Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?
- Thread starter wanderingthomas
- Start date
Peak Prosperity published a video around the time you posted, with analysis of data from New Zealand that once again shows this experiment is having a few problems:
Deaths in New Zealand
Man, I try really hard not to get angry at this clown world, then I read a story like this:
Wow, don’t know if this has been shared already. I can’t even believe it.
If it’s true, I don’t understand why people still believe in insurance?
Insurance at all levels is a scam, IMO.
Just put some money away every month, that’s my motto.
DEATH by Vaccine “legally considered suicide” French Court Rules.
Wow, don’t know if this has been shared already. I can’t even believe it.
If it’s true, I don’t understand why people still believe in insurance?
Insurance at all levels is a scam, IMO.
Just put some money away every month, that’s my motto.
I took a closer look at this study Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccinations by age and sex which is mentioned in: Large British study finds risk of myocarditis doubles after each mRNA jab
In the study, there were three vaccines:
BNT162b2 from Pfizer-BioNTec, ChAdOx1 from AstraZeneca and mRNA-1273 from Moderna
What they researchers did:
"We estimated the number of excess myocarditis, events per million persons in the 1-28 days
following each exposure for the main analysis and by age and sex "
An attempt at interpreting some numbers from the study
The estimated numbers are given as an incidence rate ratio (IRR) per million with a 95 % confidence interval (95%CI). The confidence interval marks the lower and higher limits within which there is a 95 % chance that one will find the number of myocarditis, per million. One can also say there is a 2.5 % chance the number is less than the lower limit and a 2.5 % chance the number of cases is higher than the upper limit.
In the population as a whole during the 1-28 days following any dose of vaccine 2,539 were hospitalized or died from myocarditis during the study period from December 1, 2020, to November 15, 2021. "552 (0.001%) of these events occurred during 1-28 days following any dose of vaccine."
1. dose, 42,200,614 people
ChAdOx1 (n=20,646,456), (IRR 1.27, 95%CI 1.05, 1.55)
BNT162b2 (n=20,391,600), (IRR 1.37, 95%CI 1.12, 1.67)
mRNA-1273 (n=1,162,558) No statistical significant association with mRNA-1272 from Moderna was found.
2. dose, 38,347,981 They received two doses of either:
ChAdOx1 (n=20,059,058): No statistical significant association with ChAdOx1 from AstraZeneca
BNT162b2 (n=17,294,004): (IRR 1.60, 95%CI 1.31, 1.97).
mRNA-1273 (n=1,039,919): (IRR 13.71, 95%CI 8.46, 22.20)
The only carry over from first to second dose is BNT162b2, where the IRR is 1.37 vs 1.60, so slightly higher.
3. dose 10,978,507
ChAdOx1 (n=35,608):. No myocarditis event occured 1-28 days after.
BNT162b2 (n=10,599,183): (IRR 2.02, 95%CI 1.40, 2.91)
mRNA-1273 (n=343,716): No myocarditis event occured 1-28 days after.
The Pfizer's BNT162b2 was the only one that turned up with statistical significant results for all three doses, which is probably due to a large number of doses given. If you list the IRR for the first, second and third dose of BNT162b2, one finds the IRR values to be 1,37, 1.60 and 2.02. This shows that the IRR increases slightly after each dose, something like 20 %.
However, it is noticeable that while there was no statistically reliable number after just one dose of Moderna mRNA-1273, it went up to an IRR of 13.71 for the second. That is a lot.
However, there is a higher incidence rate ratio for males below 40 taking the Pfizer-BioNTech
For BNT162b2, the IRR after the first dose is 1.66, (95%CI 1.14, 2.41) after the second dose the IRR is 3.41 (95%CI 2.44, 4.78), and "after a third dose of BNT162b2 (IRR 7.60, 95%CI 2.44, 4.78)" But there is an error in the last number quoted, though it is from the paper, as 2.44, 4.78 were also used for the second dose. If you go down to the data in Table 1 page 9, and confirm from the diagrams later on page 13, you will read it should have been (IRR 7.60, 95%CI 1.92, 30.15), where 1.92 and 30.15 must replace 2.44 and 4.78). Thus, the progression for the IRR becomes 1.66, 3.41, and 7.60. These numbers are close to double the IRR after each dose. Seen from this perspective, the article title is correct, moreover the pre-risk was only 0.59!
The table 1 of the study also shows that the risk of myocarditis after receiving the first shot is significantly higher in the general population, if you get Covid, or SARS-CoV-2, as they call it, within the period they observed (1-28 days). In other words, while there is a statistically significant increased risk of myocarditis from being vaccinated, it appears this risk is even higher if you happen to get Covid right after vaccination. This risk is also higher compared to contracting myocarditis prior to being vaccinated. The pre-risk IRR of a myocarditis event in the general population is 2.18 (95%CI 1.57, 3.04), but in the 1-28 days following the first dose the IRR is 8.40 (95%CI 6.89, 10.25).
Again, there are sex and age variations. If I just take the IRR numbers pre-risk and after the first dose there is:
General population 2,11; 8.40 These are the numbers given above and can be used for comparing with the different groups below.
Male below 40: 1.38; 2.02
Male above 40: 2.57; 12.86
Female below 40: n/a: 5.98 ("n/a" I interpret to mean it was so low they could not even measure it).
Female above 40: 3.82; 12.37
It seems one has to be especially careful in the week immediately after having received a vaccine. This is just one area, related to the heart, what about the others?
While studies have a difficult time reaching the public in a noticeable way, the companies, in the meantime, appear to make a killing:
In the study, there were three vaccines:
BNT162b2 from Pfizer-BioNTec, ChAdOx1 from AstraZeneca and mRNA-1273 from Moderna
What they researchers did:
"We estimated the number of excess myocarditis, events per million persons in the 1-28 days
following each exposure for the main analysis and by age and sex "
An attempt at interpreting some numbers from the study
The estimated numbers are given as an incidence rate ratio (IRR) per million with a 95 % confidence interval (95%CI). The confidence interval marks the lower and higher limits within which there is a 95 % chance that one will find the number of myocarditis, per million. One can also say there is a 2.5 % chance the number is less than the lower limit and a 2.5 % chance the number of cases is higher than the upper limit.
In the population as a whole during the 1-28 days following any dose of vaccine 2,539 were hospitalized or died from myocarditis during the study period from December 1, 2020, to November 15, 2021. "552 (0.001%) of these events occurred during 1-28 days following any dose of vaccine."
1. dose, 42,200,614 people
ChAdOx1 (n=20,646,456), (IRR 1.27, 95%CI 1.05, 1.55)
BNT162b2 (n=20,391,600), (IRR 1.37, 95%CI 1.12, 1.67)
mRNA-1273 (n=1,162,558) No statistical significant association with mRNA-1272 from Moderna was found.
2. dose, 38,347,981 They received two doses of either:
ChAdOx1 (n=20,059,058): No statistical significant association with ChAdOx1 from AstraZeneca
BNT162b2 (n=17,294,004): (IRR 1.60, 95%CI 1.31, 1.97).
mRNA-1273 (n=1,039,919): (IRR 13.71, 95%CI 8.46, 22.20)
The only carry over from first to second dose is BNT162b2, where the IRR is 1.37 vs 1.60, so slightly higher.
3. dose 10,978,507
ChAdOx1 (n=35,608):. No myocarditis event occured 1-28 days after.
BNT162b2 (n=10,599,183): (IRR 2.02, 95%CI 1.40, 2.91)
mRNA-1273 (n=343,716): No myocarditis event occured 1-28 days after.
The Pfizer's BNT162b2 was the only one that turned up with statistical significant results for all three doses, which is probably due to a large number of doses given. If you list the IRR for the first, second and third dose of BNT162b2, one finds the IRR values to be 1,37, 1.60 and 2.02. This shows that the IRR increases slightly after each dose, something like 20 %.
However, it is noticeable that while there was no statistically reliable number after just one dose of Moderna mRNA-1273, it went up to an IRR of 13.71 for the second. That is a lot.
However, there is a higher incidence rate ratio for males below 40 taking the Pfizer-BioNTech
For BNT162b2, the IRR after the first dose is 1.66, (95%CI 1.14, 2.41) after the second dose the IRR is 3.41 (95%CI 2.44, 4.78), and "after a third dose of BNT162b2 (IRR 7.60, 95%CI 2.44, 4.78)" But there is an error in the last number quoted, though it is from the paper, as 2.44, 4.78 were also used for the second dose. If you go down to the data in Table 1 page 9, and confirm from the diagrams later on page 13, you will read it should have been (IRR 7.60, 95%CI 1.92, 30.15), where 1.92 and 30.15 must replace 2.44 and 4.78). Thus, the progression for the IRR becomes 1.66, 3.41, and 7.60. These numbers are close to double the IRR after each dose. Seen from this perspective, the article title is correct, moreover the pre-risk was only 0.59!
The table 1 of the study also shows that the risk of myocarditis after receiving the first shot is significantly higher in the general population, if you get Covid, or SARS-CoV-2, as they call it, within the period they observed (1-28 days). In other words, while there is a statistically significant increased risk of myocarditis from being vaccinated, it appears this risk is even higher if you happen to get Covid right after vaccination. This risk is also higher compared to contracting myocarditis prior to being vaccinated. The pre-risk IRR of a myocarditis event in the general population is 2.18 (95%CI 1.57, 3.04), but in the 1-28 days following the first dose the IRR is 8.40 (95%CI 6.89, 10.25).
Again, there are sex and age variations. If I just take the IRR numbers pre-risk and after the first dose there is:
General population 2,11; 8.40 These are the numbers given above and can be used for comparing with the different groups below.
Male below 40: 1.38; 2.02
Male above 40: 2.57; 12.86
Female below 40: n/a: 5.98 ("n/a" I interpret to mean it was so low they could not even measure it).
Female above 40: 3.82; 12.37
It seems one has to be especially careful in the week immediately after having received a vaccine. This is just one area, related to the heart, what about the others?
While studies have a difficult time reaching the public in a noticeable way, the companies, in the meantime, appear to make a killing:
And isn't it strange that societies that for years have taking pride in having abolished the death penalty now have taken resort to a procedure that is like a random way of achieving the same result.
or maybe the vax people are not the "type" of people to give blood.
lilies
The Living Force
WOW, last week there was a small sticker / sign put into the mailboxes in our town informing us about several blue-collar jobs have become available in the fourth biggest city in Hungary, 50km east of us. The name of the company was Blue Collar Inc. (sic)
I got curious and sent them an email asking if they require / mandate vaccination for new hires.
Got their reply that they do NOT require vaccination for the advertised jobs and if I give them my number they will contact me.
WOW. :-o
In domestic media all we read was mandatory vaxxination and about people complaining that they were mercilessly duped & getting pulled into the Jab-for-Job trap.
Then this happens. :-o
Recently I just got a three-second look at the TV at Moms and the screen showed "There are lots of workplaces empty / jobs that need to be filled" on government sponsored state news.
I had the gut-feeling for months now that there will be major job openings, employers offering bigger and bigger salaries bidding-hunting for survivors just to take them.. But that scenario, I thought, would have happened in the aftermath of the April Drop Dead Date event. And we are still not there. Billions got Vaxx-AIDS. Their annihilated immune systems just waiting for Bill Gates' artificially engineered SmallPox v2.0 lab-made / bioweapon plandemic, which must be what he & Melinda meant by both of them parroting in unison: "They won't survive the second wave".. as if this 1st wave was just a preparation for the second..
Still Blue-Collar's reply improved my mood. Hopefully it means we will continue on the railroad tracks of a somewhat better / more livable timeline. (knocking on wood)
I got curious and sent them an email asking if they require / mandate vaccination for new hires.
Got their reply that they do NOT require vaccination for the advertised jobs and if I give them my number they will contact me.
WOW. :-o
In domestic media all we read was mandatory vaxxination and about people complaining that they were mercilessly duped & getting pulled into the Jab-for-Job trap.
Then this happens. :-o
Recently I just got a three-second look at the TV at Moms and the screen showed "There are lots of workplaces empty / jobs that need to be filled" on government sponsored state news.
I had the gut-feeling for months now that there will be major job openings, employers offering bigger and bigger salaries bidding-hunting for survivors just to take them.. But that scenario, I thought, would have happened in the aftermath of the April Drop Dead Date event. And we are still not there. Billions got Vaxx-AIDS. Their annihilated immune systems just waiting for Bill Gates' artificially engineered SmallPox v2.0 lab-made / bioweapon plandemic, which must be what he & Melinda meant by both of them parroting in unison: "They won't survive the second wave".. as if this 1st wave was just a preparation for the second..
Still Blue-Collar's reply improved my mood. Hopefully it means we will continue on the railroad tracks of a somewhat better / more livable timeline. (knocking on wood)
FDA DOCUMENT ON MODERNA VACCINE APPROVAL REMOVED FROM AGENCY'S WEBSITE
A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) document explaining why the agency approved Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine was removed from the agency’s website overnight.The Summary Basis for Regulatory Action offered more details about how regulators reached the approval decision, and included references to an unpublished analysis that found the rates of post-vaccination heart inflammation were higher than any U.S. agency had found before.
After The Epoch Times reviewed the document and sent questions about it to FDA spokespersons, it disappeared from the agency’s website.
“We are aware of the issue and hope to have the document reposted as soon as possible,” a spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email on Feb. 3.
Safe and effective:
www.globalresearch.ca
Stunning German Analysis Finds that COVID-19 Vaccine Death Rates Are Far Higher than Previously Reported
Read more:
Stunning German Analysis Finds that COVID-19 Vaccine Death Rates Are Far Higher than Previously Reported - Global Research
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Visit and follow us on Instagram at...
www.globalresearch.ca
Global Research on a roll:
Full article:
www.globalresearch.ca
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Covid Pandemic: A “Truth Bomb” Explodes to Illuminate the War on Humanity
[WSJ screenshot won't show]
[Includes Gates vax depopulation TED Talk]
Full article:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Covid Pandemic: A "Truth Bomb" Explodes to Illuminate the War on Humanity - Global Research
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Visit and follow us on Instagram at...
www.globalresearch.ca
Edward Dowd, hedge fund expert:
If it is proven that Pfizer committed fraud in the data on its clinical trials of the "Covid vaccine" as in fact has happened, the contracts it signed with governments, whereby it was exempted from liability for the side effects of its "vaccines", would be null and void in fact and it would indeed have to take responsibility for the sick and dead because of its "drug (just like the rest of the manufacturing companies).
If it is proven that Pfizer committed fraud in the data on its clinical trials of the "Covid vaccine" as in fact has happened, the contracts it signed with governments, whereby it was exempted from liability for the side effects of its "vaccines", would be null and void in fact and it would indeed have to take responsibility for the sick and dead because of its "drug (just like the rest of the manufacturing companies).
It may or may not change the timeline but at least it's much needed work for some. I just hope it's not to exploit the unemployed or gather ID on those not vaxed.
BHelmet
The Living Force
I can not find this video on YouTube. On bitchute it is just a sketchy audio. It is not on Brighteon. It is not on the FDA site that I can see.
Chaze
Jedi
One step forward . . .
The New Hotness? Follow the Polling! Democrat Govs. Drop Mask Mandates as Biden Holds Tight to His Science.
Also: Connecticut’s Ned Lamont to End Statewide School Mask Mandate on Feb. 28.
On the other hand there’s Illinois: (Video) Illinois Governor JB Pritzker: Illinois Might Have to Wear Masks Forever.
All of this sudden movement is due to the truckers in Canada....
OLD AND BUSTED: Follow the Science.The New Hotness? Follow the Polling! Democrat Govs. Drop Mask Mandates as Biden Holds Tight to His Science.
In addition the above, AP is reporting: California to lift indoor mask mandate for vaccinated people on Feb. 15, Newsom says. After Feb. 15, unvaccinated people still will have to be masked indoors, and everyone, will have to wear masks in high-risk areas.
Also: Connecticut’s Ned Lamont to End Statewide School Mask Mandate on Feb. 28.
On the other hand there’s Illinois: (Video) Illinois Governor JB Pritzker: Illinois Might Have to Wear Masks Forever.
