So in other words, summarizing the above: the PCR test was "weaponized" in order to detect particles of HIV that lead to many false-positive tests for many people, destroying their lives, because it was a test designed to find something that may not have existed in the form that they said it was - and that is, a retrovirus that as of today has never been confirmed to actually be the causative agent of HIV!
That blew my mind. And what blew it even further open is the fact that one of the main people behind the AIDS/HIV hypothesis was Dr. Tony Fauci - the same Dr. Fauci who is, today, promoting the use of the PCR test to determine the numbers of infections caused by COVID-19.
[......]
But it's not their fault. It's what they have been taught to do. And the system was perverted in order to accomplish this, and thus enable the use of the PCR test as a weapon for our current enslavement.
The work of Dr Kary Mullis was mentioned way earlier in the thread and I remember the topic of the ABC interview. I went looking to see if I could find the interview on youtube. I didn't find it but I did find this:
At around the 38 min mark Dr Mullis mentions that the best way to get funding for scientific study is to approach the military and design the proposal to suggest that you research could help out with a potential threat.
It is interesting to find how AIDS originated from, but if we tell people about it, they might think we are crazy.
Does HIV exist? Does HIV cause AIDS?
But it’s originated from and some humans use that stuff to inflict other humans health is another stories. Because how come the AIDS spread among mostly to gay people?
Dr Mullis was also involved with a documentary about AIDS called House of Numbers. It's a very long time since I've watched it in it's entirety, but IIRC the diagnostic criteria was very different from country to country. One person could test negative in Africa, but positive in America, then negative in Canada for example. In Africa, AIDS wasn't limited to the gay population - it was blacks from lower socio-economic areas in general. In city area's of higher density gay populations one of the diagnostic criteria IIRC was the use of a particular party drug. Promiscuity was also a part of the diagnostic criteria regardless of whether it was African or gay. It almost seems as though the diagnostic criteria were changed to target particular populations in particular area's - that's something that could also be achieved with the arbitrarily chosen number of cycles that samples were put through in the PCR test. So the whole AID's thing could just have been a part of the practice run or research for current day events.
Here's Mullis' interview from the House of Numbers:
Edited to add the full House of numbers documentary.
Last edited: