2012 Crop Circles

[Palinurus]

Looks like a rather strange one.
Might be representing a clockwork of some kind, indicating 11.20 hours (or 23.20 hours, for that matter). It also looks like some sort of broken record (old style vinyl)).
Doesn't seem to be a genuine one to me, though.

 

[Ekios]

Made me think of this part of the transcriptions :

Session 11 June 2011

Q: (L) What I did is I messed it up when they were trying to do 5 by 10, I made it 500. They went 5... Yeah, I don't know what they did. Okay, does anybody have anything else they want to talk about? (Perceval) There's a question about crop circles. (L) Yeah, I saw that but I thought it was kind of a dorky question. "Why have this year's crop circles been so lame?" (Perceval) Andromeda dictated it, and I just typed it. [laughter]
A: 6D has begun to withdraw from the fray.
Q: (L) Well, what do you mean by, "withdraw from the fray"?
A: As we have pointed out before, the crop circles were an almanac. The last page is soon to turn.

Note to Mention : this was close to be precisely a year ago.

And now,your link about that last CC : It mentionned that in its comments ...

Fig. 2: Obtained Polar Clock

As the aerial shot was not taken perpendicularly to the formation, we are not sure about the time displayed, but we think that at least the date can be considered correct. When you compare pictures 1 and 2, you can see that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:43:53 on Saturday, 4th August 2012. We have no idea what this particular time might mean. Hope someone will find out why this date should be significant.

Edit=Link

 

[3DStudent]

Note to Mention : this was close to be precisely a year ago.

And now,your link about that last CC :

Yeah, when I first saw it I thought it was a calendar. There are some watches that tell time by those concentric circle patterns. It looks pretty well done, but circles are probably easy to fake. And the C's said they don't give dates.

 

[Ekios]

Note to Mention : this was close to be precisely a year ago.

And now,your link about that last CC :

Yeah, when I first saw it I thought it was a calendar. There are some watches that tell time by those concentric circle patterns. It looks pretty well done, but circles are probably easy to fake. And the C's said they don't give dates.

True indeed, so back to square one, as everytime before, we will see when the day come ;)

 

[Rich]

Interesting one on June 9th at Woodborough Hill. Alton Barnes.Wiltshire.UK

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2012/WoodboroughHill/WoodboroughHill2012a.html

Interestingly each one is slightly different. The one seemingly at the front has 8 circles (planets?) followed by one with 7 and finally 6.

 

[whovian]

Could these represent the 3 ships carrying the 12 million lizzies each that the C's first described in 1994?

 

[Ekios]

Maybe it's the pictures but they look pretty bad done .. or is it just me ?

 

[loreta]

Made me think of this part of the transcriptions :

Session 11 June 2011

Q: (L) What I did is I messed it up when they were trying to do 5 by 10, I made it 500. They went 5... Yeah, I don't know what they did. Okay, does anybody have anything else they want to talk about? (Perceval) There's a question about crop circles. (L) Yeah, I saw that but I thought it was kind of a dorky question. "Why have this year's crop circles been so lame?" (Perceval) Andromeda dictated it, and I just typed it. [laughter]
A: 6D has begun to withdraw from the fray.
Q: (L) Well, what do you mean by, "withdraw from the fray"?
A: As we have pointed out before, the crop circles were an almanac. The last page is soon to turn.

Note to Mention : this was close to be precisely a year ago.

And now,your link about that last CC : It mentionned that in its comments ...

Fig. 2: Obtained Polar Clock

As the aerial shot was not taken perpendicularly to the formation, we are not sure about the time displayed, but we think that at least the date can be considered correct. When you compare pictures 1 and 2, you can see that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:43:53 on Saturday, 4th August 2012. We have no idea what this particular time might mean. Hope someone will find out why this date should be significant.

Edit=Link

Maybe the last day of the Olympics?

False, the dates are 27 July to 12 August. What a mystery.

 

[NewOrleans]

It's still unexplained and it's still fascinating by being open to conjecture. If 6D entities just spelled it out in words - YOU"RE DOOMED NOW, PEEPS- we'd all be a bit surprised.

Do badly designed crop circles always point to hoaxes and must we compare them to designs from a different time window? Who knows? Maybe the wobbliness of these last ones is an indication of a failing conduit and not human imitation. Usually, it seems, some mathematics-as-message is decipherable. At the peak of the crop circle phenomenon the designs were always geometrically crisp, complex and elegant. Maybe, as the C's mentioned, these might be the last ones before the end of the messages. Maybe they are just not going to be spectacular.

 

[Ekios]

It's still unexplained and it's still fascinating by being open to conjecture. If 6D entities just spelled it out in words - YOU"RE DOOMED NOW, PEEPS- we'd all be a bit surprised.

Do badly designed crop circles always point to hoaxes and must we compare them to designs from a different time window? Who knows? Maybe the wobbliness of these last ones is an indication of a failing conduit and not human imitation. Usually, it seems, some mathematics-as-message is decipherable. At the peak of the crop circle phenomenon the designs were always geometrically crisp, complex and elegant. Maybe, as the C's mentioned, these might be the last ones before the end of the messages. Maybe they are just not going to be spectacular.

As the C's would say : Open.

 

[Gonzo]

It's still unexplained and it's still fascinating by being open to conjecture. If 6D entities just spelled it out in words - YOU"RE DOOMED NOW, PEEPS- we'd all be a bit surprised.

Do badly designed crop circles always point to hoaxes and must we compare them to designs from a different time window? Who knows? Maybe the wobbliness of these last ones is an indication of a failing conduit and not human imitation. Usually, it seems, some mathematics-as-message is decipherable. At the peak of the crop circle phenomenon the designs were always geometrically crisp, complex and elegant. Maybe, as the C's mentioned, these might be the last ones before the end of the messages. Maybe they are just not going to be spectacular.

I don't think anyone here suggests poorly designed crop circles are always hoaxes, rather that errors or flaws are an indication they could be either manmade or perhaps created by entities other than those who created the more elegant ones. Other factors are also taken into consideration. Aside from whether any empty beer cans, ropes and planks are discovered nearby, the method of bending the stalks is taken into consideration. Methods that cause breakage or other distortions that harm the plant point to a different source than the ones that have no negative impact on the plant. The more elegant ones were bent in a way that allowed the plants to continue to grow unharmed.

Gonzo

 

[anart]

It's still unexplained and it's still fascinating by being open to conjecture. If 6D entities just spelled it out in words - YOU"RE DOOMED NOW, PEEPS- we'd all be a bit surprised.

Do badly designed crop circles always point to hoaxes and must we compare them to designs from a different time window? Who knows? Maybe the wobbliness of these last ones is an indication of a failing conduit and not human imitation. Usually, it seems, some mathematics-as-message is decipherable. At the peak of the crop circle phenomenon the designs were always geometrically crisp, complex and elegant. Maybe, as the C's mentioned, these might be the last ones before the end of the messages. Maybe they are just not going to be spectacular.

I don't think anyone here suggests poorly designed crop circles are always hoaxes

I'd say that unreservedly, actually. Whether it's a 4D STS hoax or human hoax doesn't really matter. Sorry, but after seeing some of the genius designs that were flawlessly executed - for years - I don't buy for a minute that anything less than that is real, and by real I mean created by 6D STO. I think, as the C's said, that the real circle designers have 'withdrawn from the fray'. I wouldn't say with certainty that this means that there will never be another genuine crop circle, but I'd not be surprised if that were so. That's just my personal take on it, of course.

 

[Katka]

And now,your link about that last CC : It mentionned that in its comments ...

Fig. 2: Obtained Polar Clock

As the aerial shot was not taken perpendicularly to the formation, we are not sure about the time displayed, but we think that at least the date can be considered correct. When you compare pictures 1 and 2, you can see that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:43:53 on Saturday, 4th August 2012. We have no idea what this particular time might mean. Hope someone will find out why this date should be significant.

Edit=Link

I really hope that this CC if fake. On 4th August I'll be at Woodstock Festival in Poland and if anything happens (like an alien invasion for example. I know the chances for that are poor, but still... ) I really wouldn't like to be in the middle of panicked crowd...

 

[NewOrleans]

To clarify my point, Gonzo I didn't mean to imply that anyone there thinks less-than-perfect-geometric ones are ALWAYS hoaxes... I value all the different points of view most sincerely. Inspiring crop circles tend to reinforce our - my - belief that higher intelligence shows itself through magnificent design. Just saying that it's a mystery. It's part of the appeal, the fun of it. The fine CC designs of the past always seemed to have a visual harmony that was unmistakably awe-inspiring.
But then again I get easily impressed by the design of tree leaves by the side of the road as I go for a walk.

 

[MikaelYosef]

Could this image alternatively be a reference to planetary positions in the solar system at a future point in time? Perhaps the six closest to the Sun?

Even though applying a date and time seems to suggest a specific upcoming event, it is still a vague interpretation I think - it could refer to any year, any timezone, etc. A specific planetary alignment however is less ambiguous. Would anyone with a background/interest in astronomy know if the above picture fits an upcoming alignment?