2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

I see this periodically with people who are suffering from either ideological possession, or who simply want to nestle down into the blankets and stay asleep...

-While at the same time, they fight to maintain the delusion that they are open-minded, critical thinkers who are absolutely not suffering from ideological possession and who are not simply trying to nestle down into the blankets to stay asleep, (such ugly features simply cannot be accurate descriptors of themselves! -That would mean the ego is in charge along with a bunch of trash programming. No sir..!)

I admit I do tend to err towards a positive prospect and give benefit of doubt rather than finding solace in grim visions plus who am I to be right but what’s that got to do with being ‘possessed’?

Can you see in the above mbww the gap between what Woodsman suggested to you and how you have responded? Do you understand the concept of Ideological Possession? Because when one admits to a tendency ('an inclination towards a particular characteristic or type of behaviour') to 'err' one is acknowledging a possibility of being consistently in error i.e. a definition of too err is to make a mistake. I know you think that your erring is a positive but can you see at all that you are actually revealing to yourself a potential error in your critical thinking capacity by making the repeated baseline assumption of positive prospects and benefit of doubt?

You've got blocks and fortifications built into place, and you're pretending that you're something you are not.

Have you ever considered you are pretending to your self to be something you are not?

The biggest flaw however is that such an explanation of the world based on psychological traits focuses on perceptions and fails to provide meaningful causal explanation, the WHY. Evil psychopaths devoid of any soul take the prime seat in a world devoid of any purpose? Just so that "us", the good humans can have something to fight against, a raison d'être? - in other words evil becomes immanent...But why, cui bono? For their own delight? For polarization purposes? Doing the devil's bid? Consciousness awakening?...Enlightenment through suffering? - Doesn't have to be any of that, if you ask me.

And then how do you factor in the divine providence and guidance (pronoia), the "angels" and the "us from the future" intuition...? Would you have your children put through suffering and ordeals so they become better adults, or learn better?

A causal explanation is that this place is a school and we attend to learn all its lessons. So its not a world devoid of purpose; far from it - its highly purposeful. Its purpose is to provide all means possible at this level of consciousness of learning which if it is to be completed requires suffering as part of the process of balanced learning - by definition. Because suffering exists and suffering offers lessons. One does not learn by learning only what comforts and pleases the ego. A balanced universe allows all things to exist within its reach, including all the worst things imaginable. These are also but names of God as the Sufis suggested. When one goes to school we are not allowed to dictate what is and isn't on the curriculum. We may not like a certain subject; it may be very hard, even painful. But perhaps that's where the most valuable learning lies, so we have to go through it as well. The fun bit, the easy bit, the bit that seems to come naturally to us - oh yes we learn from that as well - but if that's all we learn, are we really learning or are we hiding and finding comfort in that which merely pleases? We think not.

That's probably where you and the members here divide. That's fine. That's your free will choice. But it is also ours. For many here have learned the hard way the more you suppress, avoid, delude the self with wishful/magical thinking (e.g. love and light etc), the more the imbalance and distorting of reality manifests in ones life, and tends to reveal itself in the liminal spaces between a rigid one dimensional mind set and a perpetually balancing universe (where light and darkness have equal right to exist).
.
My thinking however is that such visions of dominance and control are deeply flawed simply by the negative perception lens they subject reality to.

No one here thinks in terms of outcomes of dominance. We all recognize that attempts at control are all eventually destined to fail. But we do recognize that 'negative' forces, which by their inherent nature are incapable of comprehending that they are merely an aspect of the light that manifests all, believe they can dominate and do seek perpetual control (i.e. the extinction of the light that made them). This is the subtle difference between what you think we think and what we actually do. This dominance seeking by the dark can rise dramatically for a period and give all the appearance of managing to wrestle control away from the light - and that darkness can appear to last for enough time to produced increased suffering - but everything is merely a lesson and the sun will rise once more and balance will be restored - and lessons will have been learned. But no amount of thinking that this can't happen because of love and light not allowing it to be so will ever bare scrutiny against the fullness of reality itself. So good luck to you with trying to maintain that illusion over the next while. Its going to take an awful lot of self-delusional mental gymnastics to sustain.
 
As evidence mounts of some kind of 'inside job' that facilitated the "storming of the capitol"...

Yeah it seems coincidental that all 'real' terrorists seem to be to be self quarantining since early last year imo.

Extraordinary allegations have been levelled at members of the US Congress who are accused of taking Trump fanatics on “reconnaissance” missions through the Capitol building a day before the insurrection under the guise of “public tours”...

“This is unusual for several reasons, including the fact that access to the Capitol Complex has been restricted since public tours ended in March of last year due to the pandemic.”

The uptick in visitors was so noticeable that it got reported to the sergeant at arms on January 5.


Lucky...one would think some pretty spectacular statements could have been made by a couple of suicide bombers in the 'heart' - bearing strategic gifts!

1610620788167.png

I do love that the 'rioters' remain inside the velvet cordon though :love:
 
Now this is interesting.

It turns out the people who raided the capitol building had gathered at its entrance and were planning their action before the president had even taken the stage, adding to the suggestion that Trump's speech had not been the inciting cause of the 'riot' (video cued up to play at the relevant point):

 
Now this is interesting.

It turns out the people who raided the capitol building had gathered at its entrance and were planning their action before the president had even taken the stage, adding to the suggestion that Trump's speech had not been the inciting cause of the 'riot' (video cued up to play at the relevant point):

I think you ment this one? @15mins
 
Yes: enter General Flynn. (That's a serious scowl he's got going there!) I have just started listening to the latest Dark Journalist Youtube video, and he mentioned that Flynn had a great deal to do with getting Trump to run for president the first time around. Wow. Had no idea. And then look what happened to him. So, Flynn was part of a double threat, it seems. Trump backed by Flynn. And here he is back, and pardoned -- which allows him to again serve in government.

Just a reminder that one of the main reasons Flynn was so targeted and trapped by the ABC agencies/Dems early on in the Trump Presidency was because Flynn was absolutely serious about working to 'drain the swamp'. It wasn't merely rhetoric for Trump to be saying this on the campaign trail and after - Trump meant business. And in allying himself to Flynn (and vice-versa) he really meant to get the job done - however unrealistic it was to think that they could.

Sidney Powell: Michael Flynn Planned to ‘Audit’ Intel Agencies Before FBI Prosecution


MARIA BARTIROMO: This is September 2018, we don’t have any evidence of collusion. And yet, they still wanted to take down Trump’s campaign, beginning with General Flynn. You basically open this up, this is going to be a domino effect, giving us a window into what really took place. Are their other things that have been declassified that the public needs to see to better understand this?
SIDNEY POWELL: There are things that we still don’t have like the original Flynn 302, the original FBI report. The FBI has not produced that. If Mr. Wray wants to improve anything, I think that would be the first place to start, and then the next draft of it too, because we know there were multiple alternations of it. But there’s no excuse for not having produced the first draft of the FBI 302… Flynn was going to audit the intel agencies that would of included some of the FBI’s work, as well. They were all absolutely terrified of an honest person getting in the job of national security advisor and finding out what they all done, in addition to all the other atrocities.
 
Something I find a bit frustrating is how entrenched 'popular opinion' is in terms of how Trump has been portrayed in the media. It almost matters not at all what he says publicly regarding violence - because if there is any, people will believe he is responsible despite all evidence to the contrary. Like the popular belief Putin is evil, there is nothing rational about these popular beliefs, yet it's people who believe the contrary that are labelled naive conspiracy nuts.

Facts and truth mean nothing to those living in the smoke and mirrors despite how intelligent or discerning they appear or claim to be - and that is one thing that can still, I am ashamed to say, bring me to tears of sorrow, seeing loved ones blinded by wilful ignorance and stubborn pigheaded adherence to the popular narrative.

Damned if they do, or damned if they don't definitely applies - and watching it hurts.
That's how I see it too. It's like how Yuri Bezmenov said about Subversion, which I think could also be called Gas Lighting, "What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country ... They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior."

This split among social media that is now happening, this will create an echo chamber on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit (already done), where only the official narrative is presented, and almost nobody will present any alternative views. Then these people will only be able to tolerate the "official" stories - This is already happening now, but this effect will increase now even further. :(
 
Nowadays, it is relatively cheap and easy to have your own server at home.
Just ask Bryan Pagliano he'll install one in your bathroom for $5K.

Several pages back it was said that the Q movement has transcended the US - it has gone global.
Well I'm from down under and I was the first to ask about Q on the forum back in Jan '18. It took me about a year to get the crew to ask the C's about Q and during that time I was well caught-up in the hype (it was more convincing back then before so many failed predictions). But even when the C's said it was a psy-op I was still in denial and tried to find some hidden meaning to confirm that it was positive. Eventually, thanks to members here posting, I was able to snap out of the daze and see it for what it is. So I can understand the mindset of people who follow it, for eg. someone who has discovered it more recently and hasn't taken the time go through and read/verify everything. They just come across the excited ramblings of someone who says the good guys are going to win and it sounds comforting to them. However the ones who followed Q from the very beginning, through all the failed predictions and shifting the goalposts more than an EPL season, I cannot fathom how they're still on that train. They're the ones who will come up with a new twist after Biden takes over, with JFK Jr. just waiting in the shadows for the right moment. Any day now.
 
I listened to the Alex Jones show Today (Jan 14.)

Alex said he has analyzed every angle and that: the globalist operation its demonically inspired not of this world - it only gonna get worse from here - interdimensionaly there is an attack on this planet - the good times are over - the people running this is not in control its aliens - this planet being run by inter-dimensional aliens - at the end of this everybody dies, including the elite/bad people working for them.

But to the topic. Steve Pieczenik was hosted.

Steve is saying 'we' are now in an 'official military coup'. That Joe Biden will not be president. There will be a large number of arrests and Trump being the genius who put it together, will remain president.

According to Steve - Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Pelosi and Mitt Romney - will be arrested. "A large number of people who are gonna be arrested, detained and will be tried by military tribunal."

Alex called this optimism porn. I don't know, nor do I believe what Steve is saying either.

Steve said and they betted that if he is wrong about this - to never appear on Alex Jones show again. If right he will be one of the official payed commentator on his show. But Jones said he has to come back to the show regardless.
 
Just a reminder that one of the main reasons Flynn was so targeted and trapped by the ABC agencies/Dems early on in the Trump Presidency was because Flynn was absolutely serious about working to 'drain the swamp'. It wasn't merely rhetoric for Trump to be saying this on the campaign trail and after - Trump meant business. And in allying himself to Flynn (and vice-versa) he really meant to get the job done - however unrealistic it was to think that they could.
Yes, absolutely. I became aware of this about Flynn only recently, given all that's been happening. He had very specific ideas about how to clean up intelligence, for example, which is why the CIA (and other intel agencies, no doubt) and parts of the military were so threatened by him. Having said that, my reaction (in my last post) had more to do with the fact that Flynn was perhaps instrumental in convincing Trump to run, which I'd never heard before. I haven't gotten back to that most recent Dark Journalist video yet, but that came up at the outset of that particular video.

So, now we are beginning to understand more deeply what Trump, and Flynn and others meant to accomplish with Trump's presidency.

Interesting to note, Trump didn't even like the expression "drain the swamp" at first, which came up possibly organically from his supporters (not sure exactly where it came from). So, Trump took it on at some point, and has been using it ever since.

Also interesting to note, in a recent video I was watching (perhaps it was that recent Greg Hunter interview with Alex Newman that I've linked to several times here), but it was mentioned that it was Bill Barr who convinced Trump not to trust Flynn early on. I'd like to double check on that seeing how it so thoroughly encapsulates the problem with Barr.

So, obviously Trump reversed course at some point, and now he's back to being "in with Flynn."
 
Back
Top Bottom