Yes, I have had my suspicions that this could well be the case. Lewis Carroll was a brilliant mathematician but very defensive of classical algebra. He did not like the new fangled mathematics including Hamilton's quaternions, as had originally been used by James Clerk Maxwell in his famous equations, which later became the basis for the classical theory of electromagnetic radiation. However, I believe Maxwell went further and came up with a working Unified Field Theory, which after his death Oliver Heaviside came along and butchered. Heaviside reduced the complexity of Maxwell's theory down to four partial differential equations from an original 20, which are known now collectively as Maxwell's Laws or Equations. Thanks to Heaviside, the use of scalar and vector potentials is now standard in the solution of Maxwell's equations but this may have been a deliberate misdirection on Heaviside's part, as Maxwell had used quaternions rather than vector potentials to set out his original theory. Dr Joseph Farrell thinks this is the case too. The C's confirmed this in the following exchange:
Q: (A) What about quaternions? Lord Hamilton invented quaternions, and this Bearden tells us that Maxwell wrote his equation using these quaternions, and his original papers are hidden from us by the government; that Maxwell knew more than we are told. Is this really the case?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Are these quaternions useful?
A: Partly, but there is a missing link.
As to the C's references to Alice Through The Looking Glass, we have:
Session 25 July 1998:
Q: (A) You say knowledge protects. It protects against WHAT?
A: Many things. One example: post transformational trauma and confusion.
Q: So knowledge is going to protect us against post transformational trauma and confusion. You are saying that this transition to 4th density is going to be traumatic and confusing. Do you mean transformation from 3rd to 4th density, or 3rd to 5th density, i.e., death?
A: Both.
Q: So, if one does not have the shock and trauma and the confusion and so forth, one is then able to function better?
A: Yes.
Q: Well if a person transitions directly from 3rd to 5th density via dying, that implies that persons can transition directly from 3rd to 4th density without dying. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: How does that feel? How is that experience …
A: Alice through the looking glass.
Q: (A) Okay, they say that knowledge is supposed to protect from trauma and confusion. On the other hand, all is lessons, so trauma is a lesson. Why are we supposed to work to avoid a lesson?
A: You are correct, it is a lesson, but if you have foreknowledge, you are learning that lesson early, and in a different way.
Q: (L) So, if you learn the lesson in a different way, does that mitigate the need or the way or the process of the way of learning at the time of transition?
A: Yes. Smoother.
Q: (L) I do have to say that thinking about it all, not being able to do anything about it, not being able to talk to people about it because they don't believe, is certainly more painful than being hit by the shock of it...
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, you are suggesting that I CAN tell others such things?
A: You can convey, but suggest it be done in a subtle fashion.
Q: (L) Well, how subtle can it be? I mean, 'hello folks, you know the words munch, crunch, yum yum???'
A: It is not all that way, and you know it! Most are not eaten, just manipulated. Knowledge protects in the most amazing ways. Mathematics are "taught' in your realm in such a way that only a select few will learn. And mathematics is the language of all creation. For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes. Suggest those present who still need to, learn algebra.
Q: (L) Okay, you suggest that those present learn algebra...
A: Who need to.
Q: (L) Are you saying that we can unlock doors between matter and anti-matter universes? Is that what you are getting at here?
A: Maybe...
So, we see above the C's laying stress on using algebra to unlock the doors between the matter and antimatter universes and, as noted above Lewis Carroll was a brilliant mathematician who excelled at algebra. Moreover, we see the C's saying that the experience of transitioning directly from 3rd to 4th density is like Alice going through the looking glass. They must have had good reason for drawing Laura's attention to Carroll's book
Through The Looking Glass.
In the book, a sequel to Alice's' Adventures in Wonderland, Alice again enters a fantastical world, this time by climbing through a mirror into the world that she can see beyond it. There she finds that,
just like a reflection, everything is reversed, including logic (for example, running helps one remain stationary, walking away from something brings one towards it, chessmen are alive, nursery rhyme characters exist, and so on).
This reflection and reversal may therefore be a reference to the matter and antimatter universes, where in the latter things are reversed, so that
antimatter is composed of the
antiparticles of the corresponding
particles in "ordinary" matter, and can be thought of as matter with reversed charge, parity, and time, known as
CPT reversal. Thus, a
proton and an
antiproton have the same mass but opposite electric charge. An antiproton is negatively charged and an antielectron (a positron) is positively charged.
The modern theory of antimatter only began in 1928, with a paper by Physicist
Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his
relativistic version of the
Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of
antielectrons (N.B. Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter). These were discovered by
Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named
positrons from "positive electron".
Hence, the modern theory of antimatter appeared long after Lewis Carroll's time. However, could he have learned about it through scrying sessions involving the Orphic Circle, which used sacred mirrors (creating a psychomanteum) and trance mediums? Could Carroll have also been given a glance at 4th density by looking through the mirror? Recall that in Alice in Wonderland, Alice drank a potion that
The C's reference to
Through the Looking Glass and its link to the matter/antimatter universes were further enforced in the following exchange:
Session 22 June 1996:
A: Slowly, but surely. Now, get ready for a message: We have told you before that the upcoming "changes" relate to the spiritual and awareness factors rather than the much publicized physical. Symbolism is always a necessary tool in teaching. But, the trick is to read the hidden lessons represented by the symbology, not to get hung up on the literal meanings of the symbols! [
This could well apply to the symbolism found in Lewis Carroll's two Alice books]
[…]
Q: (F) Well, they mentioned twice to be careful about putting in the designated quotes. (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon." What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?
A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings.
Q: (L) Synchronicity is involved. Does this have something to do with "image?"
A: Duplicity of, as in "Alice through the looking glass."
Consider here the characters of the identical twins Tweedledee and Tweedledum who draw Alice's attention to the Red King—loudly snoring away under a nearby tree — and maliciously provoke her with idle philosophical banter that she exists only as an imaginary figure in the Red King's dreams.
The idea that Alice only exists in the Red King's dreams, connects today with the concept of the simulation hypothesis, which proposes that all of existence is a simulated reality, such as a computer simulation*. This simulation could contain conscious minds that may or may not know that they live inside a simulation. Simulated reality would be hard or impossible to separate from "true" reality. Could Lewis Carroll have had some inkling of this concept through Orphic Circle sessions or did he base it on the Indian philosophy of Maya (meaning "illusion" or "magic") or in Ancient Greek philosophy Anaxarchus and Monimus who likened existing things to a scene-painting and supposed them to resemble the impressions experienced in sleep or madness? In the 17th Century, Rene Descartes was one of the first Western philosophers to promote the dream argument. In his Meditations on First Philosophy, he states "... there are no certain indications by which we may clearly distinguish wakefulness from sleep", and goes on to conclude that "It is possible that I am dreaming right now and that all of my perceptions are false". No doubt Carroll would have been familiar with Descartes work as he was both a philosopher and a brilliant mathematician. Perhaps we can see Carroll's overt awareness of the simulation hypothesis or the illusion/dream argument when at the end of the story Alice recalls the speculation of the Tweedle brothers, that everything may have been a dream of the Red King, and that Alice might herself be no more than a figment of his imagination. Indeed, the book ends with the line "Life, what is it but a dream?" It would be well worth reading the book and its prequel to see if one can detect other underlying physics concepts or hidden lessons represented by, or disguised behind, the symbology, as suggested by the C's above. In doing so, keep in mind possible links to the Tarot deck (particularly the Major Arcana). I would recommend starting with the weird chess game, which links so many of the chapters together. Note that when Alice reaches the 8th rank, she (like any pawn) becomes a queen. What significance is there in this? Do the black and white kittens in the story possibly represent Ying Yang?
View attachment 80960
*For more on the simulation hypothesis see Simulation hypothesis - Wikipedia
Q: (L) Double images. Does this relate to matter and antimatter?
A: Yes, and...
Q: (L) Gravity and manifesting on one side and manifesting a mirror image on the other...
A: Yes, and...
Q: (L) And images of 4th density bodies with tenuous fibers connecting to DNA as in manifesting imaginal bodies on 4th density?
A: Astronomical.
Q: (L) Okay, that relates to stars and planets... astronomical in terms of another universe, an alternate universe composed of antimatter?
A: Yes, and....
Q: (L) And is this alternate universe going to merge with our universe...
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this alternate universe of antimatter the point from which phenomena occur or are manifested in our universe?
A: More like doorway or "conduit."
Q: (L) Is this alternate universe the means by which we must travel to 4th density? Is it like a veil, or an abyss of some sort?
A: Think of it as the highway.
Q: (L) So, we must travel through this universe of antimatter in order to reach 4th density?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is something going to happen in terms of interacting with this antimatter in order to bring about some sort of transition?
A: No. Realm Border is travelling wave.
Q: (L) Okay, you say "traveling wave," and then you say that antimatter is the highway. Does this mean moving through antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter via the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border?
A: Bends space/time, this is where your unstable gravity waves can be utilized.
Q: (L) Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which destabilizes the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite with matter, creating a portal through which space/time can be bent, or traveled through via this "bending." In other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the antimatter, IS the bending of space/time? Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Is there a portal for each person, or one large portal?
A: No.
Q: (V) So we move through a portal in masses?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this generating of EM fields to destabilize the gravity wave what the HAARP assembly is designed and built for?
A: No.
Q: (V) If there are not personal portals for one person, or portals for groups of people...
A: Portal is where you desire it to be.
Q: (V) So it could just be a state of mind?
A: No. With proper technology you can create a portal where desired. There are unlimited options.
Q: (L) Proper technology. Unstable gravity waves. And once you told us to study Tesla coils.... antimatter... destabilizing the gravity waves through EM generation allows the antimatter to interact with matter which then creates a portal... is it in the antimatter universe that all this traveling back and forth is done by aliens when they abduct people?
A: Close. They transport through it but most abductions take place in either 3rd or 4th density.
Q: (L) Is this movement through the antimatter universe, is this what people perceive in their abductions as the "wall of fire?" The coming apart? The demolecularizing?
A: No. That is TransDimensional Atomic Remolecularization.
Q: (L) Okay, if a person were passing into the antimatter universe, how would they perceive it?
A: They wouldn't.
Q: (L) Why?
A: No space; no time.
Q: (L) Antimatter universe has no space and no time... so, the antimatter universe is possibly where the poor guys of flight 19 are?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And you can get stuck in this place?
A: Yes. And if you are in a time warp cocoon, you are hyperconscious, i.e. you perceive "zero time" as if it were literally millions of years, that is if the cycle is connected or closed, as in "Philadelphia Experiment."
Where you state: "And then take those geometric figures and translate them with geometric algebra", this reminds me of what the C's said in the session dated 5 February 2000 and in particular the last line of the exchange:
Q: It's really sad that Santilli is involved with such flakey people! (F) Hasn't he always been? (L) He is certainly influenced by the wrong people! And I don't think we want anything to do with him at all. (A) Now, we were talking about Kaluza Klein, and you mentioned the Germans "exploring the loop of the cylinder" in relation to time travel. I don't know what this means but I have the idea that it is related to extra dimensions, hyperspace. Now, we asked a question at some point, and you said that a cylinder is really a double loop. You then suggested that we meditate on the true meaning of this sentence. Now, I don't know how to meditate, but I do know how to do math. So, I drew three pictures here: one is a real cylinder, two is a kind of cylinder inside a cylinder, and three, like a torus. Laura said that it wasn't any of these, that it should only have one side like a cylinder/mobius strip - no left and no right. So, this could be option 4, something like a Klein bottle or option 5, something called a twisted torus. Is it 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5? Or 6, none of the above? Is it one of these?
A: Selection 3.
Q: 3 is the torus. (L) What is a loop of the cylinder? Yes, there is one loop and then there is another loop. One loop is probably what we call time - cyclical time.
A: Time cycle.
Q: What is the second loop?
A: Included, but not inclusive.
Q: I guess that means that it is included, but is not the whole thing. It covers that, but that isn't the whole thing. What DOES it mean?
A: Yes.
Q: Wait, I asked what is the second loop. The second loop is included but not inclusive?
A: Remember, you do have cycles but that does not necessarily mean cyclical. 3-Dimensional depiction of loop, seek hexagon for more. Geometric theory provides answers for key. Look to stellar windows. Octagon, hexagon, pentagon. [
MJF: Think here perhaps of the hexagon at the pole of Saturn, which may be an example of a type of stellar window]
Q: Are those the different levels of density?
A: No, but it relates. Geometry gets you there, algebra sets you "free."