Not sure where you got the 200k figure from.
Here: Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19):
Deaths from all causes: 820,870. But they say it's 97% of expected.
For some reason it's very difficult to understand CDC tables.
Not sure where you got the 200k figure from.
Agron, I think you're not seeing the forest for the trees. Protests generally don't work anyway and all they do is point out to the authorities who they should look out for. Also, gives them the chance to arrest some troublemakers.There were 0! people on the protests. I thought there will be atleast a few hundred people in a city with million inhabitants... Seems theres NO hope for Zagreb. Chances that I will be here in the fall are getting mighty SLIM..
Cause it seems that the majority of city folk will happily take whatever the governments will push on them.
And as we already know, theres NO Covid19..... Just this nasty Chinese globalist "virus" ....
So this is how it will look in schools around the globe next year... All the kids will have to be tracked and vacced and sold out for the benefit of 1%.
(if some benevolent cosmological forces dont show up in the meantime that is.....)
View attachment 36198
A friend from NZ posted this about the new legislation in NZ:Apparently new legislation is being passed at the moment under urgency which means the public and the opposition only had half a day to look it over. I heard from somebody on Twitter that it contains the mechanism for them to make it unlawful to refuse vaccination, but I haven't been able to verify that yet. Nonetheless, that would seem to be a good way for the government to force it through encapsulated in the legislation needed to legalize the Levels system.
Wow, I'd really hoped this wouldn't happen in NZ... in my opinion we should be FAR MORE AFRAID of this Bill than covid...
If this bill passes we have no rights, not even over our own bodies. I pray people see the need to oppose this...
It really is time people wake up.
......
Orders that can be made under this Act
An order made by the Minister or the Director-General (as the case may be) under this section may do 1 or more of the following things:
(a)
require persons to refrain from taking any actions that contribute or are likely to contribute to the risk of the outbreak or spread of COVID-19, or require persons to take any actions, or comply with any measures, that contribute or are likely to contribute to preventing the risk of the outbreak or spread of COVID-19, including (without limitation) requiring persons to do any of the following:
(i)
stay in any specified place or refrain from going to any specified place:
(ii)
refrain from associating with specified persons:
(iii)
stay physically distant from any persons in any specified way:
(iv)
refrain from travelling to or from any specified area:
(v)
refrain from carrying out specified activities (for example, business activities involving close personal contact) or require specified activities to be carried out only in any specified way or in compliance with specified measures:
(vi)
be isolated or quarantined in any specified place or in any specified way:
(vii)
refrain from participating in gatherings of any specified kind, in any specified place, or in specified circumstances:
(viii)
report for medical examination or testing in any specified way or in any specified circumstances:
Powers of entry
(1)
An enforcement officer may enter, without a warrant, any land, building, craft, vehicle, place, or thing if they have reasonable grounds to believe that a person is failing to comply with any aspect of a section 11 order.
(2)
However, subsection (1) does not apply to a private dwellinghouse or marae.
(3)
A constable may enter a private dwellinghouse or marae without warrant only if they have reasonable grounds to believe that people have gathered there in contravention of a section 11 order and entry is necessary for the purpose of giving a direction under section 21.
(4)
A constable exercising a power of entry under this section may use reasonable force in order to effect entry into or onto the land, building, craft, vehicle, place, or thing if, following a request, a person present refuses entry or does not allow entry within a reasonable time.
Am I missing something?
These are interesting times, and I am looking forward with interest to see how this plays out in New Zealand.
Wow. Thanks for that. It is worse than I thought. I have signed the petition, it is up to 12,000 and posted it online as well.
True. One thing could be a bar where everybody must smoke. That protects really.By going along with all the absurd restrictions and countermeasures, they implicitly validate the core premise that the virus is a threat worthy of shutting down society over. The result is that the fence-sitting normie thinks, "Well this person is irresponsible and endangering lives." It would be far more effective to reject all aspects of the lockdown: no masks, no social distancing, etc.
According a report by Radio Free Asia (RFA), French pentathlon world champion Elodie Clouvel recently told local media that when she and her boyfriend Valentin Belaud participated in the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan in last October, many French athletes, including herself, fell ill. At the time they all assumed it to be the flu, but some of them were quite sick, she added.
She went on to say that she recently visited a military doctor, who told her that she may have had coronavirus, as very many on the French team were ill at the same time, according to CNA.
The RFA report also pointed out that former Italian fencing Olympian Matteo Tagliariol also said that when he participated in last year’s Military World Games in Wuhan, he and five roommates all got sick with COVID-19 symptoms, experiencing long recovery times afterwards. He said his fever and difficulty breathing continued even a week after returning home.
Antibiotics did not work, and it took three weeks for him to recover. His son and partner also fell ill; then, a couple of months later, COVID-19 broke out.
Several Swedish athletes reportedly also were unwell, including swimmer Raphael Stacchiotti. These suspected cases are encouraging Swedish epidemiologists in the view that the virus may have been spreading in Sweden as earlier as November last year.
The report also said that nearly 10,000 athletes from 100 countries participated in the Wuhan sporting event. The international medical journal “Infection, Genetics and Evolution” published a British study on its official website on May 5, indicating that COVID-19 began to spread rampantly between Oct. 6 and Dec. 11 last year, according to CNA.
One thing could be a bar where everybody must smoke.
Brutal piece of legislation! A bit like war time and war on terror combined. Then, there is the suppression and "strategic communication¨.A friend from NZ posted this about the new legislation in NZ:
If this bill passes we have no rights, not even over our own bodies. I pray people see the need to oppose this...
There are interesting developments in this story and the controversy it’s created in the Church. Archbishop Vigano has released the timeline of events when Cardinal Sarah agreed to sign and then when he back-pedalled. Also released was the statement made by Cardinal Sarah that he was advised by friends to remove his name because he is currently employed by the Church.One caveat though - this seems to be more of a bottom-up initiative and doesn't come from the Vatican or in the form of an "official position". There was one current Cardinal among the signatories (Cardinal Sarah) initially, but he backpedaled, interestingly without renouncing the content of the open letter. So while the signatories (here is a list) are high-ranking clergy, many are retired and they are not top Vatican officials. Still quite something, especially because the letter is so well-written.
The Prime Minister is giving herself authority to dictate the public health response that was previously held by the Director General of Health. It enables her and the Minister of Health to make political decisions and enforce regulations.
This is creating quite a storm on social media. Even people on the left are weighing in about the human rights issues in this and are very surprised to find themselves being denounced as right wing fascists by the PMs adoring masses.The Prime Minister is giving herself authority to dictate the public health response that was previously held by the Director General of Health. It enables her and the Minister of Health to make political decisions and enforce regulations.
The amendments made by the opposition party are significant. This can be read in the supplementary information on the Bills website.
-Namely the bill has to be voted on and passed by the House of Representatives every three months—if it’s not it is repealed.
-the “enforcers” that the government can appoint must be police constables or current employees of the crown. They cannot appoint whoever they like.
- gatherings cannot be limited to less than 100 people.
- the Prime minister (Ardern) must consult with the Leader of the Opposition and the Director General of Health before making decisions.
I just signed, I’m watching the count of signatories—it’s going up one every second!Wow. Thanks for that. It is worse than I thought. I have signed the petition, it is up to 12,000 and posted it online as well.