Several things here. The C's are experts and masters at saying things without saying them. When you read "no dice" in Spanish, it literally means I don't tell you. But since the question is about constellations and supernovae it seems to me that the clue was in plain sight.
es.wikipedia.org
Relation to the constellation of Virgo
If one reads carefully the events that caused Dice to leave the world seem similar to the times when men becoming wicked and greedy caused the flood.
Now, virgo:
en.wikipedia.org
If we continue the search and include supernovae:
Catch a bright supernova in Virgo – Astronomy Now (distant galaxy)
Virgo is the largest constellation of the Zodiac.
www.space.com
It is actually quite difficult (if it really happened) to find any nova or supernova in the constellation of Virgo that is within 2,000 light years to affect us. The candidate may be PSR B1257+12:
en.wikipedia.org
But even the Spica star itself may be a supernova candidate according to this podcast:
A bright star with a brighter future
stardate.org
However, since Spica has recently left the main sequence, this event is not likely to occur for several more million years.(
Spica - Wikipedia)
As for Spica In his
Three Books of Occult Philosophy,
Cornelius Agrippa attributes Spica's
Kabbalistic symbol
to
Hermes Trismegistus.
That's a very interesting theory and may have as much merit as my own. In English or American slang the expression "No dice" is used in the sense of refusing a request or indicating that there is no chance of success, the former being the sense, I think, the C's were using here and the same sense that applies in Spanish. I do think the constellation of Virgo is important to this quest, as it may be represented by the female shepherd figure in Poussin's painting of The Shepherds of Arcadia. However, whether it is a star in Virgo that will go super nova soon who knows. We will just have to wait and see.
For my part, I spent a lot of time looking at the options and just as you have looked at Virgo, I looked at the constellation of Libra (which represents balance and justice), especially as it was added to the Zodiac in 1302 in order to make the twelfth house of the Zodiac and contains the stars that represented the former claws of the constellation Scorpius.
I was drawn to Scorpius by the fact that Laura had noted that the C's had said that the Nephilim giants had come from an area around the constellation of Scorpius as had the human race and they subsequently confirmed that the planet's name was D’Ankhiar:
Q: (L) You said the other night that the Nephalim came from some area around the constellation Scorpio, is that correct?
A: Originally seeded there but you were too.
Q: (L) We were originally seeded somewhere else? Where? Orion? What is the name of that planet?
A: D’Ankhiar. Ankh is ancient symbolism of this planet. Is female symbol. Stands for mother planet.
Q: (L) Is this other planet our original home?
A: Yes.
However, it struck me as odd that the Nation of the Third Eye were called "Antareans" by the C's, suggesting that they may have come from the Antares binary star system, which just happens to contain a red supergiant star due to go supernova in the near future (I have seen figures of between 10,000 and a million years cited but how accurately astronomers can predict such things is open to question).
The other factor to bear in mind for the candidate star is that the supernova event, when it occurred, caused a "Sign of struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of Royal Blood Lines". Hence, you will need to find a star that if it has gone supernova will have done so at a time of the dynastic struggle the C's spoke of. As I said in the article, I thought originally that it might have been the time of the Glorious Revolution in England that saw James II toppled. However, as a student of English history, I noted that the toppling of James II in 1689 came only at the end of a protracted struggle for the throne that had started with the War of the Roses in the mid-15th Century, which culminated in Henry Tudor seizing the throne from the last Plantagenet monarch, Richard III. The Stuarts, a Scottish family, only took the throne of England, which they then combined with that of Scotland, through their descent from Margaret Tudor, Henry VII's daughter and King Henry VIII's sister. You might justifiably say why should we concentrate on English history and English royalty here. The C's might, for example, have had the French monarchy in mind and the death of King Louis XVI of France that would bring Napoleon Bonaparte and his family to power through the French Revolution that would ultimately end in France becoming a republic. It struck me though that if Antares was the star that went super nova, it would have done so during the War of the Roses at a time when the Renaissance was getting into full swing and new ideas were starting to emerge in Europe after the rediscovery of the Hermetica. It may also have coincided with the first stirrings of the modern Rosicrucians as well since there are some scholars who see the movement that burst on the scene in the early 17th Century as having had its roots in men such as Sir Thomas More, Erasmus and later John Dee.
However, the key to this is in the "pre-ordained activities of Royal Blood Lines", which the C's tell us is to "Control as in STS domination". This is one of the central tenets of William Bramley's book The Gods of Eden, where the system of royalty was imposed on populations for control purposes by the Lizard beings, with the kings usually being hybrids who had stronger Lizard STS genetics in them than the common man. The Stuarts, like their French Orleans cousins, believed in the 'Divine Right of Kings' and ruled as absolute monarchs, as did the Russian Czars until the execution of Czar Nicholas II and his family by the Bolsheviks in 1918 and as the Japanese Emperors did until Japan's defeat at the end of the Second World War (interestingly, in support of Bramley's argument, the Japanese royal family genuinely believe they are descended from the gods). When James II was toppled from his throne, England saw the introduction of a constitutional monarchy that effectively transferred power to the British Parliament, mainly the elected House of Commons. It was the British Prime Minister who now decided on foreign and trade policy and on war or peace. The more cynical among us may argue that the real power now lays in the hands of the bankers - what Benjamin Disraeli called the Hidden Hand or we today would call the "Deep State". Hence, today one can argue that the pre-ordained activities of Royal Blood Lines in imposing STS domination is clearly over, since the monarchs (where they are still head of state) are now merely figureheads with perhaps the only significant exception being the Saudi Royal family.
So why focus on England and its royal family. I originally wrote a longer piece in my article on the significance of the victory of Henry VII and the eventual toppling of his descendant James II and its effects these events would have on world history, which resonate down to our own times. I decided not to include it because the article was already long and I appreciate that my articles are being read by an international readership here on the Forum. It might have seemed a bit too jingoistic to concentrate on events that took place on Bosworth Field in 15th Century England. However, there are many historians who play what you might call the "what if game" and even write books on it. For example, what if President John F Kennedy had survived his assassination in Dallas - would the agony of America's involvement in the Vietnam War had been avoided (Kennedy was bringing the US military advisors home from Vietnam even as he was being shot - President Linden Johnson sent them back again). What if the British soldier in the western trenches in WWI who had Adolf Hitler in his sights but failed to shoot him had gone ahead and killed Hitler (Hitler reputedly even kept a picture of the man)? Would WW2 have occurred? What if the American Revolution had never occurred. Would the British have ruled North America, on the lines of an extended Canada instead? Has there always been an active, hidden hand (perhaps alien and Antarean combined acting through surface human agents via the Consortium) that has ensured history has progressed as it has done in order to ensure that we have the world that we have today, where we are at the dawn of a New World Order a New Atlantis? If so, perhaps Richard III's demise at Bosworth Field could have been an important event helping to bring around that New World Order. Here is what I originally intended to say on the matter:
England’s Rise from Obscurity
You might say so what! Why should the victory of an obscure English king centuries ago make any difference to us today – particularly if you do not live in Britain. The answer to this is that the ascent of the Tudors to the throne would lead to changes in England and then later Britain and the World that paved the way for the creation of our modern New World Order. The English Reformation and the dissolution of the Catholic monasteries instituted by Henry’s son, Henry VIII, would completely transform the social order of England and allow for the rise of a new gentry, including men like Sir Francis Drake and Sir Walter Raleigh, swashbucklers, explorers and adventurers, who greatly profited from the sale of the monastic lands. The reign of Henry’s daughter, Queen Elizabeth I, would lead to the beginning of the British Empire (inspired by John Dee and implemented by men like Sir Francis Bacon) through the English colonisation of North America. This would be a Protestant empire free of the shackles of Rome's influence. However, with the death of Elizabeth, the Scottish Stuarts then came to the throne as descendants of Margaret Tudor, Henry VII's daughter. This would lead to two brutal civil wars in England in the 17th Century, partly driven by religion but also by the central issue of whether the king had the right to rule absolutely by virtue of the doctrine of the ‘Divine Right of Kings’. This notion was finally put to bed by the toppling of James II, although his son and grandson would try to wrest the throne back in the early to mid-18th Century. In the meantime, this period saw the rise of Freemasonry, which would be exported first from Scotland to England and then from England to Continental Europe, and subsequently to the New World. The Stuarts and their supporters would play a major part in exporting Scottish Rite Freemasonry to Europe. This period would also see the public emergence of the Rosicrucians.
From being a relatively poor backwater off the north coast of Europe, England would emerge in the 18th Century as a major centre of science, technology, culture, the arts, trade, and commerce. Bacon would again play a major role in this through his Invisible College that would eventually lead to the establishment of the scientific body known as the Royal Society. England would then help to lead the world into the Industrial Revolution. Through the City of London, it also became the world’s financial centre after the institution of the privately owned Bank of England, which would become a model for all central banks. As a naval superpower, it would go on to create the largest empire seen on Earth in terms of people and territory (unless we take Atlantis into consideration). Although it would suffer a major setback in the loss of its American colonies, England’s influence would continue to be felt everywhere, whether financially, commercially, culturally, or militarily throughout the 18th, 19th and early 20th Centuries.
Before you say this sounds like a eulogy for the British Empire, I would counter by saying that I think none of this happened by accident. I would argue that this stupendous and meteoric rise was carefully planned and assisted by external forces, especially the Brotherhood and the Illuminati bankers, but perhaps by unseen influences as well, such as the Nation of the Third Eye, the Orions and the Consortium. When the British Empire was exhausted after the two Punic World Wars of the 20th Century, which saw Britain’s rapid economic and military decline, the baton of leadership of the New World Order project was passed to its seemingly errant daughter (was the American Revolution really a Rosicrucian/Illuminati smokescreen though?), the United States of America. However, London still remains today an extremely important financial centre. I know this from personal experience since I have mixed with international bankers and worked for numerous investment banks in the City of London and Canary Wharf and in doing so I have come to appreciate the sheer scale of the City of London’s financial reach. They say a picture can save a thousand words. Well here is the emblem of the City of London and I trust you will take my point:
At the moment, only New York approaches London as the premier financial centre of the World. Although the US is clearly the major military superpower of the World and the major enforcer for the New World Order (as confirmed by the C’s), the real power behind all of this lies with finance. This is where the Illuminati bankers come in. It is not for nothing that the C’s have said that the USA and the UK are two major centres of STS power. Is it any coincidence that they are the two major cheerleaders for the continuation of the War in the Ukraine.
One of the key players in helping to establish the British Empire and to establish the ‘New Atlantis’ in North America was, of course, Sir Francis Bacon. I do not believe you can underestimate his influence here and that is before you even consider that he may have been the Grand Master of the Rosicrucians. However, we need to ask - was he being guided in all he was doing? If so, by whom? Was he working to his own plans or someone else’s? Moreover, as a practising alchemist, did he have links to that strange enclave of alchemists in the Pyrenees?
Postscript
A recent book I have read by the American author Steve Sora called Rosicrucian America may help to shed more light on Bacon’s influence on the development of the democratic system in the United States and how men like Benjamin Franklin and George Washington looked to Bacon, his writings and his legacy in fulfilling Bacon’s dream of creating a New Atlantis. I hope to write about these connections soon and particularly about the role William Penn and Pennsylvania would play in all of this.
The Horsehead Nebula
Please note that when the C's speak of a supernova having to be within within 2,000 light years to affect us genetically, I would suggest that the candidate will in fact be much nearer. We can rule out any star that is within 50-100 light years of Earth though since, if it were that close, the supernova might destroy all life on the Earth through the emission of harmful gamma rays.
There is also the issue of the Horsehead Nebula, which is found in the constellation of Orion, to bring into consideration when seeking the super nova candidate.
Q: (L) You mentioned the importance of the Horsehead Nebula in relation to the symbol of the Knight. What is the significance of the Horsehead Nebula?
A: Keep up your search, as you are near.
Although the famous Horsehead Nebula is in the constellation of Orion and might therefore link us to the blue supergiant star Rigel at the foot of Orion as Laura thinks, it was when I discovered a second less well known horsehead nebula adjacent to the constellation of Scorpius, where Antares is located, that I got really excited. Then when I discovered that drawing of Mercator (who the C's mentioned in the transcripts - could somebody pin that reference down perhaps), which showed the foot of Ophiuchus, the serpent holder, in the heart of the scorpion, I began to wonder if the C's could have meant the horsehead nebula in Scorpius. However, I readily admit that this is all speculation and conjecture on my part but it does seem to fit together and might help to explain why the Antareans have the name the C's labelled them with.
As to the connection between the Horsehead Nebula and the symbol of the Knight, I noted in the transcripts a few exchanges that may shed some light on this:
Session 4 May 1996:
A: First, some blockbuster stuff for the Knighted ones... Look upon a detailed map, and reflect, remember lonely journeys from long ago, and begin to unlock shattering mysteries which will lead to revelations opening the door to the greatest learning burst yet!!
Q: (F) Oh, my. A LOT of questions... (L) Was there more than one journey to Camp Blanding?
A: No.
Q: (L) Only one?
A: For you.
Q: (L) More than one for Tom?
A: ?
Q: (L) You said "knighted ones," as though there were some significance to the name...
A: Discover...
Session 28 June 1997:
Q: Okay. Back to Mr. Mann. He says that he has found, through applications of "mystery" teachings, and certain personal enlightenments, as well as the application of sacred geometry principles, the exact location on earth where one can transcend space and time, as he puts it. Is there such a place?
A: There are "points" where this process is facilitated more easily, but it is the process which is most key, not the locator. It has to do with magnetic field meridian conjunctions.
Q: Okay, he suggested that I look at Pouisson's painting 'Winter,' for clues.
A: Yes, go see the painting mentioned. There are strong connections between this and both the Denver International Airport Murals, and the suggestions we gave you for your inground pool design!
Q: Well, he described it as a figure of Noah clinging to a horse between two pillars [
MJF: I can't see that in the painting myself - see below]
. Other than the alchemical symbols I have discovered through etymology and philology, for the horse, what other implications does this figure suggest?
A: Maybe it is something about either the notation of the "knight," or the gas nebula in Orion. By the way, Laura, have you contemplated the life of your father and what led him to his drug addiction and destruction? Hmmmm? Big clues to be found there?? And, if so, what? What indeed!!
Q: What are you talking about?! Does this have anything to do with the 'arm problem' as described in the Matrix material, his arm, my arm, Tommy's arm, Mother's arm?
A: Quest, my dear, quest! Clues, as you know by now, make learning an explosively significant experience!
[.....]
Q: Well, they claim that they are the direct descendants of Christ through Mary Magdalene. But, getting back to the subject of Percy and knight. Through Gaelic we relate Percy to Perch, to March, to horse, to Mer, to sea, to "Mary," and then knight goes back again to juga and yogi, which then comes forward to Jadczyk, and all of them relate to genetics. And then we come back to the issue of my father, as a Knight, and my own ancestors, Henry Percy and Elizabeth Mortimer. The Mortimers were the Earls of March, and the carriers of the only extant line of the Welsh kings. So back to my father. Realizing of course, that he was a fraternal twin, he had black hair and brown eyes, and his brother was red haired and blue eyed, which makes for an unusual situation to start with. Was there something else unusual about his birth?
A: Yes.
Q: And what was this?
A: It was "conscripted."
Session 4 April 1998:
Q: Oh God! Alright. The three aspects of the goddess: in the story of Perseus, there was Cassiopaea, Andromeda, and Medusa... the three aspects, the mother, the virgin, and the crone. But, in this story, Perseus manages to cut the head off the crone. In other stories, the crone always manages to win. Is there any particular reason why Perseus cuts off the head of Medusa? Was this transposed? Was the Medusa merely another aspect?
A: Serpentine. [MJF: Note here a possible connection with the serpent (which could link with the constellation Serpentarius) which Bluegazer pointed out on the rock in Poussin's painting of Winter or The Flood]
Q: What about serpentine? Representative of the serpent race or the Lizzies?
A: Eden.
Q: Was the story of Perseus the story of Eden? Was Medusa the representative of the serpent of Eden?
A: Not quite.
Q: What are you alluding to that I am not getting? I feel that I am out of sync with this conversation.
A: Out of sync only occurs when presupposition reigns supreme. [
MJF: Could this be a subtle reference to the 'Divine Right of Kings', a doctrine that led to the overthrow of King James II and also led to his father, Charles I, losing his head on the executioner's block? You could say that both monarchs were out of sync or out of step with the times.]
[.....]
Q: Okay. Next question: the White Mare Goddess image that prefigured the Omega symbol, what is this related to?
A: Transcends.
Q: The White Mare transcends something?
A: Transcendental.
Q: What is the relationship of the White Mare to the symbolism of the knight? The knight on the horse is repeatedly used in alchemical symbolism. [MJF: Recall here that the Knights Templars used a device or emblem depicting two knights riding a horse.]
A: Rites.
Q: One of the rites in question is that the making of the knight involves touching both shoulders with the end of a sword which is actually a symbolic beheading. Why is the knight symbolically beheaded?
A: Blast open limitations of encasing spirit in body.
When a supernova occurs you could liken it in some ways to a star being violently beheaded. However, the C's have told us that a supernova, if close enough to Earth, may lead to the cosmic rays emitted causing a genetic splice of [DNA] strand. Hence, this could lead to some people (particularly those of the bloodline) being illuminated, which may tie in with the following exchange:
Session 23 October 2004:
Q: (A) Why are you transmitting from Rigel? What is special about Rigel?
A: Oh, wouldn't you like to know?
Q: [Discussion as to what that might mean. Laura points out that Rigel was mentioned in a previous discussion about supernovae.]
A: We already told you "No dice!"
Q: (Galahad) Should we tell the group about the change to Rigel?
A: Wait a bit and "see" how brilliant you are.
Maybe Poussin''s painting of
Winter deserves a second look from an alchemical and stellar viewpoint.
