Here’s an article that goes into the logistics of delivering vaccines and the number of deep freezers being bought by businesses (also currently lobbying to be first in line after essential workers) to create a “safe” work environment. There’s also mention of how to incentivize (coerce 🤔) employees in to taking the vaccine.

With freezers in tow, US employers rush to fill vaccine void | AJOT.COM

As U.S. health authorities near emergency approvals for the first Covid-19 vaccines, companies are taking some of the first concrete steps to prepare for the unprecedented and complex task of distributing hundreds of millions of doses to the American workforce.

Ford Motor Co. has procured deep-freezers to store vaccines at some of its factories. Sanderson Farms Inc., a top poultry producer, will administer vaccines to employees at health clinics erected at its facilities, and the CEO pledges to get inoculated on video to encourage workers to do the same. Activision Blizzard Inc. plans to cover vaccination costs for employees and their immediate families. Several industries are lobbying to get their workers near the front of the line after the first doses go to health-care workers and nursing home residents.

More actions will come once federal and state officials set guidelines to steer how and when everyone from teachers to truckers will eventually gain access to the shots in coming months.

“That’s really when the question is: How do employers play this?” said Bunny Ellerin, director of the Healthcare and Pharmaceutical Management Program at Columbia Business School. “They absolutely are going to have to deal with this if they want to have healthy employees” and one day return to a more normal work life.

The answers—whether they come from companies or government—are all part of the effort to save lives and get people back to work. Since the pandemic struck, there are 9.8 million fewer jobs and the U.S. economy has shrunk by 3.5% from its prior peak.

And once the logistics are figured out, another touchy subject awaits: how to get workers to actually take the shot.

Next in Line

The food industry is among the most eager to get priority for their workers, after thousands caught the virus earlier this year at meat and food plants. Such crews should receive vaccinations following health-care employees and those in long-term care, the lobbying group North American Meat Institute said.

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union has likewise urged federal health officials to grant early vaccine access for essential workers at grocery stores, meatpacking and food-processing facilities. Conagra Brands Inc. said it is working through a trade association to get priority for its essential facility workers.

Delta Air Lines Inc. hasn’t decided whether to require vaccinations before employees or passengers can fly, though it will strongly encourage its workers to get shots, Chief Executive Officer Ed Bastian said on NBC’s “Today” show last week.

“Airline employees are front-line workers and will be given priority as front-line workers to access to the vaccine,” Bastian said. “Myself, I can’t wait to get vaccinated.”

Other companies with primarily office-based personnel are taking a more passive approach.

“Our plan will be to get the access to the vaccine as fast as possible for our employees, but consistent with what society has in terms of priorities,” Bank of America Corp. Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan said in November. “It’s incumbent on us and all private industry to make sure that we let society work through what it needs on this thing, get it in high-risk people, get it in the first responders.”

Banks, which critics have long targeted for big bonuses paid out to executives and traders, were wary of crafting plans to vaccinate white-collar workers early. Adding to their hesitation: They’ve spent months publicly touting how well their employees are performing in the remote environment. Internally, there’s also a desire to show support for front-line branch workers, many of whom have still had to appear in-person.

Guidance Needed

Several companies said they needed clearer direction from state and federal authorities before deciding how they’ll make a vaccine available to their workers.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s advisory committee has recommended that states first vaccinate health-care workers and long-term-care residents. The advisory group will finalize recommendations for using specific vaccines only after the Food and Drug Administration authorizes their use. Moreover, those guidelines are non-binding, meaning states can ultimately decide how to use the doses they receive.

Essential workers are likely to be vaccinated soon after health-care workers and long-term care residents. Data show these workers are at an increased risk for catching the virus and vaccinating them is important to protect the people and the work they provide, according to the CDC committee.

Avoiding Mandates

Some employers are coordinating directly with pharmacy benefit managers and vendors about vaccine distribution, said Elizabeth Mitchell, CEO of the Pacific Business Group on Health, whose members include large companies and public employers. Most employers say they’ll strongly encourage the shots but not require them, Mitchell said. “The companies have aligned incentives here: They want their workforce to be healthy,” she said.

Hospitals similarly plan to offer Covid-19 vaccines to their employees but will not mandate them. Doing so may only deepen mistrust among an already skeptical public, executives say. Instead, they will rely on leaders within the hospital to get vaccinated to set an example for the rest of their ranks.

“The way I portray this to people is the following: This is your ticket out of the pandemic. This is how we end it, we end it with a vaccine,” said Robert Citronberg, executive medical director of infectious disease and prevention at Advocate Aurora Health Inc., a health system with 26 hospitals across Illinois and Wisconsin.

Early Steps

Smithfield Foods Inc., the biggest global pork producer, said it would devote space in its ultra-low-temperature freezers to store vaccines. Sanderson Farms, the No. 3 American chicken producer, has established health clinics at all of its locations where the company intends to administer vaccines when they become available while CEO Joe Sanderson will take the vaccine on video.

Ford has purchased a dozen ultra-cold freezers to store vaccines and offer them to its employees globally once they become available. The company is still studying how to best offer a voluntary vaccination program, which will look different depending on what’s needed at its facilities globally, said Kelli Felker, a company spokeswoman.

“Our initial emphasis is on essential workers at our manufacturing plants, warehouses, workplace-dependent employees and employees who are required to travel,” she said.

Orders for specialty deep-freezers needed to store Covid-19 vaccines at arctic-like temperatures have been pouring in at So-Low Environmental Equipment Co. The closely held company in Cincinnati recently booked nearly 10% of its annual sales in a single day, said Dan Hensler, vice president of sales and marketing.

The company has been working overtime every weekday and all day on Saturdays to fulfill skyrocketing demand from hospitals, county health departments and pharmacies, and even small, independent drugstores—many of which never needed a deep-freezer until now. In some ways, the experience has revealed how communication from authorities about vaccine distribution has been lacking, Hensler said.

Seeking Deep-Freezers

“These people were calling up and ordering things and they didn’t really know what they were ordering. They’ve seen the guidelines about how their vaccines needed to be stored, but there was never good direction from above, even to us,” he said. “We took chances and built up inventory over the summer. We could’ve done double if someone had told us what to expect.”

Video game publisher Activision Blizzard may seek government approvals to participate in vaccine distribution as part of a plan to help its employees have access to a vaccine, Milt Ezzard, vice president of global benefits, said in a statement.

“As we’ve done with Covid testing and treatment, we will ensure that costs are covered for employees and their household family members, regardless of enrollment status in our health plans,” Ezzard said.

Shipping & Handling

One area where lack of information has confounded companies that are willing and able to help involves the transportation of the vaccines being produced by Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc.—concoctions that require ultra-cold temperatures.

Mike Kucharski said his JKC Trucking near Chicago hasn’t yet been contacted about any refrigerated vaccine cargo even though it’s been helping FEMA and other agencies distribute medical supplies, protective gear, blood and human plasma for the pandemic response since March. The company, owned with his father, John, has about 250 trucks.

“It’s going to be a new commodity that wasn’t in the market before,” he said. “There’s going to be an instant lack of equipment” capable of maintaining super-low temperatures.

And over at Prime Inc., a Springfield, Missouri-based freight and logistics company with some 6,500 owned or contracted trucks, big clients worry about capacity. “We have had several of our big customers reach out and say ‘Is this going to be a problem for us?’” said Jim Guthrie, director of operations. But that will depend ultimately on how many trucks are needed, he said, and “I just don’t know the answer to that.”

Logistics executives working with the federal government to distribute the earliest vaccines downplay the potential for strain.

The vaccines are being transported in special shipping boxes designed to maintain cold temperatures for 10 days, Wes Wheeler, chief executive officer of Healthcare Logistics at United Parcel Service Inc., said at a White House event Tuesday. And Richard Smith, president of the Americas for FedEx Corp.’s Express unit, said his company and its competitors have plenty of capacity to deliver vaccines via air freight.

“That is a huge myth that’s out there,” Smith said at the event.

Small Businesses

For small businesses, planning for distributing the vaccines is hard not only because of the unknowns in guidelines but also because they are already strained during the pandemic. That could potentially put them behind big organizations in accessing the vaccines.

“They obviously don’t have a lot of cash to go out and buy freezers,” said David Chase, vice president of national outreach at Small Business Majority. The trade group represents over 80,000 employers nationwide, many of whom have fewer than 10 employees. “We want to make sure that the distribution is equitable and big businesses aren’t favored over small businesses.”

Eric Cup, owner and founder of art construction company Bridgewater Studio Inc. in Chicago, said he’s been talking to his Covid-19 testing contractor about the possibility of providing vaccines on-site to his staff. He would “strongly encourage” his 48 employees to get the shots. If on-site vaccination is not available, he may consider giving them time off to receive both rounds of vaccines.

Overcoming Reluctance

While it’s still early days, it’s already clear that companies will face resistance to a vaccine from some members of the workforce. A push by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and other carmakers to reopen factories earlier during the pandemic made some employees question the company on health issues, friction that could spill over to a vaccine, said Mervin White, a quality auditor at Fiat Chrysler’s Ram truck plant in Sterling Heights, Michigan.

“People in the plant already feel like we were drug back like lab rats,” White said. “Is it really about safety, or is it about making bank, or making money?”

Fiat Chrysler said a team that includes medical professionals is studying the most effective approach for distributing vaccines to employees when they become available.

Toyota Motor Corp. is considering how to handle employees who may refuse to take a coronavirus vaccine. The company does suspect that’ll be the case for some and plans to respond flexibly, spokesman Scott Vazin said.

“We aren’t investing in refrigeration because we don’t want to take that away from front-line workers and those truly in need,” Vazin said. With wide availability of a vaccine not expected until spring, “we’re still focused on prevention.”
 
The results of the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials have just been published in peer-reviewed journal. The paper was accompanied by an editorial where the New England Journal of medicine euphemistically states:

"The number of severe cases of COVID-19 (one in the vaccine group and nine in the placebo group) is too small to draw any conclusions about whether the rare cases that occur in vaccinated persons are actually more severe," it said.

Other questions include whether unexpected safety issues may arise when the number of people vaccinated grows to millions and possibly billions of people.

Also unknown is whether more side effects will emerge with longer follow-up, how long the vaccine remains effective, whether it will limit transmission, and how it will work in children, pregnant women, and immunocompromised patients.

So basically the clinical trials conducted by Pfizer and that led FDA approvals and billions in sales doesn't prove:
- if the severe case are more severe in vaccinated persons or not
- the scope of the side effects once the vaccine is administered to millions
- the long-term side effects
- how long it will be effective

It means that it is totally possible that the Pfizer vaccine worsens the symptoms of COVID-19, has a number of long-term side effects, has severe short term effects and will be ineffective soon after administration (and totally ineffective against other variants of SARS-COV-2 that were not tested)

And this gloomy picture is only based on the data collected and published by Pfizer! :umm:
 

Very interesting. Claims were made earlier this year that this virus was made in a lab and part of the evidence to back up those claims was that the virus contained segments of HIV. Anti-bodies produced in response to Australia's vaccine (which contain SARS-CoV-2) appear to be the same (or similar) anti-bodies produced in response to HIV viruses.

"The drug, created by the University of Queensland (UQ) and biotech firm CSL, triggered a “robust” immune response to SARS-COV-2 in phase 1 trials, but it also led to some unfortunate complications involving another dangerous virus. Antibodies that were shielding participants from a Covid-19 infection were also leading to false positives on HIV tests."

So the point of this virus was always to compromise human health (immune system suppression) to make people more controllable. So keep your immune system healthy and vibrant and you can have reasonable confidence that you'll be ok.
 
Politician Michael Schnedlitz (FPÖ) gave a fiery speech in the Austrian House of Commons in which he dealt with the government's corona policy. The 'far too expensive' coronate tests are a thorn in his side. While his colleagues were watching, Schnedlitz showed that the corona rapid test was positive for a drop of coke.

In the first part of his speech, the politician sprinkled the test with cola. After 5 minutes he got the result: the cola was infected with corona. Schnedlitz said that the government uses the same test to test en masse. He pointed out that the test is extremely unreliable. (DeepL)

Never i could have thought to get the truth from this party.
See the dismissive, selfabsorbed types in parliament, same as in my country.
 
As if their programming and deliberate humiliation of the human herd could not get any worse or more on message... they come up with this in China...

And as we know, if it sticks in China it will be coming to an airline near you in the not too distant future...

First they came for the cabin crew... and by logic, the passengers will have to be next...

China asks cabin crew to wear nappies to reduce virus risk


Adult-baby-Incontinence-diaper-nappy-PDM01-6-SIZE-S-M-M-L-L-XXL.jpg_q50.jpg
 
Michael, I can't open the page?
Opps! Here's a try again with article info below. It was also on national news radio broadcasts here in Ireland...

China asks cabin crew to wear nappies to reduce virus risk

China's aviation regulator has recommended cabin crew wear disposable nappies and avoid using the toilet to cut the risk of Covid-19 infection.

The advice on nappies is in a section on personal protective equipment in new guidelines for airlines.

The regulator said the recommendation applied to charter flights to high-risk Covid-19 destinations.

Globally, airlines and airports have been making big changes to how they operate to get passengers flying again.

The Civil Aviation Administration of China laid out its advice in a new 49-page set of guidelines for airlines to prevent the spread of coronavirus.

The recommendation on nappies applies to charter flights to and from places where infections exceed 500 in every one million people.

It comes on top of the advice for cabin crew to wear medical masks, disposable gloves, caps, goggles, disposable protective clothing and shoe coverings.

Flight crew are also advised to wear a range of protective gear, but not nappies.

The global aviation industry has been struggling to rebound from the pandemic's debilitating impact on travel.

New measures being put in place for flights differ by country. Some require airlines to leave at least one seat empty between passengers, others have made masks mandatory for the duration of flights.
 
The recommendation on nappies applies to charter flights to and from places where infections exceed 500 in every one million people.

It comes on top of the advice for cabin crew to wear medical masks, disposable gloves, caps, goggles, disposable protective clothing and shoe coverings.

Geez, at this point why aren't the cabin crew just being given full on hazmat suits? But why just the cabin crew? Why not include the flight crew in the diaper dispensation and hazmat handouts as well? Heck, why be stingy about it, tis' the season for giving is it not?

Hazmat suits and diapers for everyone! Merry Christmas! :rotfl:

What totally absurd lunacy. Good thing we re-stocked our popcorn, because this show has more unexpected twists and turns than an episode of Resurrection: Ertugrul!
 

Sometimes you have to go back to go forward. And in that vein and along that train of thought, let’s do just that – let’s go back some 15 Augusts now to 2005, and a very wise and curious man named Jeff Wells, in a snug little place along the then burgeoning internet byway called Rigorous Intuition, screen captured here in its entirety in modular form (bless you Brian Wilson!) for your perusal. One little piece entitled “Who’s Screening Who?”

1607706950914.png
1607706979166.png
1607707001052.png
1607707034206.png
1607707056474.png


Perhaps you might recall the name Kary Mullis from more recent times as well, because it is his exact PCR test which is creating such a controversy regarding the accuracy and the crazy fudging of the COVID positive test numbers – they are either exploding beyond our ability to count or wildly inaccurate depending upon what news dispensary you trust. Since you, dear reader, have ridden the crazy train to this particular stop on the line, allow me to introduce you to a rabbit hole of quite boundless depth.

To whit:

Kary Mullis would have in no way, shape or form stood for what is passing now as conventional wisdom regarding the efficacy of his invention being used as a diagnostic tool in perpetrating the great COVID thought control psyop. His loud and very dissenting voice could have mucked the whole thing up from the very start, and that is something they couldn’t have, so Kary Mullis died, ironically and “suddenly,” of pneumonia on August 7 2019 – a time when some would say was a mere 3-4 months before this global “plandemic” got underway with the bug being accidentally/on purpose unleashed, likely at the ground zero origin point of Wuhan.

 

Sometimes you have to go back to go forward. And in that vein and along that train of thought, let’s do just that – let’s go back some 15 Augusts now to 2005, and a very wise and curious man named Jeff Wells, in a snug little place along the then burgeoning internet byway called Rigorous Intuition, screen captured here in its entirety in modular form (bless you Brian Wilson!) for your perusal. One little piece entitled “Who’s Screening Who?”

View attachment 40686
View attachment 40687
View attachment 40688
View attachment 40689
View attachment 40690


Perhaps you might recall the name Kary Mullis from more recent times as well, because it is his exact PCR test which is creating such a controversy regarding the accuracy and the crazy fudging of the COVID positive test numbers – they are either exploding beyond our ability to count or wildly inaccurate depending upon what news dispensary you trust. Since you, dear reader, have ridden the crazy train to this particular stop on the line, allow me to introduce you to a rabbit hole of quite boundless depth.

To whit:

Kary Mullis would have in no way, shape or form stood for what is passing now as conventional wisdom regarding the efficacy of his invention being used as a diagnostic tool in perpetrating the great COVID thought control psyop. His loud and very dissenting voice could have mucked the whole thing up from the very start, and that is something they couldn’t have, so Kary Mullis died, ironically and “suddenly,” of pneumonia on August 7 2019 – a time when some would say was a mere 3-4 months before this global “plandemic” got underway with the bug being accidentally/on purpose unleashed, likely at the ground zero origin point of Wuhan.


Indeed Ocean a lot of necessary 'circumstantial' events seem to have coalesced in the build up to March 2020!

In the grim but very on point interview between Dave Cullen and Irish Economist Fiona Marie Flanagan (see below), they discuss the issue of the scale of the plans that were already in place and being worked through come April 2020 for a whole new PCR driven industry of permanent and ever present testing (e.g. x 2 a month for every citizen!) as proposed in the sweeping Rockefeller Foundation 'National Covid 19 Action Plan'. (see attached PDF - if you havent previously seen this, I suggest download and keep).

The integration, scale and reach of this plan is where they always intended to go from day one. In many ways the key platform upon so much more will be built.

Lucky the PCR inventor wasn't around 'to discuss' all this.

This document stands out as one of the key corner stone blueprints of a universal strategy they are now working towards implementing. For example, Fiona Marie Flanagan believes it will eventually transmogrify into the means to also monitor and ration your very own personal C02 footprint... and as they discuss the virus was always a means to an end and that end has always been climate related depopulation.

 

Attachments

About 40,000 people participated in the trial, with half receiving two doses of the vaccine and the other half a placebo. Out of 170 covid-19 cases among trial participants, only eight were in the vaccinated group, the companies said in a statement. They said the vaccine worked similarly well “across age, gender, race and ethnicity demographics”. The results are encouraging because older individuals are at an increased risk of becoming severely ill and dying from covid-19, in part because the immune system weakens with age.
There has to be very serious mental gymnastics to come to 95% effectiveness when they only gave vaccine to 8 people out 170 covid patients from 40,000 volunteers. I may be missing something."""

seek10, It sounds to me that they are saying 170 of the 40,000 got COVID. Of those 170, 8 were vaccinated and 162 were not. The 95% effectiveness is bad math. Sounds like they are dividing 170 by 162 (170 - 8) to get the 95% figure. Really insanely stupid math. Just mumbo jumbo really.

And the big joke is that out of 40,000 only 170 had COVID??!? That is minuscule!! .004 random infection rate? wow
 
Back
Top Bottom