Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[Tuulikki]

A very sobering and (if true) heart-breaking overview of the impact on the shots on pregnancy. Dr Northrup and Dr Thorpe estimate that in the US there have been at least 100,000 fetal deaths above the norm for those who get the injections in the first 20 weeks or pregnancy. Dr Northrup also reports in a dramatic rise in stillborns being reported by drs in hospitals as well as the very few undertakers willing to speak out.

OBGYN Whistleblowers: Dr Northrup & Dr Thorp On The Devastating Impact Of The Experimental Shots​

The pregnant women of today would probably have little or no knowledge of the devastating effect of the drug Thalidomide back in the 1950's and early 60's. My own mother was offered this drug to treat her morning sickness whilst pregnant with one of my brothers although it was also used for other symptoms. She declined it thankfully. It was widely deemed to be quite safe and effective after exhaustive trials on rodent embryos but apparently more extensive trials of the drug were not carried out. It caused horrible malformations of limbs and also resulted in miscarriages, and many babies died within six months of birth from various causes connected with the drug. Of the thousands of babies worldwide affected by the drug only about 3,000 remain alive today.

When I was growing up I came across several examples of children who had been damaged by Thalidomide. It was a dirty word and most people knew it. Unfortunately today's pregnant women seem to think that it is an acceptable risk to take into their bodies (permanently) an experimental drug with no long term risk stats. The belief in an all-powerful authority that knows everything there is to know about the effects of the vaccines appears to be absolute and unassailable. The women who took Thalidomide in early pregnancy were probably told something very similar and came to regret it bitterly.

 

[Hi_Henry]

Unfortunately today's pregnant women seem to think that it is an acceptable risk to take into their bodies (permanently) an experimental drug with no long term risk stats.

Yes, that one is truely hard to understand.

We have a treatment without finished long term studies (2022/2023) being pushed on millions and some people are contemplating getting 3rd dose, IF NOT MORE !!!!
Completely robotic behavior if not downright stupidity.

https://twitter.com/OpenVAERS

How concerned are you about adverse events related to the vaccines?

www.medscape.com

 

[Hi_Henry]

Could they be getting ready to throw Fauci under the bus ?

2 years of lying is beginning to show serious cracks in the narrative they were selling. They might be seeing signals that the most conned are finally catching on to the scam. Hence, a sacrifice needs to be made so as not to have the whole thing explode.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1480909671082901504

Here is something from a different perspective of this Circus which got me a bit emotionally stirred. Nice to read about people who won't be pushed around.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1480744020406005762

 

[Michael B-C]

An unverified report on this site:

Insurers fail to pay out after former French entrepreneur with life insurance of several million euros dies following vaccination.

The patchy report gives few details but it seems:

A very wealthy, grandfather with significant amounts of life cover benefiting his family dies directly following and as a result of taking the jab.

This was not disputed by the doctors, nor his life insurers.

However the insurance company refused to pay out because the taking of experimental drugs/treatments is specifically excluded from their policy.

The family then bring the insurance company to court - and lose.

The court states:

“...the experimental vaccine side effects are publicized and the deceased could not claim not to have known about them when he voluntarily took the injections.'

Therefore it seems his death is legally a form of self-responsible death or 'suicide' which his policy also excludes.

Our French colleagues may well correct the above interpretation or dig up any supporting evidence to say if any of this is true! I post it here simply because true or not - it makes total sense!

 

[manitoban]

The pregnant women of today would probably have little or no knowledge of the devastating effect of the drug Thalidomide back in the 1950's and early 60's. My own mother was offered this drug to treat her morning sickness whilst pregnant with one of my brothers although it was also used for other symptoms. She declined it thankfully. It was widely deemed to be quite safe and effective after exhaustive trials on rodent embryos but apparently more extensive trials of the drug were not carried out. It caused horrible malformations of limbs and also resulted in miscarriages, and many babies died within six months of birth from various causes connected with the drug. Of the thousands of babies worldwide affected by the drug only about 3,000 remain alive today.

When I was growing up I came across several examples of children who had been damaged by Thalidomide. It was a dirty word and most people knew it. Unfortunately today's pregnant women seem to think that it is an acceptable risk to take into their bodies (permanently) an experimental drug with no long term risk stats. The belief in an all-powerful authority that knows everything there is to know about the effects of the vaccines appears to be absolute and unassailable. The women who took Thalidomide in early pregnancy were probably told something very similar and came to regret it bitterly.

My Mother was also offered Thalidomide when pregnant with my older brother for morning sickness and her Dr. tried very hard to convince her that it was perfectly safe. Thank God she didn't do it, however she did know a lady who did and the poor baby was born with deformities.

It did indeed become common knowledge back then, but I've noticed that whenever this terrible tragedy is brought up in regards to taking experimental vaccines while pregnant today, the answer is always something along the lines of, "Science is so much more advanced now than it was back then!" People today are, as you say, even less likely to question medical advice than they were back then.

 

[Hi_Henry]

An unverified report on this site:

Insurers fail to pay out after former French entrepreneur with life insurance of several million euros dies following vaccination.

Nice find Michael.

This is exactly the problem that anyone trying to go this route will probably encounter. On top of it many people will simply not know how to approach this problem even if it comes to their minds. From my limited understanding you really need before and after lab work to have a good chance to win. Even then it is a waiting game that costs money.

 

[luc]

An unverified report on this site:

Insurers fail to pay out after former French entrepreneur with life insurance of several million euros dies following vaccination.

The patchy report gives few details but it seems:



Our French colleagues may well correct the above interpretation or dig up any supporting evidence to say if any of this is true! I post it here simply because true or not - it makes total sense!

It seems to be taken from the facebook page of the lawyer (MAITRE ALBERTO CARLO BRUSA) on 3 or 4 January, but his profile is not public so I can't verify.

The logic of the insurance companies is impeccable: if you take part in a medical experiment/trial, this is on you. But most people don't even know it IS an experimental drug, given all the propaganda.

 

[Don Cesar]

An unverified report on this site:

Insurers fail to pay out after former French entrepreneur with life insurance of several million euros dies following vaccination.

The patchy report gives few details but it seems:



Our French colleagues may well correct the above interpretation or dig up any supporting evidence to say if any of this is true! I post it here simply because true or not - it makes total sense!

Hello Michael B-C, all I can say is that I had read a few months ago that French insurance companies had this cancellation policy in their contracts concerning experimental treatments. It's just from memory, I have no link for proof ...

 

[Michael B-C]

My Mother was also offered Thalidomide when pregnant with my older brother for morning sickness and her Dr. tried very hard to convince her that it was perfectly safe. Thank God she didn't do it, however she did know a lady who did and the poor baby was born with deformities.

It did indeed become common knowledge back then, but I've noticed that whenever this terrible tragedy is brought up in regards to taking experimental vaccines while pregnant today, the answer is always something along the lines of, "Science is so much more advanced now than it was back then!" People today are, as you say, even less likely to question medical advice than they were back then.

Such a relief your mother resisted and trusted her instinct, manitoban. I distinctly remember form my childhood that Thalidomide was the absolute go to cautionary tale concerning the imperfection by nature of science driven by 'enthusiasm' and wishful thinking. Even aged around 10, everyone knew it - and that was for something that impacted a mere 10,000 kids worldwide! As you say today that has been memory holed and now its 'Trust the Science, Stupid!' - especially among the educated left who have morphed en masse and on a dime from 'Corporations all Bad!' to 'Big Pharma, our Beneficent Savior'! Quite astonishing (and only adds to the mass formation meme). Of course the cognitive dissonance is so great they wouldn't dream of weighing up a reality in which, as an integral part of their standard business model, Pfizer and crew have accumulated billions and billions in fines (but no prosecutions mind!) for outright lying and endangering life, simply for profit.



Of course as the top 2 monster fines - awards going to GlaxoSmithKline and of all people Pfizer - took place way back in 2009-2012 we can safely say, as you say, "Science is so much more advanced now than it was back then!"

 

[psychegram]

It did indeed become common knowledge back then, but I've noticed that whenever this terrible tragedy is brought up in regards to taking experimental vaccines while pregnant today, the answer is always something along the lines of, "Science is so much more advanced now than it was back then!"

While I wasn't around back then, it wouldn't surprise me at all if back in the 50s people were saying the same thing. "Oh, we've come so much further since the days of snake oil salesmen hawking their patent tonics! Thalidomide was developed by modern scientists ... it has to be safe!"

 

[psychegram]

Hello Michael B-C, all I can say is that I had read a few months ago that French insurance companies had this cancellation policy in their contracts concerning experimental treatments. It's just from memory, I have no link for proof ...

Even if they do have such clauses written in, they may be getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. There are multiple reports of all-cause mortality having increased. Now, if they argue it's the vaxx, they can avoid paying out - but will earn the wrath of public health for making the vaxx look bad. Or they can just pay out on all those policies - and go bankrupt.

 

[aragorn]

I'm reading the 'bombshell' documents released by Project Veritas and especially the report by 'Major Murphy' is an interesting read. However, as we've seen these kind of 'bombshells' previously, and how they later turned out to be forgeries/disinfo, I'm careful not to 'jump the gun'. One thing that bothers me a little in Murphy's document is the repeated focus on the 'bat-angle', that is, that their intention was to infect the bats in the Chinese caves with an engineered (through GOF research) 'bat vaccine' to protect their troops in the future, and then the thing escaped. Is this document trying to divert attention from the angle that they, maybe, actually tried to engineer something to harm/control people?

Snippet:

“SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSr-CoV-WIV {Wuhan Institute of Virology}, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recominant bat SARSr-CoV backbone. It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosoilzed so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm” (pp. 3–4).

Having said that, many things in Murphy's report seem plausible and, if true, would explain a number of things. Plus, it paints Fauci even more as a liar, if that's possible . I can't copy-paste the text here (due to the format) but you can have a read here: Major Murphy's report.

All documents on PV:s site here:

Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath | Project Veritas

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

 

[Don Cesar]

Even if they do have such clauses written in, they may be getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. There are multiple reports of all-cause mortality having increased. Now, if they argue it's the vaxx, they can avoid paying out - but will earn the wrath of public health for making the vaxx look bad. Or they can just pay out on all those policies - and go bankrupt.

Or wake up a little more people who realize that their life insurance is no longer valid because of vaccines which are still experimental for the moment ... A good subject of controversy if, I hope, it is disseminated in the public media ... But hey ... Wait and see ...

 

[JEEP]

Or wake up a little more people who realize that their life insurance is no longer valid because of vaccines which are still experimental for the moment ...

This makes me think of something I saw recently about the insistence that there is no difference between the widely used original Pfizer vax and the unavailable Comirnaty shot - that there should be no hesitation or objection that one isn't getting the FDA approved Comirnaty! Well, having your life insurance voided is a big reason to object!

 

[Pecha]

Could they be getting ready to throw Fauci under the bus ?

2 years of lying is beginning to show serious cracks in the narrative they were selling. They might be seeing signals that the most conned are finally catching on to the scam. Hence, a sacrifice needs to be made so as not to have the whole thing explode.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1480909671082901504

Here is something from a different perspective of this Circus which got me a bit emotionally stirred. Nice to read about people who won't be pushed around.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1480744020406005762

Yep, it sure seems that they are prepared to throw him away to the masses. The "leaked" reports imply that the virus originated in Wuhan, and not possibly Fort Detrick! Backstabbing while keeping yourself out of harms way is the name of the game in STS-land