I think far too many people are putting faith in trump. It was covered in the sessions that he is essentially fully compromised now. This was years ago.
Weontv,
I was curious about the way you presented the excerpt and the way the you stated that basically Trump being compromised is a done deal, from 'years ago' even.
What you didn't paste in was the lines above what you did paste in, and the way that I took the context of the session was it started with a question about the former President of Mexico's interview and how at the time, he was trying to keep himself relevant during a time that Trump was exposing the Mexican gov't for not just ignoring the issue of allowing UN coordinated migrants to traverse Mexico, but supporting it in a way via Catholic Charities and other NGO's. And we fast forward to today, we see there was merit in what Trump was calling the Mexican Gov't out for. We now have 22 million more illegals in the United States.
So in the session that you pasted in, you omitted the previous context-relevant lines which gave the questions referencing what I point out above, but started with Laura's reframing a question based on the C's response to the question about Fox's motives. Which went like:
(L) Yeah. So, this Vicente Fox video was really hilarious. But you know, he's really helping the Deep State because surely he has to know the pressures that Trump is under. But on the other hand, Trump is acting kind of like a moron in terms of his foreign policy statements to say the very least. So, is Vicente Fox just trolling him in a big way, or is he actually acting as an agent of the Deep State?
[Noko enters and starts speaking during answer]
A: Former. He figures that anyone as naive as Trump at this point deserves trolling.
Taking into consideration of the context and your statement, the C's nor Laura stated in that session that Trump is naive, but that Vicente Fox "figures" that Trump is naive. Which Sun Tsu kinda covered in the 'act weak' concept a while back...
But what concerned me was after you stated your beliefs that you ended the post with an opinion that violence, for even possibly members of this forum, is deserved.
I think things will get violent faster than people expect.. These tyrants deserve it, anyways.
The precedent being that during the last staged violence in this country and yours, was that no tyrants were subjected to the violence but for the most part law enforcement, community leaders, business owners/workers and children bore the brunt of the violence.
So when statements like...
What concerns me is that you have "trumps army" that will essentially follow him to a T, he is essentially just a demagogue now.
You dismiss the notion that "trumps army" might just be American's that would like to see the Constitution adhered to and release power from a centralized and corrupt DC back to the individual states. The main changes that have gone into effect that has freaked out the cognitive dissonance crowd is exactly that procedure, decentralizing the institutions that cause so much misery for so many people both in the US and abroad.
To most the way you phrased..
but I think he didn't realize the gravity of how deeply rooted the corruption is, maybe they have dirt on him.. maybe they threatened him, who knows.
could be accurate regarding the gravity, the C's even mentioned the size of the bite, but one thing that is for sure is that he has been threatened. So perhaps not "maybe" but instead "absolutely" he is threatened, publicly all the time by just about everyone, all the time. Witness his motorcades which for an 'ex' President is pretty 'unprecedented' in the level of physical security due to threats.
Things are going to get hotter for sure and I just think pausing in a moment of high excitement to consider which parts of your body is agitated and the forces acting upon your being, might create less compression when accelerating a thought out onto the eyes of others to read.
Taking into consideration how that accelerated thought might not seem to have much 'gravity' but it may very well be something that requires more objectionability which overall increases it's effect.