Hi_Henry
The Living Force
Video discussion between public health lawyers who are part of the German 'Corona investigative committee Nr. 41' and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, Switzerland-based scientist, academic and international public health expert who understands how the WHO in Switzerland works (or is supposed to).
Stuckelberger explains that Bill Gates and his 'GAVI' vaccines NGO is functionally a Big Pharma lobby group and that it has corrupted the WHO to the extent of acquiring for itself the status there of a 'member-state' - furthermore, one with total legal immunity to criminal investigation or regulatory oversight.
28 mins long. Worth watching for a glimpse into how international heath regulations (some of which are legally binding on its member-states, some not) have been hijacked by corporate interests - particularly since Bill Gates 'bought into' the vaccine industry in 2009 and used his influence to change the definitions of 'pandemic' and 'immunity'.
The switcheroo done on WHO's definition of 'pandemic' is already covered in this thread (there need no longer be high numbers of actual cases or deaths from a disease for it to be declared 'pandemic'), but it may not yet have been clarified here that, today, for the WHO, immunity can only be achieved through vaccines - natural immunity 'no longer exists'!
WHO INSIDERS BLOW THE WHISTLE ON TOTAL IMMUNITY OF BILL GATES THROUGH GAVI - GLOBAL VACCINE ALLIANCE
WHO insiders blow the whistle total immunity of BIll Gates through GAVI - world vaccine alliance. Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and lawyer Dr. Justus P. Hoffmann interviewing Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger anrumble.com
Excellent interview.
If one listens to this interview, one will get a good glimpse of how completely corrupted the WHO is. That Gates is placed on the same level as a nation in the executive committee of the WHO is beyond "normal operating procedures". Additionally hearing that things have been setup such that the head of WHO is the ultimate decider what nations MUST DO is mind blowing.
A corrupt man like Tedros is a decider of what nations should do Heck, just a bit of research enable someone to realize that Tedros is no "white hat" looking out for the welfare of the common man.
Seeing how the UN and the various religious organization (I have mainly in mind the Catholic Church) are completely in step with what is going on with the vaccine roll out is eye opening. Even the Pope was cheering on "get you vaccine sheep" while threatening his immediate clergy. All these organization which supposedly are for betterment of mankind are completely synchronized with the like of Gates, Fauci and Tedros.
Tough to be optimistic watching this.
I have gone back over the Dr. Bridle interview (My post ) and would like to share a few of my observations, as very little has been mentioned here about what he said.
1) The Dr. Bridle is a vaccine developer. Hence, like it or not I would not expect him to come out and say, "Vaccines are a waist of time". But then I would not dismiss everything he says just because he does not say this. He has invaluable insider knowledge of how the vaccine business works hence I think his interview is worth a closer study.
2) I have a sense that in the interview he is indirectly attacking the currently used vaccines. I bet in private he is telling his family and close friends not to take any of these vaccines and he says as much in this interview. He would not take it.
He clearly states that a good vaccine take 10 yrs. to develop. For Ebola that kills within hours, it took 4 yrs to roll it out (this was super fast development). So for any critically thinking person, that information in itself should be sufficient information to conclude that what is being offered now ,after only 3 months, is not be to trusted.
Besides, Pfizer clearly states (if someone looks for this information) that their vaccine "MAY reduces the symptoms of Covid-19 illness" but will NOT stop one from being infected or from transmitting the virus to others.
Question: Why take it ?????
3) He clearly states that a good vaccine should confer "long term immunity" . What is out there today does not do this.
4) He takes on the less than transparent Pfizer Phase I and II study results as well the fact that Phase III which is not completed (long term effects).
He points out that data was/is hidden and the rosy efficacy results advertised appear to be grossly inflated. In my opinion he is hitting hard the Pfizer product but doing it with a velvet glove by showing facts.
Now it’s interesting as a re-analysis with these new data taken into account was actually performed by the associate editor of the British Medical Journal. Now just called the BMJ. Alright. I do want to point out this is a non peer reviewed opinion letter. Okay.
But their new estimate taking into account that these unconfirmed cases actually predicts that the effectiveness could be as low as 19 to 29%, which is a remarkable difference.
I bet that when he uses words like "interesting", "intrigued", or "cutting corners" he would use much stronger ones with a confidant in a private conversation. My guess he would say "It is all bullXXXX"
He's one of a few to mention the issue with pregnant women.
But what I want to point out here, which I am personally concerned about is as a scientist, I know it’s only four people. Okay. Only four out of a total of eight people that have been confirmed in the UK to have been vaccinated and to have been pregnant. So it’s low numbers, right. But four of these individuals experience spontaneous abortions. Okay. So again, we’re not supposed to be using these vaccines in individuals who are pregnant.
Here is what the UK medical personnell pamphlet states about someone pregnant
Here is what the pamphlet for the vax recipient says,Pregnancy and breast-feeding
There is currently limited data available on the use of this vaccine in pregnant women. If you are
pregnant or breast-feeding, think you may be pregnant or are planning to have a baby, ask your doctor
or pharmacist for advice before you receive this vaccine. As a precaution, you should avoid becoming
pregnant until at least 2 months after the vaccine
Pregnancy and breast-feeding
If you are pregnant or breast-feeding, think you may be pregnant or are planning to have a baby, ask your doctor or pharmacist for advice before you receive this vaccine.
5) Dr. Bridle does not shy away from pointing out that vaccines can have very negative long term side effects. He points this out as it pertains to the Swine flu pandemic of 2009.
In his interview he points out that anyone taking these Pfizer/Modern or AZ vaccines is participating in an experiment called Phase III Trials. Many are not even aware of this and think that they are taking something that protects them, "It protects me from getting Covid-19". Dr. Bridle basicly lays out the crumbs in his interview which say "No you are not protected from Covid-19".And one of the places actually, where this stood out the most was it was in Finland. Now, what I want to point out is, again, as longer term it again, because because life goes on and it’s hard to make a direct link between a vaccine and some kind of outcome. It took a large accumulation of data. So it took about two years before there was sufficient data for this to start becoming reasonably obvious.
And then you can even see the paper here, reporting this, wasn’t published until 2012, and this is dealing with a pandemic in 2009, right? So it took about three years before this problem to be identified. So yes, there are examples potentially of longer-term consequences emerging.
6) Dr. Bridle is one a few taking on the subject of mixing manufacturers and changing the usage protocols of these vaccines. Though I'm not a doctor, when I found in the News that this would be done I thought to myself that the people suggesting to do this to be criminals. Yet, it was done without a blink in some places.
"We" is the individual taking the vaccine as everyone in the chain of supply has been given a legislative "Get out of Jail" card in many countries. You can't take them to court, Period.And that’s only going to hold true if you have used the recommended interval and dose, okay. Performance and safety of these vaccines cannot obviously cannot be guaranteed if administered in any way different from the way in which they obtain regulatory approval. I can’t emphasize this enough. If something goes wrong with these vaccines, if they don’t perform as well as expected, if there’s some kind of a safety issue, think about it. The manufacturer is not gonna take responsibility. The health regulatory agencies, aren’t gonna take responsibility. They’ve told us how they should be used.
BYRAM BRIDLE ➝ 00:36:56
And if we don’t use them that way, we’re gonna be the ones responsible for the outcome. And I just want to give you an example.
I will just stop here and refer others interested to his interview transcript. In my opinion his talk is much more structured and easy to follow than Dr. Bossche.