Me and a friend spent a long time looking over all of this last night. There are many allegations that Aaron McCollum (AM) makes. A listing of these may be useful as a way of preserving the memory for later comparison.
AM claims in the video that he is giving this interview of his own free will, and that his apartment was smashed, etc. But he is neither in jail nor dead, and the fact may be that he himself is a false-flag operation. Or what we are seeing is newscast.
We noted last night that there is a concurrent explosion of the idea that disclosure "is near" This has also been dredged up in the past several days and covers the range 'they realize that world economy may collapse so they are going to dump the ET technologies on us to creat a new industrial revolution', to "the elite are finished now - that cat is too far out of the bag" My comment here is that even the recent British disclosures are only more reports of sightings. Until we begin to see old documents de-classifed that describe recovery operations, names of players, pieces of recovered wreckage, etc. 'disclosure' remains a myth. One last point here is that I noted last night that both Dr. Steven Greer (survivor of the co-opted Disclosure Project) and astronaut Edgar Mitchell claim that the reason that the US has not made moves towards disclosure is due to special interests. This adds fuel to the notion that in 1956 the Rand Corporation advocated much in the style of "banking-is-too-good-for-politics" that ET was too good for politics, and that since we have seen the complete transfer of the technologies to the private banking cartel's hands.
AM makes a number of claims that are pretty far out there. My goal had been to go back, replay, and dissect his points to write them down. But there are a number of new angles I saw on things second time through that video which have cast both new light and doubts for me.
In the latter part of the show, his eyes become more pointed and his posture more dire. It is as if you are listening to a conspiracy theorist who has told his story many times, and know what parts can be presented without losing his audience, and how to say them. If you hear them out, they get animated and more "out there" later. His presentation definitely was structured, with beforehand decisions made about what parts are coming in a later interview. We'll see if that ever happens. His rant at the end about coming forward, doing your own research, etc. looked rehearsed.
I took Perceval's comment:
And his comments about being in the Coast Guard black ops is just fantasy. There is no such branch of the coast guard.
to heart, and on the surface I'd agree. But I also know that the US goverment has involved almost all of its agencies in this war, and because of that, it is quite likely that cross-branch work is commonplace. A decent historic example of this I ran across is Bob Ballard (discovered the Titanic). He came out last year and confessed that he was really working for the Navy, and in a lecture I saw by him two weeks ago, he showed photos of himself in Navy uniform, while he was covertly assigned to work at NOAA.
Speaking of Bob Ballard, I found out also that he is launching two major expeditions this year, one through the Suez Canal and Gulf of Aden, which will be involving High Schools and what an amazing tale that is. He is due pass through the Gulf of Aden in early Summer with his submmersibles.
[quote author=dant]I see from visual observation, those very shifty eyes, and to his left is this arm popping in and out while he is talking.[/quote]
Very true. There is someone sitting beside him on the couch, and someone off to the right of the camera that he makes eye contact with at several points. He also cracks a subtle smile and some right-side eye shifts that seem singular. As does the way his eyes roll.
Something he said caught my attention. The idea that he was playing two roles, and that occasionally his vanilla coast guard role was used as an umbrella for the real op that he was unable to describe to his squad-mates, made me think of Cognitive Dissonance. If his masters are not drugging him to forget, does anyone think that it might be possible to "overdrive" someone with a dual existence to the point that they lose focus and memory, making them putty in your hands?
He claims he can't remember, which may be true, and this handler thing ya'll mentioned may be dead on, but he also might be so scatter-brained as a result of memory loss that he needs this kind of handler just to keep him on track - regardless of whether he is giving this interview of his own free will or not.
His statement about having to strip of his wallet, watch, etc. (and presumably any digital cameras he might try and smuggle) reminds me again of full-body airport scanners.
That latter part of AM's talk of synthetic beings and Avatar-style presence in a body dowsed me the second time through as it apparently did Clif High.
Perhaps I will place my tick list of things to check up on in another reply and simply list which pieces I looked in to. ciao for now.
