Alexander Davidis: Another "Puzzling" Psychopathy Expert?

[Fifth Way]

Re: Alexander Davidis: Another Psychopathy Expert?

I'd personally like to give Alexander the chance to respond with why he did what he did and when before making any conclusions myself, however I also think it's worth noting that at one point it was mentioned that "Thomas Sheridan is wholeheartedly supporting the project", regarding the film Alexander was raising money to make. Perhaps there is a connection between the two that goes deeper than just a casual recommendation? I don't know at all for sure, just thinking out loud.

Thank you Foxx, I appreciate that you are being reasonable.
Sheridan supported my project back last winter, at a time when we all thought of him highly. There is not deeper connection.
From glancing over it, the Sott article shocked me and I wanted to read up on it before passing judgment, hence I removed it at the time. Who would have thought that using discernment and background checking on my own group-wall would earn me a headline on the net's most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering sites, implying that I am just that.
Never a dull moment...

 

[Joe]

Re: Alexander Davidis: Another Psychopathy Expert?

Sheridan supported my project back last winter, at a time when we all thought of him highly. There is not deeper connection.
From glancing over it, the Sott article shocked me and I wanted to read up on it before passing judgment, hence I removed it at the time. Who would have thought that using discernment and background checking on my own group-wall would earn me a headline on the net's most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering sites, implying that I am just that.

If you believe Sott.net to be the "most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering site", I don't see why you would have so little faith in our research as to require that you do your own research. Clearly there was either a conflict of interest going on there and/or not much faith in Sott.net at all.

 

[Guardian]

Re: Alexander Davidis: Another Psychopathy Expert?

If you believe Sott.net to be the "most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering site", I don't see why you would have so little faith in our research as to require that you do your own research. Clearly there was either a conflict of interest going on there and/or not much faith in Sott.net at all.

Yup, Alex scrubbing the SOTT article, at the same time Sheridan announced he had a "famous Hollywood producer" making a video for him is what raised my suspicions. Then again, that might have been just what Sheridan had in mind?

 

[anart]

Re: Alexander Davidis: Another Psychopathy Expert?

I'd personally like to give Alexander the chance to respond with why he did what he did and when before making any conclusions myself, however I also think it's worth noting that at one point it was mentioned that "Thomas Sheridan is wholeheartedly supporting the project", regarding the film Alexander was raising money to make. Perhaps there is a connection between the two that goes deeper than just a casual recommendation? I don't know at all for sure, just thinking out loud.

Thank you Foxx, I appreciate that you are being reasonable.

Who is being unreasonable?

Sheridan supported my project back last winter, at a time when we all thought of him highly. There is not deeper connection.
From glancing over it, the Sott article shocked me and I wanted to read up on it before passing judgment, hence I removed it at the time.

Removing it is 'passing judgment'. I mean, really, fifthway - since when does sott.net post an article worth removing? I think you're lying - either to us or to yourself or to both. I don't know which it is, but it's definitely one of them.

 

[Guardian]

Re: Alexander Davidis: Another Psychopathy Expert?

Removing it is 'passing judgment'. I mean, really, fifthway - since when does sott.net post an article worth removing? I think you're lying - either to us or to yourself or to both.

I'm leaning towards "both" ... because it's really hard to do one without the other?

 

[truth seeker]

Re: "From Internet Troll to Psychopathy Expert: The Con-Artistry of Thomas Sheridan"

So, Alexander Davidis, who has serious problems with narcissism, has gone ahead and set himself up as a psychopathy expert too! Why am I not surprised? Perhaps it is time for an expose on him...

...Since I canceled the psychopathy documentary project last winter I have not been active in that field at all.

If the project was cancelled, then why keep any social networking site(s) attached to the project up? Wouldn't it have made more sense to have removed them completely?

Also, in addition to removing the Sott article, why would you all of a sudden change the page from public to private? This makes it seem as though you're either still involved with the project or intend to do so in the future. What exactly is it that you're running from?

 

[jasstnhawk]

How do you arrive at the conclusion that I set myself up as a psychopathy expert? Since I canceled the psychopathy documentary project last winter I have not been active in that field at all.

Concerning whether or not you set yourself up as a psychopathy expert: If you do not know anything about the topic of psychopathy or you know very little, and you are not an expert in the topic as you have implied in this thread, then your FB group name and the name of you documentary are very misleading, because your FB group name and the name of your documentary imply that you are an expert in psychopathy or at least knowledgeable in the topic. So if you are not knowledgeable in the topic of psychopathy or an "expert", are you just "playing" as one?

Canceled your documentary??? Then what did you mean by this statement posted on your "Psychopathy - And Why you Need To Know" FB group page on August 22, 2012???

Alexander Davidis: I think I am about to close it. But haven't complete decided yet. Looks like I cannot give it the attention I wanted and the documentary is still on hold. Pondering about what to do with it.....

So which statement is true, the documentary is on hold or completely canceled??? One thing I have noticed in your writings here on the forum is that you carefully structure your words in such a way that they tend to misdirect and confuse the reader. Also, when asked a direct question, you rarely give a direct answer.

Thank you Foxx, I appreciate that you are being reasonable.
Sheridan supported my project back last winter, at a time when we all thought of him highly. There is not deeper connection.
From glancing over it, the Sott article shocked me and I wanted to read up on it before passing judgment, hence I removed it at the time. Who would have thought that using discernment and background checking on my own group-wall would earn me a headline on the net's most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering sites, implying that I am just that.
Never a dull moment...

I posted the SOTT article about Sheridan on your FB group wall to inform/warn others and for no other reason, as evidenced by the omission of any personal thoughts or feelings. Your action of removing the SOTT article was seen by me as a removal of a threat (to you and/or any future support), and a possible cause for doubt or distrust of SOTT in the minds of the other members of your FB group. In other words, in my view you neutralized SOTT by removing the article. In the process, you may have discredited SOTT in the minds of the other members of your FB group who are under the impression or who are led to believe via implication that you do know something about the topic of psychopathy based on your FB group name and the fact that you were/are(?) working on a documentary about psychopathy. Looks to me that if anybody is doing any "implying" in this thread or elsewhere, it's you. Furthermore, your words and actions, for me, only serve to disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and neutralize the topic of psychopathy specifically and the Truth signal on the whole. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck ... no implication needed.

 

[Azur]

Not to distract from the discussion, I hope, however, I have to ask:

Who the hell are you Robin?


Seems you've got a couple of real LIVE fires going in a short time, on this forum alone.

 

[Joe]

Not to distract from the discussion, I hope, however, I have to ask:

Who the hell are you Robin?

Seems you've got a couple of real LIVE fires going in a short time, on this forum alone.

Where's this coming from Azur? I see nothing wrong with Robin's post.

 

[Azur]

I dunno, something seems off with the timing.

Robin came out of the blue, and charging.

Alexander is certainly not a big deal.


Edit: .

I'm obviously missing something subtle, maybe.

 

[Joe]

I dunno, something seems off with the timing.

Robin came out of the blue, and charging.

Alexander is certainly not a big deal.

Lisa's big re-intro is ascribed to Robin's active forbearance via facebook.


I'm obviously missing something subtle, maybe.

Can you explain more please? I still don't understand what your problem is.

 

[Azur]

Maybe it's nothing, J.

Just a feeling that I can't put in words. Not being coy, or mysterious or any of that, something just bugs me about this.

 

[Niall]

Could you please try to keep your 'feelings' in check?

Robin has asked some pertinent questions I would like to see Fifth Way answer.

 

[Azur]

Could you please try to keep your 'feelings' in check?

Robin has asked some pertinent questions I would like to see Fifth Way answer.

My feelings will have no bearing on whether Robin answers or not.


The pertinent question, as you put it, and as I have intimated, is a side show to something else.

 

[anart]

Could you please try to keep your 'feelings' in check?

Robin has asked some pertinent questions I would like to see Fifth Way answer.

My feelings will have no bearing on whether Robin answers or not.


The pertinent question, as you put it, and as I have intimated, is a side show to something else.

Your feelings are running your thinking and making you act like a horse's ass - again. Really, Azur - is there anything else to you or is this it?