… we are hearing about a huge amount of deaths in China and this seems very scary. So then I started looking into it and then I saw this article - I think this was interesting - you know we look all over the place (and by the way I have scientists around the world and other doctors that are sending me information saying did you see this.
Well this is a company that makes something called CytoSorb and they have a headline
‘The Wuhan Coronavirus and the Cytokine Storm’.
In the middle of this article… looking at the blue clinical features of
patients infected with 2019 novel Coronavirus in Wuhan China, the article notes the correlation of high levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines or a cytokine storm with severity of illness in patients infected with the Wuhan coronavirus or what we're now calling CoV 19.
Okay - cytokine storm; any of those of you that deal with your child pandas or pans or autism we talk about the cytokine storm which is essentially (let's just keep it as simple as we can) it's like your immune system having a nuclear meltdown all through your body. If you look at some of things that can happen there’s multiple organ failure, pulmonary infiltrates, lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiovascular shock, etc - you get the idea you don't want to have a cytokine storm.
There is a lot of reporting that this Coronavirus/ CoV 19 is causing a cytokine storm.
All right that's interesting so you ask the question ‘what else could be causing this problem if it's not the Coronavirus? I know there's been reporting that people died from pollution all the time in China and people have respiratory distress syndrome as a result. But I found this interesting:
we actually found that there was a vaccine that was attempted to be made after SARS started and we're all talking about SARS because it was the last time we had a Coronavirus that scared the hell out of everybody around the world. Now it didn't spread as far as we thought and it didn't end up being quite as deadly as was thought it would be but it really scared everyone. Right after that they went into trying to make a vaccine for SARS. Well we looked into this and we discovered there's about four studies that we looked at and they all had a natural similarity; this study (right here) that was in Plus One:
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccine leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus
If you read on….
All mice exhibited (remember all mice in the animal study) exhibited histopathology changes in lungs two days after the challenge including all animals vaccinated of given live virus…
… challenge meaning with an animal study you can actually put them in contact with the SARS Coronavirus that they were vaccinated from and essentially what they discovered was there was a history of pathology seen in animals given one of the SARS CoV’d vaccines; it was uniformly a th2 type immunity pathology.
Let me cut to the chase;
these mice were getting extremely sick, essentially having what appear to be like a cytokine storm, not from the virus - it wasn't happening to the mice that didn't get the vaccine - only the ones that got the vaccine, the one that had antibodies from the vaccine were actually overreacting to the virus. It goes on to say they we're suffering (from in this part of the article)
Necrotizing vasculitis was prominent in medium and large blood vessels, involving vascular endothelial cells…
This is some deep science but let's look at vasculitis - we look up vasculitis and here's what we find:
Complications from vasculitis can be
Organ damage
Blood clots and aneurysms
Vision loss or blindness
Infections
These are the types of things which will make someone keel over dead in the streets right?
So the thing is when we try this SARS vaccine on the animals, the animals do just fine after the vaccine but then when they come in contact with SARS, which the vaccine was supposed to protect them from, now they're having necrotizing vasculitis, probably organ failure.
So let's go to the rest of the study: it goes on to describe this problem over and over and over again. Let’s just cut to the conclusion:
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against the infection with SARS-CoV.
They seemed to work!
However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution: In proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
If we go back to the earlier slide right before that where they compared it to the children - look at this second last line where it says:
That lung disease exhibited the characteristics of a Th2-type immunopathology with eosinophils in the lung sections suggesting hypersensitivity that was reminiscent of the description the Th2 type immunopathology reaction in young children given an inactivated RSV vaccine and subsequently affected with naturally currying RSV (32-33)
This is an older study:
most of those children experience severe disease with infection that led to a high frequency of hospitalizations and two children died from the infection.
So this study even went on to say what we're seeing
reminds us of a human study we did on children with totally different vaccine – RSV - where they seem to do great with the vaccine, even had antibodies, but then when they came in contact with the disease they actually had a hyper stimulated reaction. What they found was the body took in more of the virus or the bacteria - this is this is something that's known to happen on occasion - and made them more sick than they would have been.
Where is this all leading? Where am I going with this? Why do we care about animal studies where the animals are dying after coming in contact with the virus? Well ask yourself this question - they were warned
not to move forward with a human vaccine trial because of what they were seeing in animals. But the next question should be,
did China listen to that warning? Did China test a SARS vaccine on its own population? A really good question and I haven't heard anyone in the news ask themselves.
But when I looked into it I found this headline by CBS in 2004:
China To Test risky SARS Vaccine
or this article that followed up:
SARS Vaccine Approved for Human Trials
In my version I have a photo of a kid who's injected with SARS vaccine - it said on May 22nd 2004 - so on May 22nd 2004, they were definitely injecting somebody in China with a SARS vaccine.
Then we look at was that just a small trial? Is it possible there was a larger vaccine trial? Did they give SARS vaccine to everybody? Well what we do know is this - that
China reported a new vaccine law - a mandated vaccine program - that started when? From this on the Library of Congress:
The law will take effect on December 1st, 2019
So that’s when they started their mandatory vaccination program.
When did we see the first case (and we say the first deadly version of Coronavirus, when did it appear?) Look at this from Johns Hopkins:
A study that came out in January 25th, 2020, notes that the individual the first reported case became ill on December 1st 2019 and had no link to the seafood market.
Are they connected? Who knows - I don't know. But what I do know is that we had a vaccine for SARS - which is what this is by the way, they’re now starting to look at changing in the name as they think that maybe this is a second SARS Coronavirus. But they were both Coronavirus’.
What if China gave everybody in that country a vaccine that did the opposite of what they wanted? Instead of making them protect themselves from SARS when they came back in contact with some version of SARS and Coronavirus it made them deadly ill.
Would China cover that up? You're damn right they would especially since their law says that they're responsible and they will have to compensate people who were injured by this vaccine program just like we do here in America (Irony)!!!
They would cover it up. Would the CDC, would the WHO cover that up? I think they would. I think that the CDC and WHO have found out that it was actually a vaccine program that was making this Coronavirus deadly where it might have just been a common cold; to have the people of the world recognize that a vaccine could actually make a virus more deadly…. nobody at CDC / WHO would ever want us to know that.
Is that what happened? I don't know. What matters is that
it could happen! That that could take place… that in any country in the world we could be given a vaccine that isn't tested properly and we don't know that it actually makes you more vulnerable to the disease and if we cover it up what would it look like? It would look something like these headlines.
it is out of control.
