamics, among other things. We're opening up.
 
March 4th, 2012
Why is the electromagnetic field weakening?

A: Spinning is slowing!

Q:
(L) So the electromagnetic field of the earth is a property of its spinning? And it's spinning is a property of... can be affected by electric stuff. (Belibaste) Yeah, like a motor, if it slows down, it generates less electromagnetic field. (Perceval) Getting ready for a flip.
Another source of the electromagnetic field weakening (temporally and localized depending on it size) is meteor impact. Event small airburst could effect it.

Effect of meteorite on the electromagnetic field

Meteorite impacts create intense, localized electromagnetic effects, including shock waves that melt rocks and reorganize their magnetism. These impacts can generate electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), create plasma clouds that shield and temporarily weaken the Earth's ambient magnetic field, and create new magnetized rocks, according to studies like this one from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Key Effects on Electromagnetic Fields:

  • Temporary Weakening and Shielding: The intense heat and shock from an impact create plasma, which increases the electrical conductivity of rocks. This plasma acts as a shield, preventing the ambient magnetic field from penetrating the material, leading to a localized decrease in magnetic field strength.
  • Permanent Magnetic Alteration: As the shock-heated material cools, it remagnetizes, creating a permanent, localized magnetic anomaly (like the Santa Fe impact structure) that records the state of the Earth's magnetic field at that moment.
  • Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Generation: The high-velocity, ionized trail of a meteor passing through the atmosphere can create a "cone" of charge separation. This, along with its passage through atmospheric potential gradients, can produce detectable EMPs, as described in this Physics Stack Exchange discussion.
  • Core Rotation Variation: Large impacts can slightly affect the rotation speed of the Earth's core, potentially inducing variations in the strength of the magnetic field over long periods.
  • Magnetic Reversals: While very rare, some theories suggest that significant meteorite impacts could potentially influence, but not necessarily cause, reversals in the Earth's magnetic field, according to the USGS (.gov).
    USGS (.gov)
    USGS (.gov) +5
Meteorite-Driven Magnetic Behavior:
  • Remagnetization: The magnetic carriers in meteorites, such as kamacite, can be easily altered, meaning that their original magnetic records can be erased or overwritten upon impact, as explained in this AGU Publications article.
  • Asteroid Collisions: Collisions between asteroids can generate their own small magnetic fields, and fragments from these collisions can carry these magnetic signatures, as discussed in this YaleNews article and this article from Universe Today.

Effect of small meteorite airburst on the magnetic field

A small meteorite airburst (5–20m range) generates a high-energy plasma plume and intense shock waves, which can locally and temporarily distort or attenuate Earth’s magnetic field. The plasma generated at the leading edge of the shockwave increases electrical conductivity, shielding the local magnetic field and leaving a temporary, weak remnant signal in its wake.

As we were told by the C's, the wave is following the comet cluster and will be arriving prior to the wave.


A: No. Wave comet cluster all using same energy.

Q: (L) Using same energy to what?

A: Pass through space\time.

Q: (L) Does this mean that without this comet cluster they cannot pass through space/time?

A: No. Slower. message follows here. Quiet for one moment please: From now on when word to follow is in quotes we will designate as follows: mark then word then mark. Now, "slower."

{We installed quote marks on the board after this. From this point on, when words in the Cassiopaean responses are in quotes, it is because they have so designated.}

Q: (L) So, it is slower for them to come here without this wave. Where is the wave coming from?

A: Follows cluster.

Q: (L) It follows the cluster. What does this wave consist of?

A: Realm border.

Q: (L) Does the realm border wave follow the comet cluster in a permanent way?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is the realm border loosely associated with the comet cluster each time it comes?

A: No. Realm border follows all encompassing energy reality change; realm border will follow this cluster passage and has others but not most.

Q: (L) Is this realm border a dimensional boundary?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay, this realm border, do dimensions...

A: Pulsating realms. Fluctuating realms.

Q: (L) Is our realm fluctuating or pulsating?

A: No.

Q: (L) But this other realm does?

A: No.

Q: (L) What fluctuates?

A: Residence.

Q: (L) Whatever is in that realm fluctuates?

A: No. Your planet fluctuates between realms.

Q: (L) How often does this fluctuation occur?

A: About every 309,000 years.

Q: (L) In other words we can expect to be in 4th density for about 300,000 years?

A: Yes.

So my deduction is that the prior lowering of earth electromagnetic field may be a prerequisite (catalyst) to the realm border transfer. A large scall bombardment just prior to the wave may in effect lower the electromagnetic field of the whole planet.
 

Attachments

  • 1774531112235.jpeg
    1774531112235.jpeg
    1.4 KB · Views: 8
Another propriety, I think, of a meteorite explosion is that it may open a window as it also produces as shown in previous post an EM pulse. See this next session.

Could you define for us a 'window? - Convergence; opening to alternative states via energy grid points.
Session 12 December 1998

Laura said:

Q: It seems to me that if what he was saying was true, that he certainly would not be allowed to say it. It's based on and converges with all the stories they are telling about Rennes-le-Chateau and seems to be more smokescreen. Anyway, Mike has questions. (M) You said that this place over Rennes-le-Chateau was a window. What is a window? (L) Now, I realize that we have all assumed that we know what a window is, but we have never really asked for a definition. Could you define for us a 'window?

A: Convergence; opening to alternative states via energy grid points.

Q: Are windows where you can pass back and forth? Moving between realms?

A: It is possible.

Q: How does a window differ from a 'portal?'

A: Window is open, portal is crafted.

Q: A window is naturally occurring portal?

A: Close.

Q: Does a window remain open all the time, or does it open and close for various reasons.

A: Closer to latter.

Q: What determines its opening and closing?

A: Frequency.

Q: Frequency of what?

A: Energy patterns.

Q: Frequency patterns of the area itself, or of people, or of people in interaction with the area?

A: Former.

Q: What could occur to change the frequency of the area?

A: EM pulse.

Q: Where do these EM pulses originate from?

A: They are transmutable.

Q: Transmutable from what?

A: Not online.

Q: What?

A: Your assumptions get you lost.

Q: What does it mean when you say 'EM pulses are transmutable?'

A: We will not answer these rapid fire inquiries as they abridge learning.



Where do these EM pulse originate from, indeed.

They are transmutable

Well, isn’t what happen to meteorite when they explode, over head or on impact, they transmute from a solid to plasma which impact the electromagnetic field or frequency of the area. They create a window that permit to move between realm and as we know may be an entering point for what we call window faller.
I wonder if today we could have an answer to Laura is question. Maybe it was already answered, I don't know.
To be continue…
 
Where do these EM pulse originate from, indeed.

They are transmutable

Well, isn’t what happen to meteorite when they explode, over head or on impact, they transmute from a solid to plasma which impact the electromagnetic field or frequency of the area. They create a window that permit to move between realm and as we know may be an entering point for what we call window faller.
I wonder if today we could have an answer to Laura is question. Maybe it was already answered, I don't know.
To be continue…

A couple of related/complementary sessions regarding this subject:

June 21st, 2014

(Data) I made a calculation about the magnetic field of the earth today. In just six months in 2014, the magnetic field weakened by 10% in North America. It weakened 6 microtesla, and the average magnetic field is 60 microtesla. And ONLY over North America. In Russia and China, it appeared to have grown a little bit stronger.
Latest ESA study published last year reinforces this pattern.

Changes_in_strong_magnetic_field_over_Canada_and_Siberia_article.gif

(L) So it's weakening mainly over North America? Is there any significance to that?

A: Oh indeed!

Q: (L) And what might that significance be?

A: Just you wait!

Q: (Perceval) Does a weakened magnetic field have any correlation to stronger likelihood of meteorite impacts or space rock attraction type stuff?

A: Or geological activity!

July 22, 2010

Is the Gulf Stream breaking up, and is that going to bring on an ice age?

A: It is, it will.

Q:
(L) Is that like imminent?

A: The cause is more than the oil. [...]

What do you mean: "The cause is more than the oil"?

A: Internal planetary changes including magnetic field modifications.

Q: (L) And what is causing the internal planetary changes including the magnetic field alterations?

A: Both the change in the cosmic environment and the presence of foreign bodies in and near the inner solar system. {pause} Realm convergence.
 
Hmm, the timing of this "acclimatization" article is interesting:What If Earth's Magnetic Field Disappeared?
tQtZxvDJ9i6wwifKchQBS-650-80.jpg.webp

Around Earth, an invisible magnetic field traps electrons and other charged particles. (Image credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)

Extending from Earth like invisible spaghetti is the planet's magnetic field. Created by the churn of Earth's core, this field is important for everyday life: It shields the planet from solar particles, it provides a basis for navigation and it might have played an important role in the evolution of life on Earth. But what would happen if Earth's magnetic field disappeared tomorrow? A larger number of charged solar particles would bombard the planet, putting power grids and satellites on the fritz and increasing human exposure to higher levels of cancer-causing ultraviolet radiation. In other words, a missing magnetic field would have consequences that would be problematic but not necessarily apocalyptic, at least in the short term.And that's good news, because for more than a century, it's been weakening. Even now, there are especially flimsy spots, like the South Atlantic Anomaly in the Southern Hemisphere, which create technical problems for low-orbiting satellites. [...]

Far more relevant to the lives of humans is that the magnetic field is weakening. Scientists have been measuring this weakening directly with magnetic observatories and satellites for the past 160 years. Whether the field was faltering before that is a bit murkier, as is what it will do next. The magnetic field is currently about 80% dipolar, Tarduno said. That means it acts mostly like a bar magnet. If you could put iron filings around the planet (and remove the influence of the sun, which spews a constant stream of charged particles called the solar wind toward Earth, blowing the magnetic field around like long hair in a breeze), the resulting magnetic field lines would show a clear North and South. But 20% of the field is non-dipolar, meaning it's more complicated;there are local variations. [...]
Tarduno and his team have found that a weird eddy in the core under South Africa might be contributing to some of this weakness. This eddy appears to cause the South Atlantic Anomaly, a known weak spot in the field that stretches from about 190 miles (300 kilometers) east of Brazil across much of South America. In this area, charged particles from the solar wind dip down closer than usual to Earth. The South Atlantic Anomaly isn't particularly noticeable on the ground. But Earth-orbiting satellites encounter more damaging solar particles there, and astronauts who have traveled through the region on the International Space Station have reported shooting-star visual phenomena thought to be caused by relatively high levels of radiation at the level of low Earth orbit there.

What would this world with a minimal magnetic field look like? Well, your compass wouldn't work, for one thing. "It's just going to be pointing toward the [region of] the highest magnetic field," Tarduno said. "It could be very close to you; it could be very far away."

The northern and southern lights would be visible from lower latitudes, because these colorful shows are the result of the interaction between charged particles hurled from the sun in the solar wind and Earth's magnetosphere. Currently, these auroras appear near the poles, following Earth's largely North-South magnetic field lines, but a weaker field would allow the particles to penetrate Earth's atmosphere, lighting up the sky closer to the equator.

The conditions in the South Atlantic Anomaly for satellites might become common across the globe, which would cause technical glitches. Solar particles can ping electronics, disrupting bits of memory in what are called single-event upsets, or SEUs. When solar particles interact with the charged layer of Earth's atmosphere called the ionosphere, they also knock electrons free from their molecular orbits. These free electrons then interfere with the transmission of the high-frequency radio waves used for communication.

Interactions between the solar wind and Earth's atmosphere can also break down the ozone layer over time, Tarduno said, which would raise humanity's collective ultraviolet radiation exposure and increase skin cancer risks.

"Whilst it probably wouldn't be utterly catastrophic for life, there would be a much higher radiation dosage on the ground without a magnetic field," said Martin Archer, a space plasma physicist at Queen Mary University of London.

There is little evidence that past magnetic field variations have impacted life on Earth. Still, the magnetic field has undoubtedly shaped Earth's surface, helping to keep the planet's fragile atmosphere from being blown into space by the relentless force of the solar wind, Archer told Live Science.

A magnetic field is not crucial for having an atmosphere — Venus has no magnetic field and has a massive, if unwelcoming, atmosphere — but it certainly acts as an additional protective layer. Mars, which used to have a magnetic field but lost it some 4 billion years ago, has had its atmosphere almost entirely stripped away. And if there were a way to give the moon an Earth-like atmosphere, the solar wind would whittle it to nothing in a mere century, Archer said.

Interesting how astronauts who have traveled through the South Atlantic Anomaly on the International Space Station have reported shooting-star visual phenomena. They think it might be radiation related, they're not sure though. Cs said UFOs avoid the area.

O related news, Smile is about to be launched. Smile will be launched aboard a Vega-C rocket from Europe’s Spaceport in French Guiana. Smile is a joint mission between ESA and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, designed to study how the solar wind interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
 
What do you mean: "The cause is more than the oil"?

A: Internal planetary changes including magnetic field modifications.

Q: (L) And what is causing the internal planetary changes including the magnetic field alterations?

A: Both the change in the cosmic environment and the presence of foreign bodies in and near the inner solar system. {pause} Realm convergence.

Today, it all become clear, the cause of the war with Iran is more than oil.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom