it a joke.
Hahaha, I first thought Macron, but then he looked so old... lol, didn't catch the joke at first, but this is really funny!It's a joke, a Photoshopped picture of the president, Emmanuel Macron, as if it was in the future. See here:
(Meaning that we'll be confined till then.)
No problem, it is a good joke.in a joke, i m talking to her, sorry
What we can learn from past pandemics
Epidemics, plagues, and pandemics have been around since the dawn of civilization. Indeed, they are an unintended consequence of civilization. Disease certainly afflicted our prehistoric ancestors, but since the earliest humans lived in small isolated bands, they had limited opportunity to share germs beyond their own community. That situation changed dramatically when the agricultural revolution replaced a nomadic with a sedentary lifestyle 10,000 years ago.
Once humans began to live in villages, towns, and especially cities, they had to contend with contagious diseases on a larger scale. They have been doing so ever since. For much of history, urban dwellers lived in crowded, unsanitary conditions.
[...]
The Venetians banned sailors from entering their cities for 30 days, which they later extended to 40. The Italian “quaranta giorni” (literally, “40 days”) became the English “quarantine.” In some towns, officials literally sealed infected people into their houses, a harsh precursor to current admonitions to “work from” home. While quarantines may have helped deter the spread of plague, the wholesale slaughter of cats proved counterproductive in trying to stop a disease spread by rats. [Why the slaughter of cats - suspected of carrying/spreading the disease? Still blaming rats - more disinformation also in article]
What we can learn from past pandemics
History does not repeat itself, but it can help us understand the present and prepare for the future. The pandemics of the past offer valuable lessons.thehill.com
thank you for bringing up this article. It made me think. The Virus of the Time has also the power to make certain themes of the past, those of which we should learn, go viral. I have the feeling that more and more people are ready at least to start the search. Being curious, look how they dealt with crisis in the past. Be aware of the consequences of ones doings. in every direction, without loosing focus on what is important to learn. THAT is truely a wonderful thing I think is actually happening right now.Fox News just said a famous playwright has died from complications from COVID - he was 81.
More regarding unsanitary conditions:
Wondering if this is intentional or unintentional truth telling? The other infecting virus at work?In some cities, trucks and carts drove down streets calling on people to “bring out their dead,” who were then buried in mass graves. Some victims, especially children, died of neglect and even starvation, as no one would enter infected houses to care for them. During a pandemic, fear can be as much of a problem as the disease itself.
History does not repeat itself, but it can help us understand the present and prepare for the future. The pandemics of the past offer valuable lessons. First, in all probability COVID-19 will not come close to the severity of any of the great pandemics.
We have far more knowledge and resources to prevent infection and treat this disease than did our great grandparents in 1918. Second, fear continues to be as contagious and debilitating as the disease itself. Considerable evidence suggests that COVID-19 is not particularly lethal to healthy people under 60.
Unfortunately, this fact has not prevented the hoarding of masks and hand sanitizer. Whether current anxiety develops into a full-blown panic depends on whether the federal government has learned the final lesson of past pandemics: withholding information, distorting facts, and downplaying the threat always makes matters worse.
In a crisis, people must be able to trust their leaders. Trust can be earned and maintained only when those leaders provide clear, accurate and timely information.
Tom Mockaitis is a professor of History at DePaul University where he teaches World Civilizations. His most recent book is, "Violent Extremism: Understanding the Domestic and International Terrorist Threat."
What we can learn from past pandemics
History does not repeat itself, but it can help us understand the present and prepare for the future. The pandemics of the past offer valuable lessons.thehill.com
Here in the Netherlands everything goes quite smoothly.
Had just gone to the supermarket in the evening, and there was still a lot of bread.
Even my favorite one with sesame seeds on the crust,
Peter R. is a topic of his own... that man raises some serious red flags usually (his connections to the amsterdam underground - crying at the funeral of his top criminal friend cor van hout?).
... and then more public outcry where citizens are going to ask the government for a lockdown, maybe?
Disagreeing for weeks with the containment policy he calls "medieval", he has been hammering home the need for nationwide mass screening to detect suspicious cases, isolate and treat positive patients. As in South Korea: the country reported on Monday the lowest number of new daily cases of coronavirus contamination since the end of February and is now fuelling hopes that the epidemic is under control.
luc said:Dr. Wordarg's work, questions the numbers, knows about how the Italians count their deaths and why this matters, pities the elderly who might sooner die from isolation than from the virus
Very interesting indeed. As it turns out it actually happened that way as you can see here. What is even more interesting is what happened before that point starting at 53:20 (and later in it) in the video. Trump is calling out Pompeo to stand in front of the press and explain himself pointing out that the state department is the deep state department referring directly to Pompeo. Trump definitely pushed Pompeo here to take the heat of what he is been up to. I encourage you to watch the whole thing from that point on, it is very revealing...
Here is the snipped again:
I had a surprising experience today. A client called me for some project, and after we finished we chatted a bit about the situation. Little by little, each of us revealed a bit of skepticism, we kind of "circled" around each other. At the end of the chat, turns out that she is familiar with Dr. Wordarg's work, questions the numbers, knows about how the Italians count their deaths and why this matters, pities the elderly who might sooner die from isolation than from the virus, says all this is overblown and that the real concern is the economy, and that a friend of hers who is a doctor just shakes her head in disbelief about all that. Whew!! Another friend of ours, a lawyer, also told us he thinks the whole thing is totally overblown. This gives me hope!I've been thinking about this recently. Without trying to make a too simplistic analysis, beyond the small particularities of each case, I have noticed two different profiles of individuals within the group of those who approve draconian measures:
1- Those who are mostly scared, who believe without questioning what their governments and the media say and who basically believe that they or their loved ones may die tomorrow, but who at the same time seek to adapt with some dignity to the new rules and are mostly concerned with taking care of their families by following all the rules.
2- Those who, besides being afraid and believing everything they hear, feel an imperative need to play an active role, to take the lead and be part of the police and control apparatus that the States are constructing. They are very active in neighbourhood groups making furious calls for EVERYONE to respect the rules, insulting (and encouraging others to do so) anyone who threatens isolation or questions it even minimally. Many of these also spend hours monitoring any movement in their neighborhoods and reporting anything "suspicious" to the authorities.
I think a good part of group 1 has the potential to "make the journey towards disillusionment and deprogramming". On the other hand, those in group 2 seem more likely to polarize towards the opposite end and be willing to defend their "small totalitarian world" along with the "big one".
For this reason I think it is important to know how to distinguish between individuals who belong to one group or another; with the former we can be a little more open by making them question the wisdom of everything that is happening, not seeking to confront but to open a channel of questions that will eventually lead them to rethink everything they believe when the time is right. With the second group, the best I can think of is to reinforce our strategic enclosure, not to seek any kind of direct confrontation and to go as far as possible unnoticed by them... They are now in a better position than we are, so a strategic withdrawal might be the best option at this time.
I shouldn't have posted my pseudoscience, sorry for that, it was a bad guess! However, I don't understand why you are making a "joke" about me being a member of the Gestapo, it's neither funny, nor cool.do you think cassandra is part of said gestapo? Just joking. I just wanted to explain why her line of thinking was wrong and give a reference.
I think you got that wrong. I didn't make fun of you of course. it was on JEEPs reply, that i picked up the Gestapo. So don't worry. I am sorry when my wording is clumsy, I am no english native speaker, I am german.I shouldn't have posted my pseudoscience, sorry for that, it was a bad guess! However, I don't understand why you are making a "joke" about me being a member of the Gestapo, it's neither funny, nor cool.
I do however take your point, and I may have expressed myself badly, but I dislike your tone.