Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[seek10]

Here is a X post raised some questions and but it could be nothing but distraction though he looked weird. This guy seems to have prosthetic arm and was nearer to Charlie when he was shot. But, this guy has some interesting background. See the MIA's complete reply in the tweet.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968814868087325007

HEY ANDREW — @AndrewPiskadlo

Stop playing the victim. You’re hypersensitive because you know your behavior after Charles’ assassination reeked of staged bullshit.

1.Out of hundreds of people there, somehow you magically end up front-and-center in the New York Times, and other headlines Not rattled, not silent perfectly camera-ready. Totally normal. Crisis Actor 101. Central Casting called, and you nailed the audition.

2.You’re chummy with Attorney Robert Barnes —REALLY INTERESTING Barnes makes a living slinging dirt at Candace Owens, and somehow he’s tucked into your tiny 1,000-follower circle. Cute coincidence. Or not. Connection.

3.And here’s the kicker — your rap sheet. You were ARRESTED in 2022 for: ASSAULT • CHARGE 76-10-506 – Threat / Use of Dangerous Weapon in a Fight• CHARGE 76-10-528 – Carrying a Dangerous Weapon While Under the Influence of Alcohol/Drugs• CHARGE 76-5-102(2) – Assault• CHARGE 76-9-701 – Intoxication

THIS IS YOUR TIME TO UNLEASH - Here’s Why

You’ve got some hardcore evidence of Ukraine ties, sex-trafficking rings (Utah + international waters), and sketchy airplane/flight logistics.

Yet instead of putting that work front and center, you’re out here milking the wounded-martyr routine.

Do the opposite How about using all that camera time to actually drop the receipts? Flights. Companies. Dates. Patterns. Stop auditioning. Either drop the truth you’ve been sitting on — or keep proving you’re just another actor reading someone else’s script.

Here is this man's X post expressing sympathy.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967852781181735173

As a whole we are no where near knowing what happened. Motive is obvious (we can't expect agencies to agree to it) and all else is still hazy.

• As per candace's local informants, Tyler night have been manipulated to drop the weapon behind chicken coop. If we go with that narration, the person on the top of the building is not Tyler. so he has to be some body else.
  • The pictures on the stair case, could be Tyler and could be from some other time. OR some look alike.
• Some other video analyst says the guy running on the building started running almost before students reacted to the shot. So he may not be the real shooter. so we can assume there could be another shooter.
• Arranging all of them is not big thing for the culprits. The cat and mouse game of more video's of false leads is expected given the power of the culprits and timing.
• What is surprising is how many independent investigator's folded to Israeli wishes so fast - Dave smith, probably PDB guy, Nick Fuentes and so on. Some beaming?

 

[Ruth]

Already posted multiple times, discussed, and 'debunked' - or, rather, eclipsed by better information/analysis.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that what was discussed on the video had been 'debunked' or eclipsed by better information/analysis. Could you please point out which one of the points he made regarding ballistics (because he said he didn't have time to go into all the other inconsistencies) has been proven incorrect? It sure would be handy to have the autopsy report!

1. The FBI is lying (funnily enough, many military and ex-military people have difficulty with this concept, although the presenter obviously doesn't, as this sentiment is prominently displayed behind him).

2. Kirk was not shot with a .30-06, as it would have "made a bigger hole". He guessing at a 556.

3. Kirk was not wearing body armour. The mic was clipped to the outside of his shirt to the cord that ran beneath his shirt, which wound around his neck and connected to his earpiece in his right ear.

4. The wound on the neck is an exit wound not an entry wound, meaning he was shot from behind, or behind and to the side, not from the front.

Some of these things should be easy to prove of disprove if we had correct information. Has there been any further information (that is reliable) forthcoming?

 

[Ruth]

What happens with TPUSA in the future should be interesting to watch and especially what type of things will be aired on Kirks show and how his wife Erika will handle the situation from now on. I‘m afraid the PTB might not like what she will do at all and maybe also the way in which TPUSA will develop from now on.

I'm hoping that is the case. I'm all in favour of the PTB not likeing what happens. A significant group of people to "watch" would be the Zionists and the Israel Lobby. Many people have said (Candace and Tucker as well as some in TPUSA) that prior to Charlie's assassination, that HUGE amounts of pressure was being put on Charlie to make TPUSA more "Israel friendly". It does look like they wanted to do a Zionist takeover. They probably still do, but may find it difficult with Erika in charge - especially if she's talking to Candace!

 

[Brewer]

I'm not a hunter, but this was one of the first results on Google:

Hornady 165gr SST.......no exit wound. - The Firing Line Forums

Hornady 165gr SST.......no exit wound. The Art of the Rifle: General

thefiringline.com

Several replies saying it's normal for those bullets.

I hunt deer weekly and use a version of that projectile when reloading, here's the projectile that forum is discussing, the only difference is that mine are 5 grains .32 gram lighter.

The Hornady SST (Super Shock Tip) is designed to deliver tremendous shock on impact while expanding quickly and reliably, particularly at higher velocities. Flat shooting and deadly accurate, it's an ideal bullet for whitetails, as well as most North

This is what one looks like after travelling through 2 shoulders, 2 ribs, 2 lungs and one layer of skin before coming to rest under the skin of the shoulder opposite the entry. Those chunks are bone chips, this was the bullet that blew out the lung.

They are quite frangible but often the copper jacket will lodge in the animal and the lead alloy core will pass through and exit. Unless the Kirk shooter was using a custom made cartridge the bullet would've passed through, the frangible ones too, causing a noticeable exit wound. Deer are far tougher animals than us humans.

 

[dennis]

One other possible reason for disassembly of the rifle would be to switch barrels so the ballistics won't match the projectile assuming one is found. After firing ditch or hand off the shooting barrel to an accomplice who makes away with it, replace barrel with a substitute so the rifle found in the suspect's possession can't be used to directly tie him to the death of the victim.

 

[Cosmos]

Charlie Kirk’s wife, Erika, has taken over as the new CEO of Turning Point USA. Let's see if she really carries on his alleged legacy.

View attachment 112049

That could get interesting:

Firstly because of what Erika said in her memorial of Kirk shortly after he was killed, pretty much giving the impression to not let his legacy die and bring those who did it to justice. Secondly, because Kirk himself described her as much more conservative and far less moderate, here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968692791120109860

And thirdly because the people close to Kirk and his show said that Erika said “she knows everything“ after she got a call after the assassination where somebody “very important“ asked her “how much do you know?“ and that Kirk told them if anything ever happened to him that Erika should head TPUSA:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968794533975499260

And Candace keeps saying that only her husband and Erika would currently have the power to make her consider stopping or calming down her research.

Edit: Inserted the following: where somebody “very important“

Thing is, the fact that Erika is much more conservative and less moderate than Charlie may not be such a good thing. I’d risk a guess that Charlie did as well as he did precisely because his views were more moderate. The further you go to the right the less tolerance and openness to discourse there is. And that’s the exact opposite of what’s needed at the moment.

Same thing goes for the left really. It’s the moderates on the left that Charlie had the biggest chance of getting through to. The extreme leftie types don’t seem to be even capable of processing an opposing view point - let alone changing their mind.

When you combine the above with her husband allegedly being killed by a leftie (I don’t know whether she believes the official narrative about the perpetrator) it may mean she ends up being much more hardcore in her views and approaches. Which will put her and the entire organisation at risk of becoming a useful instrument in sowing further divide and discord between left and right. And that will further the PTB agenda - not derail it.

Yeah, in terms of Erika Kirk, I think it is a wait and see. But if I would need to bet, for various reasons that include quite some context and recent happenings, I would bet my money on Erika joining the good guys side. I think similar to Charlie, Erika has received very strong programming and manipulations to feel and see Israel in the way she most likely did at least a number of months ago. It seems though Kirk was in the midst of an awakening phase toward that reality when he was taken out, and it would surprise me if Erika wasn't aware of that. Here is a video of both of them at a point 5 months ago, in which both probably still were heavily programmed in that regard:

What stands out to me besides that said programming and also heavy bible programming, that quite some common sense and decency seems to shine through Erika despite all of that. AND at times Erika sounds quite a bit more nuanced and not so black and white about many things. Also notice what Tucker and others have to say about Erika:

[...]Yesterday I watched Tucker Carl memorial of Kirk on Kirks Show and I found what he and they guys said about J.D. Vance pretty interesting. First they talk about Erika Kirk, and the video starts at that point:

[...]

Having said that, Erika also seems to have a very strong "Israel best friends" background/programming, and it is likely that all the surrounding snakes will work overtime now to get her on staying on that line. How will that turn out? I guess that hangs in the air and we will see. But given the acute context, I think Erika might be a person that can cut through that BS.

 

[RedFox]

4. The wound on the neck is an exit wound not an entry wound, meaning he was shot from behind, or behind and to the side, not from the front

Here’s another possibility:

So here’s a hypothesis. The bullet hit him in the chest, ricocheting off a bone (shattering into pieces), and exited at the front of his neck.

Everything so far seems to indicate he was shot from the front. So we have to work with that.
Either it’s an abnormal entry wound on his neck, or it’s an exit wound and he was shot from the front.

 

[Timótheos]

This thread is starting to suggest/murmur that perhaps it was CIA/mainland USA PTB/Government forces that assassinated Charlie Kirk. If that came out, it would cause the biggest shock to wake the public that I can possibly think of. Even more so than revealing Covid-19 came from Fort Detrick or that the “vaccines” are what has been killing people. Covid-19 was a slow boil and peoples emotions on Charlie Kirk’s assassination are heightened.

I think at a certain level of understanding-

CIA/mainland USA PTB/Government forces
Mossad/Israel
MI6/UK
One world government
Illuminati
etc

are essentially different names or arms of the same entity - a super trans-national global reaching power network often referred to as the "deep state" or PTB. They operate invisibly behind the scenes and act in ways to affect and direct global affairs in ways that serve their 4D STS master's agenda. They seem to know about each other and are in communication with each other, sometimes acting in concert, other times in opposition. But when it comes to big "marker events" like 9/11 or CK's assassination, it seems unlikely that it involved ONLY one government or agency without the planning, foreknowledge and involvement of others.

 

[Ricardo]

I'd use the overall term consortium , also wonder if undergrounders can be qualified in the same mix.

 

[Niall]

The specific part of Owens's latest podcast where she describes what she sees on the footage filmed with the camera directly behind Kirk (which was shared with her by the guy we saw taking the camera down and removing its SD card):

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969237496815865992

So, we don't need to wait for an autopsy report to state with a high degree of certainty that there's no exit wound.

The X poster's conclusion, that this would "DEBUNK the official narrative of a rifle shot from in front" is faulty because he's implying that Kirk was shot from behind, which is inconsistent with all the other evidence: how Kirk's body moves, how the crowd reacts, the acoustics demonstrating a distance of 140 yards, no one standing behind Kirk with a gun, etc.

And so, thanks also to Brewer's input on 30.06 bullet characteristics, and the current-best-guess that there was no vest/armor to 'deflect the bullet upwards', we're still in the realm of 'a magic bullet' that entered his neck at full force, fired almost directly in front of Kirk from 140 yards, and somehow remained in his body.

 

[Bluegazer]

Has this already been posted here? I am trying to understand the events that have occurred, and day by day more things outside of known reality are, let's say... manifesting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969279134036635936

I don't know if it's a faulty video or what, but it reminded me of this: New Session Update (June 28, 2025)

 

[Niall]

Mom and Tyler on police bodycam footage from 2022 after our 'ultra-radical-trans-cult-psycho-killer', then presumably aged 21 or 22, was involved in a minor traffic accident:

 

[Cosmos]

Obviously I‘m not sad at all that Kimmle was fired, in fact, I feel pretty much the opposite that could be described as “thank god, finally!“.

When it comes to free speech I think the following guy makes a very important point that many seem to miss in that debate (while I‘m hesitant towards some of the other things he is saying). There is something that is called objective reality, basic decency and goodness, and the opposite of that, And pretending that you can judge every speech without those basic criteria’s is kind of crazy :

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967725854303326688

I think, given the above and our discussions here about the issues in the wake of this event in regard to "the left" and "the right" and how we should feel and think about "justified reactions", I think it might be worthwhile for us all to take a note and think critically/deeply about what Candace said about it yesterday in the following video. And also note what she says about Kimmle getting fired:

 

[Ryan]

I don't know if it's a faulty video or what

It's an artefact of the video compression. The chair was sitting in front of the table and the guy just picked it up and threw it out of the way.

 

[JEEP]

Has this already been posted here?

It's an artefact of the video compression. The chair was sitting in front of the table and the guy just picked it up and threw it out of the way.

Yeah, the chair part wasn't clear, but I guessed one of the guys tossed it out of the way. What was clear this time was the wired ear piece coming out of his ear - and that would suggest a continuing wire around the back of the neck and down the front of the shirt. So we're back to that wire partially accounting for the shirt moving up like it did on the front left.





There does appear to be a reddish circle in the ear, but that could be bleeding from the earpiece being violently extracted by the shockwave impact.