Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[liam1310]

Another whistleblower expert is speaking out -Professor Dolores Cahill - Degree in Molecular Genetics and PhD in Immunology. She is prepared to stand as expert testimony for free for anyone who wants to challenge the lockdown and social distancing. She's based in Ireland so I don't know if that's an international offer. Highlights of the interview:

-First 10 mins outlining experience and credentials
- #Nothingburgervirus
- open the countries back up
- reality is opposite to what governments and media are presenting
- exposure gives life long immunity
- important for natural biome to come into contact with viruses - absolutely no need for lockdown
- well known in immunology that you can take preventative measures to boost your own immune system (vitamins C and D, zinc and good nutrition)
- no-one needed to die
- symptomatic need 1 - 5 x 10 cent hydroxychloroquine tablets
- Hydroxychloroquine well known to be effective because it was used in the first SARS virus in 2003.
- If our health agencies, governments and media were working for society they would be telling to boost up on vitamin D and C and mineral zinc and also then to have hydroxychloroquine on stand by for the at risk symptomatic.
- military that were given flu vaccine in 2017, 2018 had cytokine storm when they come across coronavirus and got severely sick.
- flu vaccines given in Wuhan and Italy were grown on dog tissues, and dogs are known to have coronaviruses.
- test coronavirus vaccines create cytokine storms when the vaccinated come into contact with coronavirus after vaccination.
- no need for any further drugs (vaccines) to be developed.
- vaccines should not be called safe because they are not safety tested and not subject to randomised placebo trials and ingredients in vaccines themselves are known to be bad for the immune system.
- there is no need for the hype. This is neglecting the population.
- no need to wear a mask unless you have symptoms and if you have symptoms just stay at home.
- absolutely no basis for social distancing if you boost your immune system there will be no second spike.
- if there are deaths and there is known to be a prevention and a treatment then it's a crime against humanity.
- presentation of data has been misleading, incorrect and causing fear.
- will personally take a case against mandatory vaccination because there is no way to support mandatory vaccination against human rights.
- It's a joke that nobody is dying from cancer or cardiovascular disease any more because COVID-19 is recorded on the death certificates.
- media reporting new cases confirmed instead of that these people are immune for life and will no longer transmit the disease.
- we need to stop the politicians and the media using this as a fear mongering propaganda tool to take away rights from people, make them more sick and to force vaccinations on to them.
- is fearful that deaths due to lockdown will be attributed to the second spike. It seems as though they want to have more deaths so that they can retrospectively justify the lockdowns so that they can retrospectively justify the curtailments in freedoms.
- on pandemic bonds - pandemic had to be called by March 2020 for those bonds to pay out. (she refers to the IMF here, but as far as I know it was the World Bank that issued pandemic bonds in 2017 - IMF is the overseer of World Bank)
- addresses laboratory induced gain of function in viruses and show's how some changes in viruses attributed to mutation do not happen in nature. Gain of function research on coronaviruses started in North Carolina, but there was a moratorium placed on the research and it was blocked in a lot of countries so it was moved to a Wuhan lab with $3.7 million in funding.
- without the gain of function inserts into the virus it would engage with the ACE2 receptors, but when it has the gain of function inserts, the virus has another way of getting into the body. This change in the virus did not occur naturally.
- This is all a hoax and we have to call it out. We need to call out the police, the media, the journalists, the civil servants, the governments.
- if there is just 1% of people who are awake, we need to get together and decide that we are not going to be played, shop in local stores, liaise with farmers, protect small businesses.
- If we realise that the government, the media, the civil service, the health service are not working for the people then we need to be having alternative conversations using this as an opportunity to set things up to work for the people.
- If anyone wants to challenge the government lockdown - association or business, she is making herself available for free as an expert witness, or to challenge the government or take part in any debate.

Each time somebody new speaks out I just want to cheer!



Yeah - timing, temperance and forebearance. When the system starts to implode, I'm guessing their won't be much resistance to mass gatherings.

Recent interview with Dolores Cahill.. The YouTuber is labelled far right by media so won't be suprised if she is put in the same category by the media. Haven't had time to listen to it all, Maybe later..

Edit forgot link

 

[hlat]

Nothing showed in search until I put in 'Marc Anthony Boyer' Found this statement on FB, dated April, 21. The case was before the Oregon Supreme Court (? I think)
It reads (and you are to site this to avoid vaccination)

There's no working link. The full address was cut off, so I'm not able to look this up to verify. A real court case would have a legal citation.

 

[Joe]

Brooklyn, NYC. Pre-school for adults (alleged adults).

Btw, remember all that talk over the past few years about "safe spaces", and everyone laughed?

 

[Persej]

My understanding is that they want to use the "pandemic" as an excuse to vaccinate the whole world with something that will make everyone who receives it more controllable, regardless of whether they got covid and received positive benefits, which is of course hubris. I'm just thinking they must have a better plan than that. Or at least other options.

Other option would be releasing the virus that would target a specific ethnic groups. But that would also be hubris.

Yeah, 5G!

If 5G would be enough, then they wouldn't have started the vaccine project. And if they haven't started the whole pandemic scenario, people wouldn't have started screaming about 5G.

It could be that their plan B is just naked authoritarianism. If they can't subjugate the entirety of the population via everyone voluntarily handing over their freedoms, they'll use that segment they have brainwashed to enforce their dictates with brute force.

From a purely 3D perspective a naked techno-authoritarianism would probably work. But they are apparently seeing something that we can't at this moment.

Btw, remember all that talk over the past few years about "safe spaces", and everyone laughed?

They surely got what they wanted!

 

[Arwenn]

It was foreseeable that there is no compulsory vaccination but a voluntary compulsion.
~snip
And today? The same process. The state places the compulsory vaccination on companies and institutions - people have no obligation. Of course he will be vaccinated, otherwise he will be denied access to all social, social and health facilities. This also applies to certain jobs and border crossings.
This form of government reminds me of the socialist system today. The state exerts its influence on people through institutions. In this way, human rights are massively curtailed without actually cutting them directly.

i can see that happening here too. In Australia (before this whole COVID crap), the govt. brought in a ‘No jab, no pay’ policy for parents getting welfare payments. Then they made it ‘No jab, no play’ for entry to daycare and preschools. So I can see a COVID vaccine being pushed in much the same way, where people simply have no choice.

There is nothing ‘voluntary’ about compulsion (by definition is the the action or state of forcing or being forced to do something), just as there is nothing ‘social’ about social distancing.

 

[psychegram]

i can see that happening here too. In Australia (before this whole COVID crap), the govt. brought in a ‘No jab, no pay’ policy for parents getting welfare payments. Then they made it ‘No jab, no play’ for entry to daycare and preschools. So I can see a COVID vaccine being pushed in much the same way, where people simply have no choice.

There is nothing ‘voluntary’ about compulsion (by definition is the the action or state of forcing or being forced to do something), just as there is nothing ‘social’ about social distancing.

I think that's exactly what the plan is. If you don't get the shot, you'll be barred from schools, workplaces, businesses, travel, and possibly rental contracts. Not by law, no; instead it will be a gulag archipelago of 'independent' businesses acting 'out of an abundance of caution' and 'placing your safety first'.

So, you'll be perfectly free to not get the shot, and thus be excluded from employment, education, social contact, and possibly residence.

The intention will be to nudge the population into compliance. But it will be interesting to see what happens if a substantial portion of the population refuses to get the shot. It could result in parallel societies forming, in one of which the oligarchs lose all leverage for control. That would be an interesting form of blowback.

 

[NewEngland Seeker]

52 Years Ago, a Pandemic Flu Killed 100,000 in the US and Nothing Shut Down—Not Even Woodstock

The US total population today is 1.6 X more than in 1968, therefore, the total deaths adjustment compare to current population would be 160,000. The current US total Covid-19 "padded" deaths is 89,135 and with death rates declining. Covid-19 virus is not tracking to dwarf the 1968 Hong Kong flu which makes this whole global hysterical governmental measures even more a sign of a "Hidden Agenda Measures."

Just another BS indicator.

 

[SOTTREADER]

Any of the German members know of the speaker in this video?

One of the best and most informative videos I've heard on DNA/RNA vaccines.

Vital viewing in my opinion.

 

[SOTTREADER]

I've not seen much talk here about the 1976 swine flu scare....

Listen to Ron Paul talk about it... You'd be forgiven if you think he's talking about covid... The video is actually 11 years old and I think he's talking about the H1N1 pandemic.

History repeating itself? People forgetting the past? PTB re-running the same script over and over again?

Look at this, adverse effects from the H1n1 vaccine... Look who's talking... Dr Fauci!!!

Wonder what exotic and need I emphasis "RARE" life threatening side effects will come out of this covid vaccine!!!

Ha! My God!!! This script has been running for a very very long time!

 

[Zzartemis]

If 5G would be enough, then they wouldn't have started the vaccine project. And if they haven't started the whole pandemic scenario, people wouldn't have started screaming about 5G

Before the PlanDemic there was a huge pushback to 5G. Globally citiy populations were organizing to keep out of their towns and were sucessful. This forum has not concentrated much on 5G.

 

[SOTTREADER]

Diving down memory lane...

Does this sound like what may be happening now?

We the people never learn!

Jaw dropping! Absolutely jaw dropping

 

[SOTTREADER]

Know the risks

It would all be a joke if this stuff wasn't serious.

Hammering the point home even more

Predicting the second wave since 2009

#secondwave!!! Wash your hands... Etc etc

 

[Persej]

Dr Andrew Kauffman w Max Igan 15/05/2020... topic: CONvid (1984) PLANNEDemic! An EYEOPENER on what theyre trying to do with testing for conrona... and MORE

I was going through the old sessions, and I found this same phenomena described several years ago. At that time it was about Boston Bombings, Sandy Hook and 9/11:

Q: (L) Now, we had a Sott Talk Radio show about truth seekers being driven off the track by things that are put out, or actions that are undertaken by, various agencies to drive them into wild conspiracies. The idea is that disinformation agents, COINTELPRO agents, and so forth, plant so many false clues and so many outlandish things and start and spread memes and plant things that supposedly verifies the crazy stories, just for the purpose of distraction, diversion, and to make them engage in infighting. One of the things that Atreides was talking about was that he's been reading this book that is a collection of the speeches and writings of Martin Luther King. He says he's been looking at the history and it seems that violent groups never, ever, have succeeded in changing anything. Even if you have a revolution, usually what you end up with is: meet the new boss, same as the old boss. But nonviolent protest that is massive and cohesive, has very often brought significant change. That's why many of the individuals who were the charismatic leaders of nonviolent movements were assassinated. Bobby Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, John Lennon, Gandhi, and so on and so forth down through history. So then he proposed that fake terrorism is a strategy to deal with the possibility of another Martin Luther King popping up because when the powers that be encounter a group that they cannot militate, they cannot drive them to armed resistance, which is where they want them... Remember, John Lennon said “once they've got you violent, they've got you were they want you” - since they fail to militarize nonviolent people, they create these violent events out of whole cloth and ascribe them to nonviolent people. In other words, they do false flag operations and then blame it on whatever group they want to blame it on, even if that group is 100% nonviolent. But the point is, they really do the violence. That part isn’t fake. How else to blame it on the non-violent? So, our discussions have led to the idea that the claim that actors staged the Boston terrorist attack scenario – or others – is simply not true. It is a disinfo meme that is being spread for a number of reasons, not the least of which is to induce people to believe lies and another is to give the illusion that all this horrible stuff is not really happening; everything is really under control. All they have to do is fake a scenario. When we say fake a scenario, the violent thing really happens. There's really a bomb, there is really somebody blamed, patsies, etc. I mean, JFK's assassinations wasn't just actors. John Kennedy really was assassinated. But there was a patsy this drama was staged around and there were all kinds of false clues, false trails, laid that did nothing but produce lies and confusion. But the patsy had nothing to do with the truth of what really happened. So anyway, we had this long discussion on our radio program, and our question I think is: Are we on the right track, or is there something we are missing?

A: Basically, correct, yes. Main thing missing is the information factor. Those who believe the lies begin to fracture within and then project this outward onto others.

Q: (L) We had a discussion of why would they not show images of the children killed at Sandy Hook, but then they did show horrific images at the Boston Bombings. So I understand there are a couple of possible reasons for not showing images of children. One being that that would be perceived by society itself, by the public, as being a horrible thing to do because it would be considered torturing the parents, tasteless, etc. But that was soon followed by the Boston bombing where they were able to scare and terrify people with violent images of such things as the poor guy with his legs blown off. (Perceval) It's also the context: Sandy Hook was just one lone American not associated with terrorism, though he was a conspiracy theorist, allegedly, so that blackened the reputations of those sorts. However, the Boston bombing was the next level up: home-grown terrorism. (L) So I don't think the fact that they didn't show the pictures of the children, or that they did show pictures of this guy with his legs blown off, is any evidence that both of them were staged by actors as some people have been claiming. That's kind of ridiculous. On the right track there?

A: Yes.

(...)

Q: (L) Okay, we want to ask about Judy Wood. We had her on our radio show and she was a real fruitcake. I have to say that right up front here. We were somewhat impressed with her book even though it has flaws. There was some sloppy little bits of research here and there, and some major assumptions that she was making even though she was saying that nobody else was allowed to make assumptions. But in general, the basic idea is that something happened to this building to turn it into dust that is some kind of strange and unusual weapon or phenomenon or something we don't understand. But then of course she proceeds to claim she knows what the answers are, which is not true. Nevertheless, we have the idea that her idea that something we don't know much about is going in the right direction. Is that the case?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was she in a 6-year coma?

A: Not that long, but yes. All the better to program her.

Q: (Belibaste) So during this phase she had this crash. She was hit by a car driving 80 mph. She was a pedestrian running. And she was X months or X years hospitalized, and during this time they mind programmed her to say what she said. (Perceval) Maybe not directly. (L) Okay, we've got some questions we can get through pretty quickly.

Q: (Kniall) In Judy Wood's book, there were 6 or 7 eyewitness descriptions of people who were caught in the dust clouds. They said it was like being inside a tornado. (Perceval) And some of them were found very far away from where they started... (Kniall) Some of them had the sensation of being picked up...

A: Refer to our previous answers about the forces in play that day. Judy Wood, just like the "actors proponents" were sent to destroy information with the usual methodology.

Q: (L) So you are saying that Judy Wood, with her distracting info alongside a great collection of anomalies is programmed to destroy information? And the same is true about the people promoting the “actors scenario” or even the “no planes” nonsense on 9-11. (Perceval) Well, Judy Wood’s book actually contains some important information that according to the C's is true. But she is destroying information…

A: By pointing to wrong theoretical answers that are equivalent to the “actors scenario”, and by her behavior.

Q: (L) Her idea that it was strange and unknown is probably the one correct thing. But her answers, her Hutchison Effect and Zero Point stuff, that is just all her assumptions. It's allgiving the wrong answers. It's also giving the wrong answers for the alternative people who believe it, and causing them to lose information. It's driving away people who might be able to observe the problem and solve it by the absurdity of those answers and by her behavior. (Andromeda) Same thing with those actors people. There was a setup, and a drama, but they made it totally absurd. (L) It's what Jacques Vallée described as the Truth Train. If people are on a train headed for truth, the best way to divert them since you can't stop the train or you don’t want to be seen stopping the train, is you get there in the engine and you just start stoking up the fire until the train goes so fast that it runs off the track and they all get killed. (Perceval) The only thing I can think of is that somebody else was coming along parallel to Judy Wood who was going to go in that direction, and they got her in there first as their man. At such a late stage, it's better that her book is out there instead of nothing. (Anart) But you're reading it already informed. Other people aren't reading it with that same lens, so they're reading it and they just come to her conclusions. You never did that. You said there's great info here, BUT...

And I think that this same scenario is happening again. 5G people claim that there are no such thing as viruses, and Qanon people claim that there are no such thing as earthquakes! Earthquakes are actually explosions happening in underground bases filled with cabalists which are now being cleaned by Trump's army of patriots! And Bill Gates is arrested and waiting for trial!

COINTELPRO is working big time right now, just like in the past, and many people are buying it. It happened before and it's happening again.

 

[NewEngland Seeker]

I guess that state may be where I'm at now, or pretty close to being. Currently my food requirements have been much less demanding. Food seems to be an unnecessary burden. Currently my requirements are half a meal, once daily and I am full to the point that my cup runneth over.

At 67yo I still work with my son cleaning roofs and waterproofing/preserving concrete. I definitely am not laying around, lamenting.

Thanks for bringing this up.

This has been happening to me too. I stay active and do 4-6 mile walk/day and still gaining weight on what use to be just a snack. Having to fast more to try and reset my intake pattern.

I hope this continues since it's a positive change for the current situation.

 

[Jones]

“Sniffer dogs that can detect asymptomatic coronavirus carriers could screen 250 people an hour” Coronavirus sniffer dogs could screen up to 250 people an hour

I think that using sniffer dogs will backfire on them because the dogs won't lie and they will show that coronavirus is more widespread in the population and prove that 99% of people don't get sick with it. Also if coronavirus is in current flu vaccinations or future coronavirus vaccinations then the dogs will indicate on the recently vaccinated as well - including their handlers. The other thing is that dogs can carry coronaviruses so they will be indicating on themselves and each other. I first heard about coronaviruses back when I was working in rescue and true to the knowledge of coronaviruses in people, dogs didn't didn't develop an infection unless they had other comorbidities. In rescue dogs that could just be a stress load, a parasite load or the fact that they'd been underfed. I don't know enough to say whether different strains of coronavirus have detectably different scents though.

Here's another article about using sniffer dogs for coronavirus and as the article states:

"Research indicates that dogs can be trained to detect the odour of disease at the equivalent dilution of one teaspoon of sugar in two Olympic-sized swimming pools of water."

So they could indicate on you if you have some droplets on your clothes that contains coronavirus!

Going back about 15 years ago, professionally trained scent detection dogs were selling for around $90,000 AUD, so I have no doubt that some dog trainers will jump on this bandwagon.

It could be comical except for the fact that of all the things you can train a dog for, scent detection dogs can end up with bounties on their heads from criminal elements or those with opposing agenda's because they are so efficient and accurate. It will create fear of or anger towards these dogs in some people and the dogs may never understand why people are reacting to them in this way and could end up returning the same reactions unless they are carefully selected for the correct temperament.