Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

@United Gnosis Free provocation is not a good idea. If that's your intention with such a comment so.... well use your imagination. And it is preferable for someone to tell me straight up if what I am commenting on or looking for does not seem right or wrong than a response that unsuccessfully tries to be funny.
 
Bluegazer said:
@United Gnosis Free provocation is not a good idea. If that's your intention with such a comment so.... well use your imagination. And it is preferable for someone to tell me straight up if what I am commenting on or looking for does not seem right or wrong than a response that unsuccessfully tries to be funny.
Click to expand...
Provocation?

I apologize if I didn't make explicit the connotations that inspired my mood - and maybe a discussion would be appropriate in the firearms thread, if you so desire. I was thinking that we shot a few different calibers, and my hunting rifle (6.5 creedmoor) has decent recoil but a surprising shockwave.

I don't know about you, but I'm not a gun nut, I bought the tool over 6 months ago and only took it out twice for a couple dozen rounds before. Before I got my acquisition license early this year, I hadn't even steered close to bullets, much less something well-above supersonic like a proper hunting round. So I'm still in proper awe of its awful power. Forcing the eye to remain open for follow-through isn't easy, but I got it a couple times and it looks like the shock is strong enough to squish your eye and blur everything for that instant. I had ear protection but my left ear is still ringing anyways. Only half a dozen bullets and the shoulder feels it too. What a surprise that my mind jumped to the association :huh:

Yes, the post was made in three-quarters jest. However, I thought linking the graphene-type materials to the symbiote's sonic weakness was interesting. Therefore thinking about, where can I generate a sonic boom strong enough, well I don't want to bust all my speakers so there you go, I thought about bullets.

Sorry if expliciting the humor makes it tedious, but I am surprised at your interpretation of my comment. I don't even know what you read into it, much less why you thought it was what was said. But on that note, I've had blurry vision in the last couple months, my mom was worrying to me 'it could be long covid' and i was telling her, well it'll have to wait until I order some ivermectin out of asia, but after yesterday, it somehow seems to have improved, a lot actually now that I notice it (leaning forward on forearms to type/look at screen in the last couple weeks, vs leaning back with extended arms today. Yes, I am actually curious about 'experimenting' more with that shockwave, and as me and my buddy both loved target shooting all our childhoods, going to the range shooting feels like natural wholesome yet serious fun.

What's wrong/provocative about that?
Read it over later. For now, g'night.
 
Last edited:
I visited London again yesterday and noted that the mask situation on the Met line has changed somewhat. Far less people are muzzled now and where previously they seemed to be attracting gimlet stares from the masked, this time it all seemed quite cosy and free and no one seemed to be paying particular attention. I think the poplace are getting used to seeing unmasked people around more. This is very good. It was even the case for many people going through the barriers at the stations. The threat of fines has not been rescinded but I did not see anyone stopped or questioned about the lack of mask. Long may it continue.
 
Caveat: curve fitting, will need to see dose 3 results, but interesting hypothesis:

gab.com

Steve Kirsch on Gab: 'This is HUGE. There is no way "they" can explain …'

Steve Kirsch on Gab: 'This is HUGE. There is no way "they" can explain this one: death is proportional to dose. The y-intercept is negative meaning that there are negligible "background deaths" which means... >250K deaths, virtually all caused by the vaccine. There is no other explanation...
gab.com gab.com

1633364130838.png

Source: Spike Protein, a Dose Dependent Killer?

Spike Protein, a Dose Dependent Killer?​

Kamal Mokeddem
Kamal Mokeddem
1 day ago·2 min read






The VAERS database has reports of 722,534 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines through 9/24/2021. What could be more fun to do on a Saturday night than bust out an R terminal and see what we can test against this data?

The first thing I wanted to look into was the theory that Myocarditis cases could be explained by an errant vaccination where the needle hits a blood vessel. This should be an independent event occuring with equal likelihood in dose 1 or dose 2 of a series. This is easily disproven as happening far more often in dose 2 of either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines. That leads to a concern that there may be a dose dependent relationship between something in the vaccines and adverse reactions.

The obvious candidate in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines is the dose of mRNA. From “mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability” mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability we determine that each Pfizer shot contains 30 micrograms of mRNA, each Moderna shot contains 100 micrograms. Then from VAERS jan 1, 2021-sept 13, 2021 we determine the number of reports of fatalities within 30 days for Pfizer dose 1 (379), Pfizer dose 2 (774), Moderna dose 1 (627), Moderna dose 2 (774). We then need to normalize by the number of people vaccinated for each vaccine (113m Pfizer, 75.74m Moderna). If we divide the fatalities reported in VAERS by the total number of doses of each vaccine we obtain a relative fatality rate that is comparable across vaccines.

We might then hypothesize that there is a relationship between cumulative dose of spike protein from mRNA (x) and fatality rate per million doses over 30 days (y).

x = 30μg (Pfizer dose 1), 60μg (Pfizer dose 1+2), 100μg (Moderna dose 1), 200μg (Moderna dose 1+2)

y (fatalities/1m doses)= 394/113, 710/113, 545/75.74, 767/75.74

When plotted we end up with this graph:

1*33GFblnG9MemCsOnp4QuMQ.png

That looks logarithmic. Let’s plot it again as the log of the dose with the best fit line in red.

1*holVysPGhGSwWJOktbDjZQ.png

1*holVysPGhGSwWJOktbDjZQ.png

That looks like a decent model. We get a .98 R² with a p-value of 0.8%. Very unlikely we got this relationship by chance. It would be interesting to know if there is a physical basis for this empirical relationship. Also it would be interesting to know how to normalize the spike proteins produced by adenovirus vector vaccines (J&J) with the mRNA vaccines to add more data points.
Click to expand...
 
JEEP said:
The evidence keeps piling up - when is it going to make a difference?

New UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work and have negative effectiveness as low as MINUS 66%​

Click to expand...

This is probably the best "official" evidence so far against the clotshots and the "vaccine passports":

Image1.png

https://assets.publishing.service.g...238/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_39.pdf

It shows that everyone over 40 in the UK is more likely to get a covid infection if they are vaxxed. Which makes demands for "vaccine passports" completely absurd.

It seems that those under 40 are getting some degree of protection against infection (probably because they got their injections more recently), but it is likely to wane and become negative just like among the older people.

On the other hand, this report also shows that hospitalization and deaths due to covid are lower among the vaxxed. So either the clotshot does offer some protection in this regard or it is something like treating the vaxxed with Ivermectin while the unvaxxed get Remsdevir to skew the numbers. There have been reports like that.
 
axj said:
On the other hand, this report also shows that hospitalization and deaths due to covid are lower among the vaxxed. So either the clotshot does offer some protection in this regard or it is something like treating the vaxxed with Ivermectin while the unvaxxed get Remsdevir to skew the numbers. There have been reports like that.
Click to expand...
In addition to your last thought that the vaxxed are getting Ivermectin as opposed to Remdesivir, these statistical "facts" are likely also skewed due to persons being considered unvaxxed within 14 days of receiving their clotshot. So, if they are hospitalized or die even though they did get the shot, for statistical purposes, they are considered unvaxxed. Further, the newly vaxxed are likely infecting the unvaxxed via shedding.
 
Looks like we're moving towards mandatory vaccination for everyone in France...
www.publicsenat.fr

Covid-19 : le sénateur à l’origine du texte sur la vaccination obligatoire, veut des sanctions en cas de refus - Public Sénat

Bernard Jomier, rapporteur de la proposition de loi instaurant la vaccination obligatoire contre le SARS-CoV-2 veut amender le texte du groupe PS du Sénat. Si le texte était ainsi adopté par le Parlement, le non-respect de cette obligation serait passible de 135 euros d’amende.
www.publicsenat.fr www.publicsenat.fr
While the vaccination campaign against covid-19 is clearly at a standstill in France, the Senate's Social Affairs Committee will examine on October 6 the Socialist Group's bill on universal compulsory vaccination against SARS-CoV 2. Two days before the committee debates the bill, which will be examined in the Chamber on October 13, there is only one amendment.

Tabled by the rapporteur Bernard Jomier, the second of the signatories of the bill, the amendment provides for a fine in case of refusal to submit to vaccination against covid-19. Failure to comply with this obligation would be punishable by a fixed fine of 135 euros. In the event of a repeat offence - three fines in 30 days - this fine will be increased to 1,500 euros.

As of January 1, 2022
This penalty would start on January 1, 2022, "to give all those concerned time to comply," explains the senator from Paris, a doctor by profession.

Currently, the 11 mandatory vaccines (against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, whooping cough, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, etc.) for children under two years of age (unless medically contraindicated) have conditioned since 2018 the admission or maintenance of a child in a school, daycare, nursery, or summer camp.

However, failure to comply with them is no longer subject to criminal or financial penalties since 2017. Previously, parents refusing this provision risked up to six months of imprisonment and a 3,750 euro fine. At the time, the obligation was only valid for diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis.
Click to expand...
 
Well.., the new passport laws just landed today in Canada, Nova Scotia.

Nobody who can't show proof of vaccination is allowed to in restaurants, pubs, music venues, movie theaters. This is Day One.

A friend of mine took a poll at a place she works of customer opinions. The bulk of people asked weren't just in favor, but were aggressively in favor, expressing anger for those who refuse to take the drugs. -That they would like to egg their houses, punish them, etc.

I also noted a change in her behavior; it was a really sad decision for her to finally get the vax, she struggled and cried, but now.., she's repeating the lines about keeping people safe, about unvaxxed people being selfish, endangering people's sense of safety. She said she'd be getting her kids vaxxed when the drugs were available. -She said the government wants to keep us safe.

It's heartbreaking. I was really stunned. People wanting to do me harm who I would never want to hurt? I told her I loved her, and left feeling dazed and sad.

I was going about town today, and noticed a visceral realization within myself; this is what it must have felt like to be Jewish in Germany during the dark years. These people have lost their minds. It's happening so quickly!

I think Jedi Master Yoda missed a step:

"Fear leads to Anger,
Anger leads to Hate,
Hate leads to Suffering."

The step he left out, the first step..,

Ignorance leads to Fear.

Knowledge protects, and that protection needs to extend beyond just mandated government/corporate drugs, but also must include friends and neighbors shifting dramatically in their relations to you. How soon until somebody snaps and something tragic happens?

I can't say I'm surprised, but still.., a part of me really hoped for better from Canadians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom