A very dangerous document has appeared in the German government. Of course he was on leave and it was presented as a private opinion and not as a government document.
The Federal Ministry of the Interior has imposed a ban on an employee who previously stated in a 93 document that the current corona virus was due to a "false alarm".
The employee initially emailed leading Ministry of Interior officials, including a Secretary of State, on Friday. An internal analysis of his presentation shows "serious failures of crisis management", it said, "deficits in the regulatory framework for pandemics" and "corona crisis is probably proving to be a false alarm". An hour later he apparently sent the same paper to employees of the state ministries of the interior - he refers to the first email: "In the acceptance of your interest, I will inform you of the email below as technical information."
The speaker claims: “The observable effects and effects of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that - in terms of health effects on society as a whole - it is more than a false alarm. The new virus presumably did not at any time pose a risk to the population that exceeded the normal level (comparative figure is the usual death rate in DEU). Corona essentially kills the people who statistically die this year because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation). The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated (no more than 250,000 deaths with Covid-19 worldwide in a quarter of a year, compared to 1.5 million deaths during the 2017/18 influenza wave). The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. We are most likely dealing with a global false alarm that has remained undetected for a long time - this analysis result has been checked by KM 4 for scientific plausibility and essentially does not contradict the data and risk assessments submitted by the RKI. ”
The Federal Ministry of the Interior advises on the problem of why this alleged corona false alarm should have occurred: “The fact that the alleged false alarm remained undetected for weeks is essentially due to the fact that the current framework for action by the crisis team and crisis management is in a pandemic does not contain suitable detection instruments that automatically trigger an alarm and initiate the immediate termination of measures as soon as either a pandemic warning turns out to be a false alarm or it is foreseeable that the collateral damage - and in particular parts that kill human life - are threatening to increase, than the health and especially the deadly potential of the disease under consideration. "
The speaker warns: "The deficits and failures in crisis management have consequently led to the conveyance of incorrect information and thus triggered disinformation among the population." (An accusation could be: The state has proven itself to be one of the largest fake news producers in the corona crisis).
The alleged false alarm resulted in the critical infrastructures being negatively affected: “Critical infrastructures are the lifeline of modern societies that are essential for survival. As a result of the protective measures, the current security of supply in the critical infrastructures is no longer as usual (previously a gradual reduction in the basic security of supply, which can be reflected in upcoming stress situations, for example). The resilience of the highly complex and strongly interdependent overall system of critical infrastructures has decreased. Our society is now living with increased vulnerability and higher default risks of vital infrastructures. This can have fatal consequences if a really dangerous pandemic or other threat occurs at the now reduced level of resilience at KRITIS. ”
The speaker is strongly opposed to the current state interference in civil liberties: “The proportionality of interference in the rights of e.g. There are currently no citizens because the state has not adequately weighed up the consequences. The BVerfG requires an appropriate weighing of measures with negative consequences (PSPP judgment of May 5, 2020). The situation reports of the BMI-BMG crisis team and the federal state reports to the federal states must therefore be sent immediately
The speaker explains about the deaths:
1. Operations postponed or canceled due to limitations in hospital availability (and treatment options): In total, we had a total of around 17 million inpatients with ORs in 2018. That is an average of 1.4 million patients per month. In March and April 90% of all necessary surgeries were postponed or not carried out. That means 2.5 million people were not cared for as a result of government measures. So 2.5 million patients were not operated on in March and April 2020, although this would have been necessary. The expected death rate cannot be assessed seriously; Experts assume that there are numbers between 5,000 and up to 125,000 patients who will die / have already died due to the postponed surgery.
2. Subsequent treatments of patients (e.g. cancer, stroke or heart attack) postponed or canceled due to limitations in hospital availability (and treatment options): The negative effects of interrupted care structures in cancer patients, whether cancer follow-up or interrupted cancer prevention programs, such as breast cancer, are obvious. because these measures have proven their usefulness in long studies and have been established on this basis. Here, too, it can be assumed that millions of patients will be treated annually. In some cases, the availability restrictions of the clinics will also lead to the premature death of patients. It is difficult to predict this effect. Experts who commented on the fact that up to several thousand additional deaths were expected to die or will die in March and April 2020.
3. In the care of people in need of care (a total of 3.5 million people in DEU), the level of care and the quality of care (in care facilities, in outpatient care services as well as in private / intra-family care) decrease due to restrictions imposed by the state. Since the good level of care in DEU has been proven to save many people from premature death (which is why so much money is spent on this), the drop in levels enforced in March and April 2020 will have triggered premature deaths. For 3.5 million people in need of care, an additional death rate of one tenth of a percent would result in an additional 3,500 deaths. In the absence of more precise estimates, it is not known whether there are more or fewer.
4. Increases in suicides (previously an average of 9,000 per year); Reasons for the increase in suicides: long-term significant impairment of all living conditions, which can become critical for mentally unstable personalities; but numerous suicides as a reaction to the economic destruction of livelihoods can also be expected; Diverse professional groups that do not feel able to cope with the burden of social and personal changes and their personal (joint) responsibility.
5. Additional deaths from heart attacks and strokes. Over the past years and decades, integrated concepts have been developed that have successfully influenced morbidity and mortality and are based on the fact that care is provided as early as possible (in the course of the disease), as quickly as possible (time to care) and as competently as possible. These inter-sectoral / -disciplinary chains are damaged in many ways (outpatient care, deprivation of resources) and also suffer maximally from the fact that due to one-sided and exaggerated information policy, those affected unjustifiably fear Corona more than these diseases and suppress warning signs and also fear these diseases not being treated well in the current corona fixation in the hospital. As a consequence, many affected people are currently not / too late to see a doctor, which means increased morbidity, worsened rehabilitation and increased mortality in these diseases. "
deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de
ichbinanderermeinung.de
The Federal Ministry of the Interior has imposed a ban on an employee who previously stated in a 93 document that the current corona virus was due to a "false alarm".
The employee initially emailed leading Ministry of Interior officials, including a Secretary of State, on Friday. An internal analysis of his presentation shows "serious failures of crisis management", it said, "deficits in the regulatory framework for pandemics" and "corona crisis is probably proving to be a false alarm". An hour later he apparently sent the same paper to employees of the state ministries of the interior - he refers to the first email: "In the acceptance of your interest, I will inform you of the email below as technical information."
The speaker claims: “The observable effects and effects of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that - in terms of health effects on society as a whole - it is more than a false alarm. The new virus presumably did not at any time pose a risk to the population that exceeded the normal level (comparative figure is the usual death rate in DEU). Corona essentially kills the people who statistically die this year because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation). The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated (no more than 250,000 deaths with Covid-19 worldwide in a quarter of a year, compared to 1.5 million deaths during the 2017/18 influenza wave). The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. We are most likely dealing with a global false alarm that has remained undetected for a long time - this analysis result has been checked by KM 4 for scientific plausibility and essentially does not contradict the data and risk assessments submitted by the RKI. ”
The Federal Ministry of the Interior advises on the problem of why this alleged corona false alarm should have occurred: “The fact that the alleged false alarm remained undetected for weeks is essentially due to the fact that the current framework for action by the crisis team and crisis management is in a pandemic does not contain suitable detection instruments that automatically trigger an alarm and initiate the immediate termination of measures as soon as either a pandemic warning turns out to be a false alarm or it is foreseeable that the collateral damage - and in particular parts that kill human life - are threatening to increase, than the health and especially the deadly potential of the disease under consideration. "
The speaker warns: "The deficits and failures in crisis management have consequently led to the conveyance of incorrect information and thus triggered disinformation among the population." (An accusation could be: The state has proven itself to be one of the largest fake news producers in the corona crisis).
The alleged false alarm resulted in the critical infrastructures being negatively affected: “Critical infrastructures are the lifeline of modern societies that are essential for survival. As a result of the protective measures, the current security of supply in the critical infrastructures is no longer as usual (previously a gradual reduction in the basic security of supply, which can be reflected in upcoming stress situations, for example). The resilience of the highly complex and strongly interdependent overall system of critical infrastructures has decreased. Our society is now living with increased vulnerability and higher default risks of vital infrastructures. This can have fatal consequences if a really dangerous pandemic or other threat occurs at the now reduced level of resilience at KRITIS. ”
The speaker is strongly opposed to the current state interference in civil liberties: “The proportionality of interference in the rights of e.g. There are currently no citizens because the state has not adequately weighed up the consequences. The BVerfG requires an appropriate weighing of measures with negative consequences (PSPP judgment of May 5, 2020). The situation reports of the BMI-BMG crisis team and the federal state reports to the federal states must therefore be sent immediately
The speaker explains about the deaths:
1. Operations postponed or canceled due to limitations in hospital availability (and treatment options): In total, we had a total of around 17 million inpatients with ORs in 2018. That is an average of 1.4 million patients per month. In March and April 90% of all necessary surgeries were postponed or not carried out. That means 2.5 million people were not cared for as a result of government measures. So 2.5 million patients were not operated on in March and April 2020, although this would have been necessary. The expected death rate cannot be assessed seriously; Experts assume that there are numbers between 5,000 and up to 125,000 patients who will die / have already died due to the postponed surgery.
2. Subsequent treatments of patients (e.g. cancer, stroke or heart attack) postponed or canceled due to limitations in hospital availability (and treatment options): The negative effects of interrupted care structures in cancer patients, whether cancer follow-up or interrupted cancer prevention programs, such as breast cancer, are obvious. because these measures have proven their usefulness in long studies and have been established on this basis. Here, too, it can be assumed that millions of patients will be treated annually. In some cases, the availability restrictions of the clinics will also lead to the premature death of patients. It is difficult to predict this effect. Experts who commented on the fact that up to several thousand additional deaths were expected to die or will die in March and April 2020.
3. In the care of people in need of care (a total of 3.5 million people in DEU), the level of care and the quality of care (in care facilities, in outpatient care services as well as in private / intra-family care) decrease due to restrictions imposed by the state. Since the good level of care in DEU has been proven to save many people from premature death (which is why so much money is spent on this), the drop in levels enforced in March and April 2020 will have triggered premature deaths. For 3.5 million people in need of care, an additional death rate of one tenth of a percent would result in an additional 3,500 deaths. In the absence of more precise estimates, it is not known whether there are more or fewer.
4. Increases in suicides (previously an average of 9,000 per year); Reasons for the increase in suicides: long-term significant impairment of all living conditions, which can become critical for mentally unstable personalities; but numerous suicides as a reaction to the economic destruction of livelihoods can also be expected; Diverse professional groups that do not feel able to cope with the burden of social and personal changes and their personal (joint) responsibility.
5. Additional deaths from heart attacks and strokes. Over the past years and decades, integrated concepts have been developed that have successfully influenced morbidity and mortality and are based on the fact that care is provided as early as possible (in the course of the disease), as quickly as possible (time to care) and as competently as possible. These inter-sectoral / -disciplinary chains are damaged in many ways (outpatient care, deprivation of resources) and also suffer maximally from the fact that due to one-sided and exaggerated information policy, those affected unjustifiably fear Corona more than these diseases and suppress warning signs and also fear these diseases not being treated well in the current corona fixation in the hospital. As a consequence, many affected people are currently not / too late to see a doctor, which means increased morbidity, worsened rehabilitation and increased mortality in these diseases. "
Innenministerium verhängt Arbeitsverbot gegen Referenten wegen Corona-Leak
Das Bundesinnenministerium hat ein Arbeitsverbot gegen einen Mitarbeiter verhängt, der zuvor in einem 93-Dokument ausgeführt hatte, dass das aktuelle Corona-Virus auf einen
Internes Papier des BMI | Ich bin anderer Meinung - Jetzt oder nie!
Geheimpapier des BMI veröffentlicht - Ein uns zugespieltes Dokument des Bundesministeriums für Inneres, Bau und Heimat zeigt auf, ...
ichbinanderermeinung.de
It also quite possible that I don't understand what she really means.
