Perceval, Kniall, anart, Guardian, Foxx, and Don Genaro -- thank you for further solidifying my confident belief in the "process" (vision/mission/method --truth, value, and trustworthiness) of this forum.
Azur said:
Not to distract from the discussion, I hope, however, I have to ask:
Who the hell are you Robin?
Seems you've got a couple of real LIVE fires going in a short time, on this forum alone.
To answer your question Azur: I am a relative newbie on this forum, but not a "newbie" when it comes to some of the "life experiences" I have encountered throughout my life and from which I have learned a great deal. As a result of these "life experiences" I have a
strong desire to separate Truth from lies, even if the "subject/topic" of my questioning is a "nobody" in the larger scheme of things, for I have learned the hard way and several times over that even the "nobodies" can cause a great deal of damage as evidenced/exampled by the hospital acquired infection I contracted, during my 3 year stint in and out of the hospital, that eventually to the removal all the hard-ware in my lower back which then had to be re-inserted after the infection cleared. (Experience re-told not for sympathy, but to show an understanding) Moral of this story: "Nobodies" can cause a great deal of damage when left unchecked/un-monitored.
(See my forum intro for an outline of this experience. Also, I purposefully posted a lengthy intro to be as transparent as I can possibly be and so that other forum members would have an good/general idea of "who the hell" I am and why I post/write the way I do.)
Azur, now that you have an idea of "who the hell" I am, I would like to re-post the post that was derailed by you so as to put this topic back on track:
----->
Quote from: Fifth Way on Yesterday at 11:44:12 AM
How do you arrive at the conclusion that I set myself up as a psychopathy expert? Since I canceled the psychopathy documentary project last winter I have not been active in that field at all.
Concerning whether or not you set yourself up as a psychopathy expert: If you do not know anything about the topic of psychopathy or you know very little, and you are not an expert in the topic as you have
implied in this thread, then your FB group name and the name of you documentary are
very misleading, because your FB group name and the name of your documentary
imply that you are an expert in psychopathy or at least knowledgeable in the topic. So if you are not knowledgeable in the topic of psychopathy or an "expert", are you just "playing" as one?
Canceled your documentary??? Then what did you mean by this statement posted on your "Psychopathy - And Why you Need To Know" FB group page on August 22, 2012???
Quote
Alexander Davidis: I think I am about to close it. But haven't complete decided yet. Looks like I cannot give it the attention I wanted and the documentary is still on hold. Pondering about what to do with it.....
So which statement is true, the documentary is on hold or completely canceled??? One thing I have noticed in your writings here on the forum is that you carefully structure your words in such a way that they tend to
misdirect and confuse the reader. Also, when asked a direct question, you rarely give a direct answer.
Quote from: Fifth Way on Yesterday at 11:54:41 AM
Thank you Foxx, I appreciate that you are being reasonable.
Sheridan supported my project back last winter, at a time when we all thought of him highly. There is not deeper connection.
From glancing over it, the Sott article shocked me and I wanted to read up on it before passing judgment, hence I removed it at the time. Who would have thought that using discernment and background checking on my own group-wall would earn me a headline on the net's most respected COINTELPRO-agent uncovering sites, implying that I am just that.
Never a dull moment...
I posted the SOTT article about Sheridan on your FB group wall to inform/warn others and for no other reason, as evidenced by the omission of any personal thoughts or feelings. Your action of removing the SOTT article was seen by me as a removal of a threat (to you and/or any future support), and a possible cause for doubt or distrust of SOTT in the minds of the other members of your FB group. In other words, in my view you
neutralized SOTT by removing the article. In the process, you may have
discredited SOTT in the minds of the other members of your FB group who are under the impression or who are led to believe via
implication that you do know something about the topic of psychopathy based on your FB group name and the fact that you were/are(?) working on a documentary about psychopathy. Looks to me that if anybody is doing any
"implying" in this thread or elsewhere, it's you. Furthermore, your words and actions, for me, only serve to
disrupt,
misdirect,
discredit, and
neutralize the topic of psychopathy specifically and the Truth signal on the whole. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck ... no implication needed.
<-----