The Earth Just Started Spinning Faster than Ever Before and Scientists Don’t Know Why

[Gaby]

I would ignore the part that it is "human-driven climate change" in the next article. It is worst than Castaneda's quote of "how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior"...

Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years

[...] However, in recent years, the climate seems to be playing an increasing role in altering Earth's rotation, said study co-author Mostafa Kiani Shahvandi, a geoscientist at ETH Zurich. "I wanted to know if this was unusual or something like this happened in the past," Shahvandi told Live Science. "As it turned out, it is quite anomalous. The effect is therefore anthropogenic [caused by humans]." []

Not necessarily caused by humans. Taking a look to the research methods they've used, one has the impression that the entire study is questionable. However, the significant slowing down of Earth's rotation at this moment in time stands out as the significant signal-to-noise ratio here. It also means a Cs hit.

Even when all measurements are 100% correct, how would a twin sun cycle affect the whole? It was last here a few centuries ago, and before that, circa 27 million years ago. Perhaps the Cs cosmology is making better sense now. A review:

February 22nd, 1997

A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.

Q: (L) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and also the fourth!.

A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chlorofluorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density STS forces in a number of different ways.

Q: (L) All right, were those given in the order in which they are occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later?

A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation. Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought. [Discussion of new scientific theory recently presented that the earth is expanding.]

A: Continental "drift" is caused by the continual though variable, propelling of gases from the interior to the surface, mainly at points of magnetic significance.

Q: (J) What causes the change in the axis?

A: By slow down of rotation. Earth alternately heats up and cools down in interior.

Q: (L) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?

A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.

April 15th, 2000

Q: (L) When you described it this way, you were talking about everything "opening up." You mentioned that if the earth's rotation were to slow, even a minute bit, that everything "opens up" gravitationally speaking. But, this seems to be connected to solar activity, and no so much the speed of the earth.

A: The solar and earth activities are interconnected.

March 4th, 2012

Why is the electromagnetic field weakening?

A: Spinning is slowing!

Q: (L) So the electromagnetic field of the earth is a property of its spinning? And it's spinning is a property of... can be affected by electric stuff. (Belibaste) Yeah, like a motor, if it slows down, it generates less electromagnetic field. (Perceval) Getting ready for a flip.

Continuing with the LiveScience article:

[Shahvandi and study co-author Benedikt Soja, a professor of space geodesy at ETH Zurich, turned to the fossils of shelled single-cell organisms called foraminifera to peer back millions of years into Earth's day length. Changes in the oxygen content of these fossils could reveal sea levels when the organisms were alive, from which the researchers could extrapolate day lengths.

They found that today's 1.33-millisecond-per-century increase in day length was among the fastest changes seen in the past 3.6 [million] years. "This is expected to get even larger and even bigger than the effect of the moon," Shahvandi said.

One episode around 2 million years ago saw a similar increase in day length of 2.1 milliseconds per century , the researchers found. That was in the Early Pleistocene, during a period when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperatures rose. There is some uncertainty in the historical estimate, meaning that this period may have seen a similar increase in day length as today, or that today might be faster.

Under a future warming scenario where greenhouse gases increase, the day could lengthen by 2.62 milliseconds per century by 2080, Shahvandi and Soja reported in their study, which was published March 10 in the journal JGR Solid Earth.

Although the impact would likely not be perceptible to humans, the findings have other real-world implications. For example, Mann said, instruments that require precise knowledge of Earth's rotation rate, such as those on spacecraft, may need to be recalibrated. Other precise timekeeping applications, such as in computing, could be affected, Shahvandi said.

The findings also underscore the rapidity of modern warming. "It tells us about the rapid climate change," Shahvandi said, "[the] melting of snow and ice in polar ice sheets and mountains glaciers, and increase in the sea levels."

And if the trend continues, it's sudden glacial rebound...

 

[SasaM]

I would ignore the part that it is "human-driven climate change" in the next article. It is worst than Castaneda's quote of "how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior"...

Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years

Intrigued that this slowing down doesn't show in the data; the trend past 50 and more years as seen from the plots in previous pages of the thread has been the opposite, that the rotation has been speeding up.

Do you think the data is tampered with? If so, for what reason, to hide the truth and give the opposite impression, i.e. to make people believe in a lie that's completely opposite from what's really been going on? And in such a way to have them in their power/control like described in that Precis on Stalking text? Or something else completely? What are your thoughts on this seemingly contradictory thing?

 

[Gaby]

Or something else completely? What are your thoughts on this seemingly contradictory thing?

I think the measurements are accurate and that is what they're seeing. However, speeding relatively to when? When did current measurements started? The field of astronomy was born in the 17th century, the century when Nemesis made perihelion with the Sun, grounding the current and slowing down the planets in the solar system. Ever since, one would expect rotations to speed up relatively to that big grounding event. Now Nemesis is zooming out and is making its journey back through the Oort cloud which will take millions of years.

So the difference could be decades/centuries vs millennia trends. It has sped up since Nemesis perihelion, however, now the overall trend is "global warming". Enter an entirely different cycle: inner Earth core dynamics. Science doesn't factor in all the possible elements at play in the core mantle dynamics. Cs said there was a crystalline ammonia at Earth's inner core, and scientists are starting to tease with the idea of different elements at play.

Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?

A: Picture biorhythm graph.

Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?

A: 100,000 years, roughly.

It's all related, but the scale here is hundreds, if not a thousand years or so. It's all really amazing.

 

[SasaM]

However, speeding relatively to when?

What do you mean by "relatively to when"?

Speeding, as in increase of angular velocity or rotational speed is usually referred to 'now", i.e. there IS positive angular acceleration, in contrast to slowing down which implies that there IS negative acceleration.

When did current measurements started?

The IERS data I was referring to and shown in the plot on previous page, reproduced below for the sake of convenience, started in 1962 on daily basis. Before that there were only yearly averages from cca 1900, shown on black/white plot on previous page which is also copy-pasted below.

As shown in the first plot, when the C's made the remark around mid 2010 about Earth's rotation slowing down which could only be seen by instrumentation, there really was decrease of rotational speed which is evident on the data plot; there is an upward trend in the period 2004-2016. So it was a hit for the C's when they said that.

But now there is no such trend or any notable trend at all. Since 2016 until 2022 there was a clearly visible downward trend meaning that rotation was speeding up. That trend stopped in 2022 when this thread was started after those sensational news headlines about Earth spinning faster than ever, which also was not correct as can be seen in the second plot and also later in 2024 when that 1.6 millisecond so called 'record' was broken.

So, I'm a bit confused by your reply.
There was no mention of a "faster" or "slower" rotation compared to the time of Maunder minimum when hypothetically solar companion made its perihelion. The C's reference to Earth's rotation slowing down was evidently correct at the time when it was given, i.e. a hit then and there. Why mix that with some questionable propaganda study in favor of man-made global warming scam?

That's also the reason why I asked if you think that the data are tampered with, because when it's said that Earth's rotation is slowing down it means that it is slowing down now which is evidently not what the data show.

BTW, thanks for the October 31, 2001 session's link.
I remembered reading about crystalline ammonia at the Earth's core, but not the rest of the discussion. No wonder modern science is in the dark about the real thing producing so called Earth's dynamo as understood in magneto-hydrodynamics; super-conductivity at -55 degrees Kelvin is not something that's even allowed in physics. Well, at least not in our standard materialistic 3-dim physics taught at universities and written about in textbooks.
Evidently, we are really in need for real hyperdimensional stuff, which most probably includes also consciousness, being developed if we actually want to understand our reality on more fundamental basis.

 

[Gaby]

What do you mean by "relatively to when"?

Speeding, as in increase of angular velocity or rotational speed is usually referred to 'now", i.e. there IS positive angular acceleration, in contrast to slowing down which implies that there IS negative acceleration.

I don't mean to question these terms. They're what they are and we assume they're correct. For this moment in time.

My point is to raise the awareness of this subject to a wider perspective - one where seemingly contradictory data may be explained by factors that science leaves out of the equation.

That Nemesis made perihelion with the Sun in the 17th century. In this context, all measurements, as we know them, are after this time.

That the magnetic field is weaker at this moment in time, which is related to the Earth's spinning slowing down compared to the past according to indirect historical traces or records (fossil studies), and this is related to Earth's core dynamics, among other things. We're opening up.

 

[Konstantin]

Regarding the Earth's speed of rotation, I found this chart:

 

[Laurentien2]

March 4th, 2012
Why is the electromagnetic field weakening?

A: Spinning is slowing!

Q: (L) So the electromagnetic field of the earth is a property of its spinning? And it's spinning is a property of... can be affected by electric stuff. (Belibaste) Yeah, like a motor, if it slows down, it generates less electromagnetic field. (Perceval) Getting ready for a flip.

Another source of the electromagnetic field weakening (temporally and localized depending on it size) is meteor impact. Event small airburst could effect it.

Effect of meteorite on the electromagnetic field

Meteorite impacts create intense, localized electromagnetic effects, including shock waves that melt rocks and reorganize their magnetism. These impacts can generate electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), create plasma clouds that shield and temporarily weaken the Earth's ambient magnetic field, and create new magnetized rocks, according to studies like this one from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Key Effects on Electromagnetic Fields:

• Temporary Weakening and Shielding: The intense heat and shock from an impact create plasma, which increases the electrical conductivity of rocks. This plasma acts as a shield, preventing the ambient magnetic field from penetrating the material, leading to a localized decrease in magnetic field strength.
• Permanent Magnetic Alteration: As the shock-heated material cools, it remagnetizes, creating a permanent, localized magnetic anomaly (like the Santa Fe impact structure) that records the state of the Earth's magnetic field at that moment.
• Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Generation: The high-velocity, ionized trail of a meteor passing through the atmosphere can create a "cone" of charge separation. This, along with its passage through atmospheric potential gradients, can produce detectable EMPs, as described in this Physics Stack Exchange discussion.
• Core Rotation Variation: Large impacts can slightly affect the rotation speed of the Earth's core, potentially inducing variations in the strength of the magnetic field over long periods.
• Magnetic Reversals: While very rare, some theories suggest that significant meteorite impacts could potentially influence, but not necessarily cause, reversals in the Earth's magnetic field, according to the USGS (.gov).
  
  
  USGS (.gov) +5

Meteorite-Driven Magnetic Behavior:

• Remagnetization: The magnetic carriers in meteorites, such as kamacite, can be easily altered, meaning that their original magnetic records can be erased or overwritten upon impact, as explained in this AGU Publications article.
• Asteroid Collisions: Collisions between asteroids can generate their own small magnetic fields, and fragments from these collisions can carry these magnetic signatures, as discussed in this YaleNews article and this article from Universe Today.

Effect of small meteorite airburst on the magnetic field

A small meteorite airburst (5–20m range) generates a high-energy plasma plume and intense shock waves, which can locally and temporarily distort or attenuate Earth’s magnetic field. The plasma generated at the leading edge of the shockwave increases electrical conductivity, shielding the local magnetic field and leaving a temporary, weak remnant signal in its wake.

As we were told by the C's, the wave is following the comet cluster and will be arriving prior to the wave.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

A: No. Wave comet cluster all using same energy.

Q: (L) Using same energy to what?

A: Pass through space\time.

Q: (L) Does this mean that without this comet cluster they cannot pass through space/time?

A: No. Slower. message follows here. Quiet for one moment please: From now on when word to follow is in quotes we will designate as follows: mark then word then mark. Now, "slower."

{We installed quote marks on the board after this. From this point on, when words in the Cassiopaean responses are in quotes, it is because they have so designated.}

Q: (L) So, it is slower for them to come here without this wave. Where is the wave coming from?

A: Follows cluster.

Q: (L) It follows the cluster. What does this wave consist of?

A: Realm border.

Q: (L) Does the realm border wave follow the comet cluster in a permanent way?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is the realm border loosely associated with the comet cluster each time it comes?

A: No. Realm border follows all encompassing energy reality change; realm border will follow this cluster passage and has others but not most.

Q: (L) Is this realm border a dimensional boundary?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay, this realm border, do dimensions...

A: Pulsating realms. Fluctuating realms.

Q: (L) Is our realm fluctuating or pulsating?

A: No.

Q: (L) But this other realm does?

A: No.

Q: (L) What fluctuates?

A: Residence.

Q: (L) Whatever is in that realm fluctuates?

A: No. Your planet fluctuates between realms.

Q: (L) How often does this fluctuation occur?

A: About every 309,000 years.

Q: (L) In other words we can expect to be in 4th density for about 300,000 years?

A: Yes.

So my deduction is that the prior lowering of earth electromagnetic field may be a prerequisite (catalyst) to the realm border transfer. A large scall bombardment just prior to the wave may in effect lower the electromagnetic field of the whole planet.

 

[Gaby]

Another source of the electromagnetic field weakening (temporally and localized depending on it size) is meteor impact. Event small airburst could effect it.

Very interesting, yes.

Can you provide a link for the information you posted "Effect of meteorite on the electromagnetic field"?

 

[Laurentien2]

Very interesting, yes.

Can you provide a link for the information you posted "Effect of meteorite on the electromagnetic field"?

They were provided by AI on Google but there are some article on the effect on the magnetic field by meteorite impact.
here is one example;

https://phys.org/news/2021-11-scientist-reveals-lost-magnetism-meteorite.html

 

[Laurentien2]

This one from Russia;

https://seminar.pgia.ru/archive/2024/5_01_Cherniakov.pdf#:~:text=The%20flights%20of%20meteoroids%20are,a%20meteor%20fall%20was%20recorded