Please don't post obvious misinformation here. There is an abundance of evidence that the coronavirus actually exists.
Where is the proof that the virus is real?Please don't post obvious misinformation here. There is an abundance of evidence that the coronavirus actually exists.
Please don't post obvious misinformation here. There is an abundance of evidence that the coronavirus actually exists.
Where is the proof that the virus is real?
The two main points that stood out I think is when he said, (aside from his speech around the psychology the virus doesn't exist), is
A; the corona virus has never been isolated and
B; the picture of the alleged corona virus is actually a computer generated image / fiction.
Is that misinformation? Isn't it likely that there is a wide different viruses or reason why people show symptoms, having the common cold or flu?
Please provide evidence that:Please don't post obvious misinformation here. There is an abundance of evidence that the coronavirus actually exists.
The governor warned that violations are misdemeanors punishable by citation or arrest, and Brown said she would work with state police and local law enforcement to encourage Oregonians to comply with her directive.
The governor’s office cited emergency authority granted to her by Oregon law. Violators could face up to 30 days in jail, a fine of up to $1,250, or both.
Brown's only claim to fame is her rise to petty tyrant during covid. Otherwise, she's about as undistinguished as they come. IMO.Incoming Clackamas County Chairwoman Tootie Smith wrote on Facebook that she planned to deliberately violate the governor’s restrictions, saying she “will celebrate Thanksgiving with as many family and friends as I can find. Gov. Brown is WRONG to order otherwise.”
And Sen. Brian Boquist, R-Dallas, wrote to the Oregon State Police complaining that the governor’s order “appeared to have created new laws,” and said enforcement of the freeze amounted to “extrajudicial armed raids against private citizens.”
I was curious, so I made a quick search and found this:Please provide evidence that:
- the virus was isolated,
- The virus was cleared,
- Purified virus causes COVID-19 disease,
- the same virus was isolated from people infected with COVID
I expect a link to the scientific article.
The certainty of David Icke is of no importance because it does not affect the standard of living of the inhabitants of this planet. The confidence of the authorities in the existence of coronavirus has a disastrous impact on every element of life of the inhabitants of our beautiful planet.I was curious, so I made a quick search and found this:
Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19 - PMC
Following reports of patients with unexplained pneumonia at the end of December 2019 in Wuhan, China, the causative agent was identified as coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and the 2019 novel coronavirus disease was named COVID-19 by the World Health ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I am aware that even in the best scientific journals the data and/or the scientific method can be corrupted, either intentionally or not, to reach 'convenient' conclusions, so I'll grant it's no guarantee that the covid-19 virus exists. However, that's sort of irrelevant, because some virus does exist, whether it's a mutation of the flu or something a bit more exotic, since several people have been ill with it, and it happens to be called covid-19. I don't think they are simply confusing it with something already known before last year, because some peculiarities in the symptoms have been reported. Also, if the elite had some evil plan to impose more control on the masses, they didn't need to invent some new virus, as every year there are several new ones out there to pick from. They just had to spin the facts the best way it suited them.
Another relevant question would be: How can David Icke be so sure that the virus does not exist? He can't, and he is free to suspect there isn't any virus, just as I am free to suspect the virus is real (just nowhere near as deadly as they claim). The problem is that when Icke and others come out and assure their audience that there is no virus, then they become the 'straw man' of the alternative community, and the whole set of challenges to the mainstream narrative is swept away with one blow. 'Oh, never mind those crazy conspiracy theorists - they don't even think there is a virus when there are clearly thousands of people sick!'. That's one reason I've never been a fan of Icke.
It's a little like the 'crisis actors' theory. There have been a number of terror attacks with questionable narratives. But then some people claim even the wounded and/or dead were actors (when it was much easier to the conspirators to have real casualties) and all the questions are easily dismissed by the mainstream.
It seems like he's already getting in line with the next step: Whitney Webb shares that UK and US intelligence agencies have discreetly revealed that they are gearing up to use cyber tools and online tactics previously used for the post 9/11 'war on terror' to quash information sources promoting vaccine hesitancy and information that goes against the narrative.Just being watching sky news and they were interviewing Jonathan Asworth shadow health secretary.
He's telling us in the UK that we need a cross party agreement to stop the spread of false information online. He said it's down to the ISP/platform to ensure measures are in place.
They're specifically talking about vaccine disinformation.
A new cyber offensive was launched on Monday by the UK’s signal intelligence agency, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), which seeks to target websites that publish content deemed to be “propaganda” that raises concerns regarding state-sponsored Covid-19 vaccine development and the multi-national pharmaceutical corporations involved.
Similar efforts are underway in the United States, with the US military recently funding a CIA-backed firm—stuffed with former counterterrorism officials who were behind the occupation of Iraq and the rise of the so-called Islamic State—to develop an AI algorithm aimed specifically at new websites promoting “suspected” disinformation related to the Covid-19 crisis and the US military–led Covid-19 vaccination effort known as Operation Warp Speed.
Both countries are preparing to silence independent journalists who raise legitimate concerns over pharmaceutical industry corruption or the extreme secrecy surrounding state-sponsored Covid-19 vaccination efforts, now that Pfizer’s vaccine candidate is slated to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by month’s end.
While most human CoVs (HCoV) cause relatively mild upper respiratory tract infections (common cold), two zoonotic viruses called severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) CoV are associated with severe lower respiratory tract infections and are major public health threats. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and some HCoVs, including HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1, belong to the genus Betacoronavirus, while other HCoVs, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-NL63, belong to the genus Alphacoronavirus. Animal CoVs from the genera Alpha- and Betacoronavirus are mainly associated with infections in mammals, while viruses in the genera Gamma- and Deltacoronavirus primarily (but not exclusively) infect birds. There is now compelling evidence to suggest that bats are the natural reservoir involved in the evolution and spread of many mammalian CoVs, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Lau et al., 2005, Li et al., 2005, Memish et al., 2013).
Lower respiratory tract infections are any infections in the lungs or below the voice box. These include pneumonia, bronchitis, and tuberculosis.
A lower respiratory tract infection can affect the airways, such as with bronchitis, or the air sacs at the end of the airways, as in the case of pneumonia.
In this article, we look at the causes and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections and discuss their treatments and prevention.
Symptoms
Symptoms of a less severe lower respiratory tract infection can include a dry cough, a low fever, and a runny nose.
Symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections vary and depend on the severity of the infection.
Less severe infections can have symptoms similar to the common cold, including:
In more severe infections, symptoms can include:
- a stuffed up or a runny nose
- a dry cough
- a low fever
- a mild sore throat
- a dull headache
- a severe cough that may produce phlegm
- fever
- difficulty breathing
- a blue tint to the skin
- rapid breathing
- chest pain
- wheezing
Upper vs. lower respiratory tract infections
Lower respiratory tract infections differ from upper respiratory tract infections by the area of the respiratory tract they affect.
While lower respiratory tract infections involve the airways below the larynx, upper respiratory tract infections occur in the structures in the larynx or above.
People who have lower respiratory tract infections will experience coughing as the primary symptom.
People with upper respiratory tract infections will feel the symptoms mainly above the neck, such as sneezing, headaches, and sore throats. They may also experience body aches, especially if they have a fever.
Lower respiratory tract infections include:
Upper respiratory tract infections include the following:
- bronchitis
- pneumonia
- bronchiolitis
- tuberculosis
Flu infections can affect both the upper and lower respiratory tracts.
- common colds
- sinus infections
- tonsillitis
- laryngitis
Lower respiratory tract infection: Symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment
Lower respiratory infections include all infections below the voice box, which often involve the lungs. In this article, we look at the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatments for lower respiratory infections.www.medicalnewstoday.com
I am not smart enough to know if that link proves anything. But for me, it goes back to all of Rappaport's writings in which he says that just because people are getting sick does not mean it was the "virus", as there are many causative agents for the symptoms. (He has all his covid articles here: Covid « Jon Rappoport's Blog).I was curious, so I made a quick search and found this:
Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19 - PMC
Following reports of patients with unexplained pneumonia at the end of December 2019 in Wuhan, China, the causative agent was identified as coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), and the 2019 novel coronavirus disease was named COVID-19 by the World Health ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I am aware that even in the best scientific journals the data and/or the scientific method can be corrupted, either intentionally or not, to reach 'convenient' conclusions, so I'll grant it's no guarantee that the covid-19 virus exists. However, that's sort of irrelevant, because some virus does exist, whether it's a mutation of the flu or something a bit more exotic, since several people have been ill with it, and it happens to be called covid-19. I don't think they are simply confusing it with something already known before last year, because some peculiarities in the symptoms have been reported. Also, if the elite had some evil plan to impose more control on the masses, they didn't need to invent some new virus, as every year there are several new ones out there to pick from. They just had to spin the facts the best way it suited them.
Another relevant question would be: How can David Icke be so sure that the virus does not exist? He can't, and he is free to suspect there isn't any virus, just as I am free to suspect the virus is real (just nowhere near as deadly as they claim). The problem is that when Icke and others come out and assure their audience that there is no virus, then they become the 'straw man' of the alternative community, and the whole set of challenges to the mainstream narrative is swept away with one blow. 'Oh, never mind those crazy conspiracy theorists - they don't even think there is a virus when there are clearly thousands of people sick!'. That's one reason I've never been a fan of Icke.
It's a little like the 'crisis actors' theory. There have been a number of terror attacks with questionable narratives. But then some people claim even the wounded and/or dead were actors (when it was much easier to the conspirators to have real casualties) and all the questions are easily dismissed by the mainstream.