2009 Crop Circles

[Nicholas]

Here is another one:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/Chesterton/Chesterton2009.html

Hope we get some better overhead pictures.

 

[David]

And another one!

Cannings Cross Farm, nr All Cannings, Wiltshire - Wheat
10th July 2009

At first glance this crop circle looks fine, intact.
It doesn't take much imagination, however, to see that the centre part would have looked like an open book (seen from above) with its pages fanned out 360 degrees.

A new circle to report, but...

Hello everyone,

The crop circle season is continuing barely unabated. As we reach mid July the weather here in the UK has taken a turn for the worse with cloud wind and rain taking hold for the next couple of days.

As a result of the weather, yesterday Steve took an early morning flight to try and get some moving film of several formations. The last time he flew he was only able to get still imagery before the weather closed in and the sun disappeared.

Returning to the Honey street circle (reported last time) and them moving on towards Silbury Hill, he spotted a new circle at Cannings Cross farm, near All Cannings.

The formation looked like a Butterfly-type design (a butterfly in standing crop, surrounded by a sun (in flattened crop).

Later in the day we heard that the farmer had partially cut the circle out. And, as sad as that was, we were secure in knowing that we had recorded the circle before the damage had been done.

However, it soon became apparent the this was not he case and in fact we had not flown the circle before the farmer had inflicted his damage.

It had not been readily apparent that there was any damage from the air. But after blowing up the imagery we could clearly see where the farmer has literally run rings around it with his machinery.


The original design looks like it might have been a three-dimensional design in the centre - now sadly gone.

All this said, it is slightly strange that even though the farmer had decided to spoil this design for everyone, the formation still appears attractive and even meaningful! That it now resembles a butterfly, symbolic of transformation - seems like a jest on behalf of the cosmic joker, on a farmer who sought to despoil.

- Source: temporarytemples.co.uk e-newsletter -

It might have looked like this

 

[Psalehesost]

All this said, it is slightly strange that even though the farmer had decided to spoil this design for everyone, the formation still appears attractive and even meaningful! That it now resembles a butterfly, symbolic of transformation - seems like a jest on behalf of the cosmic joker, on a farmer who sought to despoil.

Perhaps they knew what was going to happen, and utilized this as a way of "growing" this crop circle to its final form?

The "revised" [edit: by this I mean the non-image edited, changed by farmer edition] version made me think of "Sothis, the sharp toothed":

Now, this "Sopd" is transliterated as "spdw" being very similar to "spdt" that is translated as "sothis." It is obvious that the translators have no idea what this "spdw" really is, and just translate it as "Sopd." In the end, we have three very similar words: spdt, spdw, and spd-ibhw (sharp toothed), and my guess is that this "sharp toothed" business may relate to something that is visually similar to a mouth full of sharp teeth.

Again we say: based on the scientific evidence compared to the observations of the ancients, what we seem to be looking at is a recurring shower of comets or asteroids that cycle through the solar system regularly, on a 3,600 year orbit. What is more, it seems that this body of comets, clustered together resembles a Fiery serpent with a mouthful of devouring teeth in the blackness of space. For this reason, it was given the name spdt, spdw, and spd-ibhw (sharp toothed), in the Pyramid Texts. The Bull of the South that is first seen Southern skies. It undoubtedly is a terrifying spectacle!

 

[Beau]

That one looks downright menacing. It looks like the mouth of a great white shark.

 

[christx11]

I thought it looked like a butterfly or perhaps some kind of magnetic iron filings disbursement.

That one looks downright menacing. It looks like the mouth of a great white shark.

 

[Gimpy]

The center formation reminds me of slots on a projector. Maybe 'perpendicular realities'? Or is that parallel realities? Hmm.

 

[1984]

I thought it looked like a butterfly or perhaps some kind of magnetic iron filings disbursement.

That one looks downright menacing. It looks like the mouth of a great white shark.

Interesting how we all have differing initial perceptions. It reminded me of a butterfly inside a comet. :D

 

[Nicholas]

Here we go again!

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/Fosseway/Fosseway2009.html

 

[Nicholas]

Here is a reconstruction of this crop circle:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/canningscross/canningscross2009.html

 

[Biomiast]

Well, I thought it was a moth. Basically, there isn't much difference between a butterfly and a moth:

A moth is an insect closely related to the butterfly, both being of the order Lepidoptera.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moth

The reason I think this is a moth is that, there is a light source at the background. The characteristic of a moth is its attraction towards the light. I mentioned in another thread that in Sufism, moth symbolizes spiritual seeker who circles around the divine knowledge to obtain it. Moth comes closer and closer, it burns itself for this attraction, but continues to be attracted to light. I think this image symbolizes destroying false personality and reaching divine knowledge for Sufis, but I may be wrong.

Just my two cents, fwiw.

 

[Laurentien2]

Looking at the center figure "moth or butterfly" whit a 3 dimensional perspective, I see a cone volcano shape whit is relief, ridge and val, seen from above.

 

[Gimpy]

The central figure also reminds me of an open book with the pages ringed round the binding. :) "Knowledge is Light"?

 

[Freelancer]

Here is another one:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/Chesterton/Chesterton2009.html

Hope we get some better overhead pictures.

Very interesting piece of work.

If we three-dimensionalize this crop circle, it looks like a tetrahedron inside a sphere.
Each face of the tetrahedron is divided into 7 segments.

The C's have been talking about that.
Perhaps it's a small "lecture" in physics and sacred geometry?

Session 960817

Q: (L) All right, let's get on to our questions here. Let me ask a quick one about the
tetrahedron. TR, you ask it, because you know more about it. (T) What Jim was talking
about in his letter to Ark? (L) Yes, or what Hoagland talks about, or... if you've got some
kind of definite stuff on it... (T) The Tetrahedron, triangle mathematics that Hoagland is
working with in conjunction with the Mars/Cydonia region where he supposedly discovered
this...
A: Energy consolidator. EM Wave capturer.

Also in these sessions, with Ark asking the questions:

Session 981219

Q: (A) You get what we may call a time form and this time form is sometimes like any other
physical field. So, of course the different possibilities that I can mathematically model: time
form, time vacuum, different times, time loops, and other things. These are interesting
possibilities that I have, provided I use something similar to Kaluza-Klein. Did I miss
something?
A: It is not that you miss something; it is merely that you have not yet found the something.
Q: (A) What is this something?
A: Tetrahedron.

...

Session 990925

Q: There could be many explanations. Now, we have a correspondent who wrote and
asked a question. He said that he noticed there was promotion of Hoagland's idea about the
19.5 degree tetrahedral configuration at one point, and then another idea regarding the
parallelogram business involving an 18 degree mark in another section. So, what is the
difference between the 19.5 degree comments of Hoagland, and the 18 degree point of
interest that you brought up? Are we talking about two different things here?
A: Well, if you do the math, you see that 18 degrees fits nicely with ninety. Maybe 19.5 is
due to crustal slippages in some" land mark" event?!
Q: (A) But, in geometry, this 19.5 degrees is what you get when you try to put a tetrahedron
into a sphere. That's how Hoagland got it, not because of observation.
A: Okay, that is good, too.
Q: How come you didn't know that?
A: We pointed it out in the first place.

 

[mamadrama]

Phase II of circle at Cannings Cross, Near Allington, Wiltshire

 

[rs]

I think this is "somebody's" way of saying "this wasn't a couple of drunks with boards, we are not from around here"...