Heather
Dagobah Resident
I don't think Mikovits and Wakefield really disagree on anything. Did you notice Judy was wearing a Vaxxed II cap in two of the videos I posted?
Wakefield claims the vaccines that are cause harm.
Mikovits claims the vaccines that are cause harm, but also that the vaccines that could be would do good.
So she agrees with Wakefield on the first point. She even outright says vaccines cause autism and cancer. And I don't think Wakefield has a reason to disagree with her on the second point. Whether a vaccine she could make would really be good or not could only be tested if she actually had a chance to make one, which is probably not going to happen. And we've had information in this thread that some vaccines actually are useful, so vaccines may not be completely useless in principle.
Hi M.I.
Yes, I agree they are largely in agreement -- on the same team, as it were. With regard to Wakefield's talk, I was under the impression that he felt that the whole idea of vaccines is fundamentally flawed, and that they are only effective at all in the short term -- this based on his research on the measles vaccine. That was why I thought his talk was of interest. But, yes, they would both agree on the harm caused by existing vaccines. No question of that. But as to whether the idea of vaccines should be scrapped altogether: that is where there might be room for interesting debate. I mean, you and I could speculate, but that's not the same.
Last edited: