I wanted first to thank all for the support I received after my post. This is truly a unique and caring place. As well, I am grateful for the shepherds who work tirelessly to protect us on the forum. I know it can be quite difficult to balance monitoring against not becoming too calloused and cold. So, from the bottom of my heart, thank you.
I really don't know if insipio04's intention was initially predatory. I sense at the outcome it was more like someone with a good deal of self importance who wanted Laura, perhaps, to ask the C's why he was this way, in the sense of his purpose, but also as a justification to not change. Perhaps he was looking for an authoritative excuse, like being divinely designed this way, to give him carte blanche to carry out his desires (or to excuse him when he "accidentally" looses control).
But, I felt that as soon as the situation didn't live up to his expectations, his predator side took over and started to toy with the participants and thrived on the attention. He seemed quite at home, not shy at all, perhaps even emboldened and/or fueled by the attention as indicated by his response to truth seeker:
(Quote from truth seeker)
I'm unfortunately also getting the feeling from your posts that you may be enjoying the attention you're receiving from starting this post. Is this true?
(Quote from insipio04)
put your mind over your feelings then, dont let them drag you (everyone)enjoying no, thats superficial this is not a game but like i say if your not ready to walk, dont try to fly
Oh, I forgot to answer some questions that were asked of me earlier. Forgive me if this makes the post a little long.
To respond to webglider's comment:
webglider said:
Gonzo said:
Looking at the length of my post, I am now worried that what I have written is unimportant and externally inconsiderate as it is wasting people's time.
I didn't get that impression at all. Your post seems very sincere to me. There does seem to be a program running though - one that is compelling you to meet everyone's approval. If I'm correct, and I may not be, then this program will cause you to second guess yourself time and time again as there's no way you can ever know for sure what people will think because what others are thinking is as likely as not to be conditioned by their programs.
I have to say I'm surprised you could tell that much about me. I tend to be perhaps too much of an open book, but I didn't think one of my biggest issues, that of wanting everyone to approve of and accept me, was that obvious. You are absolutely correct in you assessment.
This has been a struggle for me my entire life and I have made what I thought were great discoveries and changes only to find it had morphed, becoming more subtle and therefore more difficult to detect and catch. Here's hoping the EE program helps.
go2 said:
Gonzo said:
I had been taught that paedophiles were predominantly heterosexuals.
Yes, it is a common blurring of definition that pedophiles are predominantly heterosexual. Pedophiles are sexual attracted to prepubescent children. This category has nothing to do with homosexual or heterosexual. If the attraction is acted upon, it is child sexual abuse and a crime. Where were you taught that pedophiles are predominantly heterosexual? Whose agenda is served by blurring the definition of pedophilia?
Whose agenda? Good question. When I was a reporter for a gay newspaper, I would frequently hear the concept of gays being less likely to be paedophiles. This was usually in response to hearing stories of parents removing their children from an event or program because a gay man is involved and the parents fear he will abuse their children. Personally, I have not been able to form an opinion either way as I have seen conflicting studies and opposing views from various psychologists. There always seems to be a strong bias whenever I have encountered an opinion. Within the gay community that I experienced, the opinion was mostly heard from gay activists.
However, I noticed something interesting in that when activists within the gay community state opinions as fact, these opinions are soon repeated by more neutral (less activist) community members. And I had the same experience in a small rural town, although in this case the opinion was the exact opposite. For example, there was a man working at a day care. I would frequently hear two assumptions: that the man must be gay and that he would be attracted to the children so he should be fired.