www.sott.net
Here is something I posted a hundred pages or so ago, on May 4th.Checked West Virginia family FB today and a pastor's son hospitalized/diagnosed in April:
"Test for covid 19 came back NEGATIVE. PTL!
At this point they think he has SIRS (SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME). It causes his heart to go in and out of afib and his temperature has spiked several times."
Well, it just gets more complicated - is it still a nothing burger or is something totally different going on?
cassiopaea.org
Reading this, I'm just waiting for the words 'concentration camp' to pop up.
Oh, there we go.
Great job! I think this is a good example of speaking up and saying the right thing at the right time, even if it's a relatively small thing.
Precisely. When I see all the pensioners here wear masks that cover more than half of their heads with religious conscientiousness, I'm thinking they'll be dropping like flies in Winter from the flu or corona or whatever they get first. Their immune systems will be destroyed by then. (And of course, this will be used for 'second wave' propaganda.)
Vaccination as we have it today is total barbarism, and I've been saying for years that if you want to see really scary horror movies, watch documentaries about Monsanto or about vaccination. Most of virus-related damage that we ever see is almost certainly connected to vaccines, and all the crap we've been seeing implemented over the years is to cover up the source of that damage.
I found this book online at Internet Archives (archive.org). Here is one of the illustrations.
I was just reading this interesting Rappaport article. Mostly focussing on HIV but certainly related. Apologies, couldn't find it anywhere else.
A few others have made relevant posts to the above. I went looking for my posts from the past that discussed HIV/AIDS and viruses. Found very pertinent entries, but I'm thinking some of my past posts maybe didn't make the transition to the new forum. I just remember posting about Jon Rappoport's AIDS material - which was lengthy, so much so that I didn't finish to the end - that was so hard-hitting in its revelations of the actual truth regarding that whole 'disease'. I was in my late 20s during that time and people were afraid to have contact with anyone diagnosed with AIDS believing it was contagious (just as some believe(d) that cancer is contagious). It had a profound impact on us all at the time. If you think health care providers are in fear of Covid, that's nothing to the fear of HIV/AIDS. An accidental needlestick could be a death sentence! Having HIV/AIDS meant intentional unprotected sex could bring criminal charges (still today). There was an urban myth that one pissed-off gay man caused the global spread of HIV/AIDS by intentionally infecting every gay man he possibly could. I believe I only recently read that tale was just that - untrue. So, here's what is posted in two other threads:
In reply to Kay Kim as to AIDS and gay men, it is as Keytone has specified and Jon has stated the same - their lifestyle is at the root of the problem but it's politically incorrect to state that fact.A recent revelation that still makes me dizzy - from https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/virus-fakery-my-conversation-with-a-virologist/ :
There are a number of cases in which a virus is said to be the cause of a disease—but the evidence doesn’t stand up.
I first realized this in 1987. I was writing my book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century.
Robert Gallo, who claimed he had found the cause of AIDS, hadn’t done proper work. From everything I read, he had discovered HIV in 35 to 60 percent of AIDS patients he had studied.
He should have been able to isolate HIV in virtually every patient.
Then there was the fact that the most popular tests for HIV, the Elisa and Western Blot, were fatally flawed. They could register positive for a whole host of reasons that had nothing to do with HIV.
And no one had found sufficient quantities of HIV in humans to justify claiming it caused any kind of illness.
My own research into the so-called high-risk groups revealed that the immune suppression in those groups could be explained by factors other than a virus.
(Note: All my research at that time assumed HIV existed. Since then, several researchers, including the Perth Group, have made compelling arguments that the existence of HIV was never demonstrated.)
And the following article fleshes this all out in great detail - Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis -- Sott.net :
This article is taken from a talk I gave on HIV/AIDS at the 33rd annual meeting of the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in Ontario, California last week (some of the slides that I used for this talk are put in here). It is based on a commentary I wrote titled "A Fallacy of Modern Medicine: the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis." [1] As I will show, this fallacy has done a great injustice to people who happen to test positive for HIV, to gay men in particular. It has caused the deaths of many thousands of these young men, becoming what one might call a homosexual holocaust.
In July 1982, the name "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency" (GRID) went down the Orwellian memory hole, to be replaced with "AIDS," acquired immune deficiency syndrome. The CDC published a list of 12 AIDS-defining diseases, shown here, consisting of various opportunistic infections and cancer. It is now known that Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is caused by a fungus, and Kaposi's Sarcoma is not a cancer. A particular herpes virus causes it.
These are all old diseases affecting people that have become immunocompromised. Moritz Kaposi described the supposed sarcoma named after him in 1872, and two Dutch investigators first described Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, also now called Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, in 1942, documented in 2 infants and a 21 year old adult.
At a press conference on April 23, 1984, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Margaret Heckler, announced that a virus "is the probable cause of AIDS"—a retrovirus, which came to be named HIV (human immunodeficiency virus); along with 2 more things: that a "new process has been developed to mass produce the virus"; and we now have a blood test that "can identify AIDS victims with essentially 100% certainty." HIV/AIDS came into existence by government fiat. The secretary of HHS announced this germ cause of AIDS before any studies had been published about it.
Also that day, virologist Robert Gallo, who some call the father of science by press release, submitted a patent for his HIV "antibody blood test," bringing him millions of dollars in royalties.
Gay leaders abandoned the multifactorial risk hypothesis of AIDS. If caused by a sexually transmitted virus, then AIDS is "everybody's disease," also affecting heterosexual men and women. AIDS is not prejudiced, it can kill anyone.
In this current era of gay liberation, pointing a finger at the lifestyle of homosexual men raises sensitivities. Better to go with the "no blame, virus from hell" cause of AIDS.
AIDS investigator Joan Shenton puts it this way:
"Once HIV was accepted as the cause of AIDS by the majority of gay men, a certain sense of relief entered their lives. They had seen many of their lovers and closest friends waste away before their eyes. Now they could grieve for them, knowing that HIV, this strange, novel virus, said to have come from Africa, had caused the death of their loved one... Anyone challenging the accepted viral cause of death was deeply resented, and quickly labelled homophobic. That was sacrilege."
The human immunodeficiency virus was no longer called just HIV, it became "HIV, the virus that causes AIDS," and today, simply, "HIV/AIDS."
In 1987 the CDC revised its list of AIDS diseases, now totaling 25.
The CDC added four more AIDS-indicator diseases to its list in 1992. Now you could be perfectly healthy and still have AIDS if you were found to be HIV+ and your T-cell lymphocyte count was below a certain level. Pulmonary tuberculosis was added. If you have tuberculosis and are HIV- you have tuberculosis, if you have tuberculosis and are HIV+, then you have AIDS. The CDC added cervical cancer to the list, perhaps as a way to increase the number of women having AIDS, since men continued to comprise 90 percent of all AIDS victims. With the addition of a low T-cell count, 61 percent of all new cases of AIDS are now healthy people with no disease.
AZT (zidovudine, azidothymidine, Retrovir) was the first drug the FDA approved, in 1987, for treating people who are HIV+. Critics now know that its approval was based on fraudulent research, on trials that became unblinded and were terminated prematurely. This drug was first employed for cancer chemotherapy but proved to be too toxic and oncologists stopped using it.
The patient cited on this slide, although healthy, took AZT after he was found to be HIV +. Intolerable side-effects made him stop taking it two years later. He then developed a lymphoma and died. It turns out that people who take AZT for 3 years have a 46.4 percent probability of developing lymphoma.
In the period 1988 through 1996, there were 235,000 recorded AIDS deaths. AZT caused more than 96 percent of these deaths, with 140,000 deaths occurring in HIV+ young gay men, 20-44 years old.
The next stage in my education on HIV/AIDS occurred in 2003 at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness (DDP) in Phoenix, where Willie Soon gave a presentation on climate change; Howard Idso, on CO2; and David Rasnick, on the causes of AIDS.
I wrote an article for LewRockwell.com about this meeting, titled "Finding Truth in Phoenix." [5] Its conclusion reads: "The three truths discussed here, on climate change, carbon dioxide, and AIDS, share one thing in common, as do other truths found at this meeting. They all correct flawed hypotheses and models that have resulted from government involvement in science and medicine."
Dr. Rasnick presented the findings of a key paper he wrote with Drs. Duesberg and Koehnlein published in the Journal of Biosciences titled "The Chemical Bases of the Various AIDS Epidemics: Recreational Drugs, Anti-viral Chemotherapy and Malnutrition." These investigators show that HIV is an innocuous, passenger virus; that AIDS is not contagious and therefore is not treatable by antiviral drugs or vaccines.
At this point, 20 years into the alleged AIDS epidemic, spreading psychological terror and toxic treatment, the "scientific truth as opposed to the politically perceived truth," as DDP's Dr. Arthur Robinson would put it, is that a virus does not cause AIDS. Other things cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
[Please access the post to read the next bit of extremely shocking information regarding the AIDS hoax]
Session 29 August 2015
I believe those that are indifferent to the plight of others, may find themselves eventually in similar shoes. And those who are behind it all, may get it much much worse. If I may just add -- it's the above that are truly the walking dead. They just don't know it yet. FWIW.
Shocking doesn't even begin to describe the effect of these revelations. And, unless and until enough sheeple wake up to the facts, these crimes against humanity will continue to the ultimate goal of depopulation/biological control. And there's one more revelation from a past post - to be continued . . .I see that an article I referred to earlier on this thread from the Guerrilla News Network via a link from the What Really Happened website, is now listed on Sott.net--No Panic - Dr. Stephan Lanka on Bird Flu, AIDS and the Corruption of Medicine (_http://www.gnn.tv/A02138). Dr. Lanka is a virologist with incredibly startling statements in regards to bird flu and the true nature of viruses (interview date - October 27, 2005):
DR LANKA, are we in Germany threatened by the bird flu?
Only indirectly. Next year there will many fewer babies in Germany. According to the media, the storks will all be snatched away by the bird flu. We’ll have to get used to this.
DO YOU MEAN THAT SERIOUSLY?
Just as seriously as there being any danger for us from the purported bird flu virus H5N1. The danger or the disaster lies somewhere else entirely.
WHERE, IN YOUR OPINION, does the danger or the disaster lie?
We have allowed ourselves to lose the habit of using our reason.
That is the actual danger or the disaster. The politicians and the media are taking it upon themselves to delude us into believing everything, for instance, delude us into believing that migratory birds in Asia have been infected with an extremely dangerous, deadly virus.
These mortally diseased birds then keep flying for weeks on end. They fly thousands of kilometres, and then in Romania, in Turkey, Greece and elsewhere infect hens, geese or other poultry, with which they have had no contact, and which within a very short time get diseased and die.
But the migratory birds do not get diseased and do not die, but keep on flying, for weeks on end, thousands of kilometres. Anyone who believes this will also believe that babies are brought by the stork. In fact the larger part of people in Germany do believe in a danger from bird flu, don’t they.
IS THERE, THEN, no bird flu at all?
Since the late 19th century, diseases of poultry in mass animal farming have been observed: Bluecolouring of the crest, decrease in egglaying performance, sagging of the feathers, and sometimes these animals die too. These diseases were called bird pest.
In present-day mass poultry farming, in particular when hens are being raised in cages, many animals die each day as a result of species-alien animal [factory] farming. After a time, these consequences of mass animal farming were no longer called bird pest, but bird flu.
So for decades, we have been told that a transferable virus is the cause of this, in order to deflect from the actual causes.
THEN THOSE 100 MILLION hens which appear to have died from bird flu in reality have died from stress or and/or from nourishment deficiency and poisoning?
No! If one hen lies fewer eggs or gets a blue crest and that hen is tested H5N1-positive too, then all the other hens are gassed. That is how there got to be those 100 million apparently H5N1-killed hens.
If you look at this more closely, then you see behind it a several-decades-long strategy: In the West, the big enterprises are cleaning up on this, because those animals that died “from the contagious disease” are being compensated for at the expense of the general public, at the highest market price, while in Asia and everywhere where poultry are being farmed successfully, the poultry market there is being destroyed maliciously and on purpose under the leadership of the UN organization FAO [United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization]
All big Western poultry farming enterprises, therefore, are keeping their mouths shut and by means of their veterinaries are seeing to it that, if the market price for poultry sinks, they get an infectious disease diagnosed, so that they can get their animals sold at a higher price than would be possible with normal farming, “taken care of” at the governmentally guaranteed maximum price, and all the animals in one single batch too.
To bring it to the common denominator: It’s modern subvention scamming combined with paralyzing scaremongering, which as a secondary effect guarantees that nobody asks for proof.
WHAT DID THOSE 61 PERSONS DIE of who were demonstrated to have H5N1?
There is only very little in the way of publicly available reports, describing what were the symptoms and how these persons were then treated. These cases clearly point in one direction: Persons with symptoms of a cold, who then had the bad luck to fall into the hands of H5N1 hunters, were killed with enormous amounts of chemotherapy [chemical pharmaceuticals] supposed to restrain the phantom virus. Isolated in plastic tents, surrounded by madmen in space suits, they died, in panicky fear, from multiple organ failures.
DOES THIS BIRD FLU VIRUS then not exist at all?
In humans, in the blood or in other bodily fluids, in an animal or in a plant there never have been seen or demonstrated structures which you could characterize as bird flu viruses or flu viruses or any other supposedly disease-causing virus. The causes of those diseases which are being maintained to be caused by a virus, also those in animals, which can arise quickly and in individuals either one after the other or several at the same time, are known since a long time back.
However much you stretch things in biology, there is simply no place for viruses as the causative agents of diseases. Only if I ignore the findings of Dr Hamer’s New Medicine , according to which shock events are the cause of many diseases, and the findings of chemistry on the effects of poisonings and deficiencies, and then if I ignore the findings of physics about the effects of radiation, then there is a place for imaginings such as disease-causing viruses.
WHY THEN are disease-causing viruses still being maintained to exist?
The academic medicine protagonists/practitioners need the paralyzing, stupifying and destructive fear of disease-causing phantom viruses as a central basis for their existence:
Firstly, in order to harm many people with vaccinations, in order to build up for themselves a clientele of chronically ill and ailing objects who will put up with anything being done to them.
Secondly, in order not to have to admit that they are failing totally in their treatment of chronic illnesses and have killed and are killing more people than all wars so far have made possible.
Every practitioner of academic medicine is conscious of this, but only very few dare to speak about it. Therefore it’s no wonder either that among professional groups, it is that of the academic medicine practitioners that has the highest suicide rate, far surpassing other professional groups.
Thirdly, the academic medicine practitioners need the paralyzing and stupifying fear of diabolical viruses, in order to conceal their historical origin as an oppression and killing instrument of the Vatican’s when it was struggling to rise in the world, having developed out of the usurping West Roman army.
Academic medicine has been and is the most important pillar of support of all dictatorships and governments which do not want to submit to written law, to constitutions, to human rights, that is, to the democratically legitimized social contract.
This explains too why academic medicine really can and is allowed to do anything that pleases it, and in this is subjected to no control whatsoever. If we do not overcome this, we will all perish by this academic medicine.
AREN’T YOU EXAGGERATING a little here?
Unfortunately, no! Anyone who opens his eyes will see this in that way.
[Read the rest at the link - it goes on for quite a bit more and into the next post as well]
Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Vaccines
I have two things to add to this discussion: 1) Youtube video by Ron Paul re Swine Flu Scare _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB5-Y08qbjo We should do everything we can to make this video go as viral (pardon the pun) as Susan Boyle's--global even! 2) FLASHBACK: An interview with Dr. Stephan...
And one has to wonder the purpose of these nanoparticles - as the Cs proclaimed:
The following article, about the horrendous "Spanish Flu", is another one of those jaw-dropping bits of connecting the dots that lands like a bomb. The gist of it is that the pandemic of 1918 - known to have been responsible for the deaths of 50-100 Million people - was neither a flu or virus, and certainly wasn't Spanish - but a bacterial infection that was initially delivered - via vaccine - to American soldiers to prevent Bacterial Meningitis; the research funded and implemented by the Rockefeller Institute and the US military. So it was 'made in America'.
There are a few interesting parallels between that pandemic and what we now know about Covid-19 that come up as well.
World War II saw the deaths of between 70-85 Million people by some estimates. It just makes me wonder if the Spanish Flu wasn't (on some level) another type of "dress rehearsal" for depopulation of its own. The author of the article thinks that it was mostly hubris on the part of those working on the vaccine that created the disaster, but considering the scope of it, who knows.
Did psychopath Rockefeller create the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918?
It Started with the Rockefeller Institute's Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops. The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people. What if the story we have been told about this pandemic...
