Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Here is a X post raised some questions and but it could be nothing but distraction though he looked weird. This guy seems to have prosthetic arm and was nearer to Charlie when he was shot. But, this guy has some interesting background. See the MIA's complete reply in the tweet.
HEY ANDREW — @AndrewPiskadlo

Stop playing the victim. You’re hypersensitive because you know your behavior after Charles’ assassination reeked of staged bullshit.

1.Out of hundreds of people there, somehow you magically end up front-and-center in the New York Times, and other headlines Not rattled, not silent perfectly camera-ready. Totally normal. Crisis Actor 101. Central Casting called, and you nailed the audition.

2.You’re chummy with Attorney Robert Barnes —REALLY INTERESTING Barnes makes a living slinging dirt at Candace Owens, and somehow he’s tucked into your tiny 1,000-follower circle. Cute coincidence. Or not. Connection.

3.And here’s the kicker — your rap sheet. You were ARRESTED in 2022 for: ASSAULT • CHARGE 76-10-506 – Threat / Use of Dangerous Weapon in a Fight• CHARGE 76-10-528 – Carrying a Dangerous Weapon While Under the Influence of Alcohol/Drugs• CHARGE 76-5-102(2) – Assault• CHARGE 76-9-701 – Intoxication

THIS IS YOUR TIME TO UNLEASH - Here’s Why

You’ve got some hardcore evidence of Ukraine ties, sex-trafficking rings (Utah + international waters), and sketchy airplane/flight logistics.

Yet instead of putting that work front and center, you’re out here milking the wounded-martyr routine.

Do the opposite How about using all that camera time to actually drop the receipts? Flights. Companies. Dates. Patterns. Stop auditioning. Either drop the truth you’ve been sitting on — or keep proving you’re just another actor reading someone else’s script.
Here is this man's X post expressing sympathy.

As a whole we are no where near knowing what happened. Motive is obvious (we can't expect agencies to agree to it) and all else is still hazy.
  • As per candace's local informants, Tyler night have been manipulated to drop the weapon behind chicken coop. If we go with that narration, the person on the top of the building is not Tyler. so he has to be some body else.
    • The pictures on the stair case, could be Tyler and could be from some other time. OR some look alike.
  • Some other video analyst says the guy running on the building started running almost before students reacted to the shot. So he may not be the real shooter. so we can assume there could be another shooter.
  • Arranging all of them is not big thing for the culprits. The cat and mouse game of more video's of false leads is expected given the power of the culprits and timing.
  • What is surprising is how many independent investigator's folded to Israeli wishes so fast - Dave smith, probably PDB guy, Nick Fuentes and so on. Some beaming?
 
Already posted multiple times, discussed, and 'debunked' - or, rather, eclipsed by better information/analysis.
I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that what was discussed on the video had been 'debunked' or eclipsed by better information/analysis. Could you please point out which one of the points he made regarding ballistics (because he said he didn't have time to go into all the other inconsistencies) has been proven incorrect? It sure would be handy to have the autopsy report!

1. The FBI is lying (funnily enough, many military and ex-military people have difficulty with this concept, although the presenter obviously doesn't, as this sentiment is prominently displayed behind him).

2. Kirk was not shot with a .30-06, as it would have "made a bigger hole". He guessing at a 556.

3. Kirk was not wearing body armour. The mic was clipped to the outside of his shirt to the cord that ran beneath his shirt, which wound around his neck and connected to his earpiece in his right ear.

4. The wound on the neck is an exit wound not an entry wound, meaning he was shot from behind, or behind and to the side, not from the front.

Some of these things should be easy to prove of disprove if we had correct information. Has there been any further information (that is reliable) forthcoming?
 
What happens with TPUSA in the future should be interesting to watch and especially what type of things will be aired on Kirks show and how his wife Erika will handle the situation from now on. I‘m afraid the PTB might not like what she will do at all and maybe also the way in which TPUSA will develop from now on.
I'm hoping that is the case. I'm all in favour of the PTB not likeing what happens. :lol: A significant group of people to "watch" would be the Zionists and the Israel Lobby. Many people have said (Candace and Tucker as well as some in TPUSA) that prior to Charlie's assassination, that HUGE amounts of pressure was being put on Charlie to make TPUSA more "Israel friendly". It does look like they wanted to do a Zionist takeover. They probably still do, but may find it difficult with Erika in charge - especially if she's talking to Candace!
 
I'm not a hunter, but this was one of the first results on Google:
Several replies saying it's normal for those bullets.
I hunt deer weekly and use a version of that projectile when reloading, here's the projectile that forum is discussing, the only difference is that mine are 5 grains .32 gram lighter.
The Hornady SST (Super Shock Tip) is designed to deliver tremendous shock on impact while expanding quickly and reliably, particularly at higher velocities. Flat shooting and deadly accurate, it's an ideal bullet for whitetails, as well as most North
This is what one looks like after travelling through 2 shoulders, 2 ribs, 2 lungs and one layer of skin before coming to rest under the skin of the shoulder opposite the entry. Those chunks are bone chips, this was the bullet that blew out the lung.
1758355006034.png
They are quite frangible but often the copper jacket will lodge in the animal and the lead alloy core will pass through and exit. Unless the Kirk shooter was using a custom made cartridge the bullet would've passed through, the frangible ones too, causing a noticeable exit wound. Deer are far tougher animals than us humans.
 
Back
Top Bottom