I see a reference to Dark Journalist in some recent post, while I listen and watch, he does tend to drag it a bit, where some would compress into an least an hour, that being said, he did make a point in his recent video that struck me.
It's concerning the images from the congressional chamber. He presented an image of a lone person in the gallery of the congressional chamber, he said he was a Getty photographer, this is not my impression
I suspect they were the images captured from security cameras within the chambers, and are presented for media purposes. I have noted some of those images, they are clean and crisp, show that dude dressed up in viking gear, now identified as a some sort of NPC player, a long history of acting out a part. Some person sitting int the so called hot seat. And also some person walking off with a podium. Which is now being called in the MSM as Nancy Peolsis's podium.
The images are now stamped Getty images, with the name beside of it of some person, male or female, that to my mind could not possibly be true it was wide angled and and a cell phone could not capture the images with such clarity.
So my question is, are these images that are offered as archival images (that is what Getty is all about). Are they for posterity, to rewrite history, and to show the Trump administration in the blackest possible light for
a future generations as a dictator and demon of democracy. To mirror the images of the 1984 movie and the 2 minutes hate for Emanuel Goldstein.
It's concerning the images from the congressional chamber. He presented an image of a lone person in the gallery of the congressional chamber, he said he was a Getty photographer, this is not my impression
I suspect they were the images captured from security cameras within the chambers, and are presented for media purposes. I have noted some of those images, they are clean and crisp, show that dude dressed up in viking gear, now identified as a some sort of NPC player, a long history of acting out a part. Some person sitting int the so called hot seat. And also some person walking off with a podium. Which is now being called in the MSM as Nancy Peolsis's podium.
The images are now stamped Getty images, with the name beside of it of some person, male or female, that to my mind could not possibly be true it was wide angled and and a cell phone could not capture the images with such clarity.
So my question is, are these images that are offered as archival images (that is what Getty is all about). Are they for posterity, to rewrite history, and to show the Trump administration in the blackest possible light for
a future generations as a dictator and demon of democracy. To mirror the images of the 1984 movie and the 2 minutes hate for Emanuel Goldstein.