I would ignore the part that it is "human-driven climate change" in the next article. It is worst than Castaneda's quote of "how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior"...
Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years
Even when all measurements are 100% correct, how would a twin sun cycle affect the whole? It was last here a few centuries ago, and before that, circa 27 million years ago. Perhaps the Cs cosmology is making better sense now. A review:
February 22nd, 1997
April 15th, 2000
March 4th, 2012
Continuing with the LiveScience article:
And if the trend continues, it's sudden glacial rebound...
Human-driven climate change is slowing Earth's rotation at a rate not seen in 3.6 million years
Not necessarily caused by humans. Taking a look to the research methods they've used, one has the impression that the entire study is questionable. However, the significant slowing down of Earth's rotation at this moment in time stands out as the significant signal-to-noise ratio here. It also means a Cs hit.[...] However, in recent years, the climate seems to be playing an increasing role in altering Earth's rotation, said study co-author Mostafa Kiani Shahvandi, a geoscientist at ETH Zurich. "I wanted to know if this was unusual or something like this happened in the past," Shahvandi told Live Science. "As it turned out, it is quite anomalous. The effect is therefore anthropogenic [caused by humans]." []
Even when all measurements are 100% correct, how would a twin sun cycle affect the whole? It was last here a few centuries ago, and before that, circa 27 million years ago. Perhaps the Cs cosmology is making better sense now. A review:
February 22nd, 1997
A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.
Q: (L) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and also the fourth!.
A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chlorofluorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density STS forces in a number of different ways.
Q: (L) All right, were those given in the order in which they are occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later?
A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation. Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought. [Discussion of new scientific theory recently presented that the earth is expanding.]
A: Continental "drift" is caused by the continual though variable, propelling of gases from the interior to the surface, mainly at points of magnetic significance.
Q: (J) What causes the change in the axis?
A: By slow down of rotation. Earth alternately heats up and cools down in interior.
Q: (L) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?
A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.
April 15th, 2000
Q: (L) When you described it this way, you were talking about everything "opening up." You mentioned that if the earth's rotation were to slow, even a minute bit, that everything "opens up" gravitationally speaking. But, this seems to be connected to solar activity, and no so much the speed of the earth.
A: The solar and earth activities are interconnected.
March 4th, 2012
Why is the electromagnetic field weakening?
A: Spinning is slowing!
Q: (L) So the electromagnetic field of the earth is a property of its spinning? And it's spinning is a property of... can be affected by electric stuff. (Belibaste) Yeah, like a motor, if it slows down, it generates less electromagnetic field. (Perceval) Getting ready for a flip.
Continuing with the LiveScience article:
[Shahvandi and study co-author Benedikt Soja, a professor of space geodesy at ETH Zurich, turned to the fossils of shelled single-cell organisms called foraminifera to peer back millions of years into Earth's day length. Changes in the oxygen content of these fossils could reveal sea levels when the organisms were alive, from which the researchers could extrapolate day lengths.
They found that today's 1.33-millisecond-per-century increase in day length was among the fastest changes seen in the past 3.6 [million] years. "This is expected to get even larger and even bigger than the effect of the moon," Shahvandi said.
One episode around 2 million years ago saw a similar increase in day length of 2.1 milliseconds per century , the researchers found. That was in the Early Pleistocene, during a period when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperatures rose. There is some uncertainty in the historical estimate, meaning that this period may have seen a similar increase in day length as today, or that today might be faster.
Under a future warming scenario where greenhouse gases increase, the day could lengthen by 2.62 milliseconds per century by 2080, Shahvandi and Soja reported in their study, which was published March 10 in the journal JGR Solid Earth.
Although the impact would likely not be perceptible to humans, the findings have other real-world implications. For example, Mann said, instruments that require precise knowledge of Earth's rotation rate, such as those on spacecraft, may need to be recalibrated. Other precise timekeeping applications, such as in computing, could be affected, Shahvandi said.
The findings also underscore the rapidity of modern warming. "It tells us about the rapid climate change," Shahvandi said, "[the] melting of snow and ice in polar ice sheets and mountains glaciers, and increase in the sea levels."
And if the trend continues, it's sudden glacial rebound...
]