A recent article on the acclaimed Nature website surfaced detailing a European rise of in HIV: Highly virulent HIV variant found circulating in Europe.

"The variant also seems to lead to a reduction in immune cells called CD4 T cells, so infected people are at risk of developing AIDS much more rapidly than those with other versions of HIV."

Though they say that it's been circulating for decades, the fact that it is emergent and the timing of the article may tell a different story. As we know, it is linked to AIDS, which targets those with weakened immune systems. Having multiple jabs has that sort of effect, and may exacerbate side effects from this strain, and perhaps future strains of HIV.

Combo that with this article from yesterday: TAKE THE TEST Brits urged to get HIV tests as heterosexual diagnoses higher for first time in a decade. Something is brewing.
 
Last edited:
Is the FDA trying to shift the blame on Pfizer?

View attachment 54615
I wonder who Pfizer is going to put the blame on? Especially if they KNEW about the fraudulent science behind the trials.

 
Oh no
So they are now demonising a common, cheap and freely available drug like Paracetamol in order to explain the sudden rise in cardiac related events due to the vaccinations. Paracetamol has been around for years and is known to be relatively free of serious side effects providing it is taken in the correct doseages. They have targeted the one drug which is probably taken by a sizeable proportion of the population of the planet. Strange how such an important and "urgent warning" has only just occurred after all these decades of use. The general public will probably not delve into the whys and wherefores of this article but the headline will register, if only subconsciously -

Urgent warning to millions of Brits as daily paracetamol ‘increases’ heart attack risk

and this will normalise cardiac events in peoples' minds and will give them the probable cause. All their thinking is done for them!
 
This article is superb on deaths and injuries suffered by military personnel from covid vaccine. It is based on data which insider whistleblowers revealed from the DMED database. If we had media that was not utterly crooked and evil, the information here would be lead article in every major newspaper or first news item in all TV network news everyday for next two weeks. Be sure to read 3 page letter mentioned in article.


DMED data is explosive. Mainstream media has been ordered to ignore it.​




Summary​

  1. The medical database used by the US military shows a huge uptick in serious events in 2021. Only events caused by the vaccine (as noted by the uptick in VAERS reports for these symptoms) were elevated.
  2. The DoD has claimed the increase was because events in earlier years were under reported and they have corrected the error.
  3. Mainstream media has been told not to touch this story. This is why there is a complete news blackout on the story of the year.
  4. Their explanation doesn’t hold water for several reasons:
    1. there is no justification as to why earlier years were affected but 2021 was not
    2. only symptoms that were elevated by the vaccine were affected; that’s impossible for a computer glitch to have caused that
    3. the fixed data has obvious errors in it that are impossible to happen by any cause whatsoever (we’ll reveal this later that they didn’t catch this)
    4. the uncorrected data has been in plain sight of the CDC for a year and the CDC did not spot a single safety signal showing they are either completely incompetent or corrupt or both. There is no other explanation.
  5. The cover-up is an even bigger story than the data itself. See Horowitz: The Pentagon’s RESPONSE to the explosive DOD medical data is an even bigger story than the data

The letter​

On February 1, 2022, US Senator Ron Johnson sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on February 1 highlighting the dramatic rise in adverse events reported in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) after the vaccines were rolled out to the military. If the vaccines are truly “safe and effective,” these increases are difficult to explain.

Click the image to read the entire 3 page letter outlining some of the increased events:


The original data​

Here are the resources with the original data:

  1. Johnson’s 3 page letter to DoD Secretary Lloyd Austin III
  2. Renz Law home page (includes video interviews)
  3. Renz Law page on the DMED data with graphs (summary of the data)
  4. Download the spreadsheet with all the numbers (Excel spreadsheet). Note that the numbers in the purple coded rows are the “corrected” data which was issued after the “glitch” was noticed. Hospitalized means the patient was in the hospital. Ambulatory are the stats for outpatients. Also note that the percentage calculation is wrong: they should have subtracted 1 since a “2X increase” is the same as a “100% increase.”

About DMED​

You can read about DMED here. Essentially, it is the official database of the 1.4M active duty DoD servicemen.

For a quick intro to the database, I highly recommend you watch this 2 minute video of Dr. Robert Malone talking about the DMED database: DR. MALONE STATES DOD IS DELETING DATA FROM IT'S DATABASE TO COVER UP DAMAGES DONE BY THE "VACCINES"


Why the DMED data is so important​

There are 14 reasons that the DMED data is very important.

  1. The individual doctors themselves realize that the vaccines are causing the harm documented in the DMED database. According to an insider I spoke to, around 40% of military docs realize what is going on, but doctors in the military can’t speak out against the vaccine because they are ordered not to say anything. So all these doctors have to remain silent. The data in DMED is their voice.
  2. The original DMED data appears to be very reliable. It is hard for anyone to make excuses for the increased rates in the DMED database quoted in this letter because the event types with increases are all confirmed in the VAERS database. Unlike VAERS, this database cannot be dismissed using hand-waving arguments. DMED is not a self-reported database where reporting rates are unknown. It is a fully reported database where all the reports are from healthcare providers. In short, if the vaccines are safe, the DMED data is hard to explain. For example, you can’t pin the rise in events in 2021 on COVID since total hospital event rates declined in 2020 (relative to 2019) in both the original and corrected results. Note: The DoD now claims the 2016-2020 data was wrong and issued corrected values (graph on the right):

  1. These are absolute rate increases. In VAERS, we’ll often compare a baseline rate of an event in prior years with the current year to look for a signal. This is a “differential signal” so high values are possible. For example, the reported VAERS rate for pulmonary embolism is 3 per year. Say it goes to 300 per year, a 100X jump. But if the baseline rates of PE are 1000, then on an absolute basis, this is just a 0.3X increase. So large absolute number jumps are very significant. This is exactly what we have in the DMED database: very large absolute jumps.
  2. The effect sizes are huge. For example, the rates of hypertension increased by 21X from average in 2021. Nervous system diseases increased by a factor of 10.
  3. Nobody can explain it. If it wasn’t the vaccine causing these huge increases in adverse events, what was it?
  4. The military is deleting cases to make the effect size smaller. Watch this video DR. MALONE STATES DOD IS DELETING DATA FROM IT'S DATABASE TO COVER UP DAMAGES DONE BY THE "VACCINES"
  5. It’s a great “conversation starter” with your pro-vax friends, local lawmakers, local health authority, and favorite fact-checkers. You simply ask a simple question, “How do you explain these dramatic rate increases in 2021 vs. the 5 year average?” This works particularly well at City Council meetings, school board meetings, and with lawmakers.
  6. Symptoms with increases match the VAERS data. It is tough to claim the elevation in event rates is due to something else because a) the range of elevated symptoms is so large and b) the symptoms in DMED that are elevated match the symptoms in VAERS that are elevated.
  7. The DoD is in a panic about this leaking out. This data wasn’t ever supposed to leak out. The only reason it leaked out is due to the efforts of three whistleblowers inside the DoD. According to an insider I spoke to, the DoD has no idea how they are going to cover it up. The only thing they’ve done is claim the 2016-2020 data is underreported, but this doesn’t match reality as I explain below.
  8. Deliberate mainstream press cover-up. There is evidence that mainstream media reporters have been instructed not to cover this story or talk to Tom Renz. I verified this myself searching for articles about Renz in The New York Times and CNN. So you’ll only hear about it from alternative media. Think about it… this is one of the most explosive stories of the year (if not the decade) and the mainstream press isn’t covering it at all? What does that tell you? You don’t have to have a lot of critical thinking skills to figure that one out. It pretty much tells you everything you need to know: there is a massive cover up of adverse events.
  9. It destroys the credibility of the CDC. I just finished watching the latest ACIP meeting where CDC officials said there were no safety signals (other than myocarditis) in both the VAERS and VSD system. Amazingly, there were no deaths from any mRNA vaccine. Zero. It also begs the question how they could possibly completely ignore all the safety signals in the DMED database. They didn’t even consider it. However, they are unlikely to ever answer that question. But when the Republicans come into power in the Senate in 2023, I’d expect that Senator Johnson will ask Rochelle Walensky why the CDC is ignoring this database.
  10. The military can’t effectively refute it. After being confronted with the data, they now claim the 2016 to 2020 data was wrong. The problem is their new numbers are nonsensical as I explain below.
  11. Symptoms that were not associated with the vaccines were not elevated in 2021. Symptoms unrelated to the vaccines weren’t elevated. So if there was a data glitch causing reduced reporting rates, how come only events related to the vaccine were elevated in 2021?
  12. Total hospital event rates declined in 2020 (relative to 2019) in both the original and corrected results. What’s unique about the DMED database is that military hospitals don’t get COVID incentives. Total hospital event rates declined in 2020. If COVID is so dangerous, how do they explain that?

I spoke to a doctor in the military who confirmed the high incidence of vaccine-caused events in his practice​

This doctor estimates that 85% of the military has been vaccinated, although the military official total is 93%.

The doctor is responsible for thousands of service members and has dozens of significant vaccine injuries that are VAERS reportable (most of which have not been filed).

This is a significant adverse event rate of more than 0.75%, i.e., nearly 1 in 100 soldiers are vaccine injured, some very seriously.

It’s important to note that the soldiers are tough and don’t want anything on their medical records that could limit their responsibilities. So many simply don’t report severe symptoms. So our .75% vaccine injury rate is likely an underestimate. And remember, this is in a very healthy young population.

This doctor has zero VAERS reportable injuries in nearly two decades. So this suggests that the increased rate of reportable adverse events from these vaccines is far more than 500X. But other physicians I know with larger practices report elevated rates of from 600 to over 20,000 from the shots this year. In short, the number of adverse event reports from these vaccines is off the charts compared to other vaccines. This suggests that the 30X increase in the rate of adverse event reports in VAERS is because the vaccine is dangerous, not from reporting bias. It also suggests that VAERS is severely under-reported this year relative to other years by at least a factor of 10. The FDA has assumed that VAERS is over-reported compared to previous years by 30, our estimate is that VAERS is under-reported compared to previous years by 30. Note that this estimate (comparing the propensity to report between years) doesn’t change our minimum 41 under-reporting factor estimate for events this year.

This doctor had no doubts that the vaccine is causing these injuries. Over and over again, severe reactions (some never seen before in his/her career) all started happening shortly after after the soldier was vaccinated.

DoD spokesman claims that the DMED database was underreported in 2016-2020​

A PolitiFact “fact check” noted that:

But Peter Graves, spokesperson for the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division, told PolitiFact by email that "in response to concerns mentioned in news reports" the division reviewed data in the DMED "and found that the data was incorrect for the years 2016-2020."
Officials compared numbers in the DMED with source data in the DMSS and found that the total number of medical diagnoses from those years "represented only a small fraction of actual medical diagnoses." The 2021 numbers, however, were up-to-date, giving the "appearance of significant increased occurrence of all medical diagnoses in 2021 because of the underreported data for 2016-2020," Graves said.
The DMED system has been taken offline to "identify and correct the root-cause of the data corruption," Graves said.
What’s interesting is that only the event counts related to adverse events caused by the vaccines (as determined in VAERS) were affected by this “corruption.” That is, huge increases observed prior to the correction were only on symptoms that were vaccine related, not on other symptoms. That makes their “corruption” explanation hard to explain. Very hard to explain.

How could a glitch in the computer only affect symptoms associated with the COVID vaccine? That would be the most amazing glitch in computer history. I would love to hear the explanation for that.

Why did the corruption only affect years 2016 to 2020 and not 2021? Why, when we looked at the data before the corruption were only symptoms related to the vaccines elevated?

Others are shocked by this data as well​

I’m not the only one who is shocked by this data and the attempts to discredit it:

  1. Regarding the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database Data Dump
    An excellent article by Robert Malone pointing out the same things I did namely, if there was a data corruption, how come it did not affect symptoms that are not elevated by the vaccines? In short, the DoD cover story doesn’t hold water and the more they cover this up, the more it reveals how corrupt they are.
  2. Horowitz: Military spokesman claims 5 random years of DOD medical surveillance system were plagued by a giant glitch
  3. Horowitz: The Pentagon’s RESPONSE to the explosive DOD medical data is an even bigger story than the data (I agree! I wrote about this before he did)
  4. Evidence of Manipulation of Disease and Injury Data in US Military Database Suggests Fraud and Cover Up
  5. MILITARY SPOKESMAN CLAIMS FIVE RANDOM YEARS OF DOD MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM WERE PLAGUED BY A GIANT GLITCH
  6. DMED is a game-changer on vaccine safety.
The more they try to cover this up, the more complicit they become.

You can easily determine for yourself who is lying​

I wanted to see for myself who was lying so I picked an event that I’ve said for a long time has been highly elevated by the vaccines: pulmonary embolism. I didn’t cherry pick this event. It was mentioned in my public ACIP testimony on January 4, before I ever looked at any of the DMED data. But I’ve long highlighted pulmonary embolism as an elevated adverse event from the COVID vaccines as you can see from this post from October 30, which was the very first article I wrote on my Substack!

If you download Renz’s spreadsheet, look at the spreadsheet tabs where it has the original data on the left and the “after the corruption was fixed” data on the right.


In the case above, I looked at the pulmonary embolism tab in the spreadsheet. The incidence of PE is estimated to be approximately 60 to 70 per 100,000 in the general population. This means that for the 1.4M members of the military in the DMED database, we’d expect fewer than 839 to 979 events per year since people in the military are healthier in general than the overall population.

On the left in the chart below are the numbers before the data was “fixed” by the DoD on January 31, 2022. The rates on the left experienced nearly exactly match what would be expected. In four of the 5 years before the vaccine, the numbers were below 839. And even in the peak year (2020), the numbers are below 979.

The rates on the right hand side after the “corruption” was corrected are simply too high to be believed, roughly around 3 times higher than the normal rates. How do they explain that?

But there are other examples of data manipulation that was done that are even more obvious, even to totally untrained observers. I’ll reveal those later since I don’t want to help them clean up the manipulated data… those smoking guns will be revealed later.

The corrected increases from the letter​

Note that the percentage increases were improperly calculated in the spreadsheet and the letter (which just used the numbers from the spreadsheet). The correct numbers are shown below (a 200% increase means the numbers increased by a factor of 3).

  1. Hypertension – 2,081% increase
  2. Diseases of the nervous system – 948% increase
  3. Malignant neoplasms of esophagus – 794% increase
  4. Multiple sclerosis – 580% increase
  5. Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs – 524% increase
  6. Guillain-Barre syndrome – 451% increase
  7. Breast cancer – 387% increase
  8. Demyelinating – 387% increase
  9. Neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands – 374% increase
  10. Female infertility – 372% increase
  11. Pulmonary embolism – 368% increase
  12. Migraines – 352% increase
  13. Ovarian dysfunction – 337% increase
  14. Testicular cancer – 269% increase
  15. Tachycardia – 202% increase
Note that a more complete list can be found in Robert Malone’s post.

This data (and the subsequent cover-up attempt) is a smoking gun​

The symptoms that are elevated in DMED match up with the elevated symptoms in VAERS?

How do they explain that away?

Ask your pro-vax friends, doctors, reporters, public health officials, school board members, city council members, and local, state, and federal lawmakers the next time you see them to explain the DMED data. They will tell you they are “looking into it and will get back to you” and never will.

Comments from Jason Fields, active-duty in the Air Force​

One of my readers, Jason Fields, is an active-duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Air Force serving in a United States Space Force unit. He has declined to take the COVID-19 vaccine and is seeking a vaccine accommodation waiver from Space Systems Command for both the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines

He pointed this out this in the comments section:

One of the problems, as mentioned in the post, is that a lot of the military medical community is not willing to recognize and/or record possible vaccine injuries. I have a number of documented cases where military members who believe they have suffered a serious vaccine injury are totally blown off by the military medical community. The military members are told "there is no way" or "I guarantee" the issues are not related to the vaccine. Imagine the numbers if the medical community took this seriously. In any other situation it would be considered medical malpractice to not fully investigate these medical issues and the root cause.
Faith in military medicine among the force was already somewhere near the garbage can pre-COVID...now it is sitting somewhere 6 feet under in the landfill. Between the mask and vaccine coercion the rank and file's trust of the medical community is at an all time low.
The obvious answer to the rhetorical question of "What is the justification for him not issuing such an order?" is there is no justification and obviously he won't do it. Nobody likes to admit they were wrong...especially the government and military.

General Austin needs to step up for transparency​

General Austin isn’t being transparent with the American people.

If General Austin were to issue a blanket order directed to all military doctors to speak freely and honestly about patient statistics without fear of retribution, we would be hearing a far different story than we are hearing now.
But General Austin, who could easily issue such an order, never will because it would destroy the “safe and effective” narrative and he would be fired.

In the current situation, now that “the cat is out of the bag,” the fact that he’s not issuing such an order for transparency so that America could hear the truth tells you everything you need to know.

No mainstream “fact checker” is going to ask General Austin why he doesn’t issue such an order. The mainstream press will not either; they will not touch this story with a ten foot pole. I guarantee it.

If our men in uniform are injured, it should never be due to a deliberate order from their commanding officers requiring them to inject themselves with a known dangerous substance that could kill or disable them. They have a right to know the truth about the vaccines. Ordering the mainstream media and military doctors to remain silent (which is the case today) is not the way for the truth to come out.

Every American should demand that General Austin allow military doctors to speak the truth and protect them from retribution​

Every American should demand that General Austin immediately order all military doctors to speak truthfully about what is going on with their own patients after being vaccinated and protect all those doctors from any retribution.

Is there any justification for him not issuing such an order? I can’t think of one.

Apparently, pretty much everyone agrees with me. Click the image to see the final vote tally:

 
Same in France : HIV testing now available without prescription or advance payment
The simplification of HIV testing, a major public health issue, is now effective nationwide. Since January 1, 2022, it has been possible to undergo screening in a city laboratory :

without advance payment ;
without a prescription;
without an appointment.
This measure concerns all insured persons and their dependents (including beneficiaries of state medical assistance (AME).

 
According to France Soir, a news outlet that interviewed Luc Montagnier several times, the latter died peacefully last night. May he rest in peace, he was, I think, a true hero who fought for truth until the end.


So far, only France Soir reported the death of Luc Montagnier. If this confirmed, it's an interesting timing that after numerous statements against the vaccine, and just a few days after his words about Covid vaccine and HIV he passed away.
 
Last edited:
Source (in Dutch): Wie corona heeft doorgemaakt, heeft een grotere kans op een hartaanval

'We feared this already'
Those who have gone through corona are more likely to have a heart attack


2 hours 33 minutes ago - Updated: 6 seconds ago

It is what cardiologists already feared: some of the people who seem to have recovered from corona turn out to have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease after the infection. The world should therefore be prepared for an increase in people with these heart problems, scientists warn. "The numbers involved are really significant."

The study, conducted by Washington University School of Medicine and others, was published earlier this week in Nature Medicine. The researchers looked at the medical records of 153,760 people who tested positive. They compared them over a one-year period with people who did not have corona.

72 percent greater chance of heart failure


The researchers' conclusion is firm. People who had experienced a corona infection were 63 percent more likely to have a heart attack, 84 percent more likely to have an arrhythmia of the ventricles and 72 percent more likely to have congestive heart failure than people without corona.

Heart disease was actually 4 percent more common. "Some people may think 4 percent is little, but it's not, given the magnitude of the pandemic," one of the authors, Ziyad Al-Aly, told Science Daily.

In the U.S. alone, this means 3 million new heart patients, and an estimated 15 million worldwide. These are diseases that are permanent, and therefore don't just go away.

'Very large numbers'

We put the figures to two Dutch experts. Marijke Linschoten, physician-researcher at UMC Utrecht: "If you look at this study, an average of 3 to 10 additional cases of heart attack, heart failure or arrhythmia of the ventricles were identified for every thousand people who had experienced corona. When you consider how many millions of people have now had corona, that would be very large numbers in practice." She adds: in daily practice in the hospital, this is not yet directly reflected.

"These are significant numbers," also says Harald Jorstad, a cardiologist at Amsterdam UMC. "We were already preparing for this. We already feared this." He explains that it has long been known that corona can cause problems during the acute phase of infection. This concerns, for example, people with cardiovascular disease who become sicker. It is also known that scarring of the heart can occur.

But this study is much broader. It involves problems that arose after 30 days. "What you see here: the virus is much more than the acute form of being sick," says Jorstad. "We also need to pay attention to the aftermath, such as pulmonary covid and the impact on the cardiovascular system."

In non-vulnerable youth as well


Why some get heart problems and others don't needs to be investigated. The most striking thing according to the researchers is that people who never had heart problems before and who were not considered vulnerable, also developed heart problems after a corona infection.

Heart problems thus occurred not only in old people but also in young people. And also in people without obesity and people without diabetes. Cardiovascular disease was also found in people who had had a mild infection.

Exercise, exercise, exercise

According to cardiologist Jorstad, this research indicates that the cause of heart problems must be sought much more broadly. He stresses the importance of a healthy lifestyle.

"This should be a wake-up call. Make work of your good intentions. Ask yourself the question: what can you yourself do to live a healthier life? Well, that is exercise, exercise, exercise. And eating healthy, maintaining a healthy weight, not smoking and checking your cholesterol and blood pressure. Something has to be done about the unhealthy lifestyles that are present in society, that underlie almost all cardiovascular disease." Prevention is an understudied issue in the Netherlands, he argues. "Corona is not solved with one miracle drug."

Long-term implications


Researcher Ziyad Al-Aly suggests that people who have recovered from corona should be closely monitored. And governments must be ready to handle the increase in patients, he writes on Twitter. He fears long-term consequences for patients and health systems. It will also affect the economy and life expectancy.

Suppose you've had corona, do you need to be extra vigilant? Cardiologist Jorstad "If you get chest pain four months later during exercise, you should have that looked at. It could be a thousand things, so we don't need to send everyone to the cardiologist right away, but it's important to have this evaluated by an expert at the family doctor's office."

The best way to prevent problems with the heart, according to the researchers, is simple: first of all, make sure you don't get infected by the virus. Cardiologist Jorstad wants to take the opportunity to advise people to really get vaccinated after all. "The message seems clear to me," he says.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Study deals with the first corona wave

For the study, published in Nature Medicine, the scientists analyzed anonymized medical records in a database maintained by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The researchers created a data-set containing health information from 153,760 people who had tested positive for corona between March 1, 2020, and January 15, 2021, and who had survived the first 30 days of the disease. Very few of the people in the study had been vaccinated before developing corona because vaccines were not widely available at the time of enrollment.

"So this data was collected in the time before the vaccination campaign, at the beginning of the pandemic," says Jorstad. "We don't know which variant was at play here. We also can't translate this directly to omicron. We're all waiting for positive news, but whether omicron and the vaccination will ensure that the problems are less severe now, we won't know until, say, two years from now."

---------------------------------------------------------------
Large Dutch study

Marijke Linschoten, physician-researcher at UMC Utrecht believes it is important that more studies are done on the long-term effects of corona on the heart and vessels. "It is crucial that we look at whether other studies show the same results. At the moment, such studies are still very scarce."

UMC Utrecht and the Dutch Cardiovascular Alliance (DCVA) have themselves been conducting a large nationwide study since September. It looks at anonymized data collected during the first wave of the pandemic, enriched with data on causes of death and hospitalizations. It covers 40 percent of all patients who ended up in the hospital at the time.

"Also, since May last year, as part of another study, we have been looking at people who are hospitalized to see how often heart damage can be identified. Hopefully this will also allow us to learn more about any differences between the first corona variant and delta and omicron."
----------------------------------------------------------------

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Related:
Large British study finds risk of myocarditis doubles after each mRNA jab -- Sott.net
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full.pdf
Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?
 
We've heard about the sharp rise in life insurance claims but nothing about car accident insurance claims. A while ago there was speculation we'd see more car accidents due to the shots and I'm wondering if I'm seeing that in my area.

An acquaintance of mine had a minor fender bender in the last few days and needed her car towed. Usually the tow truck shows up within an hour but she was told it would be 24 to 48 hours before they'd get to her. She called the 3 shops that take her insurance and one said they where booked for repairs until May, another one is so full they won't take anymore. Fortunately the 3rd said they could look at her car in 2 weeks. They all said they where having a large amount of accidents lately so the unusual delays.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom